Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The online version of this article, along with updated information and
services can be found online on the World Wide Web at:
http://www.chestjournal.org/content/91/2/258.citation
review
Chest Tubes*
yen the
past
K. Scott
M.D.;t
Miller,
years,
the
available
has expanded
transbronchial
and
Technique,
ten
techniques
tion,
Indications,
greatly.
biopsy,
newly
laser
pulmonologist.
Present-day
tients
often
monitoring
the
price
of this
complications,
invasion
particularly
ing
complication,
thorax).
Traditionally,
mothorax
thoracic
with
aspira-
of critically
ill
pa-
vessels
for
However,
is a definite
incidence
a potentially
life-threaten-
of invasive
procedures
individuals
performing
competent
management.
in
of
has been
handled
by
because
of the increased
by
the
such
pulmonologist,
tube
thoracostomy
and
In addition
to emergency
indications
for
tube
the
use
should
of
for
development
of tube
thoracostomy;
nique
ofinsertion,
drainage
systems,
the
(2) discuss
techand management
procedure.
was
space
tubes
emerged
*From
when
it was successfully
epidemic
empyemas.5
tubes
procedure
in
thoracotomy
acostomy
the
the
first
to consider
in the
midnineteenth
Division
of
Pulmonary
incision,
This
century.
and
Medical
University
of South
Carolina,
tAssistant
Professor
of Medicine.
lProfessor
of Medicine.
Reprint
requests:
Dr Sahn,
Division
Medicine,
Rm 812, Medical
University
ton 29405
Critical
drainage
of the
cautery,
concept
and
re-
Hunter,
Care
in
of Pulmonary/Critical
of South
Carolina,
thoracic
capable
for
of
drainage
of
markers,
Care
Charles-
employed
widely
used
to drain
The use of chest
care
Although
1922.6
the
Modern
their
earlier
was
used
reported
by
regularly
emergency
not become
post-
tube thorcommon-
Korean
OF
chest
tubes
counterparts.
varying
multiple
are
CHEST
TUBES
distinctly
They
are
different
from
made
of clear
internal
diameter,
with
drainage
holes,
and
distance
a radiopaque
stripe,
which
outlines
the proximal
drainage
hole. This
addition
permits
better
determination
of appropriate
tube
position
on a postplacement
chest
roentgenogram.
They
or obstruct
are
pliable
drainage.
but
not
Tube
supple
diameter
enough
can
to kink
vary
from
20
to 40 French
(5 to II mm internal
diameter)
for adults,
6 to 26 French
(2 to 6 mm) for children.
The proximal
is slightly
connection
bevelled
to accessory
INDICATIONS
for
and
flared
FOR
insertion
CHEST
and
drainage
ease
of
TUBES
of a chest
but those
of most import
spontaneous
pneumothorax,
mothorax,
to allow
tubing.
tube
are
listed
to the pulmonologist
iatrogenic
pneu-
of malignant
effusions
with
pleurodesis.
Indications
lowing:
( 1)
Spontaneous
or presence
(2)
(3)
Tension
Medicine,
Charleston.
not
in World
War II,
for acute
trauma
did
until
below,
include
PERSPECTIVE
when he described
to drain
empyemas.
was
in postoperative
Lilienthal
Indications
Hippocrates
space
the
end
ofchest
tubes;
(3) examine
individual
components
and
their optimal
characteristics;
and (4) note the spectrum
and incidence
of complications
associated
with
the
HISTORIC
needle
pleural
until
1917
postinfluenzal
plastic
be
principles
placement,
thoracostomy
the
CHARACTERISTICS
those
procedures
a hypodermic
into
problems,
place
pulmonologist
include
thoracoscopy
and pleurodesis
of a symptomatic
malignant
pleural
effusion.
The
purpose
of this paper
was to (1) review
the historic
pleural
metal
developed
inserted
purposes.
Playfair
placed
a drainage
tube
with
an
underwater
seal in 1872, and Hewitt4
described
closed
tube drainage
ofan empyema
in 1876. Due to technical
exemplify
of the chest
of nutrients.
1860s,
pneumothorax
(hemopneumotube
thoracostomy
for pneu-
or hemothorax
surgeon.
