Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(2)
ABSTRACT
Background: Until today, the etiology of recurrent aphthous stomatitis remains unknown, although hints of its etiologic
basis lay on genetic susceptibility, infectious agents and alterations in immune mechanics. Current study was
established to shed light on the possible association of human leukocyte antigen class I and II alleles with recurrent
aphthous stomatitis, and to investigate the possible alterations in salivary tumor necrosis factor-alpha level in patients
and its relation with clinical types of disease.
Subjects and Methods: The study included 55 subjects: 30 recurrent aphthous stomatitis patients and 25 apparently
healthy subjects as control. Polymerase chain reaction-specific sequence primers assay was conducted to assess
human leukocyte antigen-typing whereas salivary tumor necrosis factor-alpha level was estimated by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay.
Results: The present study showed a significant association of HLA-Cw*12:02:01-and DQB1*02:01:01- alleles with
recurrent aphthous stomatitis as compared with healthy control, and there was significant low frequency of
DQB1*05:01:01- allele in patients when compared with healthy control. Furthermore, high frequency of
DQB1*02:01:01- alleles was observed among patients with minor type of recurrent aphthous stomatitis when
compared with healthy control. Another interesting finding in this study was the significant elevation of salivary tumor
necrosis factor-alpha level in patients than in healthy controls, as well as strong association of high salivary tumor
necrosis factor-alpha level among patients who expressed DQB1*02:01:0-allell was observed.
Conclusion: Cw*12:02:01- and DQB1*02:01:01-alleles may played a role in the etiology of the disease, whereas
DQB1*05:01:01-05 may confer protective effects against recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Moreover; salivary tumor
necrosis factor-alpha may play an important role in pathogenesis of disease, and may also have an important role in
the search of new treatments for disease.
Keywords: RAS, HLA allele, PCR, Salivary TNF-. (J Bagh Coll Dentistry 2012;24(1):151-157).
INTRODUCTION
Basic Sciences
151
RESULTS
The current results showed that the age of
patients ranged between 16-40 years with a mean
age of 23.1 years. Successful amplification was
resulted in the generation of a DNA fragment of
defined length as a positive internal control band
in all lanes except the negative control lane, when
there was no amplification, the band was missed.
A positive specific amplification was resulted in
the generation of a positive specific amplification
band in addition to an internal positive control
band, as show in figures (1 &2). The frequency of
distribution of various HLA- alleles for thirty
patients with RAS were typed for HLAgenotyping class I and class II. These frequencies
for two studied groups were presented in tables (1,
2, 3 and 4). Comparison between patients and
control group showed several alleles deviations in
their frequencies. Regarding HLA-A alleles, the
statistical analysis revealed no significant
association was found in patients as compared
with control, table (1). Concerning C-locus
alleles, the Cw*12:02:01-alleles were revealed
higher frequencies (17.2%) in RAS patients than
healthy control with OR of (11.00), table (2). A
survey of the distribution of HLA-DRB1 alleles
frequencies yielded no evident association
between DR alleles and RAS patients, table (3).
Among DQB alleles that have significant risk
effect in a disease, there was DQB1*02:01:0
which noticed in high frequency among patients
(48.3% vs. 20.8%) with significant differences in
comparison with healthy control (P<0.05), table
(4). On the contrary, there was significant
decrease in the frequency of DQB1*05:01:0
among RAS cases with (P=0.036), this allele
acted as protective against the development of
RAS, therefore this allele present in high
frequency in healthy control group as clearly
shown in table (4).
When RAS patients were divided according to
the type of aphtha, the prevalence of
DQB1*02:01:0 allele frequency in the group with
minor RAS remained statistically significant
higher than those of control group (OR = 0.21 and
P = 0.016), p < 0.05, table (5). But the differences
in DQB1*02:01:0 allele frequency between major
152
compared to controls.
