Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
06-92-311-01
Course Syllabus
Faculty of Engineering,
Department of Mechanical, Automotive & Materials Engineering
University of Windsor, Canada
Semester: Fall 2013
Please note: this syllabus will be reviewed during our first class meeting, and an electronic copy will be
posted on the course website within CLEW
Instructor information
Name: Dr. Daniel Green
Office Hours: TBD (and by appointment)
Email: dgreen@uwindsor.ca (24hr response time Mon.-Fri.)
Office
Office Phone
Number
(extension #)
Email (24hr
response time
Mon.-Fri.)
Mailbox
TBD
TBD
TBD
Course Description
The objective of this course is to become proficient in the analysis of stresses and strains in simple
mechanical structures subjected to combinations of axial, torsion and flexural loads. In particular,
the course will address two-dimensional transformations of stress and strain components, yield and
fracture criteria, the deflection of statically determinate and indeterminate beams, buckling of
columns having various end conditions. Finally, energy methods will be used to solve both statically
determinate and indeterminate problems.
Prerequisites
Year-1 math courses
06-85-111; Engineering Mechanics I (Statics)
06-85-218 or 06-87-227; Mechanics of Deformable Bodies
Resources
The course syllabus, assignment problems & solutions, laboratory groups & schedule will be
posted on the CLEW site
Primary textbook:
Mechanics of Materials, F.P. Beer, E.R. Johnston, J.T. DeWolf, D.F. Mazurek
6th edition, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 978-0-07-338028-5
Important Dates
Sept. 9
Sept. 18
Oct. 14
TBD
Nov. 4
Nov. 6
Last date to voluntarily drop (VW) from the course, using the Faculty
of Engineering add/drop form. http://www.uwindsor.ca/engineering/forms
Note: by the ninth week of classes for 13 week courses.
Dec. 2
Dec. 9
Course Schedule
The following course schedule is approximate and tentative:
Lecture
#
1
Date
Duration Beer-Johnston
Lecture
(hours)
Sections
Topics
1.5
Overview of course; Review axial, torsional loading
9-Sep
11-Sep
1.5
16-Sep
1.5
7.1 - 7.3
18-Sep
1.5
7.4
23-Sep
1.5
7.5
25-Sep
1.5
7.6; 7.9
30-Sep
1.5
7.10 - 7.12
2-Oct
1.5
7.13
7-Oct
1.5
7.7-7.8
10
9-Oct
1.5
8.1
Laboratories
14-Oct
11
16-Oct
1.5
8.2
12
21-Oct
1.5
8.3
13
23-Oct
1.5
8.4
14
28-Oct
1.5
9.1 - 9.3
15
30-Oct
1.5
9.4 - 9.5
16
4-Nov
1.5
9.7
17
6-Nov
1.5
9.8
18
11-Nov
1.5
10.1 - 10.3
19
13-Nov
1.5
10.4
20
18-Nov
1.5
11.1-11.4
21
20-Nov
1.5
11.4 - 11.5
22
25-Nov
1.5
11.6 - 11.8
23
27-Nov
1.5
11.9-11.10
24
2-Dec
9-Dec
1.5
36
Learning Outcomes
In this course, students will
Number Learning Outcome
Learning
Outcome Code
1a, 1b, 1c
2a, 2b, 2d
4d
5b
6c
7a
Evaluation Methods
The course grade will be evaluated as follows:
Method of Evaluation
% of Final
Grade
Due Dates*
10
weekly
1, 2, 4
25
TBD
1, 2, 4
10
End of semester
3, 5
40
Dec. 9, 2013
1, 2, 4
15
TBD
4, 6
Tutorial Assignments
(10 individual assignments)
Midterm exam
(closed-book)
Design project
(group)
Final exam
(closed-book)
Laboratories
(3 individual Lab reports)
* According to Bylaw 51, Section 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 respectively,
http://athena.uwindsor.ca/units/senate/main.nsf/947f0bc672983a17852568b60051f690/bf28934998d7c7c3852578c3006e22d7/$FILE/Bylaw%2051%20-%20Examination%20Procedures%20(Amended%20091209).pdf
Two to three hour examination slots will normally be scheduled in the formal final examination periods in each semester for all courses which terminate in that semester. All final testing
procedures (written test, oral interview, essay, take home test, etc.) shall take place (or fall due, as the case may be) during the two to three-hour final examination slot so scheduled. The
actual duration of testing procedures during the scheduled final examination slot may be less than the scheduled time, at the discretion of the individual instructor (Bylaw 51, Section 1.1.2).
The last seven calendar days prior to, and including, the last day of classes in each period of instruction of twelve (or greater) weeks in duration must be free from any procedures for
which a mark will be assigned, including the submission of assignments such as essays, term papers, and take home examinations. Courses that are presented by a specialized teaching
method, where the testing procedures are an integral part of the instructional process, shall be exempt from this regulation subject to approval of the Dean of the Faculty in which the course
is given (Bylaw 51, Section 1.1.3).
