Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PHYS &221
Most researchers spend all of their time doing either Experiment or Theory because each in itself requires such
substantial and different special knowledge and skills that it is practically impossible to do both. Every now and
then, however, Nature will provide us with someone like Enrico Fermi, who was capable of doing both equally-well.
Page 1 of 6
Page 2 of 6
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This is where you thank other people who were helpful with your research. If, for example, you
got help with your project from somebody in another department or another at EdCC, someone in
the community, or at another institution you should acknowledge them here.
REFERENCES
This is where you list all of your references cited on your poster.
V. PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS
FORMAT
You will participate in three (or more) poster sessions during our final class meeting. During one of these
sessions you will guide viewers through your poster with a short (~3 minute) presentation, and then be
available for questions. As people mill about during the poster session, you may make your presentation 3
or more times. During the other 2 (or more) sessions, you will be a viewer, learning about your classmates
projects, reading posters, and asking questions. Participation in the poster session will count for 15% of
your poster grade.
Page 3 of 6
In 1932, Jones was the first to discover that peanuts went well with chocolate, stating:
Hey, this chocolate goes really well with peanuts! (Jones, 1932, p.1539).
Then, in the References section of the poster, the reference for this citation would be given in (Name/Year)
format:
Jones, A. B. (1932). Peanuts enhance chocolate flavor. Peanut Psychology, 34, 1257-1794.
On the other hand, many Physics journals dont use either APA or MLA format, preferring instead a certain
minimalism on their in-text citations. The typical in-text citation appearing in Physics journals uses a
[Citation Number] format. For example, the same citation above would appear in the journal Physical
Review as:
In 1932, Jones was the first to discover that peanuts went well with chocolate [3].
Or
In 1932, Jones was the first to discover that peanuts went well with chocolate, stating Hey, this
chocolate goes really well with peanuts! [3]
Then, in the Reference section of the poster, the reference for this citation would be given in [Citation
Number] format:
[3] A.B. Jones, Peanut Psychology, 34 (1932).
Notice how the Physical Review style is much more minimalistic than the APA style. The in-text citation
appears as just [3], and the reference includes only the author, journal name, volume number and year.
Page 4 of 6
Exactly how an article versus a book versus an internet references versus a phone conversation, ad
nauseum, should be formatted is determined solely by how a particular journal (or teacher) wants it
formatted. APA is very specific, Physical Review is very minimalistic, and other journals tend to be inbetween these two extremes. The only way to know these details is for them to be provided to you as a
required style. English teachers will often refer you to APA or MLA styles as their required style. (See
for example http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/ for APA and MLA styles, and see
http://forms.aps.org/author/styleguide.pdf for the Physical Review Style Guide.)
Regardless, what all citation formats have in-common are that they contain enough information for your
audience to be able to easily verify an attribute the sources you use. Both the APA and Physical Review
styles are the same in this regard.
B. Specific Citation and References Style for Your Research Poster (and future papers)
For the purposes of your poster, please use a [Citation Number] format like in the Physical Review style.
Give me an in-text number [N] for your citations and a corresponding numbered-entry in your References
section that is sufficient for another party to be able to independently verify your citations. You will
otherwise not be expected to become experts in all the details of Physical Review style.
C. The 10% Rule
If you take word-for-word material from another resource, you must (1) cite it in your text, (2) include the citation in
your references, and (3) put it in block-quotes. For example,
Jones indicated that she
observed unusual amplification of salivary responses among patients consuming peanut-doped
chocolate emulsions. [3]
On a word-count basis, your writing may consist of no more than 10% of this type of quoted material.
D. Paraphrasing
Paraphrasing means to say the same thing that someone else has said but in a slightly different way, using perhaps a
slightly different sentence structure and/or different words. For example, suppose that you use an internet reference
in your poster that reads:
Einstein revolutionized the way that early 20th-century physicists understood the nature of space and
time.
This statement is of course true, and because of its linguistic simplicity it would not be hard to imagine that several
authors over the past 100 years could have made exactly that same comment independently and originally. Such an
accident of sentence structure independently-made would of course not be plagiarism, but one would never, ever
want to be in a circumstance where someone else says I found exactly this same sentence published by Jones five
years ago. I think you plagiarized it!
If you really like the way the sentence is said, but you did not honestly think of the sentence yourself, feel free to use
it, but just cite it and put it in block-quotes.
A paraphrasing of the above sentence would be a variation on it such as
The way that 20th century physicists though about physics was changed dramatically by Einstein.
Was this sentence original and spontaneous, or did somebody just steal the former sentence and change the wording
around in and attempt to hide the fact that they stole it?
Page 5 of 6
Page 6 of 6