Furthermore, the result obtained from the present
study revealed that HLA- DQB1*02:01:0 allele
frequency in the patients with MiRAS type
remained higher. Correspondingly, Wilhelmsen
and colleagues, found that patients with RAS
showed increase frequencies of HLA-A33 and
HLA-B35 alleles, and when analyzed in relation
to the subtypes of RAS the same HLA-A33 and
HLA-B35 frequency was statistically significant
only for patients with MiRAS (15). This might in
part, resulted from the limited number of
investigated patients in this study, as well as
reduction in the number of patients after the
subdivision could be attributed to the lack the
association of HLA-alleles with other types of
disease. In line with present findings, high levels
of TNF-, have also been reported by other
studies (8,9,10) have observed increased levels of
TNF- in saliva and serum of RAS patients. This
result underlines the importance of this cytokine
in the pathogenesis of RAS. In study conducted
by Valle and associates, how studied 20 patients
with RAS, they observed that saliva levels of
TNF- was significantly higher in patients with
active lesions of RAS compared with controls (9).
Guimaraes and colleagues have related the high
production of some cytokines, such as TNF-, IL1, IL-10 or IL-6 in RAS patients to some genetic
polymorphisms. This fact could explain the family
history frequently observed in some RAS patients
(18)
. In conclusion these findings demonstrated that
HLA-Cw*12:02:01- and HLA-DQB1*02:01:01alleles may played a role in the etiology of the
disease, whereas HLA-DQB1*05:01:01-05 may
confer protective effects against RAS. Moreover;
salivary TNF- may play an important role in
pathogenesis of this disease and it may also have
an important role in the search of new treatments
for this disease.
DISCUSSION
The role of genetic factors in the etiology of RAS
was documented many decades ago. As a result,
the investigative efforts were focused on the
genetic markers of susceptibility to this disease.
Moreover, the high familial incidence of RAS
suggests the possibility of a linkage or an
association of disease with HLA.
The present work revealed a significant
association of HLA- Cw*12:02:01-alleles with
RAS patients (p= 0.041), as compared with
healthy control. Different results regarding this
association was reported, results differ in different
population. In Brazilian study conducted by
Wilhelmsen and colleagues (15), observed that high
frequencies of HLA-A33, HLA-B35 and HLA-B8
were found in patients with RAS as compared to
healthy control. Correspondingly Malmstrm and
co-workers also noticed that HLA- HLA-B12
frequency was higher when they studied 14 Finish
patients with RAS (4). In 2001, twenty two Israeli
Arab patients with RAS were studied, a
statistically significant increase in HLA-B52 and
B44 molecules in patients with this disease was
observed when compared to the control group (16).
An anticipated, another finding in this study was
the higher expression of HLA- DQB1*02:01:0- in
RAS patients. This results is at variance with
some other studies (5,6,17) which lack such
association between HLA- DQ and this disease,
while reporting positive association with other
antigens of HLA- class II. For instance Gallina
and colleagues, (5) studied a sample of 26 Sicilian
patients with RAS, they found a statistically
significant increased value for HLA-DR7
frequency.
It is very important to point out that, as
mentioned by Louzada-Junior and associates (17)
the reduced frequency of HLA typing could be
considered as a protective factor for RAS. The
current study found decrease frequency of HLADQB1*05:01:0 allele in RAS patients when
Basic Sciences
REFERENCES
1. Gallo CB, Mimura MA, Sugaya NN. Recurrent Aphthous
Stomatitis. Clinics 2009; 64 (7):645-8.
2. Miller MF, Ship II, Ram C. A retrospective study of
factors associated with recurrent aphthous ulcers in a
professional population. Oral Surg 1977;43:532-7.
3. Lehner T, Welsh KL, Batchelor JR. The relationship of
HLA-B and DR phenotypes to Behets syndrome,
recurrent oral ulceration and the class of immune
complexes. Immunology 1982;47:581-7.
4. Malmstrm M, Salo OP, Fyhrquist F. Immunogenetic
markers and immune response in patients with recurrent
oral ulceration. Int J Oral Surg 1983;12:23-30.
5. Gallina G, Cumbo V, Messina P, Caruso C. HLA-A, B, C,
DR, MT, and MB antigens in recurrent aphthous
stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
1985;59(4):364-70.
6. Ozbakir F, Yazici H, Mat C, Tuzun Y, Yurdakul S,
153
13.
Olerup O, Zetterquist H.DR low-resolution PCR-SSP
typing-a correction and an update. Tissue Antigens 1993;
41:55-56.