Grading
Grades for the course will be consistent with the following table, per the
University of Windsor Policy M5: Marks/Grade Descriptors
http://web4.uwindsor.ca/units/senate/main.nsf/947f0bc672983a17852568b60051f690/2b7064df28cf09d985257b87005d2d87/$FILE/Policy%20M5%20-%20Marks-Grade%20Descriptors.pdf
Letter
A+
%
Range
90- 85- 80- 77- 73- 70- 67- 63- 60- 57- 53- 50- 0100 89.9 84.9 79.9 76.9 72.9 69.9 66.9 62.9 59.9 56.9 52.9 49.9
A-
B+
B-
C+
C-
D+
D-
Assessment Considerations
If a student fails to attend the mid-term examination for a legitimate reason (e.g. medical,
death in the family etc.), the percentage weight of the midterm examination will be added
to the weight of the final examination. If a student fails to attend the mid-term for any
other reason, he/she will be assigned a mark of zero for the mid-term examination.
Design Project
o The specifications of a design and construction project will be posted on CLEW before
the end of September. Groups of 3-5 students will work together to complete the design
project. The designed and constructed object will be evaluated by the instructor at the
end of the semester. The students in each group will also evaluate the contributions of
the other members of their group, and the final mark for the design project will reflect this
student grading.
Make-up Exams
o Students who miss the final exam for reasons that are considered valid and legitimate
by the office of the Associate-Dean academic will be subject to a make-up exam at a
time that is convenient for all parties involved. The make-up exam can be either an oral
or written examination. There is no bargaining with the instructor to change the nature,
format or content of the make-up exam.
o This policy does not apply to any other assignment or exam.
Calculators
o The only approved calculators are non-programmable, non-graphic calculators.
Electronic devices aside from calculators are NOT permitted during tests/exams.
return to the exam room and collect their personal belongings. The exam marks will be prorated
according to the time that elapsed before the alarm rang, and the exam will not be rewritten
(unless the instructor judges that the disruption occurred too early in the exam).
If a fire alarm sounds during a tutorial assignment, the assignment will not be marked.
Supplemental Privileges
A supplemental examination is allowed in this course, provided the student has submitted
all tutorial assignments and laboratory reports. The supplemental examination will only
replace the mark the student obtained in the final exam: i.e. all the other marks earned
during the semester will be used to calculate the students overall mark and grade.
The Academic Standing Committee may grant a supplemental evaluation privilege for a failed
course provided that the student:
(a) has failed only one course in the evaluation period (two full-time academic semesters); and
(b) has a grade below 50%; and
(c) has a cumulative average of 60% or better.
If a supplemental evaluation privilege is granted and the student decides to exercise this
privilege, the student must register for the supplemental and pay the appropriate fee. Once a
student has registered for a supplemental evaluation and the required evaluation method has
been prescribed, the evaluation will occur at the time and place prescribed by the Faculty of
Engineering. Failure to write after registering for the supplemental evaluation will result in a
grade of F being assigned. Both the resulting grade and the original grade will be shown on the
student's transcript and will be included in the determination of the student's cumulative
average.
Per the University of Windsor Policy T1: Policy on the Use of Turnitin.com
http://athena.uwindsor.ca/units/senate/main.nsf/947f0bc672983a17852568b60051f690/3c87fa97b5f64f7c852578ef006c00be/$FILE/Policy%20T1%20%20Policy%20on%20the%20Use%20of%20Turnitin.com.pdf
Rationale: The University believes in the right of all students to be part of a University
community where academic integrity is expected, maintained, enforced, and safeguarded; it
expects that all students will be evaluated and graded on their own individual work; it recognizes
that students often have to use the ideas of others as expressed in written, published, or
unpublished work in the preparation of essays, papers, reports, theses, and publications.
However, it expects that both the data and ideas obtained from any and all published or
unpublished material will be properly acknowledged and sources disclosed. Failure to follow this
practice constitutes plagiarism. The University, through the availability of Turnitin, desires to
encourage responsible student behaviour, deter plagiarism, improve student learning, and
ensure greater accountability.
Procedure:
Turnitin
May be used for some or all student papers in this course, as the case may be, at the
instructors discretion.
How will it be used?
You may be asked to submit your paper to the instructor in electronic form who will then
submit the paper to Turnitin if necessary.
Note that students papers that are submitted to Turnitin become part of the Turnitin
database. This assists in protecting your intellectual property. However, you also have the right
to request that your paper(s) not be run through the student papers database of Turnitin. If you
choose to do so, that request must be communicated to the Instructor or Professor in writing at
the beginning of the course.
For further assessment considerations, please see the Appendices.
10
This course will develop the following CEAB Graduate Attributes Criteria via Learning Outcomes:
Course
Learning
Outcomes
1, 2, 3
2. Problem analysis
An ability to use appropriate knowledge and skills to identify, formulate, analyze, and solve complex
engineering problems in order to reach substantiated conclusions.
3. Investigation
An ability to conduct investigations of complex problems by methods that include appropriate
experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information in order to reach valid
conclusions.
4. Design
An ability to design solutions for complex, open-ended engineering problems and to design systems,
components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate attention to health and safety risks,
applicable standards, economic, environmental, cultural and societal considerations.
7. Communication skills
An ability to communicate complex engineering concepts within the profession and with society at large.
Such abilities include reading, writing, speaking and listening, and the ability to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, and to give and effectively respond to clear instructions.
8. Professionalism
An understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the professional engineer in society, especially the
primary role of protection of the public and the public interest.
11
CEAB Hours
Subject Areas
Accreditation Units
One hour of lecture (corresponding to 50 minutes of activity) = 1AU
One hour of laboratory or scheduled tutorial = 0.5 AU
Mathematics
Natural Sciences
25%
Engineering Science
50%
Engineering Design
25%
Complementary Studies
No
12