Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Hanout Contents:
Part 1: Syllabus
Course objectives, methods of instruction, assessment, time
table
Introduction
Characterization of Blast Loading
Structural Dynamics
Blast Resistant Capacity Analysis
Structural Design Against Blast Loading
Retrofitting Structures against Blast Loading
10%
50%
10%
30%
LEARNING RESOURCES:
Textbook: None.
Lecture note: Avaliable from myuni.
References: Design of Blast Resistant Buildings in Petrochemical Facilities (ASCE 1997);
UFC Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosion 2008;
Structural Dynamics (Mario Paz 1985).
Assignments: will be handed out in class.
MYUNI: Staff contact details; Lecture notes; Assignments; Design project in pdf format;
Reference papers
Time table:
Please note that these are approximate lecture times that can be increased or decreased
depending on the progress.
Day
Time
Venue
Description
Tuesdays
3-4pm
Ligertwood 231 Law Lecture Theatre 1 Lectures
Thursdays
3-4pm
Barr Smith South 3029 Flentje Lecture Lecture/Tutorial/quiz
Theatre
2
Chapter 2
Ground
Ds
Soil Mass
Dc
Rock Mass
2.5
T
u
u
U
0
0
time t
U
0
15
-2.5
distance x
0
15
-2.5
The time and distance descriptions can be illustrated in a generalized mathematical equation
of the displacement u
u = u max sin( Kx + t )
(2-1)
where u max is the maximum displacement, K is a constant called the wave number, is also
a constant called the circular natural frequency, and t is time. If time and frequency are
constants, the variation of displacement u with the distance can be described as
u = u max sin( Kx + const )
(2-2)
If the wavelength is defined as the distance at which the wave repeats, K must be equal to
2 / to result in the sine function to repeat every time x increases by an amount equal to .
On the other hand, if the location and wavelength are constants, the variation with time at a
fixed point becomes
u = u max sin(const + t )
(2-3)
Since the period, T, is the time between repetitions, must be equal to 2 / T to cause the
sine function to repeat when time advances by one period.
Since the wave repeats after a time called the period T, the frequency f or number of times
the wave repeats itself each second is then 1/T and the circular natural frequency (which
has a unit of radians) is
1
T
= 2 = 2f
(2-4)
The frequency f (which has a unit of herz or second-1), is not the same as the circular natural
frequency and should not be confused when calculating peak accelerations and
displacements of sinusoidal waves.
For the sinusoidal waves, the wavelength and the propagation velocity c are related
through the period T as
= cT = c
1
f
(2-5)
Since velocity is defined as the change in displacement per unit time, the first order derivative
of Equation 2-1 with respect to time will give the particle velocity u& as
du
= u max cos( Kx + t )
dt
(2-6)
du&
= u max 2 sin( Kx + t )
dt
(2-7)
u& =
accordingly the acceleration u&& as
u&& =
Blast induced waves such as compressive wave can also be described as by their wave length,
propagation velocity and frequency in the same fashion as the water wave. There is one
difference between a surface water wave and one that propagates along the ground; however,
it does not affect any of the forgoing relations. The particle motion for a water wave is
progressive, while the solid is retrogressive. In other words, at top of a surface water wave the
cork will be moving in the direction of the propagation, whereas at the top of a surface ground
wave, soil particles will be moving in a direction opposite to the propagation direction.
Fig. 2.4 Particle motion variation with wave type for compressive wave
When compressive wave travels in the direction of its propagation, the distance the wave
travels between times t1 and t2 is the product of the time interval and propagation velocity as
shown in the Fig. 2.5. Then, the generalized mathematical description of displacements
caused by a plane-wave travelling in the positive direction
u = u max sin( Kx ct )
(2-8)
With K=1, the particle velocity is expressed as
u& =
du
= u max c cos( x ct )
dt
(2-9)
1.5
u&
distance
0
0
-1.5
c(t2-t1)
Fig. 2.5 Transmission of wavefronts for sinusoidal pulse
= u& / c
(2-11)
Positive particle velocities towards the right then produce negative strains. Therefore negative
strains are compressive. Thus for plane waves, ground strains can be calculated directly for
the particle velocities if the compressive-wave propagation velocity is known.
Example
The strains plotted in the Figure can defined mathematically as follows (C = 300 m/s)
(2-12)
x
u&
t
= cc u& max
(2-14)
(2-15)
where u& max is the maximum particle velocity and x / t is the propagation velocity of the
longitudinal wavefront cc . The maximum stress then occurs at the maximum particle velocity
u& max . For elastic material, its Youngs modulus can be expressed as
=E
(2-16)
Thus
= E =
u&
u&
E=
E
cc
x / t
(2-17)
cc =
(2-18)
(2-19)
u&
+
u& + u&
A
Fig. 2.6 A stress wave propagation down a straight bar
Area
The wave velocity is found from the Youngs modulus E and the mass density .
(2-20)
(2-21)
u& +
Fixed
a
9
Free
a
Fig. 2.7. Two identical longitudinal compressive waves moving toward each other along a bar
Wave transmission can be generalized for transmission from one medium ( 1c1 ) to another
( 2 c 2 ) as shown in Fig. 2.8. The incident wave I , travelling done a bar with properties 1
and c1 intersects another material, with properties 2 and c 2 , produced a reflected wave R
and a transmitted wave T . At the interface the sum of the particle velocities on both sides
must be equal. Thus
u& I + (u& R ) = u&T
(2-22)
Reflected velocity is negative because it is travelling in the opposite direction. Since particle
velocity can be directly related to stress by Equation, thus
R
I
+
= T
(2-23)
1c1 1c1 2 c 2
Furthermore, the stress on each side of the interface must be equal and thus
I + ( R ) = T
(2-24)
Then the transmitted and reflected stresses can be calculated from the incident stress as
2 I ( 2 c 2 )
(2-25)
T =
2 c 2 + 1c1
( c 1c1 )
(2-26)
R = I 2 2
2 c 2 + 1c1
When 2 c 2 is many times that of 1c1 , R is equal to I and the interface is similar to a
fixed boundary. Similarly, if 2 c 2 is many times smaller that of 1c1 , the reflected wave
should be similar to that of a free boundary.
2 c2
1c1
2 c2
waves propagate outward in a spherical manner until they reach a boundary such as another
layer (rock or soil) or the ground surface. At this intersection, shear and surface waves are
produced and the reflected surface (Rayleigh) waves become important at larger transmission
distances. At the small distances, all three wave types will arrive together and greatly
complicate wave identification whereas at large distances, the more slowly moving shear and
surface waves begin to separate from the compressive.
11
Fig. 2.10 Particle motion variation with wave type: (a) compressive; (b) shear; (c) Rayleigh
A close-in explosion produces the single-spiked pulse, A, by direct transmission to the
transducer at position A as shown in Fig. 2.11. But most blasting problems involve the
transducer position B and result in relatively sinusoidal waves B as shown in Fig. 2.11. The
idealized waves shown are typical for blasting where the close-in blasting produces transient
pulses that last 1 to 2 ms and 10 to 100 ms at relatively large distances. Combinations of these
single pulses produce the commonly observed blast-induced sinusoidal wave strains.
12
(2-27)
u = umax sin( Kx + t )
u& =
u&& =
du
= umax cos( Kx + t )
dt
(2-28)
du&
= umax 2 sin( Kx + t )
dt
(2-29)
In most circumstance, only the absolute value of the maximum motion is of interest:
u max = u max
(2-30)
(2-31)
(2-32)
u&max = 15 mm / s
13
Theoretically, integration of the transverse particle velocity record would give the
displacement. For example, the area between time 1 and 3 in Fig. 2.12 is 0.54 mm and is
found by summing the product of the average velocity between two timing lines and interval
between timing lines. The entire velocity time history must be integrated from zero to find the
true displacement. In this case, the local integrated value of 0.54mm is the displacement the
occurs between the negative peak displacement and the positive peak displacement. Therefore
the zero-to-peak displacement is one-half this value, 0.27mm.
The maximum velocity is 15 mm/s. The period T is the twice the half period which is the time
difference between times 1 and 3 is 0.06 s. Therefore,
u max =
(2-33)
Theoretically, acceleration is the maximum just after time 1, when the particle velocity slope
is a maximum, which the slope of the line between points 1 and 2
u& 12.5mm / s
(2-34)
=
= 1250mm / s 2
t
0.01s
The maximum acceleration with sinusoidal approximation is estimated as follows. The
appropriate period T would be four times the one-fourth period, which calls the rise time of
the pulse, which in this case is the time between times 1 and 2. Therefore
u&&max = u&max 2f =
(2-35)
The principal frequency is defined as that associated with the greatest amplitude pulse as
shown in Fig. 2.13.
14
The principal frequency is also defined as that associated with the averaged amplitude pulse as
shown in Fig. 2.14.
0.4
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
-0.4
0.08
Velocity (m/s)
0.8
20
Fmax
Fmax
2
10
PF
0.1
0
-0.8
t(s)
F1 500
F2
1000
1500
2000
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency-based criteria for control of vibrations require methods to predict both peak
particle velocity (PPV) in Fig. 2.16 and principal frequency (PF) in Fig. 2.17.
