Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
But why do we, as humans, need this complicated reference? We dont. A person can
quickly assimilate that the piece of paper is a letter, who the receiving and sending
parties are, and its subject in an extremely short space of time. But, the computer,
being a very hard working idiot, needs to be told everything, and every time. What we
do need is a retrieval system and this is where there is a rift between how a digital
system works and human sense.
So why do we fool ourselves that this code is of any use. Only the sequential number
is of any use as it is unique but it tells us nothing about the letter; we need a subject
reference. Unfortunately this means that the Project Manager, or similar, must allocate
a file reference as opposed to classifying the document for the computer to know what
to do with it. The Project Manager may then have to assign an actionee rather than
depend on the generic and decision-free distribution list. Distribution to "all users" may
give the impression of efficiency but is it effective? Is it nice for everybody to know or is
better to have a 'need to know' which focuses the project teams efforts and prevents
the human habit of interfering in other peoples business and possibly adding to any
confusion or inefficiency within the project.
It must be a management responsibility to ensure that correspondence is classified by
subject or discipline or area of work. For the PMPs (Project Management Proponents)
amongst us, WBS (work breakdown structure) could be the start of a filing/retrieval
system and can lend itself very nicely to a DBS (document breakdown structure). With
a few simple modifications this easily becomes a 'filing system' and, hey presto, we
have some semblance of order and structure to our documentation if the management
will is there. After all it was fairly common and rigorous in BC times i.e Before
Computer.
Maybe files and filing systems aren't really needed and the Electronic Systems of the
world are what they are held out to be and can contribute to the successful delivery of a
project. However, one of the main reasons for projects 'failing' or not being as
successful as they could be has been cited as a lack of communication. As I said
earlier 'information logistics' requires the right information, in the right place, at the right
time, and in the right format, and (most importantly) to the right people. We should
really ask the question are Electronic Filing Systems really what they are held out to
be?
In a not too far gone time, and perhaps somewhat politically incorrect time, when filing
was done manually and without computers or spreadsheets an engineer once wrote
filing should be simple unless one has a particularly dim office staffunfortunately with
a computer being defined by some as a hard-working idiot perhaps this is the case?