Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A costing report (word document) that provides a summary of the guidance and provides some background on the
assumptions used in the costing model is also available on the NICE website. The report also highlights further factors
that should be considered when using this template.
Within the assumptions input and unit costs sheets, cells highlighted in light blue are unlocked to allow users to make
adjustments to the model.
The population and cost summary allows the user to select the population to be used in the model and displays the
estimated cost impact of implementing the guidance for the selected population. Select the population(s) and appropriate
proportions from the drop down boxes in columns B, C and D. If no changes are made on this sheet, the template will
default to a population of 100,000.
The assumptions input worksheet allows the user to amend the assumptions in the template to take account of local
circumstances. Several assumptions have been made to produce this costing template, based on national data and the
view of clinical specialists advising NICE. However, we recognise that these assumptions may not accurately reflect local
circumstances. Therefore, users can input their own assumptions in the light blue cells.
Assumptions input
Any number and combination of the assumptions can be changed. To revert to the NICE assumptions delete your input
and either leave the cell blank or input a '-'. If no assumptions are made, the standard assumptions will be used. The
diagram shows how the assumptions affect the population, and calculates the volume of activity to be used in the costing
template.
The costing template worksheet shows the financial impact of the guidance based on the population selected and the
assumptions made.
The first column of calculations shows the resource impact using the selected population and the standard NICE
assumptions. The second column shows the resource impact using the selected population and any local assumptions
that have been made.
The unit costs worksheet allows users to see how the unit costs used in this template have been calculated. You can use
Table 2 for local input to amend in line with local assumptions.
The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the extent to which fluctuations in the variables will affect the overall cost of
implementing the guidance. The sensitivity analysis considers the impact of fluctuations of individual variables.
Costing template
Unit costs
Sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity analysis is independent of the input sheet and the costing template, and should be used to inform users
about the sensitivity of the costs to changes in the standard NICE assumptions.
The references and data sources worksheet lists references and sources used to inform the costing template. The
reference numbers relate to the source numbers listed on the assumptions input worksheet and are hyperlinked to the
appropriate reference.
The costs over time worksheet includes, where appropriate, estimates of uptake and cost impact over a period of years.
You can amend cells highlighted in blue to reflect local assumptions.
The costing template was developed using a structured approach. This involved:
background research into the guidance content, current practice, published information and available data
gathering expert opinion
developing a costing model to estimate the cost of implementation
testing the model, including the assumptions and outcomes
developing the template and report based on the costing model.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015. All rights reserved. This material may be freely reproduced for