Prediction of PPV can be approached from scaling relations which are often associated with
blasting in rock or soil. Scaling describes decay with distance that is normalized (hence
scaled) by the source energy, and is most useful when the same source at the same distance
may release variable energies, as in blasting and dynamic compaction activities.
When comparing blast wave the concept of scale distance is commonly used. Scale distance is
a comparative measure which can be used to scale down the amount of explosive needed to
create the same blast wave. This is useful in experimental testing as large blasts can be
simulated by locating a smaller charge weight at a closer distance to the specimen. The
relationship given for calculating scale distance:
R
W
m/kg1/3
where R is the blast range in metres and W is the equivalent weight of TNT in kilograms. This
relationship has been used in this study to scale down potential explosive loads to a scale that
can be analysed in a blast chamber.
Blast Range
0.5 m
Blast Range
1m
Blast Range
10 m
1.000
0.296
0.125
0.064
0.037
0.016
8.000
2.370
1.000
0.512
0.296
0.125
8000.0
2370.4
1000.0
512.0
296.3
125.0
0.1
0.01
0.1
10
100
1/3
0.1
0.01
0.1
R
PPV = A 1/ 3
Q
10
100
1/3
(2-36)
Fig. 2.16. PPV attenuation with scaled charge weights and radical distance
16
Principal frequency Hz
1000
100
10
0.1
10
1/3
R
PF = B 1/ 3
Q
(2-37)
17
The shock front, termed the blast wave, is characterized by an almost instantaneous rise from
ambient pressure to a peak incident pressure Pso (also called overpressure, see Figure). At any
point away from the blast, the pressure disturbance has the shape shown in Fig. 2.19. The
shock front arrives at a given location at time tA and, after the rise to the peak value, Pso the
incident pressure decays to the ambient value in time to which is the positive phase duration.
This is followed by a negative phase with a duration to- that is usually much longer than the
positive phase and characterized by a negative pressure (below ambient pressure)
Important parameters:
Peak overpressure Pso
Duration
Impulse
Arrive time
The incident impulse density associated with the blast wave is the integrated area under the
pressure-time curve and is is denoted as for the positive phase and iS- is- for the negative
phase.
Other parameters:
Peak dynamic pressure (Blast wind)
Shock front velocity U or C
Blast wave length Lw
18
When the shock wave impinges on a surface oriented so that a line which describes the path of
travel of the wave is normal to the surface, then the point of initial contact is said to sustain
the maximum (normal reflected) pressure and impulse. Fig. 2.22 shows possitive and negative
phase shock wave parameters for a spherical TNT explosion in free air at see level. Fig. 2.23
presents reflected pressure as a function of angle of incidence.
Figure 2-7. Positive phase shock wave parameters for a
spherical TNT explosion in free air at sea level
1.E+5
Pr, psi
Pso, psi
Ir, psi-ms/lb^(1/3)
Is, psi-ms/lb^(1/3)
ta, ms/lb^(1/3)
to, ms/lb^(1/3)
U, ft/ms
Lw, ft/lb^(1/3)
10000
1000
100
10
1.0
0.1
.01
.001
0.1
1.0
10
100
Fig. 2.22. Possitive and negative phase shock wave parameters for a spherical TNT explosion in free
air at see level
19
1.E+5
Pra (psi)
10000
1000
100
10
1.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Example
For Q = 1.1 tonne and H = 90m, determine peak overpressure Pso, peak reflected pressure Pr,
duration t0, arrival time ta, shock wave velocity U.
20
3. Surface explosion
A charge located on the ground surface is considered to be a surface burst as shown in Fig.
2.24. The initial wave of the explosion is reflected and reinforced by the ground surface to
produce a reflected wave. Unlike the air burst, the reflected wave merges with the incident
wave at the point of detonation to form a single wave, similar to the mach wave of the air
burst but essentially hemispherical in shape. Fig. 2.25. Possitive and negative phase shock wave
parameters for a hemispherical TNT explosion on the surface at see level
1.E+5
10000
1000
100
10
1.0
0.1
.01
.001
0.1
1.0
10
100
Fig. 2.25. Possitive and negative phase shock wave parameters for a hemispherical TNT explosion on
the surface at see level
The air burst environment (see Fig. 2.26) is produced by detonations which occur above the
ground surface and a distance away from the protective structure so that the initial shock
wave, propagating away from the explosion, impinges on the ground surface prior to arrival
at the structure. As the shock wave continues to propagate outward along the ground surface ,
21
a front known as the Mach front is formed by the interaction of the initial wave and the
reflected wave as shown in Fig. 2.27.
The height of the Mach front increases as the wave propagates away from the center of the
detonation. This increase in height is referred to as the path of the triple point and is formed
by the intersection of the initial, reflected and Mach waves as shown in Fig. 2.28 and Fig.
2.29. A protected structure is considered to be subjected to a plane wave when the height of
the triple point exceeds the height of the structure. If the height of the triple point does not
extend above the height of the structure, the magnitude of the applied loads will vary above
the height of the structure.
22
10
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
6
7
0
2
10
12
14
16
18
23
H
W
Blast wave
the
explosion and the ground surface (above, flush with Fig. 2.30 Blast loading on a structure
or below the ground.
The procedures presented here for the determination of the external blast loads on structures
are restricted to rectangular structures positioned above the ground surface where the structure
will be subjected to a plane wave shock front as shown in Fig. 2.31 and Fig. 2.32.
The forces acting on a structure associated with a plane shock wave are dependent upon both
the peak pressure and the impulse of the incident and dynamic pressures acting in the free
field. For design purposes, it is necessary to establish the variation or decay of both the
incident and dynamic pressures with time since the effects on the structure subjected to a blast
loading depend upon the intensity-time history of the loading as well as on the peak intensity.
24
3S
U
(2-38)
P = PS +CDq
(2-41)
25
Peak dynamic
0--0.172
pressure
(MPa)
(MPa)
Drag coefficient CD -0.4
(2-41)
0.172--0.344 0.344--0.896
(MPa)
(MPa)
-0.3
-0.2
Example
The dimensions of the building are 20m*10m*3m. Determine blast loading on the
components of the building subjected to an explosion 1000 lb at the scaled distance of 3
m/kg1/3. The blast wave will be applied normal to the long side of the building. It is assumed
that the peak incident pressure and duration do not change significantly over the length of the
building.
10m
3m
20m
blast
26
(2-43)
The interaction of the incident blast wave with a structure is a complicated process. To reduce
the complex problem of blast to reasonable terms, it will be assumed that (1) the structure is
generally rectangular in shape; (2) the incident pressure of interest is 1.4 MPa or less; (3) the
structure being loaded is in the region of the Mach stem; and (4) the Mach stem extends above
the height of the building (see Fig. 2.38).
27
4S
(1 + R )Cr
(2-44)
(2-45)
(2-46)
whichever curve gives the smallest value of the impulse (area under curve)
28
12
10.5
Cr = Pr / Pso
7.5
4.5
1.5
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
d
D
td =
D
U
Fig. 2.41 Average pressure-time variation for roof and side wall
29
The peak value of the pressure acting on the roof PR is the sum of contribution of the
equivalent uniform pressure and drag pressure
PR = CEPsof +CDqof
(2-47)
where Psof is the incidental pressure occurring at point f and q is the dynamic pressure
corresponding to CE Pof. CE is equivalent load factor. The drag coefficient CD for the roof
and side walls is a function of the peak dynamic pressure. Recommended values are as shown
in Fig. 2.42.
Fig. 2.42 The equivalent load factor CE and location of the peak equivalent uniform pressure vs
wavelength-span ratio
Rear walls
The blast loads on the rear wall is calculated using equivalent uniform method used for computing the
blast loads on the roof and side wall as shown in Fig. 2.43. The peak pressure of the equivalent uniform
pressure-time curve is calculated using the peak pressure Psob. The equivalent uniform load factors CE
are based on the wave length of the peak pressure and the height of the rear wall HS as are the time rises
and duration of both the positive and negative phase.
Like the roof and side walls, the blast
loads acting on the rear wall are a function
of the drag pressures in addition to the
incident pressure. The dynamic pressure
of the drag corresponds to that associated
with the equivalent pressure CEPsob, while
the recommended drag coefficients are the
same as used for the roof and side walls.
PR = CEPsob +CDqob
30
In the following paragraphs of this section, a simple cantilever barrier as well as cubicletype
and containment type structures will be discussed. The cubicles are assumed to have one or
31
more surfaces which are open or frangible while the containment structures are either totally
enclosed or have small size openings. The effects of the inertia of frangible elements of these
structures will be discussed in subsequent sections.
50
6.2 Shock Pressures.
6.2.1 Blast Loadings.
When an explosion occurs within a cubicle or containment-type structure, the peak
pressures as well as the impulse associated with the shock front will be extremely high and
will be amplified by the confining structure. Because of the close-in effects of the explosion
and the reinforcement of blast pressures due to the reflections within the structure, the
distribution of the shock loads on any one surface will be nonuniform with the structural
surface closest to the explosion subjected to the maximum load.