Today,
elective
care
FC.C.P1
being
Percutaneous
needle
examples
of the wider
now employed
by the
requires
invasion
and administration
M.D.,
the
physician
bronchoscopy
needle
and Complications
A. Sahn,
of diagnostic
applications
one
aspect
of the explosion.
biopsy
and thoracoscopy
are
scope
of invasive
techniques
Steven
pulmonary
Fiberoptic
transbronchial
developed
and
spectrum
to the
Management
for
tube
thoracostomy
pneumothorax
of underlying
pneumothorax
include
the
fol-
(large,
symptomatic
lung disease)
(or suspected)
latrogenic
pneumothorax
(progressive)
(4) Penetrating
chest
injuries
(5) Hemopneumothorax
in acute
trauma
258
Chest
Tubes
(Miller,
Sahn)
(6)
Patient
in
extremis
trauma
(7) Complicated
sions,
(9)
(10)
for
usually
Chylothorax
Postthoracic
of
thoracic
effusions
intractable
symptomatic
hours.
Preliminary
space
dispersion
of the
The
pleural
although
coagulopathies
weigh
on the clinicians
and platelet
judgment.
per
defects
se,
might
surfaces.
drainage
a patient
for
a large
develops
diagnosis
dyspnea
in
of reexpansion
PULMONARY
INDICATIONS
TUBE
When
minimal,
CHEST
INSERTION
pneumothorax
toms,
and
therapeutic
FOR
size,
symp-
presence
of underlying
lung disease
intervention
. Those
patients
guide
with
transient
is encountered,
symptoms,
and
less than
20 to 25 percent
increase
in the pneumothorax
evidence
of an
several
hours
can
tive
pressure
diffuse
than
fused
any
ment
treated
with
under
decompression
tension
and
tube
Smaller
tubes
(16 to 20 Fr) placed
and directed
toward
the lung apex
to evacuate
air from
expansion.
good breath
the
pleural
24 hours
and
recur.
If the
cm
20
pleural
defect
pleural
and
removed
air
H2O)
lung
be
if the
pneumothorax
persists,
application
may
aid
does
not
of suction
evacuating
air
space,
allowing
the lung to expand,
against
the parietal
pleura
and
symphysis.
from
the
sealing
the
promoting
Large
symptomatic
malignant
pleural
effusions
may
managed
by repeated
thoracocentesis
in patients
with a limited
expected
survival.
In patients
with an
expected
acostomy
survival
of several
months,
for drainage
and instillation
usually
is recommended.89
should
optimum
be
drained
slowly,
A small
inserted
and
fluid
removal.
not more
directed
Large
than
1,000
tube
tube
thorof tetracycline
(16 to 20 Fr)
posterobasally
effusions
should
ml during
for
be
the
first
24 hours.
When
drainage
is minimal
and the
roentgenogram
shows complete
lung expansion,
should
pleural
tion,
should
the
chest
tube
chest
tetra-
be instilled
through
the
space.
Following
instillabe clamped
for one
to two
of
to suction.u
tube
thor-
of effusion
and
this
the
be
complication
have
oxygen,
pleural
that
for
require
of these
drain
not
by
their
be purulent,
free-flowing
and
tubes
these
despite
not
complicated
bio-
compli-
effusions
removes
material
from the pleural
loculation,
extensive
lung
Large
defined
is
pneumonia
effusions
behave
clinically
like
be treated
in similar
fashion.
fibrogenic
and
prevents
trapped
thoracostomy
with
glucose
< 40 mg/dl,
Although
the fluid at the
may
drainage
if
a potreat-
7.20,
U/L).6
Early
and
drainage
These
are
(pH <
empyemas
potentially
rapidly
patients
empyema.
effusions
parapneumonic
and should
hyperpervolume
diuresis,
tube
Some
effusions
criteria
The
more
outcome.
of thoracocentesis
cated
reveal
ventilation.
Although
early
recognition
and
is diagnosed,
chemical
parameters
and LDH
< 1,000
to
and
immediately.
satisfying
time
Roentgenograms
leak in an acutely
involves
intravascular
to a favorable
empyema
indicated
a restrictive
effusions.
Tubes
space
pleural
ventilatory
posteriorly
and inferiorly
and connected
to suction
be inserted
should
be
directed
Once
the
patient
becomes
afebnile,
pleural
space
drainage
is serous,
totaling
less than 50 m1124 hours,
and minimal
fluid remains
on chest
roentgenogram,
the tube
should
be removed
in the absence
of an
empyema
30 minutes,
to avoid
postthoracocentesis
pulmonary
edema.