educational and not-for-profit purposes. No reproduction by or for commercial organisations, or for commercial purposes,
is allowed without the express written permission of NICE.
Organisation
<manual input>
Proportion
Total Population
100%
78,604
16,065
Population data
Organisation
Per 100,000 population
<manual input>
TOTAL - to be used in sheet 6
Total population
Percentage of population
Males aged 18 and over
Females aged 18 and over to be used
Males aged 18 and over
Females aged 18 and over
38,237
40,367
100%
38,237
40,367
100%
100,000
38,237
40,367
38,237
40,367
100,000
Provider Code
Provider Name
Type
Payment index
value for 201415
RTQ
Trust
1.0607
RTV
Trust
1.0456
REM
Trust
1.0387
RCF
Trust
1.0305
RBS
Trust
1.0399
RTK
Trust
1.1700
RVN
Trust
1.0747
RF4
Trust
1.1744
RVL
Trust
1.1973
RRP
Trust
1.2003
RFF
Trust
1.0323
R1H
Trust
1.2128
RDD
Trust
1.1228
RC1
Trust
1.0887
RWX
Trust
1.1504
RXT
Trust
1.0453
RQ3
Trust
1.0516
RYW
Trust
1.0567
RLU
Trust
1.0439
TAJ
Trust
1.0392
RXL
Trust
1.0265
RMC
Trust
1.0480
TAD
Trust
1.0339
1.0337
RAE
Trust
RY2
Trust
1.0411
RXH
Trust
1.0744
RXQ
Trust
1.1442
RJF
Trust
1.0397
RWY
Trust
1.0389
RJX
Trust
1.0286
RGT
Trust
1.0885
RT1
Trust
1.0773
RYV
Trust
1.0927
TAF
Trust
1.2232
RV3
Trust
1.2141
RYX
Trust
1.2313
RW3
Trust
1.0568
RQM
Trust
1.2939
RXA
Trust
1.0425
RFS
Trust
1.0289
RLN
Trust
1.0263
RDE
Trust
1.0547
RJ8
Trust
1.0000
RJR
Trust
1.0409
RXP
Trust
1.0278
RYG
Trust
1.0545
RJ6
Trust
1.2045
RNN
Trust
1.0266
RN7
Trust
1.1577
RTG
Trust
1.0400
RY8
Trust
1.0321
RXM
Trust
1.0333
RWV
Trust
1.0165
RP5
Trust
1.0359
RBD
Trust
1.0474
RDY
Trust
1.0656
RYK
Trust
1.0369
RC3
Trust
1.1992
RWH
Trust
1.1405
RJN
Trust
1.0493
RVV
Trust
1.0455
RXR
Trust
1.0325
RWK
Trust
1.2178
RX9
Trust
1.0407
RYC
Trust
1.0786
RXC
Trust
1.0441
RVR
Trust
1.1922
RDU
Trust
1.1617
RR7
Trust
1.0282
RLT
Trust
1.0507
R1J
Trust
1.0620
RTE
Trust
1.0571
RP4
Trust
1.2858
RN3
Trust
1.0952
RXV
Trust
1.0502
RJ1
Trust
1.2770
RN5
Trust
1.1096
RCD
Trust
1.0393
RR1
Trust
1.0490
RD7
Trust
1.1687
RY4
Trust
1.1349
RWR
Trust
1.1448
RQQ
Trust
1.0797
RQX
Trust
1.2052
RY9
Trust
1.1794
RWA
Trust
1.0155
RV9
Trust
1.0187
RYJ
Trust
1.2417
RGQ
Trust
1.0449
R1F
Trust
1.0511
RGP
Trust
1.0187
RXY
Trust
1.0974
RYY
Trust
1.0733
RNQ
Trust
1.0543
RJZ
Trust
1.2132
RAX
Trust
1.2075
RW5
Trust
1.0314
RXN
Trust
1.0354
RGD
Trust
1.0401
RY6
Trust
1.0503
RR8
Trust
1.0461
RT5
Trust
1.0432
RJ2
Trust
1.2043
RY5
Trust
1.0155
RP7
Trust
1.0160
RY1
Trust
1.0440
RBQ
Trust
1.0418
REP
Trust
1.0405
RRU
Trust
1.1965
RC9
Trust
1.1203
RWF
Trust
1.1095
TAE
Trust
1.0565
RPA
Trust
1.1016
RW4
Trust
1.0386
RBT
Trust
1.0437
RQ8
Trust
1.0992
RJD
Trust
1.0349
RXF
Trust
1.0406
RD8
Trust
1.1061
RP6
Trust
1.2646
RM1
Trust
1.0153
RMY
Trust
1.0253
RY3
Trust
1.0193
RVJ
Trust
1.0785
RNL
Trust
1.0286
RX6
Trust
1.0300
RAT
Trust
1.1729
RRD
Trust
1.0865
RAP
Trust
1.2012
RLY
Trust
1.0236
RVW
Trust
1.0248
RX7
Trust
1.0467
RV8
Trust
1.1954
RNS
Trust
1.0611
RP1
Trust
1.0575
RBZ
Trust
1.0194
RJL
Trust
1.0251
RX4
Trust
1.0294
RTF
Trust
1.0300
RX1
Trust
1.0387
RHA
Trust
1.0324
RNU
Trust
1.1106
RTH
Trust
1.1003
RPG
Trust
1.1777
RGM
Trust
1.0802
RW6
Trust
1.0489
RT2
Trust
1.0513
RGN
Trust
1.0602
RK9
Trust
1.0158
RD3
Trust
1.0666
RHU
Trust
1.0890
RPC
Trust
1.1429
RXE
Trust
1.0343
RHW
Trust
1.1498
RT3
Trust
1.2532
1.0032
REF
Trust
RH8
Trust
1.0211
RAL
Trust
1.2465
RQ6
Trust
1.0422
RBB
Trust
1.1004
RAN
Trust
1.1800
RA2
Trust
1.1600
RD1
Trust
1.0805
RM3
Trust
1.0560
RNZ
Trust
1.0703
RXK
Trust
1.0406
RCU
Trust
1.0327
TAH
Trust
1.0305
RHQ
Trust
1.0294
RK5
Trust
1.0314
RXW
Trust
1.0263
R1D
Trust
1.0325
R1C
Trust
1.0922
RH5
Trust
1.0357
RYE
Trust
1.1183
RA9
Trust
1.0136
RYD
Trust
1.0946
RWN
Trust
1.1099
RV5
Trust
1.1945
RRE
Trust
1.0315
RTR
Trust
1.0292
RE9
Trust
1.0294
RJC
Trust
1.0565
RQY
Trust
1.2007
RXG
Trust
1.0371
RYF
Trust
1.0485
1.0782
RAJ