14.
Sorlie DE. Medical biostatistics and epidemiology:
Examination and Board review First ed, Norwalk,
Connecticut, Appleton and Lange 1995; 47-88.
15.
Wilhelmsen NS, Weber R, Monteiro F, Kalil J,
Miziara ID.Correlation between histocompatibility
antigens andrecurrent aphthous stomatitis in the brazilian
population. Brazil J Otorhinolaryngology 2009; 75 (3).
16.
Jaber L, Weinberger A, Klein T, Yaniv I,
Mukamel M. Close association of HLA-B52 and HLAB44 antigens in Israeli Arab adolescents with recurrent
aphthous stomatitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
2001;127:184-7.
17.
Louzada-Junior P, Smith AG, Hansen JA,
Donadi EA. HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 alleles in the
Brazilian population of the northeastern region. Tissue
Antigen 2001;57:158-62.
18.
Guimares AL, Correia-Silva Jde F, S AR,
Victria JM, Diniz MG, Costa Fde O. Investigation of
functional gene polymorphisms IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10 and
TNF-alpha in individuals with recurrent aphthous
stomatitis. Arch Oral Biol 2007; 52:268-72.
Table 1: HLA-A alleles genotyping in RAS cases in comparison to healthy control group.
A*01:13,17:
A*02:01:01:
A*03:01:01:
A*03:30
A*11:43
A*23:03:01
A*24:02:01:
A*24:77
A*24:94
A*25:01:01,01
A*25:05
A*26:09
A*29:01:01:01
A*31:03,04
A*31:07,10
A*32:17
A*33:01:01-01
A*33:19
A*34:07
A*36:01-05
A*66:01,04,06
A*66:03
A*68:29
Total
Basic Sciences
Controls
N
%
2
8.3
1
4.2
2
8.3
2
8.3
1
4.2
2
8.3
4 16.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.2
0
0
2
8.3
0
0
0
0
2
8.3
1
4.2
1
4.2
1
4.2
0
0
0
0
1
4.2
25 30
Cases (RAS)
N
%
2
6.9
1
3.4
0
0
1
3.4
1
3.4
3
10.3
3
10.3
1
3.4
2
6.9
1
3.4
1
3.4
0
0
1
3.4
0
0
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.4
2
6.9
0
0
29
100
154
OR
0.81
0.82
0.15
0.39
0.82
1.27
0.58
2.58
4.45
2.58
2.58
0.27
2.58
0.15
2.58
2.58
0.39
0.27
0.27
0.27
2.58
4.45
0.27
EF
**
**
**
**
**
0.022
**
0.021
0.054
0.021
0.021
**
0.021
**
0.021
0.021
**
**
**
**
0.021
0.054
**
P (Fisher's exact)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Table 2: HLA-Cw alleles genotyping in RAS cases in comparison to healthy control group.
C*01:17
C*02:27
C*03:03:04,13,18
C*03:04:02,04:06
C*03:27,38:01
C*03:38:02
C*04:01:01:01
C*05:10 C*05:23
C*05:26
C*06:02:01:0
C*06:17/*12:09
C*07:02:01:01-02
C*07:05,08,14,
C*07:07
C*07:09
C*07:12,41
C*08:01:0102:2
C*08:05,21
C*08:28
C*12:02:01C*12:14:02
C*12:21,28
C*15:02:01-0
C*16:02:01,02:0
B*40:76
C 87
Total
Controls
N
%
1
4.2
2
8.3
1
4.2
1
4.2
1
4.2
2
8.3
0
0
3 12.5
2
8.3
1
4.2
1
4.2
0
0
0
0
1
4.2
0
0
1
4.2
1
4.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.2
1
4.2
1
4.2
1
4.2
0
0
2
8.3
25 100
Cases (RAS)
N
%
1
3.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.4
1
3.4
5
13.8
2
6.9
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
2
6.9
1
3.4
1
3.4
0
0
1
3.4
1
3.4
5
17.2
0
0
1
3.4
1
3.4
0
0
1
3.4
1
3.4
30
100
OR
0.82
0.15
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.39
2.58
1.12
0.81
0.82
0.82
2.58
2.58
1.70
2.58
0.82
0.27
2.58
2.58
11.00
0.27
0.82
0.82
0.27
2.58
0.39
EF
**
**
**
**
**
**
0.021
0.015
**
**
**
0.021
0.021
0.029
0.021
**
**
0.021
0.021
0.156
**
**
**
**
0.021
**
P (Fisher's exact)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.041
P<0.05
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Table 3: HLA-DR alleles genotyping in RAS cases in comparison to healthy control group.
