Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
RECOVERYBOILERFLOORTUBES
JR Keiser, B. Taljat, X.-L. Wang, R W. Swindetuan.,
P.J. Maziasz, RL. Thomas, and E.A. Payzant
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
D.L. Singbeil and R Prescott
Pulp and Paper ResearchInstitute of Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia
ABSTRACT
Cracking of the stainless steel layer in co-extruded
304USA2 10 tubing used in black liquor recoveryboilers is
being found in an ever-increasing number of North American
pulp and paper mills. Becauseof the possibility of a tube
failure, this is a signiticant safety issue, and becauseof the
extra time required for tube inspection and repair, this can
becomean economic issueas well.
In a project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and
given wide support among paper companies,boiler
manufacturers, and tube fabricators, studies are being
conducted to determine the causeof the cracking and to
identify alternate materials and/or operating proceduresto
prevent tulx cracking. Examination of cracked tubeshas
permitted characterization of crack features, and transmission
electron microscopy is providing information aboutthe
thermal history, particularly cyclic thermal exposures,that
tubes have experienced. Neutron and x-ray diffraction
techniques are being usedto determine the residual stressesin
as-fabricatedtube panels and exposedtubes, and finite
element modeling is providing information about the stresses
the tubes experience during operation. Laboratory studiesare
being conducted to determine the susceptibility of the coextruded 304USA210 tubes to stresscorrosion cracking,
thermal &igue, and corrosion in molten smelt. This paper
presentsthe current statusof thesestudies.
On the basis of all of these studies, recommendationsfor
meansto prevent tube cracking will be offered,
INTRODUCTION
Corrosion of water wall and floor
recovery
boilers representsa sign&ant hazard to the
?t!! e operationof
the boilers. Measurestaken to prevent, or control, corrosion
include the useof rigorous inspection and repair programs,
application of protective coatings to the surf& of tubes,and
the installation of co-extruded,or composite, tubeswith a
carbon steel core metallurgically bonded to a corrosion
resistant exterior layer. The use of axxtruded tubes,in
particular, has beenrecognized as solving many of the
corrosion problemsto which carbon steel tubes were prone,
and they have beenwidely specified for both new and retrofit
construction for the lower furnace walls and floors of kmft
recoveryboilers.
However, experiencegained from the use of co-extrudedtubes
in recoveryboiler servicehas also shown that they are subject
to someunique corrosion-relatedproblems. Rather than
general corrosion or thinning, the most common problem
affecting co-extrudedtubes in krafl recovery boilers has been
cracking which originates in the outer, stainless steellayer
(1). In many cases,the cracks are located close to, or
associatedwith, membraneor crotch plate welds at air port,
smelt spout and other openings in the boiler wall. Bare-face,
or crown cracking of tubes which form spout openings,floor
tubes,and portions of wall tubes exposedto the smeltbed is
also common, as is cracking along tube/membranewelds in
these latter locations, and in the membranesof tloor tubes.
In 1995, cracking of co-extruded tubes was identified as a
serious materials issuefacing the pulp and paper industry.
Consequently,a United StatesDepartment of Energy program
was establishedto determine the causeof the tubecracking
and to identify alternate materials or processchangesto
prevent this type of cracking. This project is being carried
out by researchersat the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(ORNL), the Pulp and PaperResearchInstitute of Canada
(Paprican), and the institute of Paper Scienceand TechnoIogy
(PST) with strong support from more than a dozenpaper
companies,most major manufacturers of recoveryboilers, one
of the principal producersof co-extruded tubing, and
producers of other typesof tubing. The researchprogram
includes review of existing literature, microstructural
characterization of compositetubing, measurementof
residual stmssesin tubing, computer modeling to predict
stressesin compositetubesunder operating conditions, and
laboratory fatigue and corrosion tests. Collection and
analysesof operational data from mills, including tube
temperaturedata and chemical analysesof smelt, are also
being conducted. From this work it is expectedthat alternate
materials or operating procedureswill be identified that can
prevent cracking of compositetubes. This paper reportson
the current statusof this project.
a,
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the
United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency
thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or
assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness,or uscftilness Of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents
that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any spccific commercial prcduct, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or
reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
in decmuicimageprodads..Imagesare
origid
BACKGROUND
General Information
Determination of Stresses
.
(bb
300 t
Esperimental measurements.
Residual stressesmeasuredusing X-ray and neutron
diEaction in unexposed 304USA.210 coextruded tubing
from both major manufacturers have been reported (10).
These messeswere shown to vary significantly through the
wall of the tube, especially in the vicinity of the stainless
&&/carbon steel interface. For both suppliers, the axial and
tangential stresseswere compressiveon the outer surfaceof
the stainless steel. The surface stresseshad a cyclic pattern
aroundthe circumfkrence of the tube, and measurements
showed a similar pattern in the hardnessas measuredin the
axial direction along the surfaceof the tube. The cyclic nature
of the stmssesand the hardnessare most likely the result of
the final processing step, straightening, and the manner in
which the tube advancesthrough the straightener.
These measurementsshow that despite the variation in stress
values, as-fabricated 64 mm (2% inch) OD 304UCS tubesat
room temperature have compressiveaxial and hoop stresses
in the surface layers. For 76 mm (3 inch) OD 304LICS tubes,
the measuredresidual stressesshow greater variability, tensile
at somelocations and compressiveat others.