Trust
RW1
Trust
1.0911
RVY
Trust
1.0361
RJ7
Trust
1.2125
RBN
Trust
1.0431
R1E
Trust
1.0327
RWJ
Trust
1.0573
RXX
Trust
1.1714
RTP
Trust
1.1647
RDR
Trust
1.0703
RX2
Trust
1.0771
RMP
Trust
1.0523
RBA
Trust
1.0297
RNK
Trust
1.2383
RX3
Trust
1.0265
RBV
Trust
1.0668
REN
Trust
1.0394
RNA
Trust
1.0356
RAS
Trust
1.1830
RTD
Trust
1.0358
RQW
Trust
1.1534
RCX
Trust
1.0259
RL1
THE ROBERT JONES AND AGNES HUNT ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
Trust
1.0316
RFR
Trust
1.0272
RDZ
Trust
1.0647
RPY
Trust
1.2137
RRJ
Trust
1.0445
RL4
Trust
1.0341
RET
Trust
1.0403
RKE
Trust
1.2134
R1G
Trust
1.0114
RWD
Trust
1.0142
RRV
Trust
1.2976
RJE
Trust
1.0242
RM2
Trust
1.0594
RHM
Trust
1.0876
RRK
Trust
1.0449
RA7
Trust
1.0841
RKB
Trust
1.0586
RWE
Trust
1.0434
RTX
Trust
1.0293
RBK
Trust
1.0344
RWW
Trust
1.0500
RWG
Trust
1.1708
RKL
Trust
1.1789
RFW
Trust
1.2014
RYA
Trust
1.0403
RGR
Trust
1.0438
RYR
Trust
1.0809
RA3
Trust
1.0530
RY7
Trust
1.0399
RBL
Trust
1.0389
RWP
Trust
1.0376
R1A
Trust
1.0364
RRF
Trust
1.0418
RLQ
Trust
RA4
Trust
RCB
Trust
RX8
Trust
1.0245
1.0356
1.0340
1.0408
1.0822
Assumptions input
The variables listed in the table below can be amended to reflect local circumstances by completing the light blue cells. If local data are not
available the estimate made by NICE can be used.
Variables
Source
NICE assumption
Local assumption
Variance
78,604
###
*1
0.19%
152
###
*1
97.9%
149
###
*2
100.0%
149
###
*3
0.5%
###
*3
0.5%
###
*3
99.0%
148
###
*4
0.0%
###
100.0%
0.00%
-100.0%
149
###
149
###
Current practice
Totals
Future practice
% of admissions with STEMI or NSTEMI eligible for
secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events
*1
97.9%
*2
100.0%
*3
0.5%
###
*3
0.5%
###
*5
85.0%
127
###
*5
14.0%
21
###
100.0%
0.00%
-100.0%
21
###
Totals
Potential savings
4.9%
###
4.3%
###
###
###
###
###
0.0%
0.4%
1.3%
721
629
36
801
4,217
746
Costing template
Err:508
Unit cost () /
proportion
Total population selected (adults 18 years and over)
Number of admissions with myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI) in
2012/13
Units
Unit cost () /
proportion
Total cost ()
78,604
Units
Total cost ()
78,604
0.19%
152
0.19%
152
97.9%
149
97.90%
149
100.0%
149
100.0%
149
0.5%
0.5%
99.0%
0.0%
100.0%
1
1
148
0
150
0.5%
0.5%
99.0%
0.0%
100.0%
1
1
148
0
150
721
629
36
801
1
1
148
150
721
629
36
801
1
1
148
150
97.9%
149
97.9%
149
100.0%
149
100.0%
149
0.5%
0.5%
85.0%
14.0%
100.0%
1
1
127
21
150
0.5%
0.5%
85.0%
14.0%
1
1
127
21
150
721
629
36
801
1
1
127
21
721
629
36
801
1
1
127
21
Current practice
Treatment options
Total
Unit costs
Aspirin plus ticagrelor
Aspirin plus prasugrel
Aspirin plus clopidogrel
Aspirin plus clopidogrel plus rivaroxaban
Estimated costs of current practice
721
629
5,328
0
6,678
721
629
5,328
0
6,678
Future practice
Treatment options
Aspirin plus ticagrelor
Aspirin plus prasugrel
Aspirin plus clopidogrel
Aspirin plus clopidogrel plus rivaroxaban
Total
Unit costs
Aspirin plus ticagrelor
Aspirin plus prasugrel
Aspirin plus clopidogrel
Aspirin plus clopidogrel plus rivaroxaban
Estimated costs of future practice
Gross resource impact
150
721
629
4,572
16,821
22,743
16,065
150
721
629
4,572
16,821
22,743
16,065
21
21
4.9%
4.3%
-0.6%
Unit cost
Actual or suspected myocardial infarction
4,217
4.9%
4.3%
-0.6%
4,217
21
21
0.4%
0.4%
1.3%
1.3%
0.9%
0.9%
746
746
Unit costs
Non-CABG thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding
Estimated additional cost of non-CABG thrombolysis in myocardial major
bleeding
Net resource impact
0
16,065
0
16,065
The table below shows the sensitivity of the total cost of implementation to changes in each variable individually. If there are 2 or more variables that make up 100% between them,
they have been varied together to ensure the model remains realistic.