An approximate method for the calculation of the internal shock pressures has been developed
using theoretical procedures based on semi-empirical blast data and on the results of response
tests on slabs. The calculated average shock pressures have been compared with those
obtained from the results of tests of a scale-model steel cubicle and have shown good
agreement for a wide range of cubicle configurations. This method consists of the
determination of the peak pressures and impulses acting at various points of each interior
surface and then integrating to obtain the total shock load. In order to simplify the calculation
of the response of a protective structure wall to these applied loads, the peak pressures and
total impulses are assumed to be uniformly distributed on the surface. The peak average
pressure and the total average impulse are given for any wall surface. The actual distribution
of the blast loads is highly irregular, because of the multiple reflections and time phasing and
results in localized high shear stresses in the element. The use of the average blast loads, when
designing, is predicated on the ability of the element to transfer these localized loads to
regions of lower stress. Reinforced concrete with properly designed shear reinforcement and
steel plates exhibit this characteristic.
The parameters which are necessary to determine the average shock loads are the structure's
configuration and size, charge weight, and charge location. Figure 2-45 shows many possible
simple barriers, cubicle configurations, and containment type structures as well as the
definition of the various parameters pertaining to each. Surfaces depicted are not frangible for
determining the shock loadings.
Because of the wide range of required parameters, the procedure for the determination of the
shock loads was programmed for solutions on a digital computer. The results of these
calculations are presented in UFC (Figures 2-52 to 2-100) for the average peak reflected
pressures pr (Figures 2-101 through 2-149) in UFC for the average scaled unit impulse ir/W1/3.
These shock loads are presented as a function of the parameters defining the configurations
presented in Figure 2-45. Each illustration is for a particular combination of values of h/H, l/L,
and N reflecting surfaces adjacent to the surface for which the shock loads are being
calculated. The wall (if any) parallel and opposite to the surface in question has a negligible
contribution to the shock loads for the range of parameters used and was therefore not
considered.
The general procedure for use of the above illustrations is as follows:
51
32
1. From Figure 2-45, select the particular surface of the structure which conforms to the
protective structure given and note N of adjacent reflecting surfaces as indicated in
parenthesis.
2. Determine the values of the parameters indicated for the selected surface of the
structure in Item 1 above and calculate the following quantities: h/H, l/L, L/H, L/RA,
and ZA = RA/W1/3.
3. Refer to Table 2-3 for the proper peak reflected pressure and impulse charts
conforming to the number of adjacent reflected surfaces and the values of l/L and h/H
of Item 2 above, and enter the charts to determine the values of pr and ir/W1/3.
In most cases, the above procedure will require interpolation for one or more of the
parameters which define a given situation, in order to obtain the correct average reflected
pressure and average reflected impulse. Examples of this interpolation procedure are given in
Appendix 2A.
Because of the limitations in the range of the test data and the limited number of values of the
parameters given in the above shock load charts, extrapolation of the data given in UFC (in
Figures 2-52 through 2-149) may be required for some of the parameters involved. However,
the limiting values as given in the charts for other parameters will not require extrapolation.
The values of the average shock loads corresponding to the values of the parameters, which
exceed their limiting values (as defined by the charts), will be approximately equal to those
corresponding to the limiting values. The following are recommended procedures which will
be applicable in most cases for either extrapolation or establishing the limits of impulse loads
corresponding to values of the various parameter which exceed the limits of the charts:
33
2-45
34
1. To extrapolate beyond the limiting values of ZA, plot a curve of values of pr versus ZA
for constant values of L/RA, L/H, h/H and l/L. Extrapolate curve to include the value of
pr corresponding to the value of ZA required. Repeat similarly for value of ir /W1/3.
2. To extrapolate beyond the limiting values of L/RA, extrapolate the given curve of pr
versus L/RA for constant values of ZA, L/H, h/H and l/L to include the value of pr
corresponding to the value of L/RA required. Repeat this extrapolation for value of ir
/W1/3.
3. Values of pr and ir /W1/3 corresponding to values of L/H greater than 5 shall be taken as
equal to those corresponding to L/H = 6 for actual values of ZA, h/H, and l/L but with a
fictitious value of L/RA in which RA is the actual value and L is a fictitious value equal
to 5H.
4. Values of pr and ir /W1/3 corresponding to values of l/L less than 0.10 and greater than
0.75 shall be taken as equal to those corresponding to l/L = 0.10 and 0.75, respectively.
5. Values of pr and ir /W1/3 corresponding to values of h/H less than 0.10 and greater than
0.75 shall be taken as equal to those corresponding to h/H = 0.10 and 0.75,
respectively.
A protective element subjected to high intensity shock pressures may be designed for the
impulse rather than the pressure pulse only if the duration of the applied pressure acting on the
element is short in comparison to its response time. However, if the time to reach maximum
displacement is equal to or less than three times the load duration, then the pressure pulse
should be used for these cases. The actual pressure-time relationship resulting from a pressure
distribution on the element is highly irregular because of the multiple reflections and time
phasing. For these cases, the pressuretime relationship may be approximated by a fictitious
peak triangular pressure pulse. The average peak reflected pressure of the pulse is obtained in
UFC (from Figures 2-52 through 2-100) and the average impulse in UFC (from Figure 2-101
through 2-149) and a fictitious duration is established as a function of the reflected pressure pr
and impulse ir acting on the element.
(2-48)
to = 2ir / pr
The above solution for the average shock load does not account for increased blast effects
produced by contact charges. Therefore, if the values of the average shock loads given in UFC
(in Figures 2-52 through 2-149) are to be applicable, a separation distance between the
element and explosive must be maintained. This separation is measured between the surface
of the element and the surface of either the actual charge or the spherical equivalent,
whichever results in the larger normal distance between the element's surface and the center of
the explosive (the radius of a spherical TNT charge is r = 0.136 W1/3). For the purposes of
design, the following separation distances are recommended for various charge weights:53
35
The above separation distances do not apply to floor slabs or other similar structural elements
placed on grade. However, a separation distance of at least one foot shouldbe maintained to
minimize the size of craters associated with contact explosions.
It should be noted that these separation distances do not necessarily conform to those specified
by other government regulations; their use in a particular design must be approved by the
cognizant military construction agency.
Average shock loads over entire wall or roof slabs were discussed above. An approximate
method may be used to calculate shock loads over surfaces other than an entire wall. These
surfaces might include a blast door, panel, column, or other such items found inside any
shaped structure.
The method assumes a fictitious strip centered in front of the charge having a width equal to
the normal distance RA and a height equal to that of the structure. This is the maximum
representative area that may be considered. Average shock loads can be determined on entire
area or any surface falling within the boundaries of the representative area.
The procedure for determining the shock loads consists of partitioning the surface under
consideration into subareas. These subareas do not need to be the same size. The angle of
incidence to the center of each subarea is calculated. The reflected pressure and scaled
impulse are determined for each subarea using Figure 2-25, respectively. A weighted average
with respect to area is taken for both pressure and scaled impulse.
Both the pressure and the impulse are multiplied by a factor of 1.75 to account for
secondary shocks.
36
A typical pressure-time record at a point on the interior surface of a partially vented chamber
is shown in UFC (in Figure 2-151 in UFC). The high peaks are the multiple reflections
associated with shock pressures. The gas pressure, denoted as pg, is used as the basis for
design and is a function of the charge weight and the contained net volume of thechamber.
UFC (Figure 2-152 in UFC) shows an experimentally fitted curve based upon test results of
partially vented chambers with small venting areas where the vent properties ranged between:
(2-49)
0 Af /V2/3 0.022
The values of A and Vf are the chamber's total vent area and free volume which is equal to the
total volume minus the volume of all interior equipment, structural elements, etc. The
maximum gas pressure, Pg, is plotted against the charge weight to free volume ratio.
UFC (Figures 2-153 through 2-164 in UFC) provides the relationship of the gas pressure
scaled impulse ig /W1/3 as a function of the charge weight to free volume ratio W/Vf, scaled
value of the vent opening A/Vf 2/3, the scaled unit weight of the cover WF/W1/3 over the
opening, and the scaled average reflected impulse ir /W1/3 of the shock pressures acting on the
frangible wall or a non-frangible wall with a vent opening. The curves in UFC (in Figures 2153 through 2-164 in UFC) for WF/W1/3 = 0 were obtained from data with A/Vf 2/3 1.0.
