Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1 (2007) 2932
Abstract: Background: Flight phobia is a common and debilitating specific phobia. Recently, an effective technology,
called Virtual Reality (VR), has been developed for the treatment of various anxiety disorders including flight phobia.
Method: This article reports the results of a pilot study consisting of four subjects treated for Flight Phobia using Virtual Reality. Results: All four subjects flew post-treatment. They experienced a significant reduction in fear of flying on
two measures anxiety about flying and global rating of fear of flying. Limitations: Due to the small sample size, the
lack of a control group, and the lack of objective measures, caution must be exercised in interpreting the results. Conclusions: The use of Virtual Reality psychotherapy is relatively new worldwide, as well as in Israel. This study suggests
the utility of implementing this technology in Israel.
Virtual Reality
Virtual reality (VR) is defined as a situation in which
the information arriving through the senses is fed
from a computer. The more senses involved, and the
higher the degree of accuracy in the presentation, the
higher the sense of immersion, and thus it becomes
harder for the client to discriminate between the
real and the virtual reality. The use of VR in therapy is relatively new. Its advantage is opening up an
alternative to in-vivo exposure and increasing generalization (5).
In VR therapy for flight phobia, the client re-
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Helene S. Wallach, Department of Behavioral Studies, Emek Yezreel College, Emek
Yezreel 19300, Israel. E-mail: helenwa@Yahoo.com, helenew@yvc.ac.il
30
Method
Subjects
Four subjects (three women and one man), who met
DSM-IV-TR criteria for specific phobia flight participated in this study.
Measures
1. Flight anxiety situations questionnaire (FAS).
This questionnaire includes 31 questions relating
various flight situations and asks the subject to
rate the level of anxiety he/she feels in each, on a
five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (no anxiety) to 5 (overwhelming anxiety).
2. Flight anxiety modality questionnaire (FAM).
This questionnaire includes 23 questions relating
to expression of fear during flying. Each question
is rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from
1 (not at all) to 5 (very intensely).
Both questionnaires (12) are used by the Valk
Institute and were translated into Hebrew by
Galit Rosenberg. Both have high reliability in
their original language and after translation to
Hebrew.
3. Questionnaire on attitudes toward flying (QAF)
(12). This questionnaire assesses history of fear of
flying, previous treatment and attitudes towards
flying. It contains 36 questions rating the level of
fear in different flying situations on a Likert scale
ranging from 011. Test retest reliability was .92
and split half reliability was .99.
4. After treatment, subjects flew accompanied by a
Procedure
Subjects were recruited through advertisements in
local newspapers. They were interviewed by a psychiatrist (the second author). Exclusion criteria
were: psychotic disorders, psychoactive substance
abuse and seizures. Only those who suffered from
flight phobia were included. All subjects filled out
the questionnaires. Following treatment they flew
with the research assistant on a short (30 minutes)
domestic flight, waited at the terminal for several
hours and flew back. They received eight sessions
of treatment administered according to a protocol
(13).
Treatment: Subjects were taught relaxation, built an
anxiety hierarchy, and performed virtual reality exposure for eight sessions lasting 45 minutes each session. Patients started in a stationary airplane and
progressed through the stages only when their SUDS
level was below 30.
Results
The three fear of flight measures taken before treatment were compared to those taken after treatment
(see Table 1). The difference in the flight anxiety modality questionnaire (FAM) was not significant
(t[3]=1.30, p=0.14). Therefore, VR therapy did not
help patients reduce their expression of fear during
flying.
Two questionnaires were used for the level of fear
during flying situations. On one no significant difference was found, yet on the other there was a significant difference. The difference for the
questionnaire on attitudes toward flying (QAF) was
not significant (t[2]=1.45, p=0.14). The difference
for the flight anxiety situations questionnaire (FAS)
was significant (t[3]=3.59, p=0.02).
Comparing the SUD level on the two post-treatment flights approached significance (t[3]=2.10,
p=0.06).
31
FAM
M
SD
FAS
M
6.02
3 226.67 60.14
4 26.70 13.63
85.75* 10.63
3 173.67 63.09
4 20.34 17.03
4 62.00 15.34
4 112.75*
Post
4 48.25
SD
SUDa
M
SD
Pre
9.50
QAF
M
SD
a SUD pre = first flight after treatment, from Rosh Pina to Tel Aviv; post = second flight after treatment, from Tel Aviv to Rosh Pina.
* p0.05
Lastly, rated global fear towards flying, pre-treatment, was compared to average SUD level in posttreatment flight (see Table 2). This yielded a significant difference (t[2]=3.75, p=0.03).
* p0.05
Discussion
Acknowledgements
The present study was conducted to assess VR treatment for flight phobia on an Israeli population. All
measures were reduced from pre- to post-treatment.
One of two measures of fear of flying was reduced
significantly from pre- to post-treatment, while the
difference in the other was not significant. An additional measure of expression of fear during flying
was reduced, but again not significantly. The comparison of a global rating of fear of flying to the average SUD level rated during an actual flight posttreatment was also significant. Lastly, this study
compared two post-treatment flights, performed
one after the other with a short delay of 23 hours between them, and found a close to significant result.
Therefore, the fear of flight continues to be reduced
with continued exposure made possible by VR treatment.
The major limitations of this study are its small
sample size, the lack of a control group and objective
measures and the lack of a follow-up. It is important
to perform this study again with a large number of
subjects, randomly assigned to treatment and con-
SD
70.00*
10.00
15.55*
17.24
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.)(Text rev.).
Washington, DC: Author, 2000.
Rothbaum BO, Hodges L, Smith S, Lee J-H, Price L. A
controlled study of virtual reality exposure therapy for
the fear of flying. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:1020
1026.
Wiederhold B. Fear of flying, center for advanced multimedia psychotherapy virtual reality therapies,
http://csppfoundation.org/vrphobia/vr.htm, 1999.
Marks IM. Living with fear. London: Bitan, 1990.
Stever J. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence, J Communications 1992;42:73
93.
32
6.
7.
8.
9.
Wiederhold BK, Wiederhold MD. Virtual reality therapy for anxiety disorders: Advances in evaluation and
treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association, 2005.
Maltby N, Kirsch I, Mayers M, Allen GJ. Virtual reality
exposure therapy for the treatment of fear of flying: A
controlled investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;
70:11121118.
Muhlberger A, Herrmann MJ, Wiedemann G, Ellgring
H, Pauli P. Repeated exposure of flight phobics to
flights in virtual reality. Behav Res Ther 2001;39:1033
1050.
Muhlberger A, Wiedemann G, Pauli P. Efficacy of a
one-session virtual reality exposure treatment for fear
of flying. Psychotherapy Res 2003;13:323336.
Ministr y of Justice
The Public Defender Office