Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SS 12
General Economics with Taxation and Entrepreneurship
Paper #1
TECHNOLOGICAL UNEMPLOYMENT:
MYTH OR REALITY
Problems
1. Do advancements in technology really hinder the achievement of full employment?
2. Will it be better to improve on the economic efficiency even though it affects
unemployment rates or focus on gaining full employment? Which of the two contributes
more to a sound economy?
3. Isnt it possible for technology to actually create more job opportunities?
4. Aside from technology, what may also be causing unemployment?
5. Should the Philippines strive for improvements in technology or stick to the
conventional, manual labor?
Summary
o Understanding Economics (Lesson 2, 4, and 7)
Sometimes, economic goals are contradictory. For example, striving for economic
efficiency by means of advancements in technology would speed up production and cut
production costs down. Because the goods are more affordable, it increases the demand of such
products/services which in turn boosts economic growth of a country. However, this may replace
manual labor and make it impossible to reach full employment.
The different types of unemployment are frictional unemployment (caused by the time
and effort needed to find a job), structural unemployment (caused by lack of skills or ability to
contribute to economy), cyclical unemployment (caused by lack of demand), seasonal
unemployment (caused by changing seasons), technological unemployment (caused by new
technology replacing jobs).
o A Tale of Two Factories
This article compares two different economic approaches of two factories of the same
company (Tenneco) both producing mufflers: one located in China, the other in the United
States. The factory in China incorporates manual labor in manufacturing the goods, taking
advantage of the low labor cost. The Michigan-based factory, on the other hand, focuses on
minimizing on labor and aims to automate as much as possible. The first capitalizes on
employment while the latter emphasizes technology. Their results prove that although the labor
cost is greatly reduced, it doesnt necessarily mean higher revenues. The factory in the United
States produced the goods more efficiently and therefore yielded more earnings despite the
higher labor costs.
o 1000 Dollars & an Idea: Entrepreneur to Billionaire
In his autobiography, Sam Wyly proves that technology could even generate more job
opportunitiesnot necessarily replace them. He acknowledged that computers and information
technology would be a multi-billion dollar industry. His idea was novel at that time: a company
which would sell computing services (similar to what a computer shop is now). He expanded
When costs for operating a business rise, income decreases which in turn lowers demand.
If the demand is low, it leads to lower rates of productionthe root of unemployment.
o Unemployment rate slightly up in 13
Despite the improving economy of the Philippines, unemployment worsened, increasing
from 7% in the previous year to 7.3%. Underemployment is also high although it has improved a
bit from 20% to 19.8%. Economists account that the growing economy mostly benefitted only
the rich and middle class but barely improved the poor. They also added that the country would
have to maintain economic growth before it can drastically improve employment in the
Philippines.
Unemployment Rate
Japan
4.40%
Singapore
1.90%
Germany
5.50%
China
6.50%
8.10%
South Korea
3.20%
entrepreneurs should keep up with the pace. These technologies have limits; businesses should
realize when these technologies are about to be obsolete in order to develop a new technology to
avoid being left behind (Morris, 2008).
Technology is created to empower people and ease peoples lives. According to an
international company, the internet has the potential to improve the Philippine economy. More
citizens gaining access to the internet means more information delivered to the people which
could improve productivity and efficiency in different sectors in the economy. It also allows
businesses to cross the borders, be more globalized, and reach more customers (Santos, 2012).
A comparative study between two Tenneco factories proves that investing on
advancements in technology would be more beneficial over attempting full employment. The
factory in China incorporates manual labor in manufacturing the mufflers, taking advantage of
the low labor cost. The Michigan-based factory, on the other hand, focuses on minimizing on
labor and aims to automate as much as possible. The first capitalizes on employment while the
latter emphasizes technology. Their results prove that although the labor cost is greatly reduced
in the Chinese counterpart, it doesnt necessarily mean higher revenues. The factory in the
United States produced the goods more efficiently and therefore yielded more earnings despite
the higher labor costs (Taylor, 2006).