Extrapolated values, for which there is less confidence, are dashed. Curves for WF/W1/3 > 0 are
not dashed at A/Vf 2/3 > 1.0 because they are not strongly dependent on the extrapolated portion
of the curve for WF/W1/3 = 0. Even lightweight frangible panels displace slowly enough that
the majority of the gas impulse is developed before significant venting (A/Vf 2/3 > 1) can
occur.) For a full containment type structure the impulse of the gas pressure will be infinite in
comparison to the response time of the elements (long duration load). For near containment
type structures where venting is permitted through vent openings without covers, then the
impulse loads of the gas pressures are determined using the scaled weight of the cover equal
to zero. The impulse loads of the gas pressures corresponding to scaled weight of the cover
greater than zero relates to frangible covers and will be discussed later. The effects on the gas
pressure impulse caused by the shock impulse loads will vary. The gas impulse loads will
have greater variance at lower shock impulse loads than at higher loads. Interpolation will be
required for the variation of gas impulse as a function of the shock impulse loads. This
interpolation can be performed in a manner similar to the interpolation for the shock
pressures.
The actual duration and the pressure-time variation of the gas pressures is not required for the
analysis of most structural elements. Similar to the shock pressures, the actual pressure-time
relationship can be approximated by a fictitious peak triangular pulse. The peak gas pressure
is obtained in UFC (from Figure 2-152 in UFC) and the impulse in UFC (from Figures 2-153
through 2-164 in UFC) and the fictitious duration is calculated from the following:
tg = 2ig / Pg
(2-50)
58
UFC (Figure 2-165a in UFC) illustrates an idealized pressure-time curve considering both the
shock and gas pressures. As the duration of the gas pressures approaches that of the shock
pressures, the effects of the gas pressures on the response of the elements diminishes until the
duration of both the shock and gas pressures are equal and the structure is said to be fully
vented.
If a chamber is relatively small and/or square in plan area then the magnitude of the gas
pressure acting on an individual element will not vary significantly. For design purposes the
gas pressures may be considered to be uniform on all members. When the chamber is quite
37
long in one direction and the explosion occurs at one end of the structure, the magnitude of
the gas pressures will initially vary along the length of the structure. At the end where the
explosion occurs, the peak gas pressure is Pg1 (Figure 2-165bin UFC) which after a finite time
decays to Pg2, and finally decays to zero. The gas pressure Pg2 is based on the total volume of
the structure and is obtained in UFC (from Figure 2-152 in UFC) while the time for this
pressure to decay to zero is calculated from Equation 2-4 where the impulse is obtained in
UFC (from Figures 2-153 through 2-164 in UFC) again for the total volume of the structure.
The peak gas pressure Pg1 is obtained in UFC (from Figure 2-152 in UFC) based on a pseudo
volume in UFC (Figure 2-165bin UFC) whose length is equal to its width and the height is the
actual height of the structure. The time tp for the gas pressure to decay from Pg1 to Pg2 is taken
as the actual length of the structure minus the width divided by the velocity of sound (1.12
fpms). At the end where the explosion occurs, the peak gas pressures (Pg1, Figure 2-165b in
UFC) will be a maximum and, after a finite time, they will decay to a value (Pg2, Figure 2165b in UFC) which is consistent with full volume of the structure; after which they will
decay to zero. The magnitude of the peak gas pressures (Pg1) may be evaluated by utilizing in
UFC (Figure 2-152 in UFC) and a pseudo volume whose length is equal to its width and the
height is the actual height of the chamber. The length of time tp between the two peak gas
pressures may be taken as the length minus the width of the structure divided by the velocity
of sound.
UFC
38
Chapter 3
Structural Dynamics (Single Degree of Freedom Model)
3.1 Analysis of Free Vibrations
3.1.1 Single Degree-of-Freedom system
The structures modelled as systems with a single displacement coordinate as shown Fig. 3.1 called Single
Degree Of Freedom System
fD(t)
fS(t)
fI(t)
y(t)
y(t)
..
Then
(3-1)
m&y& + cy& + ky = p (t )
(3-2)
(3-3)
or
(m 2 + k ) A cos t = 0
k
2 =
= k /m
m
Thus the solution is y = A cos t + B sin t . The velocity is
Initial conditions
t = 0, y = y0
y& =v 0
(3-4)
and A = y0 , B = v0 /
39
y = y0 cos t +
v0
sin t
(3-5)
(3-6)
(3-7)
(3-8)
c
k
c
2m
2m m
General solution is give by the superposition of the two possible solutions:
s1, 2 =
(3-9)
(3-10)
k
ccr
=0
m
2m
The roots of this quadratic equation
General solution:
ccr = 2 km
s1, 2 =
(3-11)
ccr
2m
y = (C1 + C2t )e ( ccr / 2 m ) t
It should be noted that for the overdamped system and the critical damped system, the
resulting motion is not oscillatory; the magnitude of the oscillation decays exponentially with
time to zero.
2m
m 2m
40
(3-13)
For this case, it is convenient to make use of Eulers equations which relate exponential and
trigonometric functions:
D =
in which
k c
m 2m
D = 1 2
c
ccr
t = 0, y = y0
= k /m
y& =v 0
y = e t ( y 0 cos D t +
Alternatively,
where
C=
v0 + y 0
y = Ce t cos( D t )
y02 +
(3-14)
(v0 + y0 )2
2
D
tan =
(3-15)
sin D t )
| v0 + y0 |
D y0
TD =
1 2
In practice, the natural frequency for a damped system may be taken to be equal to the
undamped natural frequency. Fig. 3.2 shows free vibration response with under-critically
damped system.
y(t)
Ce t
y0
y = Ce t cos( D t )
y2 = ce t2
y1 = ce t1
Logarithmic decrement :
= ln
y1
ce t1
= ln t2 = T D
y2
ce
41
TD =
1
For small damp ratio:
2
2
1 2
y(t)
Tangent points
[cos( Dt ) = 1]
ce t
y1
y2
Fig. 3.3 Curve showing peak displacement and displacements at points of tangency
(3-16)
yc (t ) = A cos t + B sin t
Particular solution:
3-17)
y p (t ) = Y sin t
m 2Y sin t + kY sin t = F 0sin t
Y=
where =
F0
F /k
= 0 2
2
k m
1
(3-18)
the ratio of the applied forced frequency to the natural frequency of vibration of the
system
Fig. 3.4 a: Undampeted harmionic excited SDOF system. b: Free body diagram
42
y (t ) = yc (t ) + y p (t )
General solution:
y (t ) = A cos t + B sin t +
F0 / k
sin t
1 2
A= 0
(3-19)
B =
F0 / k
1 2
F0 / k
(sin t sin t )
1 2
(3-20)
Since in a practical case, damping will cause the last term to vanish eventually. The forcing
frequency term (transient response) is
y (t ) =
F0 / k
sin t = Y sin t
1 2
(3-21)
F0/k = yst is the displacement which would be produced by the load F0 applied statically
D=
Y
1
=
y st 1 2
is the dynamic magnification factor (DMF) representing the amplification factor of the
harmonically applied loading. It can be seen, when forcing frequency is equal to the natural
frequency, the amplitude of the motion becomes infinitely large. In this case, the system is said at
resonance.
Particular solution:
Follow Eulers relation:
m&y& + cy& + ky = F 0e it
(3-23)
sin t
y p = Ce it
Particular solution:
mC 2 ei t + icCei t + kCei t = F0 ei t
C=
F0
k m + ic
2
(3-24)
F0 eit
yp =
k m 2 + ic
k m
+ ic =
(k m
) + ( c ) 2 e i
43
yp =
F0 e it
yp =
( k m 2 ) 2 + ( c ) 2 e i
F0 ei (t )
(k m ) + (c )
2 2
tan =
c
k m 2
yp =
(3-25)
(k m 2 ) 2 + (c ) 2
or
y p = Y sin(t )
Y=
where
Y=
F0
(k m 2 ) 2 + (c ) 2
y st
yp =
(1 2 ) 2 + ( 2 ) 2
tan =
2
1 2
yst = F0 / k
c
ccr
General solution:
y (t ) = e t ( A cos Dt + B sin D t ) +
y st sin(t )
(1 2 ) 2 + (2 ) 2
=
y st sin(t )
(1 2 ) 2 + (2 ) 2
(3-26)
Y
1
=
yst
(1 2 ) 2 + (2 ) 2
(3-27)
D=
Y
1
=
yp
(1 2 ) 2 + (2 ) 2
44
tan =
2
1 2
y(t) = y0 cost +
v0
sint +
1 t
F( ) sin(t )d
m 0
(3-28)
45
Fig. 3.7 Response of undampted SDOF system to a suddenly applied constant force
F0
(3-30)
(1 cos t d )
k
F
vd = 0 sin t d
(3-31)
k
For the response after time td, it follows free
vibrations.