DRB1*01:03
DRB1*01:23w,
DRB1*16:01:
DRB1*04:01:0
DRB1*04:02,1
DRB1*08:01:0
DRB1*09:01:0
DRB1*11:01:0
DRB1*11:45
DRB1*13:01:0
DRB1*13:01:0
DRB1*13:05:0
DRB1*13:37,7
DRB1*13:55
DRB1*13:60,8
DRB1*14:01:0
DRB1*14:19
DRB1*14:24.3
Total
Basic Sciences
Controls
N
%
4 16.7
0
0
1
4.2
0
0
2
8.3
2
8.3
3 12.5
1
4.2
3 12.5
0
0
0
0
1
4.2
1
4.2
2
8.3
1
4.2
1
4.2
1
4.2
1
4.2
25 100
Cases (R AS)
N
%
6
20.7
1
3.4
2
6.9
1
3.4
2
6.9
3
10.3
2
6.9
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
0
0
3
10.3
1
3.4
1
3.4
1
3.4
30
100
155
OR
1.30
2.58
1.70
2.58
0.81
1.27
0.52
0.82
0.25
2.58
2.58
0.82
0.82
0.15
2.65
0.82
0.82
0.82
EF
0.048
0.021
0.029
0.021
**
0.022
**
**
**
0.021
0.021
**
**
**
0.064
**
**
**
P (Fisher's exact)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Table 4: HLA-DQ alleles genotyping in RAS cases in comparison to healthy control group.
Controls
N
%
4 16.7
2
8.3
3 12.5
5 20.8
3 12.5
3 12.5
2
8.3
0
0
2
8.3
0
0
25 100
DQB1*05:01:0
DQB1*06:01:0
DQB1*06:02:0
DQB1*02:01:0
DQB1*03:01:0
DQB1*03:02:0
DQB1*03:03:0
DQB1*03:04,1
DQB1*03:10
DQB1*04:01:0
Total
Cases (RAS)
N
%
0
0
3
10.3
2
6.9
14
48.3
2
6.9
2
6.9
3
10.3
1
3.4
0
0
2
6.9
30
100
OR
0.08
1.27
0.52
3.55
0.52
0.52
1.27
2.58
0.15
4.45
EF
**
0.022
**
0.347
**
**
0.022
0.021
**
0.054
P (Fisher's exact)
0.036
P<0.05
NS
NS
0.028
P<0.05
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Table 5: HLA-allele in minor and major RAS cases in comparison to healthy control group.
Controls Cases (RAS)
Inverse OR
N %
N
% OR
EF
Minor RAS
Cw*12:02:01- 0
5 20.8
DQB1*02:01:0
Major RAS
Cw*12:02:01- 1 4.3
DQB1*02:01:0 5 20.8
5.2
2.58
**
10
45.1 0.21
4.7
0
4
0
0.27
30.7 1.27
3.8
**
PF
0.021 **
** 0.314
**
**
0.022 **
0.547
NS
0.016
P<0.05
0.453
0.351
NS
NS
Table 7: The difference in levels of TNF- (pg/ml) according to the clinical types of disease.
Type of RAS Number
1- Minor
2- Major
3- Herptiform
16
13
1
Median of
P (Kruskall-Wallis)
salivary TNF-
0.150*
0.128
0.136
P<0.05
Basic Sciences
0.94[NS]
DQB1*05:01:0
0.142
Negative
0.138
Positive
(0.135 - 0.152)
(0.132 - **)
26
4
DQB1*02:01:0
0.138
Negative
0.146
Positive
(0.132 - 0.153)
(0.135 - 0.153)
11
19
0.034
156
Basic Sciences
157