Suction
may be applied
to remove
that fluid
which
does not drain spontaneously
over the next 12 to
cycline
(20 mg/kg)
chest
tube
into the
leads
fibrosis,
be
and
expan-
filling
in the ipsilateral
lung.
fluid is rich in protein
suggesting
parapneumonic
leak
in
allow
hours),
lung
undergone
likelihood
intubation
fatal problem,
When
demonstrates
line can not
is removed
postoperative
period,
pulmonary
edema
should
supplemental
necessary,
tentially
thoracostomy.
space
may
be
to underwater
seal
should
be sufficient
When
physical
examination
sounds,
a visceral
pleural
seen
on chest
roentgenogram,
reveals
no air leak, the tube
should
tube
complete
has
the
a simple
hydrostatic
lung.
Treatment
assessment,
pneumothorax
due
alveolar
edema
be observed.
Those
with
moderate
to severe
pain,
respiratory
distress,
or evidence
of continued
air leak
should
have tube thoracostomy
performed.
Obviously,
acute
chest
appears
to be increased
when there is chronic
collapse,
endobronchial
obstruction,
trapped
lung,
rapid
removal
of air or fluid, and increased
intrapleural
nega-
alveolar
a pneumothorax
without
over
applied
to the
and apposition
pneumothorax
The
1011
SELECTED
who
acostomy
pleural
movement.
is minimal
roentgenogram
shows
a paucity
of fluid.
When
fistula
exist
complete
patient
effu-
surgery
not
that
without
suction
is
fluid removal
the chest
sion and
do
suggest
Following
unclamping,
pleural
space to promote
when
contraindications
data
occurs
(em-
maligant
(1 1) Bronchopleural
Absolute
evidence
parapneumonic
pyema)
Pleurodesis
(8)
with
TECHNIQUE
Traditional
tion
the
second
depends
pleural
OF
CHEST
teaching
upon
intercostal
TUBE
suggests
the
that
PLACEMENT
the
site
of inser-
substance
being
removed
from
The
relatively
wide,
avascular
space
in
generally
is the recommended
ment
of a pneumothorax,
CHEST
the
midclavicular
insertion
as air rises
I 91
line
I 2 I FEBRUARY,
1987
259
region
prime
the
of the pleural
concern,
the
midaxillary
line,
muscle
in the
surgical
scar.
tube
inserted
midaxillary
line
Loculated
fluid
tube
the
into
genogram
below
effusions
in the
should
major
be drained
intercostal
be
drained
area
on
require
more
being
drained
mothorax
or
of the
plain
roent-
or computed
air and
fluid
usually
from
a single,
appropriately
loculated
collections
of both
fluid
may
substance
--
in the
by insertion
indicated
Although
bundle
and posteriorly.
by ultrasound
guidance.
rib
by a
space
inferiorly
or as directed
can be drained
tube,
multiple
pectoralis
may
sixth
and directed
specific
tomographic
the
pleural
Free-flowing
chest
just
axilla,
Others
Once
placement.7
anteroapically.
6 If cosmetic
results
are of
to fifth intercostal
space
in
third
lung._...
placed
air and
than
one chest
tube.
The
dictates
tube size, as pneueffusions
may
be drained
by
serous
smaller
16 to 20 Fr tubes,
while
blood,
pus, or thick
fluid require
a larger
bore 28 to 36 Fr tube
to allow
adequate
drainage.
Occasionally,
as in bronchopleural
fistula,
a large
pleural
space
satisfactory
bore
tube
when
flow
may
rate
bronchopleural
fistulas
tubes
air adequately
to evacuate
and promote
unit needs
may
fistula exists
of the apparatus.
inserting
drain
two
from
the pleural
tube,
site
1. Appropriate
angle ofpenetration
into the pleural
space.
Blunt
space
may exceed
the
FIGURE
dissection
drainage
pleural
drainage
when
a persistent
as the leak
a chest
the
allow a
Some
require
pleural
symphysis.The
to be evaluated
carefully
bronchopleural
capabilities
When
adequately
a smaller
tube
might
not
to keep the lung expanded.
the
selected
dissection
clamp
has
institutions
sure on the
and
that
clamped
at the
Infiltration
and
created
tion,
pleural
to
union
of the
peniosteum
prevents
sterile
of the
adjacent
unnecessary
technique,
should
be made
over and parallel
the rib.
Prior
to tube
insertion,
suture
should
be placed
through
rib
to the midportion
of
a simple
mattress
the incision
for two
proximal
pleural
that
on insertion,
insertion,
when
tube
should
a pneumothorax
and
tube,
tension
securing
the
close
the
removal.
