Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
workflow
Des Fitzgerald
August 2007
Objectives
Demonstrate new approaches to
inversion
Use all available geology, gravity and
magnetics to constrain the result
Limit the infinite possibilities to a set that is
consistent with all the facts
Contacts
Dip/Strike
Pile, erode/onlap
Fault network
Commonality
Possessing like and interchangeable
characteristics
The number of voxels in common
between the proposed models and the
reference model is controlled
statistically using a Commonality
Same j
Commonalit y j
constraint
Ref j
Shape Ratio
Shape of a cylinder
h = r, Shape = 2.42
h = 2r, Shape = 2.35
h = 4r, Shape ~ 2.41
h = 20r, Shape ~ 2.89
Some aspect ratio dependency !
Cube
Shape ~ 2.45
Prism
square base r*r , height r/4 - Shape ~ 2.75
Detrending
Need to be able to fit the anomalies
caused by signal in your model
External influences or deeper sources are
not relevant
Grids continued
You create a Measured Grids List
Type, (eg Gravity)
Mean Elev., (eg 50m )
Precision, (eg 0.5 mGals)
Detrend, (eg Yes/No)
Detrend degree, (eg 0,1,2 etc)
detrend freq., (eg 0, or 100000)
grid URL (eg c:/data/bouguer.ers)
Geophysical Precision
An estimation of the standard deviation
of the measurement error in your
geophysical data
All observed data has inherent error due
to a variety of factors
Typically, ground gravity would be good
to about 0.5 mGals
Airborne Total Magnetic Intensity to
about 1 nT
Overview of Cases
1. Forward Model
Propose a start model, compute gravity response
2. Prior Only
Propose a geological model, explore probability
space implied by the geological constraints
3. Fixed Geometry
Solve for properties using a bounded least-squares
fit
5. Constrained Geology
Use gravity to constrain result
Overview continued
7. Constrained Geology
8. Constrained Geology
9. Constrained Geology
Property Uncertainty
vs
Geological Modelling
By default, we give equal importance to
these two differing aspects
You can speed convergence of your
inversion, if you have a high confidence
in your properties and there in no
spread of values
Simply adjust all the effort towards the
geological uncertainty
Voxets
Can be examined by Voxler, other thirdparty tools
Movies
Standard thirdparty products
Test Problem
Find Buried Object
Unknown dip / strike
Unknown density contrast
Unknown magnetic
susceptibility
Observed Gravity
Observed Geophysics
Vertical component of gravity
Total magnetic intensity
No remanence
Observed Magnetics
Make model
Save project
Test Properties
Geophysics Observations
Data Collection height : 50m
Gravity Data
normal ground observations
Magnetic Data
Field Intensity: 50000
Inclination: -65
Declination: 25
Actual Body
Preparing a case
NewCase Command
Create an Inversion Case
Within this case the following are
treated as constant
The voxet resolution and extent
The reference geological model
The physical property laws
The voxels to hold fixed
The geological constraints
The observed geophysical grids
Preparing a Run
Create an Inversion Run
Within this run the following are treated
as constant
The Case
The number of iterations
The initial lithology and physical properties
Case 1 Instructions
Start Geomodeller
Load Simple slab
Geophysics menu
3d Forward/Inversion
Choose G00 (gravity)
Constant grid
Choose apply
Gravity Grids
Observed
Initial
Forward
Not bad but missing some plunge??
PRIOR ONLY
computational scheme
Start
No Geophysics used
Modify models
Fails
Fails
(Modification rejected)
Continue?
Finish
Mechanics
You describe your process via the file :
Inversion.xml
Inversion.xml
Run Parameters 1
Iterations 100000
Commonality: Y
Slab Commonality Weibull(0.02,1.0)
Host Commonality Weibull(0.05,1.0)
Shape Ratio: Y
Slab ShapeRatio LogNormal(0.1,0.05)
Host ShapeRatio LogNormal(0.0,0.05)
Available Queries
MakeSummaryStats
Work out the summary statistics of all models between a start and
end iteration. From this we can derive products such as the
probability of a given lithology at a given cell
MakeHistogram
Generates a histogram of densities and/or susceptibilities for each
Formation in a Voxel dataset
MakeSectionImage
Generates a section through a Voxel dataset and presents it as a jpg
image that can then be displayed from within 3D GeoModeller
MakeDerivedVoxet
Various operations on Voxel datasets. Ex. Searches though a list of
Sujmary stats datasets and can find the most probable formation
MakeEvolutionMovie
On a nominated section can create an avi movie of the evolution of
the lithology model though the iterations
ProbabilityResults
Run1 - All random
changes allowed
Run 2 - Body
constrained by
commonality and
shape ratios
Mean Density
Predicted
density
distributions
based purely
on geology
constraints
AcceptanceCount="73365
AcceptanceRatePerHour="434214"
CommonalityRejectCount="12969"
CommonalityTestCount="99999"
ComputerName="RAYS-PC"
Counter="100000"
FinishedDateTime="24/ 8/2007 9:24:18.122000"
InterAcceptanceDifferentFormationCount="8926"
InterAcceptanceSameFormationCount="64439"
InterProposalDifferentFormationCount="35560"
InterProposalSameFormationCount="64439
ProposalRatePerHour="591849"
ShapeRejectCount="13665"
ShapeTestCount="87030"
StartedDateTime="24/ 8/2007 9:14:9.443000
Run Parameters 2
We can show how the predicted bodies can be
tightened up to honour the original shapes by
changing the commonality
Iterations 100000
Commonality: Y
Slab Commonality Weibull(0.1,1.0)
Host Commonality Weibull(0.1,1.0)
Shape Ratio: Y
Slab ShapeRatio LogNormal(0.10,0.05)
Host ShapeRatio LogNormal(0.0,0.05)
Since we
have no
geological
control the
density
anomaly is
biased to the
near surface
NB takes
500000
iterations
Enforce commonality
Enforce Shape Ratio
Use observed ground gravity
Run for 100000 iterations
Start
Modify models
Fails
Fails
(Modification rejected)
(Modification accepted)
Continue?
Finish
Dipping Slab
Gravity Grids
Observed
Initial
Final
Dipping Slab
Magnetic Grids
Observed
Initial
Final
Start
Overview of the
computational
scheme
Modify models
Fails
Fails
(Modification rejected)
(Modification accepted)
Continue?
Finish
misfit (nT/mGal)
6
gravity
magnetic
0
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
# iterations
4000000
5000000
6000000
Comments
This shows good adaption to the
expected outcome
Both Mag. And Gravity contribute
Over-view of Outcomes
Gravity Only inversion
does not do depth estimates well
Volume/mass of geological anomaly is quite good