Recurrent costs
Baseline value Minimum value Maximum value Baseline costs Minimum costs Maximum costs
0.19%
0.18%
0.20%
16,065
14,535
16,830
Change
2,295
Current treatment
% of admissions with STEMI or NSTEMI eligible for secondary prevention of
atherothrombotic events
97.90%
95.80%
99.900%
16,065
15,300
16,065
765
100.0%
0.50%
0.50%
99.00%
0.00%
95.00%
0.50%
0.50%
99.00%
0.00%
100.00%
1.00%
1.00%
98.00%
0.00%
16,065
16,065
16,065
16,065
16,065
15,300
16,065
16,065
16,065
16,065
16,065
16,101
16,101
16,101
16,101
765
36
36
36
36
Future treatment
% of admissions with STEMI or NSTEMI eligible for secondary prevention of
atherothrombotic events
97.9%
95.80%
99.80%
16,065
15,300
16,065
765
100.0%
0.5%
0.5%
85.0%
14%
95.00%
0.50%
0.50%
89.00%
10.00%
100.00%
1.00%
1.00%
80.00%
18.00%
16,065
16,065
16,065
16,065
16,065
15,300
11,475
11,475
11,475
11,475
16,065
20,619
20,619
20,619
20,619
765
9,144
9,144
9,144
9,144
Year
Details
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
5%
12%
14%
14%
14%
149
149
149
149
149
18
21
21
21
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.3%
4.3%
4.3%
4.3%
4.3%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.3%
1.3%
1.3%
1.3%
1.3%
4,217
4,217
4,217
4,217
4,217
746
746
746
746
746
765
765
765
765
765
5,360
13,780
16,060
16,060
16,060
5,360
13,780
16,060
16,060
16,060
16,060
16,060
16,060
2017
2018
2019
13,780
14,000
12,000
10,000
Cost
8,000
6,000
5,360
4,000
2,000
0
2015
2016
Year
D
Details
Dosage per day (mg)
Unit cost
2.5 mg, 56 capsule packet
75mg, 28 tablets packet
75mg, 28 tablets packet
90mg, 56 tablets packet
10mg, 28 tablets packet
Cost per day
Annual cost
Aspirin
75
Clopidogrel
75
0.82
1.89
0.03
11.00
0.07
25.00
Aspirin
75
Clopidogrel
75
D
Details
Dosage per day (mg)
Unit cost
2.5 mg, 56 capsule packet
75mg, 28 tablets packet
75mg, 28 tablets packet
90mg, 56 tablets packet
10mg, 28 tablets packet
Cost per day
Annual cost
Discount allowed
Net annual cost
0.82
1.89
0.03
11.00
0.07
25.00
11.00
25.00
Description
HRG
Activity
EB10A
4,893
EB10B
12,631
EB10C
21,329
EB10D
30,505
EB10E
25,463
VC38Z
Total
94,821
Description
Major Therapeutic Endoscopic, Upper or Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Procedures, 19
years and over, with CC Score 3+
Major Therapeutic Endoscopic, Upper or Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Procedures, 19
years and over, with CC Score 1-2
Major Therapeutic Endoscopic, Upper or Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Procedures, 19
years and over, with CC Score 0
Intermediate Therapeutic General Abdominal Procedures, 19 years and over, with CC
Score 3+
Intermediate Therapeutic General Abdominal Procedures, 19 years and over, with CC
Score 1-2
Intermediate Therapeutic General Abdominal Procedures, 19 years and over, with CC
Score 0
HRG
Activity
FZ24G
1,365
FZ24H
4,793
FZ24J
10,069
FZ27E
664
FZ27F
1,448
FZ27G
3,497
FZ38G
1,023
FZ38H
1,331
FZ38J
1,031
FZ38K
1,957
FZ38L
7,285
FZ38M
2,273
FZ38N
11,367
FZ38P
65,047
FZ59Z
18,233
FZ60Z
177,731
FZ70Z
22,942
FZ83G
481
FZ83H
716
FZ83J
1,508
FZ83K
7,921
Total
342,682
Notes
You can input your own local data in the cells highlighted in blue to reflect local practice.