Initially,
The
incision
two
ployed
are
dissection.5
without
extends
and
prevents
techniques
for
the
lung
sharp
forced
ends
commonly
method;
and
be purchased
that
into
helps
of air.
insertion
a trocar,
a sharp-tipped
through
the distal end ofthe
with
direct
pressure
method
of insertion,
prevent
over-penetation,
suture
entry
as follows:
(1) trocar
Chest
tubes
can
rigid trocar
is sufficiently
into the incision
site and
lacerating
untied
metal
plastic
em(2) blunt
with
or
rod which
tube.
This
can be inserted
the pleural
space
it
and
a twisting
motion.
This
without
a safety
mechanism
to
has an increased
risk of
or other
intrathoracic
structures.
with
the
a Kelly
the
can be wrapped
anchoring
the
and
inserted
likelihood
positioning,
tube
is removed.
After
anteroapical
can be utilized
to prevent
the loose
ofthe
tape
anchor
the tube.
for
ends
accidental
mattress
suture
off,
tied
some
covering
the incision
with
petroto prevent
air leaks,
the application
skin and predispose
to infection,
and
thus,
is not recommended.
may be applied
to the site
Surgical
is
be
of infec-
around
the end ofthe tube and
tube to the chest
wall. Although
physicians
prefer
leum-laden
gauze
may macerate
the
it
appropriate
tube
and assure
The tube is
method,
tunnel
be directed
posterobasal
appropriate
then
Bacteniostatic
and
is applied,
Several
tag oftape
can hold
still
some
allow
blunt
of air entry
into
the
and to aid in primary
posteroanterior
confirms
After
by
forceps
With
either
subcutaneous
to lessen
wound
the
genogram
space
adhesions
entered.
decrease
the chance
space
on tube removal,
postplacement
to the
end
space.
a diagonal
reasons.
First,
when
the tube is inserted,
the ends of
the suture
can be wrapped
around
the tube and tied as
an anchoring
device
and second,
on removal
of the
applied
pleural
a finger
inserted
to lyse any
the pleural
space
has been
into
the
important
of the
the
during
replaced
the
use
of a trocar
in many
(Fig 1). Once
entry
has occurred
by presKelly clamp,
the instrument
is withdrawn
should
be cleaned
with povidone
iodine
and liberally
infiltrated
with
1 percent
xylocaine
(10 to 20 ml).
the panietal
pleura
patient.
Employing
into
by forceps
the
motion
inches
tube
ointment
covered
with
dry
to cover
the
wound
proximally,
close
without
260
to the
and
an omental
chest
disturbing
Chest
gauze.
wall
the
Tubes
site
(Miller,
and
of
Sahn)
Patient
Patient
Atrnosphere
Atmosphere
or
Su ction
TRAP
FIGURE
SEAL
WATER
BOTTLE
3. Two-bottle
BOTTLE
system
with
trap
bottle
in line
with
water
seal
bottle.
cm
2-3
important,
of six
and
sufficiently
When
strong
inserting
system
FIGURE
2. One
entry.
Once
sony
tubing
bottle
water
seal
connected
to
system
with
to drainage,
the
bed
atmospheric
pinning
sheet
the
provides
should
tion.
vent.
acces-
All
leak
Once
secured,
tubing
and
Thomas8
found
ofat
#{188}
inch
least
that glass
connectors
that
clear,
internal
connectors
should
be
tube to a drainage
device.
surgeons,
Munnell
and
plastic,
serrated
diameter
were
connectors
preferred
and
or opaque
connectors
were
avoided.
are subject
to breakage
and opaque
Glass
con-
nectors
hide
connector,
obstruct
the
ends
of
preventing
When
that
and
possible
the
obstruction.
connectors
to
the
LJmin20;
displays
(v
and
length
the
aids
are important
laminar
in determining
in
turbulent
flow,
and
the
indicates
the greater
tube.
In both situations,
be
prepared
drainage
exists,
complete
pleural
for
systems,
drainage
immediate
simple
resist-
suggests
an
ofY2
inch internal
flows of 50 to 60
most
suction
drainage
may
ofeffusions,
second
acting
trap
water
disease),
(Fig
connec-
or complex,
re-
water-seal
drainage
2). If a persistent
air
be
necessary
expansion
of the lung
surfaces.
A two-bottle
with
as the
below
the
withdrawal
an
constant
negative
manometer
This bottle
seal
(Fig
and would
accumulated
unregulated
vacuum
pressure
a trap
tube,
necessitate
in the
exists
and
a third
can be raised
the
of the
repeated
water
seal
source
is desired,
which
and
of the
2 to 3 cm
bottle
can be added
to the system
has an input and output
tube,
and
vent
achieve
3). Addition
recurrent
manipulation
needs
to be kept only
water
line,
as fluid
bottle.
