Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Jungkyu Ahn
Lina Polvi
Stuart Trabant
Outline
Introduction
Where riprap is used
Riprap design
Example design
Types of riprap failure
Design considerations: How to prevent
riprap failure
Examples of riprap failure & success
Introduction
Riprap Revetment:
Strengthen riverbanks against erosion
Factors that affect riprap resistance to erosive
forces
stone size
shape
weight
durability
gradation
layer thickness
construction quality
channel alignment
cross section
bank slope
velocity distribution
ground water
Riprap Design
1. Stone size
There are two methods to determine stone size.
(1) Shear-stress method
dm =
sin 2 1
*c (G 1) 1
sin 2
Riprap Design
(2) Velocity method
Vc K c
1 sin 2
2(G 1)gd s
2
1
sin
4h
K c = log tan
ds
Riprap Design
Standard Riprap Sizing Methods
(Velocity-Based)
U.S. Corps of Engineers, EM 1110-21601
American Society of Civil Engineers
US Bureau of Reclamation Method
U.S. Geological Survey Method
Isbash Method
California Bank and Shore Protection
Method
Federal Highways HEC-11
Riprap Design
2. Stone shape (should satisfy the following)
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
3. Stone weight
1/ 3
6W
D% = %
s
Riprap Design
4. Filter
d 50 ( filter )
< 40
d 50 (base)
i)
ii) 5 <
iii)
d15 ( filter )
< 40
d15 (base)
d15 ( filter )
<5
d 85 (base)
Riprap Design
6. Revetment toe protection
Toe protection may be provided by two methods
(1) Extend to maximum scour depth
place end of toe below the expected scour depth or
ground it on nonerodible material
(2) Place launchable stone
Windrow : riprap placed at top of bank
Trench-fill : riprap placed at low water level
Weighted riprap toes : riprap placed at intersection of channel bottom and side slope
Windrow
Trench-fill
Example Design:
Yuba River, California
Purpose: Protect
outside of bend at
fish ladder exit
Stone sizing
method: Velocity
Method (after Julien,
2002)
Stone Sizing
Equation:
Vc K c
Q
Proposed Riprap
Fish Ladder
Exit
1 sin 2
2(G 1)gd s
2
1 sin
Elevation (ft)
170
Riprap as constructed
Riprap After Scour and Launch*
160
150
Design WSE
140
Riprap Height=24 ft
130
120
Scour Depth=6.6 ft
110
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
90
80
Station (ft)
100
Design Considerations:
Preventing Riprap Failure
Tieback
Tie upstream and
downstream ends of
blanket into bank
Launching Apron
Horizontal riprap on
foot of revetment
Overlap revetment
Overlap revetment
on opposite banks
Failed riprap on
Tijeras Arroyo, NM
due to poor
gradation
Failed riprap on
Tijeras Arroyo, NM
due to slide or
slump and further
bank erosion
Revegetation of riprap
along Rapid Creek, SD