Drug prices were obtained from the NHS electronic drug tariff. Accessed on the 06/01/2015 and available from:
http://www.ppa.org.uk/edt/January_2015/mindex.htm
No administration costs are expected as a result of using rivaroxaban or current treatment options
The weighted average costs of myocardial infarction and major bleeding are based on the NHS reference costs for 20
of myocardial infarction also includes rehabilitation costs. For myocardial infarction rehabilitation is for 5 days. This is b
submitted for the guidance on rivaroxaban for preventing adverse outcomes after acute management of acute coronar
Drugs used
Ticagrelor
180
Prasugrel
10
Rivaroxaban
5
58.88
54.60
1.95
710.00
47.56
1.70
618.00
2.10
765.00
Drugs used
Ticagrelor
180
Prasugrel
10
Rivaroxaban
5
58.88
54.60
1.95
710.00
47.56
1.70
618.00
2.10
765.00
710.00
618.00
765.00
Reference
cost
Weighting
Weighted average
cost
5.2%
4,484
231
13.3%
3,567
475
22.5%
2,881
648
32.2%
2,436
784
26.9%
2,098
563
1,515
100.0%
4,217
Reference
cost
Weighting
Weighted average
cost
0.4%
1,943
1.4%
917
13
2.9%
803
24
0.2%
4,073
0.4%
2,749
12
1.0%
2,043
21
0.3%
5,040
15
0.4%
3,167
12
0.3%
3,848
12
0.6%
2,763
16
2.1%
1,996
42
0.7%
2,084
14
3.3%
1,344
45
19.0%
788
150
5.3%
346
18
51.9%
423
219
6.7%
645
43
0.1%
7332
10
0.2%
5240
11
0.4%
3922
17
2.3%
1,606
37
100.0%
746
ased on the NHS reference costs for 2013/04 for both activity and unit costs. The cost
ction rehabilitation is for 5 days. This is based on the expert review group report
fter acute management of acute coronary syndrome.
The data was obtained from the 'Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project; How the NHS cares for patients with heart attack. Annual Public Report. April 2013 - March 2014.
We have assumed that all those eligible for secondary prevention treatment will go on to have one of the available treatments options.
The proportions of people with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) currently having the available treatment options are based on
data obtained from the manufacturer's submission. The submission states that approximately 99% of the people with STEMI and NSTEMI eligible for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events currently
have aspirin plus clopidogrel and the remaining 1% have aspirin alone. However, based on clinical opinion, current practice is that people have aspirin plus prasugrel or aspirin plus ticagrelor rather than aspirin
alone. Therefore the costing template assumes an equal split of 0.5% each between aspirin plus prasugrel or aspirin plus ticagrelor.
As rivaroxaban has not been recommended before the issuing of this guidance, we have assumed that currently no patients have this treatment option.
The manufacturer's submission states that the market share of rivaroxaban will rise to 14% by 2017 and remain at that level until 2019. It also assumes that rivaroxaban will draw patients from the clopidogrelbased treatments. Therefore we have reduced the current proportion of patients on aspirin plus clopidogrel by 14%.
The data was obtained from the manufacturer submission for the NICE technology appraisal guidance on rivaroxaban for preventing adverse outcomes after acute management of acute coronary syndrome.
Population data
The populations shown are residential populations of the geographical area of each health body.
Data for 'England - CCGs'; 'Wales - Health Boards'; 'NHS England Area Teams' and 'Local Authorities' were from:
Office for National Statistics (ONS); Resident population - 2011 mid-year estimates
Data for Northern Ireland Health and Social Care Trusts from:
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA);Resident population - 2013 mid-year estimates