Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Future Standards
Branko Bjelajac & Ruben Salazar, Landis+Gyr
Agenda
+ The Utilities Paradox
+ Standards Panorama in North America and Europe
+ Characteristics of Current Smart Grid Deployments
+ Future Proof Smart Meter Design
+ Smart Meter Deployments Real Cases
+ New functions, services and evolutions of the technology are neither well
known nor well defined today.
+ Options:
Deploy and foster ecosystem operating with SEP1.0/SEP1.x
Continue current deployments, but wait for SEP2.0, upgrade deployed hardware,
+ Issues:
Hardware cannot be upgraded remotely, only software.
Can deployed hardware support upgrade to newer, heavier, specification?
Most likely a light version of specification could be accommodated but
Build new hardware so that remaining and new deployments have more
resources and flexibility available.
Change architecture such that HAN SoCs can be open to share resources
with the main processor.
+ Lesson learned:
Deploy new Smart Meters with significantly increased computing
resources for HAN (2-5x in code and execution space required to be
future proven).
Ensure that new design offer flexibility to remotely change comms stack,
the application and the HAN architecture if necessary.
+ Consequences:
Current Smart Meter deployments may face regulatory issues.
Smart Grid market may be stalled.
+ Options:
Continue current deployments and work on interop at higher levels of stack.
Stop and wait for standards-based election.
+ Issues
Mostly cost driven design, so
Hardware selected is not flexible.
Limited capabilities to change speeds, bands, operating modes.
11 - Landis+Gyr Innovation SYmposium 2011 (LISY11), London, March 22nd , 2011
+ Lessons learned:
Build and deploy new Smart Meters with significantly increased computing
resources for NAN.
Ensure that new design offer flexibility to remotely change comms stack,
application and NAN architecture and topology, if necessary.
+ Cost?
12 - Landis+Gyr Innovation SYmposium 2011 (LISY11), London, March 22nd , 2011
Conclusions
+ Utilities deploy meters for long periods of time.
+ Technology changes constantly and more quickly than ever.
+ Smart Meters should provide flexibility to re-shape their functions,
services and comms capabilities according to changing needs.
+ Smart Meter upgrades must be made effective w/o visiting the meter.
+ Upgrades should verify strict security provisions for their originator.
+ Needed: a flexible Smart Meter platform that can accept remote
device upgrades for its components and respond with increased
comm bandwidth, storage capabilities, functions and services.
The best positioned provider of Smart Meters is the one that satisfies
the max. number of key future proofing reqs with its solution.
13