Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PUBLICATION
2015, G. DAVID
YAROS. ALL
RIGHTS RESERVED.
Car Collector
Chronicles
Exploring:
Ca
High RPMs
Classic Rides
Reports From the Field
Oldsmobile (1897-2004)
Cadillac (1902- )
Allant (1987-1993)
Corvair (1960-1969)
= Clickable Link
IN THIS ISSUE:
High RPMs
GDY Nets
On the Web
CLC Judges
Training
SITEings
OldsD88@gmail.com
Goodyear Blimp
5/23/1875 Alfred Sloan, Jr., bornNew Haven, CT
5/28/1937 Volkswagen founded
5/29/1946 First Kaiser-Frazer produced
5/30/1911 First Indy 500 held
5/31/1927 Ford built last Model T
1979 Cadillac
Eldorado RoadStar
May 2015
Page 2
[T]he
standard to be
applied when
judging a
car ... is one
of As
delivered from
the factory to
the original
owner at the
time of
purchase.
Page 3
the factory standard. The cold, hard truth is that brand new cars are anything but perfect.
Moreover, standards of perfection change over time with improvements in production
methods. So, what might be acceptable in 1929 might not be acceptable in 1955, and
what might be accepted in 1955 might not pass muster in 2015.
The hands-on session presented real life questions and challenges. Right off the top
one had to deal with the not at all uncommon situation of how to handle the presence of a
battery cutoff switch and/or Battery Tender type connection. Neither device was ever
installed on any car by any automobile manufacturer. That being the case, the answer of
what to do should be obvious, right? I must report it is not. The correct answer, at least
as regards the CLC, is to do nothing. No points are to be deducted?
Our trainee group was not able to agree on what was proper when it came to the hood
pad on the 55. The pad in question was vinyl covered. Everyone, except a guy who
owned a 55me, opined that the vinyl covered hood pad was not factory original. I took
the question to the instructor. He advised I was correct and the others in the group were
wrong on this score.
I mention this instance only to point out that a judges assessment is only as good as
their knowledge, experience and philosophy. Is s/he a strict constructionist or mildly progressive when it comes to interpreting and applying standards? Despite both a desire and
need for uniformity of judging criteria, there exists a wide variance.
One thing the training taught me is that it is no wonder the owners of judged cars get
upset at decisions reached! Why should points be deducted for putting radial tires on a
car that did not come with them originally, but none for installing a battery disconnect?
How does one know in advance, what is permissible and what is not? The CLC, and
hopefully other organizations, do make their judging standards readily available to the
membership. Doing so is of great help in knowing what is allowed, and what is not. I can
also see problems arise when a car owner elects to have their ride judged by another organization, say by the AACA. There is no requirement that it use the same judging standards/criteria as the CLC. Consequently, one groups 100 point car may be seen as being
only a 95 point car by another?
Hopefully, I shall be able to do some real judging at the upcoming Cadillac-LaSalle Club
Grand National Meet in June. It will be both an interesting and learning experience. I will
be most interested in learning more about the conduct of this somewhat esoteric craft.
Why should
points be
deducted for
putting radial
tires on a car
that did not
come with
them
originally, but
none for
installing a
battery
SITEings
I recently stumbled upon a web site that I want to recommend to all. I found that I could,
and most probably shall, spend hours there. It is titled The View Through the Windshield. The referenced page is, for lack of a better term, an index page or table of contents. Many
links are presented there for your consideration. Do take a look at the offering Its a Classic. It
should elicit a chuckle or two.
I also found the Auto Sketch section to be very entertaining. In addition to a discussion of the
listed vehicle, a short synopsis of events for the year of the auto being discussed is presented under
Remember When at the bottom of the sketch page.
This site is not just about cars. That being said, after spending time on the site exploring the offerings, one cannot help but be reminded of just how much the automobile permeated our culture back
in the day.
The lives of a wide divergence of folk are highlighted by Mr. Sherlock in his People section. I
could not begin to list them all, but will note they run the gamut from Annette Funicello to Margaret
Thatcher. To say the least, the scope of personalities represents a pretty broad universe.
In his Pop-culture area, among other things, he discusses the bottled water craze. I guarantee
you that it will yield a laugh or two.
The offerings are varied. So much so that you are certain to find something of interest. The humor strikes a responsive chord precisely because it contains more than a modicum of truth. The
entertainment received is well worth the time spent here. I hope you enjoy it as much as me.
disconnect?
Page 4;;
Page 5;;
Ran
when
parked?
Courtesy
Facebook
OCA
on
Ok, Ive had my say for the month. Now its your turn! I invite/encourage submission of
your comments, opinions and article contributions. I also ask that you please help spread
the word about our publication. Everything sent shall indeed be reviewed by me. Submissions should be sent to CCC at OldsD88@gmail.com.
Now that you have finished reading this months issue of the newsletter, if so inclined,
like CCC on Facebook by going here
______________________________________