Sunteți pe pagina 1din 18

CHAPTER 3

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

3.1 GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS


Gender
Male
Female
Total

No. of respondents
44
6
50

Percentage (%)
88
12
100

gender wise classification

Male
Female
44

FIGU
RE 3.1 GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 88% of the respondents are male and 12% of
the respondents are female.

3.2 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS


Age
20-25Age
30-35Age
40-45Age
Above-45Age

No. Of respondents
07
24
09
10

Percentage (%)
14
48
18
20

Total

50

100

30
24

25
20

Column1
Column2

15

Column3
9

10

10

Column4

7
5
0
20-25 Age

30-35 Age

40-45 Age

Above 45 Age

FIGU
RE 3.2 AGEWISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS
Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 48% of the respondents are in the
age of 30-35, 20% of the respondents are in the age of above 45, 18% of the respondents are in
the age of 40-45 and 14% of the respondents are in the age above 20-25%.
3.3 EXPERIENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS
Experience

No. Of Respondents

Percentage (%)

Below 5Years
5-lO Years
10-15 Years
Above15Years
Total

20

19

18

13
19
18
50

26
38
36
100

18

16
14

13

12

Column1
Column2
Column3
Column4

10
8
6
4
2
0
Below 5 years

5-10 years

10-15 years

Above 15 years

FIGURE 3.3 EXPERIENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS


Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 38% of the respondents are having
5-10years experience persons, 36% of the respondents have 10-15 Years of experience persons,
26% of the respondents are having below 5years of experience and no respondents have
experience more than 15years.
3.4 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF RESPONDENTS
Educational Qualification
UG degree
PG degree
Engineering

No. Of Respondents
07
15
12

Percentage (%)
14
30
24

Other ITI
Total

16
50

32
100

18
16

16

15

14
12

12

Column1
Column2
Column3
Column4

10
8

6
4
2
0
UG degree

PG degree

Engineering

Other ITI

FIGURE 3.4 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF RESPONDENTS


Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 32% of the respondents are other
ITI degree holders, 30% of the respondents are PG degree 24% of respondents are engineering
graduates and 14% of the respondents are UG degree holders.

FREQUENCY OF MOTIVATION OF EMPLOYEES


Motivation
Once a Year
Twice a Year

No. of respondents
50
-

Percentage (%)
100
-

No Specific Time

Total

50

100

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 100% of the respondents agree that
employees motivation is conducting once a year.

REASON FOR CONDUTING EMPLOYEES MOTIVATION


Motivation of employees

No. of respondents

Percentage (%)

Conducting
To identity motivating

methods
To decide monetary benefits
Identifying barriers of low

performance
All of the above
Total

50
50

100
100

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 100% of the respondent's agree that
the reason for conducting motivation of employees includes all the factors such as to identity
motivating methods, to decide monetary benefits and identity barriers of low performance.

Q.1. Are the salary increments given to employees who do their jobs very well motivates
them?
a) Strongly agree

b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree

d) Strongly disagree

alternatives

No. Of respondents

No of respondents (in %)

Strongly agree

15

30

agree

10

Neither agree nor disagree

15

30

Strongly disagree

15

30

Total

50

100
TABLE NO. 1

16

15

15 15

14
12
10
8
6

4
2

option A

option B

option C

option D

FIGURE 1.1 MOTIVATION BY INCREMENT IN SALARY


Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 30% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 10% are agree, 30% are neither agree nor disagree, 30% are strongly disagree

Q.2. Does the Financial incentives motivates more than non financial incentives?
a) Strongly agree

b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree

d) Strongly disagree

alternatives
Strongly agree
agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Strongly disagree
Total

No. Of respondents
10
10
15
15
50
TABLE NO. 2

No. Of respondents (in %)


20
20
30
30
100

15 15

16
14
12
10

10 10

8
6
4
2

option A

option B

option C

option D

FIGURE 1.2 MOTIVATION BY FINANCIAL INCENTIVES

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 20% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 20% are agree, 30% are neither agree nor disagree, 30% are strongly disagree

Q.3. Are You Satisfied with the salary given at present?


a) Yes

alternatives
Yes
No
Total

b)No

No. Of respondents
44
6
50
TABLE NO. 3

No. Of respondents (in %)


88
12
100

salary satisfaction level


6

yes

No

44

FIGURE1.3 SALARY SATISFACTION LEVEL

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 88% of the respondents says yes
and 12% says no .