When
to
and apposition
of the
system
is optimal
for
water
bottle
obviates
seal tube,
which
moveable
flow
Both
radius
this
is the tubing
size preferred
by
surgeons.8
Moist air in a hydropneumothorax
ir2rP/fl)9
radius
of the
=
tubing
tubing
displays
Law
(v = IT9
larger
accidental
separation
at this site.
selecting
tubing,
it should
be remembered
gas moving
through
obeys
Poiseuilles
radius
The
prefer
a standard
length
be clear,
flexible,
and
to resist
tearing.
a chest tube, a preselected
mothorax
(no clinical
lung
may be all that is necessary
additional
SYSTEMS
selected
to attach
the chest
In a survey
of 328 thoracic
operators
should
quire a water
seal. This seal allows fluid or air to drain
without
allowing
air to be sucked
into the pleural
space.
In the case of a primary
spontaneous
pneu-
security.
DRAINAGE
most
18 Tubing
water
(Fig 4).
a central
or lowered
to
adjust
its underwater
depth.
Its depth
below the water
level determines
the negative
pressure
the system
will
generate.
When
high (50 to 60 cm) negative
pressure
is
desired
and an unregulated
wall suction
source
exists,
an inordinately
large column
of water
may be necessary to appropriately
adjust
the water manometer
vent
tube.
This
differing
problem
density
ofmercury
Fanning
equation
column
importance
tubing
of the
length
is
and
the
cury
will allow
addition
may
in
be obviated
by using
liquids
of
the manometer
bottle.
A 1-cm
is equivalent
to 13.76 cm of water;
of small,
generation
measured
ofgreater
CHEST
amounts
negative
I 91 I 2 I FEBRUARY,
of merpressures
1987
261
Patient
Adjustable
Vent
Tube
Suction
suction
when
applied
TRAP
WATER
BOTTLE
FIGURE
without
the
chambers.
three-bottle
4. Three-bottle
presence
SEAL
MANOMETER
BOTTLE
system
of awkward,
with
large
trap,
water
BOTTLE
seal,
and
manometer
adjustable
The presence
of mercury
in the third
of a
system
is safe and is not a hazard
to the
three-bottle
into a plastic
system
has been
compartmenunit which
is unbreakable,
easily
any
the
segment
problem,
respiratory
that
although
limited
by
chest
the
tube
system.
flow through
maximum
Capps
et al
two
and
L/minute;
showed
these
units
is primarily
flow rate
at the suction
conditions:
(2) suction
in Table
suction
internal
flow at
resistance
of the unit
a set suction
pressure
creased.
Control
water
manometer
points
of highest
internal
are
relatively
When
and
Table
Wall
Suction
Measured
may
son
at 40 L/Min
Flow
(LIMin)
air and
tubing,
chest
compliance.
longer
the
The
tubing,
be generated
on inspiration.
could
failure
be a contributing
in patients
with
is indicated,
must
be considered.
ofgenerating
between
Sorenson
systems
of pressures
of
When
selecting
and
for ifthese
could
be
pressure
5 to 10 Lmin
and Thermovac.
are high
tion.#{176}Overall,
in Munnell
percent
of surgeons
favored
system,
with one-halfselecting
and Thomass8
a high pressure,
an Emerson
survey,
82
high flow
or similar
device.
Characteristics
Pressure
Measured
ofChest
Set
Flow
Drainage
at
20cm
H,O
Units*
Calculated
(L1Min)
Resistance
Resistance
15.0
22.8
Pleur-evac
A4005
33.5
32.7
38.0
22.5
19.7
62.7
5.8
2.3
>450
from
Capps
at 40 IJMin
(cmH,O/L/s)
34.0
*Modified
greater
seen
on
conditions
are not met, a tension
created
despite
continuous
suc-
35.5
Seal
of >20
should
pressure
pressure
34.0
Sentinel
systems
flows
care
35.5
Thoraklex
of flow
Emer-
pressure
60 cmH2O
with
a suction
system,
A4000
WS
re-
Low pressure
sys15 and 20 cm H20
Pleur-evac
Emerson
factor to continued
severe
underlying
flow
pressure
and between
the Stedman,
Gomco,
expiration,
situation
flow
In
as much
as 60 ml of air may re-enter
on inspiration.#{176} Although
not often
be exercised
to provide
a negative
than
the possible
positive
pleural
the
the
Suction
can
suction
and
capable
L/min.
be considered
1-Resistance
with
enjoy wideworkings
is
disease.
negative
include
one should
consider
the flow
systems
and employ
one with a
. Although
convenient,
these
expensive
it
quirements
tems capable
the unit
as the
high
system
backflow
When
increased.