yd =
y = y0 cos t +
v0
sin t
(3-32)
Fig. 3.8
y (t ) =
F0
F
(1 cos t d ) cos (t t d ) + 0 sin t d sin (t t d )
k
k
y(t ) =
F0
[cos(t td ) cost )]
k
If the dynamic load factor (DLF) is defined as the displacement at any time t divided by static
displacement
DLF = 1 cos t
or
t
DLF = 1 cos 2 '
T
t td
t td
t td
t t
t
DLF = cos 2 ( d ) cos 2 '
T T
T
t td
(3-33)
46
F ( ) = F0 1
td
(3-34)
y0 = 0
v0 = 0
1 t
F ( ) sin (t )d
m 0
(3-35)
Fig. 3.9
(3-36)
y
sin( 2t / T ) t
= 1 cos( 2t / T ) +
y st
2t d / T
td
t td
(3-37)
yd =
F0 sin t d
cos t d
k t d
vd =
F0
cos t d 1
sin t d +
(3-38)
k
td
td
(3-39)
DLF
or
F0
(sin t sin (t t d ) ) F0 cos t
kt d
k
1
(sin t sin ( t t d )) cos t
td
DLF =
(3-40)
(3-41)
1
t
t t
t
(sin 2 sin 2 ( d )) cos 2
2td / T
T
T T
T
y (t ) =
1 t
F ( ) sin (t )d
m 0
y (t ) = sin t
or
1 t
1 t
F ( ) cos d cos t
F ( ) sin d
m 0
m 0
(3-42)
(3-43)
47
F()
where
A(t ) =
1
F ( ) cos d
m 0
t
B (t ) =
1
F ( ) sin d
m 0
t
F0
F1
F3
F4
F2
F5
F6
v() = F()cos
v2
v3
v0
v4
v1
0
v6
A( t n ) =
(v0 + v1 + ... + vn 1 )
m
Simple summation:
Trapezoidal rule:
A(t n ) =
A(t n ) =
Simpson rule:
n = 1, 2, 3,
(3-44)
(3-45)
n = 1, 2, 3,
(3-46)
n = 2, 4, 6,
Using any of these equations, A(t) can be obtained directly for any specific value of n
indicated. However, usually the entire time-history of response is required so that one
must evaluate A(t) for successive values of n until the desired time-history of response is
obtained. For this purpose, it is more efficient to use these equations in their recursive
forms:
Simple summation:
A ( t i ) = A ( t i 1 ) +
v i 1
i = 1, 2, 3,
(3-47)
m
(vi 1 + vi )
2m
Trapezoidal rule:
A(ti ) = A(ti 1 ) +
Displacement response:
y ( t n ) = A ( t n ) sin t n B ( t n ) cos t n
i= 1, 2, 3,
(3-48)
(3-49)
Example
Determine the dynamic response of a tower subjected to a blast loading. The idealization of
the structure and the blast loading are shown in Fig. Neglecting damping.
y(t)
F(t)
F(t)
48
(3-50)
(3-51)
FI+ FD+ FS = F
(3-52)
(3-53)
F = F(ti+t) - F(ti)
FI+ FD+ FS = F
If assuming the damping force is a function
of the velocity and the spring force a
function of displacement as shown
graphically in Fig. while the inertia force
remain proportional to the acceleration, the
incremental forces can be expressed as
FI = m&y&i
Nonlinear stiffness
FD = ci y& i
Nonlinear damping
FS = ki yi
.
where the incremental displacement yi, incremental velocity
yi, and incremental ..
acceleration yi are given by
yi = y(ti+t) - y(ti)
.
.
.
yi = y(ti+t) - y(ti)
.. ..
..
yi = y(ti+t) - y(ti)
m&y&i + ci y& i + ki yi = Fi
(3-54)
(3-55)
&y&i
(t ti )
t
(3-56)
t
(3-57)
m&y&i + ci y& i + ki yi = Fi
Fig. 3.13 Linear acceleration method
49
y (t ) = yi + y& (t t i ) +
1
1 &y&i
&y&i (t ti ) 2 +
(t t i ) 3
2
6 t
(3-58)
(3-59)
(3-60)
From yi = y& i t +
Substitute
&y&i =
1
1
&y&i t 2 + &y&i t 2
2
6
&y&i =
6
6
yi
y& i 3 &y&i
2
t
t
y& i =
to
6
6
yi
y& i 3 &y&i
2
t
t
(3-61)
1
y& i = &y&i t + &y&i t
2
(3-62)
. t &y&
3
y i 3 yi
i
t
2
(3-63)
m&y&i + ci y& i + k i yi = Fi
(3-64)
6
t
6
3
&y&i + k i yi = Fi
m 2 yi
y& i 3 &y&i + ci yi 3 yi
t
2
t
(3-65)
and Fi is the effective incremental force Fi = Fi + m y& i + 3 &y&i + ci 3 y& i + &y&i (3-67)
t
The equation
ki yi = Fi
y& i =
yi =
Fi
ki
yi +1 = yi + yi
3
t
y i 3 yi &y&i
.
t
2
(3-67)
(3-68)
(3-69)
(3-70)
..
The acceleration yi+1 at the end of the time step is obtained directly from the differential
equation of motion
1
&y&i +1 = {F (ti +1 ) FD (ti +1 ) FS (ti +1 )}
m
(3-71)
50
After the displacement, velocity and acceleration have been determined at time ti+1, the
outlined procedure is repeated to calculate these quantities at the following time step ti+2
and the process is continued to any desired final value of time.
yt = Rt / k
yc = Rc / k
(3-72)
y c < y < yt
If the displacement y increases to yt, the system begins to behave plastically in tension along
.
.
curve T as shown; it remains on curve T as long as the velocity y > 0. When y < 0, the system
reverses to elastic behaviour on a curve such as E1 with new yielding point given by
yt = ymax
yc = ymax ( Rt Rc ) / k
(3-73)
yt = ymin + ( Rt Rc ) / k
yc = ymin
(3-74)
R = Rt
(3-75)
R = Rc
ki = ki +
6m 3ci
+
t 2 t
t
6
51
(3-76)
(3-77)
(3-78)
(3-79)
52
(3-80)
(3-81)
(3-82)
(3-83)
(3-84)
(3-85)
(3-86)
(3-87)
(3-88)
(3-89)
53
Example
To illustrate the hand calculation in applying the step-by-step integration method described above, consider the
single degree-of-freedom system in Fig. 7.5 with elastoplastic behavour subjected to loading history as shown.
For this example, we assume that the damping coefficient remains constant ( = 0.087). Hence the only
nonlinearities in the system arise from the changes in stiffness as yielding occurs.
54
M&y& + Ky = p (t )
y
p (t)
R = KX
M
L
However, the analysis of most real systems requires the use of more complicated
idealization. In the case of structures having distributed elasticity, the SDOF shape
restriction is merely an assumption because the distributed elasticity actually permits an
infinite variety of displacement patterns to occur. However, when the system motion is
limited to a single form of deformation, it only has a SDOF in a mathematical sense.
Therefore, when the generalized mass, damping, and stiffness properties associated with
this degree of freedom have been evaluated, the structure may be analyzed in the same way
as a true SDOF system.
FE
x
M
KE
x
ME
L
L
55
KL = FE /F
The load factor is derived by setting the external work done by the equivalent load FE on
the equivalent system equal to the external work done by the actual load F on the actual
element deflecting to the assumed deflected shape. For a structure with distributed loads;
L
WD = FE max = p ( x) ( x)dx
0
where
max =
p(x) =
(x) =
L=
Elastic
(3-91)
p (t)
x
M
rearranging
FE
x
max
L
FE = p ( x) ( x)dx
(3-92)
It should be noted that the shape function, (x) is different for the elastic range and the
plastic range and therefore the load factor, KL, will be different.
For example; the shape factor for a simply supported beam with a uniformly distributed
load, in the elastic rangers is defined as
max =
=
5 p ( x ) L4
384 EI
( x) =
p( x) 3
( L x 2 Lx 3 + x 4 )
24 EI
(3-93)
( x) p( x) 3
384 EI
16
=
( L 2 Lx 2 + x 3 )
= 4 ( L3 x 2 Lx 3 + x 4 )
4
max 24 EI
5 p ( x) L 5 L
(3-93)
max = ( L / 2) tan
( x) =
Then
( x) = x tan
( x)
x tan
=
= 2x / L
max ( L / 2) tan
FE =
p ( x ) ( x ) dx
(3-94)
(3-95)
KL = FE /F
(3-96)
56
Example
Elastic Response
p (t)
x
M
L
Plastic Response
p (t)
x
M
L
57
WD = FE max = Fr r
(3-97)
r =1
rearranging terms
FE = Frr
(3-98)
F1
FE
r =1
F2
r = r / max
ma
(3-99)
r =1
where
= natural circular frequency
m(x) = distributed mass per unit length
rearranging
ME
L
M E = m( x) 2 ( x)dx
0
(3-101)
(3-102)
where the shape function (x) is based on the deflected shape of the element due to the
applied loading and not to the distribution of the mass. Since the deflected shape of the
element is different for the elastic and plastic ranges, (x), and therefore KM, will also be
different.
58
For example:
m(x) = 0.1(kg-s2/m4)
L=10m
Elastic Response
p (t)
x
M
L
For example:
L = 10m
m(x) = 0.1(kg-s2/m4)/m
( x) =
Px
3L2 4 x 2
48 EI
( x) =
max =
PL3
48EI
( x ) Px(3L2 4 x 2 ) 48 EI
=
max
48 EI
PL3
= 3L2 x 4 x 3 / L3
59
M&y& + R ( y ) = p (t )
(3-103)
If the total resistance of the actual structural element is R and the equivalent total resistance of the
equivalent system is RE, the resistance factor KR is defined by the equation
(3-104)
KR = RE /R
To obtain the resistance factor, it is necessary to equate the strain energy of the structural
element, as computed from the assumed deflection shape, and the strain energy of the
equivalent single-degree-of-freedom system.
