Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

I

S
S
U
E
S
O
N
M
E
M
O
R
Y

- RECONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY: a term usually associated with Bartlett, which refers to a memory distorted
by the individuals prior knowledge and expectations
- EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY: an area of memory research that investigates the accuracy of memory following
an accident, crime or other significant event, and the types of errors that are commonly made in such situations

KEY TERMS

Reconstructive Memory (Bartlett, 1932)


R
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
V
E

We do not record memories passively, as we would if we were taking a photo. We need to make an effort after
meaning in order to make more sense of the event. So, instead of storing an exact replica of the initial stimulus,
we weave it with elements of our existing knowledge and experience to form a reconstructed memory

M
E
M
O
R
Y

Schemas
We store memories in terms of our past experience or schemas, which are knowledge or
packages, built up through experience of the world and can aid the interpretation of new
information (restaurant schema).
Cohen (1993) suggested 5 ways in which schemas might lead to reconstructive memory
1. We tend to ignore aspects of a scene that do not fit the currently activated schema
2. We can store the central features of an event without having to store the exact details(c)
3. We can make sense of what we have seen by filling in missing information (running)
4. We distort memories for events to fit in with prior expectations (bank robber)
5. We may use schemas to provide the basis for a correct guess (breakfast-cereal)

Misleading post-event information (Loftus, 1975)


Effects on memory of information provided after the event. Memory for events can
be changed or supplemented by later information (Eyewitness testimony study)

E
Y
E
W
I
T
N
E
S
S

T
E
S
T
I
M
O
N
Y

Other factors that


affect eyewitness
testimony

Research findings on schemas


Effects of schemas on visual memory (office, 35
seconds, skull). People can sometimes falsely
remember objects that did not exist. (Brewer and
Trevens, 1982)
Evaluation of Bartletts research
Serenade (Bransford and Johnson, 1972)
There seems little doubt that we do use stored
knowledge and past experience to make sense of
new information, and that memories for events
can be distorted because of this. However the
concept of schema is rather vague and its theory
offers no explanation as to how schemas are
acquired

Leading questions. Hit, smashed, collided, bumped or contacted


Anxiety of the witness. Weapon focus, the witness concentrates on the weapon and this distracts
attention from the appearance of the perpetrator
Consequences. Participants in experiments are less accurate than genuine witnesses because they
know inaccuracies will not lead to serious consequences
Method of testing witnesses. Witness accuracy can increase if test do not rely on forced-choice
format, if witnesses are able to give no answer if they fell unsure and if given the appropriate cues
Witnessing real life situations. People are good at remembering highly stressful events if they occur
in real life rather than in the artificial surroundings of a laboratory
Blatantly incorrect misinformation. People can ignore new information under certain
circumstances and so maintain their original memory representation intact (red purse)

What happens to the original memory? Loftus believes that, in the light of misleading information, the original
memory is deleted and replaced by the new, false memory. Other researchers have disputed this and claim that the
original memory trace is still available, even though it has been obscured by new information.
Evaluation of Loftus research. Important contribution but criticized for artificiality and her method of testing recall.

THE COGNITIVE INTERVIEW

1. To recreate the context of the original incident


3. To recall the event in different orders

2. To report every detail


4. To change perspectives

S-ar putea să vă placă și