Besides, technology could even generate more job opportunitiesnot necessarily replace
them. In his autobiography, Sam Wyly acknowledged that computers and information
technology would be a multi-billion dollar industry. His idea was novel at that time: a company
which would sell computing services (similar to what a computer shop is now). He expanded
University Computing to become a multinational company, which of course created abundant
jobs. At the same time, it cut down costs for their clients in operating their respective businesses
(Wyly, 2008).
Lastly, another evident proof that technology isnt a reasonable cause of unemployment: a
comparison of unemployment rates across different countries. Setting aside the United States of
America (which recently suffered from an economic recession), more technologically advanced
countries unemployment rates are faring much better than the Philippines 7.3%. China has an
unemployment rate of 6.50%; Germanys at 5.50%; Japan at 4.40%; South Korea at 3.20%; and
Singapore with only 1.90% unemployed (Country Comparison::Unemployment Rate).
Reflection
Finding out that technology has the potential to replace jobs made me feel quite uneasy,
especially that the course Im taking up is Electronics Engineering. The thought of the realization
of my dreambringing the country to technological advancementscould also mean thousands
of others losing their jobs, is just heartbreaking. But there was still doubt. It seems impossible for
technology to completely eradicate the need of the labor force.
After researching about unemployment, technology, and how they both affect the
economy, it was a relief being assured that although technology may somewhat affect
unemployment, its advantages obviously outweigh the consequences. Firstly, technology is
merely a minor contributor to the unemployment dilemma; the main cause is ineffective demand.
Its ignorant to blame it onto technology.
If utilizing less technology really equates to higher employment, the Philippines probably
wouldnt have to worry about getting jobs any more. However, this obviously isnt the case.
Simply comparing our country with more technologically advanced and efficient economies
would reveal that the assumption of technology hindering full employment is disoriented and
illogical.
Technology is meant to ease our lives, to simplify tasks, to bring information closer, to
keep moving us forward Aside from that, technology can actually create more job
opportunities. Although others say that people may lose their jobs because of the required
technical skills, they are forgetting that there are also many who suffer from underemployment.
If these underemployed get to get more decent jobs, it also allows the others to have the
opportunity to get employed. Besides, technology also opens new industries and business
ventures which would definitely need an increased labor force.
Since technology increases the productivity and efficiency of businesses, it means more
revenue for the company. This in turn may either raise the wages of the employees or lower the
prices of goods, increasing their buying power therefore also increasing effective demand.
Technology might even possibly help solve the unemployment problem rather than worsening it.
Its time our country embraces change. Filipinos are usually skeptical to new technology
and would rather stick to their conventional methods. Our country has the capacity to rival
others; great ideas have sprung up from the great minds of several Filipinos, only to be crushed
and rejected by the rest of the people. We should open our eyes and realize that this indifference
may be whats holding back our economy from reaching its full potential.
Works Cited
Bradshaw, Michelle R. (2007). Understanding Economics. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young
University.
Country Comparison::Unemployment Rate (2013). The World Factbook 2013-14. Washington,
DC: Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov
Economic Goals (2014). AmosWEB Encyclonomic WEB*pedia. Retrieved January 14, 2014 from
http://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=wpd&c=dsp&k=economic+goals
Remo, Michelle V. (2013, December 27). Unemployment rate slightly up in 13. The Philippine
Daily Inquirer.
Samuelson, Robert J. (2013, July 15). High tech and the long road to full employment. The
Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com.
Santos, Matikas (2012, June 19). Internet can boost economy networking firm. The Philippine
Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://technology.inquirer.net
Sherman, Howard J. (1976). Stagflation: A Radical Theory of Unemployment and Inflation. New
York: Harper & Row.
Taylor, Alex III (2006, October). A Tale of Two Factories. Fortune, 60-65.
Wyly, Sam (2008). 1000 Dollars & an Idea: Entrepreneur to Billionaire. New York: New Market
Press
Morris, Michael. Kuratko, Donald. Covin, Jeffrey. (2008). Corporate Entrepreneurship &
Innovation. Eagan, Minnesota: Thomson South-Western.