Q.4. Are you satisfied with the lunch break, rest breaks and leaves given in the
organization?
a) Yes

b) No

c) Need to get improved

alternatives
Yes
No

No. Of respondents
40
4

No. Of respondents (in %)


80
8

Need to get improved


Total

6
50

12
100
TABLE NO.4

salary satisfaction level

6
4

yes
no
need to improve
40

FIGURE1.4 SATISFACTION LEVEL

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 80% of the respondents says yes
and 8% says no and 6% says need to get improved

Q.5 What You Think The physical working conditions are provided in the organization
Are Good?
a) Strongly agree

b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree

d) Strongly disagree

alternatives
Strongly agree
agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Strongly disagree
Total

40

No. Of respondents
37
7
3
3
50
TABLE NO. 5

No. Of respondents (in %)


74
14
6
6
100

37

35
30
25
20
15
10
5

option A
option B
option C
option D

7
3 3

FIGURE1.5 WORKING CONDITION OF ORGANIZATION


Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 74% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 14% are agree, 6% are neither agree nor disagree, 6% are strongly disagree

Q.6.Do the employees in the organization feel secured in their job?


a) Strongly agree

b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree

d) Strongly disagree

alternatives
Strongly agree
agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Strongly disagree
Total

No. Of respondents
10
9
11
20
50
TABLE NO. 6

No. Of respondents (in %)


20
18
22
40
100

25
20

20
15
10

10

11
option A

option B
option C

option D

FIGURE1.6 JOB SECURITY IN THE ORGANIZATION


Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 20% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 18% are agree, 22% are neither agree nor disagree, 40% are strongly disagree

Q.7.What Do You Think The retirement benefits available are sufficient?


a) Strongly agree

b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree

alternatives
Strongly agree
agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Strongly disagree
Total

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0

d)Strongly disagree

No. Of respondents
10
11
16
13
50
TABLE NO. 7

No. Of respondents (in %)


20
22
32
26
100

16
11
10

13

FIGURE1.7 RETIREMENT BENEFITS AVAILABLE

option
option
option
option

A
B
C
D

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 20% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 22% are agree, 32% are neither agree nor disagree, 26% are strongly disagree

Q.8.Are the medical benefits provided in the organization are satisfactory?


a) Yes

b)No

alternatives
Yes
No
Total

No. Of respondents
41
9
50
TABLE NO. 8

No. Of respondents (in %)


82
18
100

medical satisfaction

yes

No
41

FIGURE1.8 MEDICAL SATISFACTION


Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 82% of the respondents says yes
and 18% says no

Q9. Do you think the Jktyres system reduces biasness?


a) yes

b)No

alternatives
Yes
No
Total

No. Of respondents
39
11
50

No. Of respondents (in %)


78
22
100

TABLE NO. 9

biasness reduction

11
yes
No
39

FIGURE1.9 BIASNESS REDUCTION

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 78% of the respondents says yes
and 22% says no

Q10. Are You overall Satisfied with the companys motivation methods?
a) Strongly agree

b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree

d) Strongly disagree

alternatives
Strongly agree
agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Strongly disagree
Total

No. Of respondents
37
5
3
5
50
TABLE NO. 10

No. Of respondents (in %)


74
10
6
10
100

40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

37

option A
option B
option C
optioon D

FIGURE1.10 OVERALL SATISFACTION

Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 74% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 10% are agree, 6% are neither agree nor disagree, 10% are strongly disagree

Q.11 How frequent you get the feedback?


a.)Monthly

b)weekly

c)daily

d)quarterly

e)yearly

alternatives
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Quarterly
Yearly
Total

No. Of respondents
5
25
10
6
4
50
TABLE NO. 11

No. Of respondents (in %)


10
50
20
12
8
100

30
25

25
20

option A
option B
option C
optionD
optionE

15
10

10
5

6
4

0
Monthly

Weekly

Daily

Quarterly

Yearly

FIGURE1.11 FEEDBACK FREQUENCY


Interpretation: From the above table, it can be inferred that 10% of the respondents says
monthly, 50% says weekly, 20% says daily, 12% says quarterly and 8% says yearly

S-ar putea să vă placă și