Since the resistance of an element is the internal force tending to restore the element to its
unloaded static position, it can be shown that the resistance factor KR must always equal the
load factor KL.
F - R = Ma
F - R = (KM /KL)Ma
or F
- R = KLMMa = Mea
(3-105)
(3-106)
(3-107)
when expressed in terms of the unit area of the element, Equation can be written as
f - r = KLMma = mea
(3-108)
Instead of computing the several factors above, the load-mass factors in the elastic and elasto-plastic
ranges can be determined by relating the primary mode of vibration of the member to that of an
equivalent single-degree-of-freedom system. In the plastic range, it can be assumed that neither the
moment nor the curvature changes between the plastic hinges under increasing deflection. This
behavior results in a linkage action, consideration of which can be used to evaluate the effective plastic
mass.
60
(3-109)
where
me =
KE =
The values used for the effective mass and stiffness for a particular element depends on the
allowable maximum deflection. When designing for completely elastic behavior, the elastic
stiffness is used. In all other cases the equivalent elasto-plastic stiffness, KE, is used. The
elastic value of the effective mass is used for the elastic range, while in the elasto-plastic
range the effective mass is the average of the elastic and elasto-plastic values.
61
62
Chapter 4
Resistance-Deflection Function and Dynamic Analysis
4.1 Static versus dynamic material response
Conventional loads such as wind and live
loads are applied relatively slowly to a
structure and remain constant for a relatively
long period of time compared to the
response of the structure. Blast loaded
structures experience a very rapid
application of the load and a corresponding
rapid rise in member stresses. This is
transient and will normally return to ambient
conditions in a short period of time.
Material response under dynamic loads is
markedly different than for static loads. As a
material is loaded rapidly, it cannot deform
at the same rate at which the load is applied.
This creates an increase in the stress level at
which yield occurs as well as the ultimate
stress achieved prior to rupture. As a fast
strain rate, a greater load is required to
produce the same deformation at a lower
strain rate
Fig. 4.1 Typical stress-strain curves for concrete and reinforcing steel
In general, the faster the material is deformed (strain rate) the greater the increase in
strength. The resulting strength increase allows members to develop structural resistance in
excess of their static capacity. This increase can be on the order of several times, thus it is
too significant to ignore these effects when computing flexural response. This effect is
accounted for in blast engineering by the use of a dynamic increase factor.
63
DIF = y s (1 + (log & + 3) 0.03438) / 0.01413 & <= 102 s-1 (4-1)
10
where
y s = 10 ( 6.156 s 2)
(4-3)
s = 1 (5 + 9 f cs / 10)
(4-4)
1
1
10
100
1000
10000
& is the strain rate (s-1) and fcs is compressive strength of concrete
Fig. 4.3 DIF for
concrete under compression
(MPa).
DIF values for any strength of concrete under tension are defined by Malvar and Crawford as:
&
DIF =
&S
0.03759
&
DIF = 0.0168
&S
& 1 s 1
1
3
(4-5)
(4-6)
& > 1 s 1
DIF values for any strength of steel are defined by Malvar and Crawford as:
DIF
&
= 4
10
(4-7)
= 0.074 0.040
fy
414
= 0.019 0.009
(4-8)
fy
414
(4-9)
64
The design curves for the DIF for the unconfined compressive strength of concrete and for
the yield stress of ASTM A 615, Grade 60, reinforcing steel, are given in Figure 4-9 and 410, respectively. The curves were derived from test data having a maximum strain rate of 10
x 10-3 in./in./msec. for concrete and 2.1 x 10-3 in./in./msec. for steel. Values taken from
these design curves are conservative estimates of DIF and safe for design purposes.
Figure 4-9 Design curve for DIF for
ultimate compressive strength of concrete
1.8
1.7
1.65
1.5
DIF, fdy / fy
1.5
1.35
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.05
0.9
1.E-6
1.1
1.E-5
1.E-4
.001
.01
1
1.E-6
1.E-5
1.E-4
.001
.01
0.1
Fig. 4.6
65
Reinforcing Bars
Concrete
Reinforcing Bars
Concrete
fdy/fy
fdu/fu
f'dc/f'c
fdy/fy
fdu/fu
f'dc/f'c
Bending
1.17
1.05
1.19
1.23
1.05
1.25
Diagonal
Tension
1.00
------
1.00
1.10
1.00
1.00
Direct Shear
1.10
1.00
1.10
1.10
1.00
1.10
Bond
1.17
1.05
1.00
1.23
1.05
1.00
Compression
1.10
------
1.12
1.13
------
1.16
M(k
N.m
)
Mu
My
Kp
K=
384 EI
3
5L
y
curvature
Fig. 4.6 Yield and ultimate moment capacity of a section
The ultimate unit resisting moment Mu of a rectangular section of width b with tension
reinforcement only is given by: Mu = (Asfds/b)[d - (a/2)] in which: a = Asfds/(0.85 b f'dc)
As = area of tension reinforcement within the width b
fds = dynamic design stress for reinforcement
d = distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of tension
reinforcement
a = depth of equivalent rectangular stress block
b = width of compression face
f'dc = dynamic ultimate compressive strength of concrete
66
Concrete
Steel
Steel
FRP
DIF
FRP
Steel
Compression
Tension
Concrete
Steel
(Stress)
F (Force)
Fp1
Fs1
Fc
ku
d
bar= y
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fs2
Fp2
To calculate the yield capacity of the section in Fig. 4.9(a), the strain in the tensile steel is
first set at its yield strain and an estimate of the neutral axis depth kud is made as in Fig.
4.9(b). From the strain diagram with a DIF value calculated from the strain rate diagram, a
stress profile can be derived as in Fig. 4.9(c) from which the longitudinal forces acting are
calculated as in Fig. 4.9(d). The neutral axis depth is varied until longitudinal equilibrium
is achieved and the moment capacity and curvature can be calculated.
In calculating the yield capacity of the retrofitted section, a check is required as to whether
the CFRP debonds before the steel yields. This was found not to be a factor in calculating
the yield capacity of an FRP NSM plated section due to the close proximity of the FRP to
the steel reinforcement and the relatively high debonding strain achieved using the NSM
technique. For example, the 20mm NSM plates used in the experimental tests in the Fig.
had an IC debonding strain of 0.0164 compared to the steel reinforcement yield strain of
0.0028. However for EB plates, a typical IC debonding strain for a 200mm wide FRP plate
would be 0.0016, which is lower than the steel reinforcement yield strain and implies that
the plate would debond before the member begins to yield. This need be discussed where
the use of EB plating options is analyzed.
67
(Strain)
<c
u
kud
k ud
(Strain)
k ud
(a)
<IC
<fr
(b)
IC/fr
(c)
d
(d)
Fig. 4.10 Flexural analysis of ultimate capacity concrete crushing and debonding
When calculating the ultimate capacity of the retrofitted section, there are three possible
failure mechanisms that can govern the ultimate capacity: (1) crushing of the concrete on
the compression face at a strain c of about 0.003 as shown in Fig. 4.10(b); (2) failure of
the FRP strips due to IC debonding at a plate strain of IC as in Fig. 4.10(c); (3) or failure of
the plate at a fracture strain of fr as shown Fig. 4.10d. A solution is found by pivoting
about each of these failure strains in turn to find the pivotal failure strain and its associated
failure strain profile which lies within the two remaining failure strains.
68
Resis
tance
(kN)
M(k
N.m
)
Mu
My
Kp
K=
Rult
Ryield
Kp
384 EI
3
5L
K
yult
yyield
curvature
Deflection (mm)
Neutral axis
t
Fig. 4.12 Moment-curature analysis of a section
For example, a RC beam with simple supports subjected to uniformly distributed loads needs
only one plastic hinge to develop the ultimate resistance of the element
L
Lh Lh
Plastic Hinge
2Lh
Fig. 4.13 Pleastic hinge to develop the ultimate resistance of the element
R yield = 8M yield / L
(4-10)
y yield = R yield / K
384 EI
K=
3
5L
Resis
tance
(kN)
Elastic Response:
Rult
Ryield
Kp
(4-11)
Plastic Response:
Rult = 8M ult / L
(4-12)
K
yult
yyield
Assuming the plastic hinge length to be 0.75 times the depth of the
specimen, the rotation in the member can be calculated by
Fig. 4.14 Resistance deflection curve
Lh
L
= ult dx
= ult Lh
yult =
0
2
Deflection (mm)
69
For the beam fixed at both ends, more plastic hinge is required
1. Elastic
2. Elastic-Plastic
3. Plastic
Elastic Response:
R y = 12M us / L
(4-13)
ye = R y / K e
Ke =
384 EI
L3
(4-14)
yu
ye
ye-p
Fig. 4.15 Resistance deflection curve for two end fixed beams
Elastic-Plastic Response:
Ru = 8( M us + M uc ) / L
K e p =
Ru R y
ye p y e
Ke p =
384 EI
5L3
(4-15)
Plastic Response:
Ru = 8( M us + M uc ) / L
Lh
= ult dx
0
= ult Lh
yult =
L
2
(4-16)
KE
XE
Fig. 4.16 Resistance deflection curve for fixed end beam with UDL
70
Energy Absorption
The importance of resistance-deflection curves is that the total energy absorption capacity of
a member can be found by calculating the area under the curve. This concept is extremely
useful in making comparisons of members capacities to resist blast loads.