To determine if exposure in a recovery boiler has an intluence
on the residual stressesin composite tubes, tube panelswere
removed from operating nulls and analyzed with X-ray or
neutron difFraction. A two-tube section of 64 mm (2% inch)
OD 304UCS tubes was examined with X-ray diffraction to
determine the surf&e residual stresseson both sidesof the
section. To determine the through-thickness stressprofile, a
single-tube section of 3 inch OD 304L/SA210 composite
tubes was measuredwith neutron diffraction. Figure 3 shows
the surface residual stressesobtained by X-my diffraction at
the surface of the two-tube section, The fireside exhibits a
different residual stressstate than the cold side after service.
For both axial and hoop stresscomponents,the fireside
messeson the crown of the tube are tensile with a maximum
of 300 MPa, while the cold side stresseson the crown are
neutral or compressive. The through-thickness stressprofile
determined by neutron diffraction on the single-tube
specimenis shown in Fig. 4. Here, both the fireside and cold
side stressesare tensile after service; however, the fire-side
exhibits higher tensile residual stressesthan the cold side.
The maximum tensile stresson the surfaceis about 250 MPa.
-180
-120
Arguar
60
Josbm
0
from &Me
00
120
Web Meg j
1.30
0
120
60
from center web Meg.)
160
400
W!
300
l &
0 I-
200
I--
-180
-120
Arqw,
60
Podm
postulatedmechanisms.
.j
.,
Radial
.3
PositIon
Cold
.z
tom
.I
tnierfac.
,
(mm)
Sida Cran
4onL~.*
-.l....l....l....l........,,
6aor..m.--.s
. . . . . . . . . . . ..T-
.,.
,,
---.j
.,
-3
.z
Radial Position
:
3
from Interface
O.1
. ..I...
--
.
(mm)
--VW----
-200
t
-4ooL~~~~
---
--v
Carbon
steel I
.5
......l....................,.J
-I
-3
Radial
Posiiion
-2
from
-1
lnicrfaca
0
(mm)
Aby
I
626
2
tube
sum
x0
350
19
304
1co
250
ig
50
0
E
2wE
fa
-50
*loo
.?
150 1
loo
-150
-200
50
.250
300
t Ii
0
0
200
400
640
8x
1000
ame 1s;
Mnnkaila
firesids
350
250
=I
E
2Co E
a
150
-I 0
i
-100
-200
-300
0
200
400
ths bl
600
800
2w
4w
#x)
-
I
0
10
100
1000
cyci*r
IO
10000
100000
fallurc
IO
100
10000
1000
Cycisr
to
100000
frifutc
1!5oox
1 soox
13.4
pm
l3.4pm
clad substructure, shown in Fig. 15b,consistedof a lowdensity dislocation network characteristic of mill-annealed
material. To confirm the severedifference in throughthickness microstructure, hardnessmeasurementswere made
acrossthe stainless steel layer. Consistentwith the observed
dislocation microstructural differences,the cladding of the
!:~
1
10
100
1ooa
10000
Cycle*
Figure 17 TEM substructure produced by fatigue testing ofjne-grained 304L stainlesssteel (a) thermal/mechanical cycling
between 300 and 600 c with 0.5% strain range; (b) isothermal cycling at 300 c and 0.7% strain range.
Table I Washwater sample analysis results as a function ofjloot tube temperature during the water wash.:
Temperature
(C)
2.36
57
80.6
3.1
1.70
5.59
16.9
1 0.054
2.64
1.32
5.78
17.3
0.020
11.6
2.75
0.66
5.96
17.8
0.019
11.6
4.25
12.2
1 0.054
11.7
11.7
1.88
0.35
1.53
0.21
4.89
14.2
1 0.031
11.6
1.89
0.17
4.33
12.2
1 0.032
11.7
1.57
1 0.13
5.18
14.6
1 0.039
11.7
1.42
1 0.10
3.44
9.2
1 0.054
11.9
p 3000
-% 2500
2
d 2000
f
i
IS00
e
4 1000
500
0
I+-t6Cr-2SI
Fe36Cr-tfl
Fe-120.3Sf
626
FMMt
Ni(3jAl
626
304L
SA2fO
450
ii
a350
P
250
0.8
4.0
Thermal
1.2
1.4
expansion
1.6
coeffident
1.8
20
22
[lo" 'C']
SUMMARY
2
*?EC-n
h62a
A225
ss3oe
ss104
La
1:2
r:r
[I 0 I.?]
2>
ucfnr
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to acknowledgethe efforts of H.F.
Longmire for preparation of metallographic specimens,J.W.
Jonesfor selection and preparation of electron microscopy
specimens,P. Eng for conducting SCC experiments,D.F.
Wilson, S.J. Pawel, and J.R DiStefano for review of the
document, and ABB-CE Services,Inc., Sandvik Steel,and
Welding Services Inc. for contribution of much of the sample
material used for laboratory studies. Information, tube
samples,and assistancehave also beenprovided by ABB-CE
Sewices, inc., Ahlstrom Machinery Corporation, Babcock&
Wilcox, Kvaemer Pulping Technologies, Fluor Daniel Forest
Products, Champion International, Georgia-Pacific,P.H.
Glatfelter, International Paper, Irving Pulp and Paper,James
River, MacMillan Bloedel, Mead, Potlatch, Rivetwood
International, Union Camp, Westvaco,Weyerhaeuser,and
Weyerhaeuser-Canada.
REFERENCES
I. D. L. Singbeil, R Prescott,J.R Keiser, and R W.
Swindeman, Proceedings of1997 TAPPI Engineering
Conference, Composite Tube Cracking in Kraft Recovery