Likewise,
fell as resistance
in-
resistance.
more
lung
set at 40
cmH,O.
As
valves
between
chambers
and
chamber
itselfwere
considered
rates
are necessary,
characteristics
ofthese
low intrinsic
resistance
units
closed
some
situations,
the pleural
space
source,
the unit itself contributes
significantly
to the
resistance
ofthe
system.
They examined
capabilities
of
five commonly
used
chest
drainage
units
under
the
following
Despite
their cost, they
familiarity
with
their
tube drainage
systems
have intrinsic
larger
the collection
bottle
and the
transportable,
readily
pressure
adjustable,
and permits easy access
to obtain
specimens.
These
compact
units have their own intrinsic
resistance,
as does each
ofa
tube.
an extravagance.
spread
use
and
desirable.
Like
patient.
This
talized
noted
when
vent
et al.
262
Chest
Tubes
(Miller,
Sahn)
CHEST
When
the
several
TUBE
functional
simple
integrity.
space
is not
holes
and
functioning
is suspected,
flushed
with
of a tube
the
saline
is questioned,
can be employed
of synchronous
suggest
the tube
motion
in the pleural
tube
SHOOTING
status
maneuvers
Observation
respiratory
TROUBLE
to assess
water
seal and
is still functioning
all connections
are tight.
and
occlusion
of the
tube
can
solution,
its
If the
drainage
be disconnected
in an
effort
and
generally
is
the
initial
to dislodge
approach
to
be
clamping
question
bling
system
air
is
question
that
bottle,
it
through
clamped
which
point
tube,
the
then
connector,
water
seal
just
proximal
disappears
identifies
component
or
when
the
can
site
when
to
tube
drainage
point
in
clampedjust
of leakage;
distal
the
avulsion
(one),
and
to
and
in
an
identified
unsuccessful
agents.
tions
have
been
tube
than
through
expected,
superior
of
When
longer
the
indication
present
or the
for
tube
aware
REMOVAL
tube
thoracostomy
is nonfunctional,
be removed.
Authors
differ on the
chest tubes.627
Opinion
is divided
of clamping
prior to tube removal,
is no
it
should
methods
to remove
as to the necessity
with 75 percent
of
thoracic
surgeons
surveyed
favoring
clamping
for 12 to
24 hours
prior
to removal.8
Clamping
allows
for
identification
of persistent
air leak or re-accumulation
offluid.
We suggest
that in preparation
for removal,
bandage
should
be removed,
the site cleaned,
and
previously-tied
mattress
suture
clipped,
allowing
ends to be freed.
At the time of removal,
the
should
exhale
and perform
a Valsalva
maneuver.
tension
applied
incision
edges
and
smoothly
then
can be
Routine
wound
to the
mattress
together,
the
at end-expiration.
tied
care
to oppose
and suture
suture,
tube
The
patient
With
to hold
is removed
mattress
the
the
its
the
quickly
suture
the wound
margins.
removal
at three
to five
days
allows
for optimum
healing.
A chest
roentgenogram,
1.2 to 24 hours following
chest tube removal,
for observation
ofresidual
air or fluid is recommended.
the
rib
that
the
tortuous
with
well-described
has
emphysema
and spread
studies
of thoracostomy
tube
complications
exist;
most
reports
are anecdotal.
Milliken
et
retrospectively
analyzed
complications
in patients
were
tubes
analyzed
in a subgroup
were
placed
by blunt
expiration.
the
the
inferior
underlying
operator
tend
neushould
to become
be
more
is a
re-
effusion
or
abdominal
placement
of
complication
is
rare
segment
of the
can
over
the
ax
of lung aspirated
chest
tube.
Sub-
occur
at the site of tube
chest wall but is gener-
only a cosmetic
problem.
Prophylactic
antibiotic
administration
tube placement
requiring
tube
wounds,
Grover
Inter-
by placing
pulmonary
edema
which
follows
rapid
reported.
cutaneous
insertion
of the
is controversial.
thoracostomy
and associates1
with
chest
In a study of patients
for penetrating
chest
found that 2.6 percent
of clindamycin-treated
patients
developed
pleural
space
infection
vs 16 percent
of control
subjects.