2
ib
rX
m
= u E + a ru ( yult X E )
2ma
2
mu
(4-17)
where mu is equal to KLMmu (mu is plastic mass) ma is the average of the effective elastic and
plastic masses and XE the equivalent deflection. Ductility of the member is defined as yu/yy.
A
B
yyB
yuA
yyA
yuB
Slabs reinforced with steel bars at different reinforcement ratios will absorb energy differently.
40000.0
1200.0
35000.0
1000.0
0.50%
30000.0
1.00%
800.0
1.36%
1.47%
600.0
1.69%
2.01%
0.00%
400.0
0.28%
Resistance (kNmm)
Resistance (kN)
0.79%
25000.0
20000.0
15000.0
10000.0
200.0
5000.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
Deflection (mm)
50.0
60.0
70.0
0.0
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
Reinforcement Rate
71
72
Mp =
MN =
73
M&y& + R( y ) = p (t )
p (t)
x
ki yi = Fi
(4-18)
(4-19)
Resis
tance
(kN)
6m 3c
k i = ki + 2 + i
t
t
Rult
Ryield
K=
384 EI
3
5L
Kp =
1/2
Tn = 2(me/KE)
Rult R yield
yult y yield
1/2
= 2 (KLmMm/KE)
Kp
(4-20)
K
yult
yyield
Deflection (mm)
Numerical Integration
Initialise:
Determine the stiffness, K, mass, M, tension resistance, Rut, compression resistance, Ruc,
dampening coefficient, C, forcing function F(t), time increment, t, reaction resistance
coefficient, a, and reaction force coefficient, b.
For blast design, the dampening is usually set to zero.
To include the effects of static loads, the tension and compression resistance should be
adjusted accordingly.
At each time step (step = 0 to last), determine the value of the forcing function, F0...Flast.
For the initial time step (step = 0), initialize the displacement, velocity, acceleration, yield
displacements, and resistance.
74
y0
=
0
v0
=
0
a0
=
Fo/M
yt,0
=
Rut/K
yc,0
=
Ruc/K
R0
=
0
Initialise the response indicator, KEY,
0
(elastic)
KEYo =
For each time step: (step = i, beginning with i = 0)
Calculate the effective stiffness,
If (KEYi = 0) then Ki = K + (6/t2)M + (3/t)C
Other wise Ki = (6/t2)M + (3/t)C
Calculate the effective incremental force,
Fi = (Fi+1 Fi) + [ 6/t2)M + (3/t )C ] vi + [ (3)M + (t/2)C ] ai
Solve for the incremental displacement,
yi = Fi / Ki
Calculate the incremental velocity,
vi = (3/t)yi (3)vi (t/2)ai
Calculate displacement, an velocity at the next time step (step = i+1)
yi+1 = yi + yi
vi+1 = vi + vi
Determine the calculation case, Z, for the next time step, (Z is used as a switching
mechanism in selecting the appropriate formulas for KEY, yt, and yc)
If (KEYi < 0) and (vi+1 < 0) then Zi+1 = 1
If (KEYi < 0) then Zi+1 = 2
If (KEYi < 0) and (vi+1 > 0) then Zi+1 = 1
If (KEYi > 0) then Zi+1 = 3
If (yi+1 < yci) then Zi+1 = 5
If (yi+1 > yti) then Zi+1 = 6
Othersixe Zi+1 = 4
Determine the response indicator for the next time step,
then KEYi+1 = KEYi
(same as previous time step)
If ( Zi+1 = 1 or 4 )
If ( Zi+1 = 5 ) then KEYi+1 = -1 (plastic compression)
If ( Zi+1 = 6 ) then KEYi+1 = 1 (plastic tension)
Otherwise KEYi+1 = 0
(elastic)
Determine the tension yield displacement at the next time step,
If ( Zi+1 = 2) then yt,i+1 = yi + (Rut-Ruc)/K
If ( Zi+1 = 3) then yt,i+1 = yi+1
Otherwise yt,i+1 = yti,1
Determine the compression yield displacement at the next time step,
If ( Zi+1 = 2) then yc,i+1 = yi+1
If ( Zi+1 = 3) then yc,i+1 = yi - (Rut-Ruc)/K
Otherwise yc,i+1 = yci,1
75
Calculate the resistance at the next time step based on the value KEY,
If (KEYi+1 = 0)
then Ri+1 = Rt (yt,i+1 - yi+1)K
If (KEYi+1 = 1)
then Ri+1 = Rut
Otherwise Ri+1 = Ruc
Calculate the resistance at the next time step,
Ai+1 = [ Fi+1 (C) vi+1 - Ri+1 ] / M
Calculate the dynamic reaction,
Vi = (a)Ri + (b)Fi
Repeat the loop until the desired deformations are reached.
Fig. 4.21
76
Example
Determine the maximum response of a single-degree-of-freedom system subjected to dynamic load using
design charts.
Step 1. Given:
m = 2.5 Kips-sec2/ft
K = 9,860 Kips/ft
Ru = 750 Kips
XE = 0.076 ft
T = 0.10 sec
P = 1000 Kips
77
Chapter 5
Structural Design against Blast Loads
Fig. 5.1
For elements with shear reinforcement (single leg stirrups shown in Figure 5-2 or lacing shown
in Figure 5-3) which properly tie the flexural reinforcement, the crushing of the concrete
results in a slight loss of capacity since the compressive force is transferred to the compression
reinforcement. As the element is further deflected, the reinforcement enters into its strain
hardening region, and the resistance increases with increasing deflection. Single leg stirrups
will restrain the compression reinforcement for a short time into its strain hardening region. At
four (4) degrees support rotation, the element loses its structural integrity and fails. On the
other hand, lacing through its truss action will restrain the reinforcement through its entire
strain hardening region until tension failure of the reinforcement occurs at 12 degrees support
rotation.
79
Table 5-2
TYPE
OF
STRESS
Bending
Diagonal
Tension
Diagonal
Tension
Lacing
Compression
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Column
2<<5
fdy
f'dc
5 < < 12
0<<2
fdy
fdy
f'dc
f'dc
2<<5
fdy + (fdu-fdy)/4
f'dc
5 < < 12
0<<2
(fdy + fdu)/2
fdy
f'dc
f'dc
2<<5
5 < < 12
fdy + (fdu-fdy)/4
(fdy + fdu)/2
(3)
(3)
(4)
fdy
f'dc
80
Moment of Inertia
The determination of the deflection of a reinforced concrete member in the elastic and
elasto-plastic ranges is complicated by the fact that the effective moment of inertia of the
cross section along the element changes continually as cracking progresses. It is further
complicated by the fact that the modulus of elasticity of the concrete changes as the stress
increases. It is recommended that the computation of deflections throughout this volume be
based upon empirical relations determined from test data.
The average moment of inertia Ia should be used
in all deflection calculations and is given by
Ia =
I g + Ic
2
3
For the design of beams, the entire crossbTc
I
=
Ic = Fbd3
g
section is considered, so that
12
Ig =
Tc
12
Ic = Fd3
3
Fig. 5.5 Coefficient for moment of inertia of cracked sections with tension
reinforcement only
81
Fig. 5.6 Coefficient for moment of inertia of cracked sections with equal reinforcement
on both faces
Elements designed using the full cross section (type I) are usually encountered in those structures
or portions of structures designed to resist the blast output at the far design range. This type of
cross section is utilized in elements with maximum deflections corresponding to support rotations
less than 2 degrees.
82
Crushing of the concrete cover over the compression reinforcement is exhibited in elements
which undergo support rotations greater than 2 degrees. Sufficient compression reinforcement
must be available to fully develop the tension steel (tension and compression reinforcement
must be equal). Elements which sustain crushing of the concrete without any disengagement of
the concrete cover are encountered in structures at the far design range when the maximum
deflection conforms to support rotations greater than 2 degrees but less than 5 degrees.
Although the ultimate strength of elements with type III cross sections is no less than that of
elements with type II cross sections, the overall capacity to resist the blast output is reduced. The
spalling of the concrete cover over both layers of reinforcement, caused by either the direction
transmission of high pressures through the element at the close-in range or large deflections at the
far range, produces a loss of capacity due to the reduction in the concrete mass.
The above moment capacity can only be obtained when the areas of the tension and
compression reinforcement are equal. In addition, this reinforcement must be properly
restrained so as to maintain the integrity of the element when large deflections are
encountered.
83
vu = Vu/bd
and for type II and III sections from:
vu = Vu/bdc
(5-4)
where Vu is the total shear on a width b at either the face of the support, or at the section a distance d
(type I) or dc (types II or III) from the face of the support. For the latter case, the shear at sections
between the face of the support and the section d or dc away need not be considered critical.
The ultimate shear stress vu must not exceed 10 (f'dc) in sections using stirrups and 2 (f'dc) in
sections without stirrups.
The shear stress permitted on an unreinforced web of a member subjected to flexure only is limited to:
(5-5)
where is the reinforcement ratio of the tension requirement at the support. For the computation of the
reinforcement ratio, d is used for type I sections and dc for type II and III sections.
(5-6)
84
28m
3.66m
blast
85
Pure Compression
The ultimate dynamic strength of a short reinforced concrete column subjected to pure axial
load (no bending moments) is given by:
Po = 0.85 f'dc(Ag - Ast) + Ast fdy
(5-7)
Po =
maximum axial load
Ag =
gross area of section
Ast =
total area of reinforcing steel
A member subjected to pure axial compression is a hypothetical situation since all columns
are subjected to some moment due to actual load conditions. All tied columns must be
designed for a minimum load eccentricity. This minimum design situation is presented in a
subsequent section.
Pure Flexure
An interior column of a shear wall type structure cannot be subjected to pure flexure under
normal design conditions. For the purpose of plotting a P-M curve, the criteria presented for
beams is used.
87
Balanced Conditions
At balanced conditions, the eccentricity of the load is defined as eb, and is given by:
eb= Mb/Pb
(5-8)
eb = 0.20h + (1.54mAs)/b
and:
m = (fdy) / (0.85 f'dc)
eb =
h=
b=
As =
(5-9)
(5-10)
balanced eccentricity
depth of rectangular section
width of rectangular section
area of reinforcement on one face of the section
Fig. 5.11 Rectangular section with
equal reinforcement
For a circular section with spiral reinforcement, the balanced eccentricity is given by:
eb = (0.24 + 0.39 Tm) D
(5-11)
and: T = Ast/Ag
T =
Ast =
Ag =
D=
Compression Controls
When the ultimate eccentric load Pu exceeds the balanced value Pb, or when the eccentricity e
is less than the balanced value eb, the member acts more as a column than as a beam.
For a rectangular tied column with equal reinforcement on opposite faces (Fig. 5.11), the
ultimate axial load capacity at a given eccentricity is approximated by:
Pu =
As f dy
bhf 'dc
+
e
3he
+ 0 .5
+ 1.18
2d h
d2
(5-12)
88
Pu =
e=
As =
d=
h=
b=
For a circular section with spiral reinforcement, the ultimate axial load capacity at a given
eccentricity is approximated by:
Ast f dy
Ag f 'dc
+
Pu =
9.6 De
3e + 1.0
+ 1.18
Ds
(0.8 D + 0.67 Ds )2
(5-13)
Tension Controls
When the ultimate eccentric load Pu is less than the balance value Pb or when the eccentricity
e is greater than the balanced value eb, the member acts more as a beam than as a column.
For a rectangular tied column with equal reinforcement on opposite faces (Fig. 5.11), the
ultimate axial load capacity at a given eccentricity is approximated by:
1/ 2
2
e' (1 e')
h e'
Pu = 0.85 f 'dc bd 1 +
+ 2 (m 1) 2 +
(5-14)
d d
d d
s = A / bd
e' = e + d - (h/2)
mD
0.85e
T
s
Pu = 0.85 f 'dc D
0.38 +
0
.
38
2.5 D
D
D
(5-15)
89
Slenderness Effects
It is recommended that for the design of columns in shear wall type structures the effective
length factor k may be taken as 0.9 for columns that are definitely restrained by beams and
girders at the top and bottom. For all other cases k shall be taken as 1.0 unless analysis shows
that a lower value may be used.
For columns braced against sidesway, the effects of slenderness may be neglected when:
kLu
M
< 34 12 1
r
M2
(5-16)
k=
Lu =
r=
Moment Magnification
Slenderness effects due to buckling and secondary bending moments must be considered in
the design of columns whose slenderness ratio is greater than that given by Equation. The
reduction in the ultimate strength of a slender column is accounted for in the design procedure
by increasing the design moment. The cross section and/or reinforcement is thereby increased
above that required for a short column.
A column braced against sidesway is designed for the applied axial load P and a magnified
moment M defined by:
C
= m
(5-18)
P
M = M2
1
Pc
M=
design moment
=
moment magnifier
M2 = value of larger end moment on column
Cm = equivalent moment correction factor defined by equation
M1 = value of smaller end moment on column
P=
design axial load
Pc =
critical axial load causing buckling defined by equation
Cm = 0.6 + 0.4 M1 / M2
(5-19)
90
Pc =
2 EI
(5-20)
(kLu )2
EI =
Ia =
Ig =
Ic =
F=
Ec I a
1 .5
Ia =
I g + Ic
Ic = Fbd3
(5-21)
Dynamic Analysis
Columns are not subjected to the blast loading directly. Rather, the load that a column must
resist is transmitted through the roof slab, beams and girders. These members "filter" the
dynamic effects of the blast load. Thus, in buildings designed to obtain plastic deformations,
the dynamic load reaching the columns is typically a fast "static" load, that is, a flat top
pressure time load with a relatively long rise time.
The roof members and columns act together to resist the applied blast load. However, a
reasonable design can be achieved by considering the column separately from the roof
members. The response (resistance-time function) of the roof members to the blast load is
taken as the applied dynamic load acting on the columns.
Columns are subjected to an actual axial load (with associated eccentricity) equal to the
ultimate resistance of the appropriate roof members acting over the tributary area supported by
the column. It is recommended for design of columns the ultimate axial load be equal to 1.2
times the actual axial load. This increase insures that the maximum response of the column
will be limited to a ductility ratio (Xm/Xe) of 3.0 or less. If the rise time of the load (time to
reach yield for the appropriate roof members) divided by the natural period of the column is
small (approximately 0.1), the maximum ductility is limited to 3.0. Whereas, if the time ratio
is equal to 1.0 or greater, the column will remain elastic. For the usual design cases, the ratio
of the rise time to the natural period will be in the vicinity of 1.0. Therefore, the columns will
remain elastic or, at best, sustain slight plastic action.
Design of Tied Columns
An approximate design method has been developed which gives satisfactory results for biaxial
bending. The equation is in the form of an interaction formula which for design purposes can
be written in the form:
1
1 1 1
= +
Pu Px Py Po
(5-22)
91
Pu =
Px =
Py =
Po =
The above Equation is valid provided Pu is equal to or greater than 0.10 Po. The usual
design cases for interior columns satisfy this limitation.
Minimum Eccentricity
Due to the possible complex load conditions that can result in blast design, all tied columns
shall be designed for biaxial bending. If computations show that there are no moments at the
ends of the column or that the computed eccentricity of the axial load is less than 0.1h, the
column must be designed for a minimum eccentricity equal to 0.1h. The value of h is the
depth of the column in the bending direction considered. The minimum eccentricity shall
apply to bending in both the x and y directions, simultaneously.
Longitudinal Reinforcement Requirements
To insure proper behavior of a tied column, the longitudinal reinforcement must meet certain
restrictions. The area of longitudinal reinforcement shall not be less than 0.01 nor more than
0.04 times the gross area of the section.
d.
92
Required:
Design of a unreinforced
masonry wall spanning between foundation and
roof (one-way)
3.05 m
18.3m
blast
Step 1.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
23.4
kPa
90 ms
For unreinforced masonry, the failure mode is based on tensile cracking. To avoid the resulting
catastrophic failure, the wall must remain elastic. Thus the ductility ratio is 1.0.
93
Add reinforcing steel and fill wall cavities solid with concrete.
Fig. 5.13 Add reinforcing steel and fill wall cavities solid with concrete
Before test
After test
C2
Fig. 5.14 Retrofitting masonry using spread on techology
94
5.6
Pressure impulse diagrams were generated by having a maximum reflected pressure as a start
off point .This point was inputted by the user and could be altered easily each time. The SDOF
model then starts with a positive pressure duration (td) of zero and incrementally increases it
95
until failure criterion has been reached. This is graphically represented on Figure 5.16. The
failure criterion was chosen to be the hinge failure when generating those P-I diagrams.
Moreover the space variation of the load vector was not considered significant when
producing PI diagrams and thus assuming blast events at arbitrary standoff distances. To
account for this and to be conservative, the standoff distance was set to a large value (1000m)
and thus resulting in Pr acting at every point on the beam without space variation.
Figure 5.16 Maximum reflected pressure with increasing td starting from zero
Once the failure point has been found, then the SDOF will incrementally decrease the
maximum reflected pressure based on the number of points required for the P-I diagram (also
inputted by the user) and the same procedure is repeated. Figure 5.17 shows a graphical
representation of the procedure used to generate P-I diagrams.
96
97