In
contrast,
with
Neugebauer
spontaneous
receiving
prophylactic
antibiotics
had
a higher
compli-
cation
rate (13.8 vs 3 percent).
In the absence
of trauma
and with good aseptic
technique,
there
is no need
for
prophylactic
antibiotics
with chest
tube insertion.
REFERENCES
Few
tube
thoracostomy
over an 11-year-period.
vessels
of a peripheral
drainage
port
de-
with
lacera-
passage
its
the
age.
Unilateral
complication
been
have
occurs
more often
can rise as high as
avoiding
with
Moreover,
COMPLICATIONS
ceiving
trauma
rib and
pleural
or direct
is more
that
symphysis
stomach
on full
infarction
into
the
ally
pleural
liver, and
be avoided
intercostal
moval
of a large
Subcutaneous
tubes
lungs
can
above
bundle.
tube
of complications.
space
to the
no
to
by inadvertent
bleedings
were
pleural
symphysis
or adalso may exist following
at
reported
intercostal
artery
just
There
the diaphragm.9
This
since the diaphragm
fourth
rovascular
TUBE
attempt
Splenic,
(one).
30 cases
of
with
trocar
frequently,
with
compliance
or when
exist.9#{176}This situation
margin
liver
attributable
reported
in patients
stomach
ofthe
a variety
lung,
(1
laceration
ofthe
dissection.
directly
reports
of the
costal
lung
curve
left lobe
blunt
series
sclerosing
the
to the
of 447
complication
(two),
to the lesser
11 with
the
to occur
tube
be changed.
CHEST
lacerations
injury
Four
a technical
of 1,249
patients,
there
were
(2.4
percent),
19 associated
insertion
creased
hesions
performed.
suffered
a laceration
Of a total
empyema
likely
the spot in
of bub-
the
the
longer
diaphragm
(one),
Laceration
sequential
before
and after
Demonstration
including
no
insertion.
The literature
obstruction
with the fibrinolytic
agents
an alternative,
especially
in parapneumonic
effusions.
Ifan air leak is suspected
at a particular
point in the
system,
was
patients
deaths
obstructing
debris.
In the past,
instillation
of streptokinase
and streptodornase
was employed
successfully to open
occluded
tubes.
Today,
saline
irrigation
insertion
percent)
1 Hippocrates,
als
re-
in the setting
of acute
Technical
complications
of 447 patients
dissection
after
whose
trocar
Writings.
Hutchins
29,
BA,
ed.
In:
Great
Chicago:
books
of the
Encyclopedia
Western
world.
Britannica
Inc,
twentieth
century,
1952;
142
2 Hochberg
1. New
3 Playfair
quently
4 Hewett
LA. Thoracic
York:
GE.
Vantage
Case
surgery
Press,
before
1960:
ofempyema
by drainage:
recovery.
C.
for empyema.
Drainage
CHEST
the
treated
by aspiration
Br Med
1875;
Br Med
and
subse-
1:45
1876;
I 91 I 2 I FEBRUARY,
ed
255
1:317
1987
263
5 Graham
6
EA,
Open
Lilienthal
H. Resection
ofthe
a report
based
resection
was
lems
on
GH.
8 Wallach
Major
HW.
effusions.
Thorax
1975;
Bernstein
in
which
23
for
pleural
surgery,
space
vol 28.
diovasc
malignant
25
pleural
M.
Intrapleural
Cancer
1983;
tetracycline
in
51:752-55
A. Re-expansion
edema.
Re-expansion
pulmonary
edema.
Chest
1980;
Miller
WC,
following
13
108:664-66
Light
RW,
DA,
Churchill
17
18
19
managing
The
Dis
Gobbel
WG.
CE,
Hughes
Obstet
1970;
Munnell
ER,
Thomas
EK.
Current
systems.
Ann
Thorac
Surg
1975;
EW,
Birath
G.
catheters.
TL,
pleural
Roe
BB.
Surg
parapneu-
30
Philadelphia:
Surg
WB
Physiologic
1958;
London:
Insertion
Resistance
Surg
KA.
in both
ofapical
chest
Hoe
BB.
1985;
of the
phys-
Thorac
Car-
study
drainage
systems.
RJ, Long
PH.
streptodornase.
B,
Long
treatment
Improved
Surg
Simon
of
Clinical
JAMA
PH.
experience
1951;
145:620-24
and
streptodor-
Streptokinase
surgical
technique
Gynecol
RR,
Millikan
Bailey
infections.
for closure
Obstet
TD,
1965;
Lancet
1953;
E, Brenner
tube.
Ann
Moore
EE,
Steiner
oftube
of thoracostomy
mci-
121:845-46
Abraham
a chest
JS,
Emerg
B. A new
technique
Med
1982;
11:619-22
E, Aragon
GE,
VanWay
thoracostomy
for acute
CW.
trauma.
Am
High
incidence
Surg
140:738-41
Moessinger
AC,
Driscoll
perforation
Pediatr
by
1978;
Wilson
AJ,
JM
Jr, Wigger
chest
tube
in
HJ.
neonatal
of
pneumothorax.
92:635-37
Krous
in
Carney
M,
32
in thoracic
drainage
33
HE
the
Lung
stiff
Ravin
perforation
lung
CE.
syndrome.
Intercostal
increased
to
the
airflow
in
broncho-
ofdrainage
34
33:275-81
factors
operated
DH,
risk
in
determining
nonoperated
of the
TL,
in
Grover
pleural
space.
ing
35
chest
Neugebauer
FL,
JK.
JGB.
Lancet
Tench
suction.
Trinkle
and
Thurston
aspiration.
Stably
tube
1957;
Critical
Trapnell
pleural
28:296-302
principles
the
thoracentesis:
130:1097-98
concepts
Morris
of chest
Chest
during
chest
tube
Pediatr
Surg
1974;
9:213-16
19:261-68
Thorac
Potential
air leaks.
artery
elderly
laceration
patients.
during
Chest
1979;
oedema
after
75:520-22
FA.
drainage
1962;
pneumothorax.
DJ.
A comparative
M, Lipin
and
White
placement
209
Gynecol
Am
with
in
lung
1:13-17
Spontaneous
1968,
JM,
1980;
31
Eastridge
Am
Parapneu-
Ginsberg
Complications
Dis
RB.
Pierson
52:40-46
streptokinase
Miller
oftrauma.
PA,
chest.
George
patients
management
Surg
Batchelder
Respir
398-402
tube.
Swenson
Rev
edema
69:507-12
1980;
Aslam
adequate
21
1980;
and
Hespir
ed.
SG,
Med
Livingstone,
spirometric
20
1979:
Killen
Am
GD,
pulmonary
Am
Jenkinson
Diagnosing
Saunders,
16
WM,
effusions.
Zuidema
Experimental
of pneumothorax.
Girard
SA.
H.
29
effusions.
Sahn
monic
15
H, Palat
reexpansion
1973;
monic
14
Toon
RN.
of pleural
1966;
for securing
28
77:708
12
physics
Surg
sion.
27
30:54-60
A.
McIntyre
VW,
bronchopleural
1:220-23
26
pulmonary
Rusch
DM,
24 MillerJM,
Prob-
ML,
to evaluate
and
with
for
Tyler
units
Enerson
nase
Langin
Berstein
JS,
iology
75:257-320
68:510-12
effusions.
M,
1922;
Capps
88:57
with
14-24
1983:
SG,
pleural
infections
drainage
in clinical
22
drainage
cases
Surg
tube
to the
156:839-71
operative
Ann
tetracycline
1975;
AJ, Oswald
malignant
for supportive
chest
Intrapleural
Waquarrdin
lung
consecutive
space,
Chest
9 Zalozink
Sci 1918;
problems
pleural
its relation
Med
or intended.
Closed
In:
ofthe
31
done
pneumothorax:
Am
problems.
11
RD.
ofempyema.
7 Lawrence
10
Bell
treatment
WD.
Lung
Radiology
Richardson
MK,
JD,
Thorac
therapy
following
pleural
Cardiovasc
Surg
Thorac
and
infarction
by chest
122:307-09
Fewel
antibiotics
Fosburg
pulmonary
1:1367-69
entrapment
1977;
Prophylactic
wounds.
Unilateral
1970;
JG,
Cardiovasc
HG,
Arom
in the
Surg
Trummer
space
1971;
KV,
treatment
MJ.
intubation,
Webb
GE,
of penetrat-
1977;
74:528-36
Routine
antibiotic
a reappraisal.
61 :882-84
96:246-53
264
Chest
Tubes
(Miller,
Sahn)
Citations
Open Access
Reprints
Receive free email alerts when new articles cit this article. sign
up in the box at the top right corner of the online article.
Images in PowerPoint
format