Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
It gives me great pleasure to welcome you all to the 42nd Annual General Meeting of our
Association. It is a matter of satisfaction for me to report yet another year of robust growth and
strong performance encompassing all the segments of SEAI.
During the financial year 2011-12, for the first time in the history of Marine product exports, the
export earnings crossed USD 3.5 billion. Exports have crossed all previous records in quantity,
rupee value and US $ terms. Exports aggregated to 862021 tonnes valued at Rs. 16597.23
crores and USD 3508.45 million. Compared to the previous year, seafood exports recorded a
growth of 6.02% in quantity, 28.65% in rupee and 22.81% growth in US$ earnings respectively.
No. of
Members
61
42
07
14
84
30
39
25
21
323
2. Regional Setup
The regional Offices as listed below are headed by the following:
Regional Presidents
Regions
Mr. Kishanbhai Fofandi. Gujarat
Mr. Rustom Irani
Maharashtra
Mr. M.M.Ibrahim
Goa
Page | 1
Mr.George K.Ninan
Mr.Norbert Karikkassery
Mr. D.Durai Raj.
Mr. V.Padmanabham
Mr.G.Mohanty
Mr.Taj Mohamad
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamilnadu
Andhra Pradesh
Orissa
West Bengal
Page | 2
Mr.Norbert Karikkasserry and Mr. Elias Sait, Secretary General and all the MC members for
rendering their effective support and participation. Mr. Sait with his considerable knowledge and
experience of the seafood trade has played a major role in obtaining substantial benefits for the
Industry from the Government and other agencies. Mr.Sait will continue to play a major role in
guiding the affairs of our Association.
B. EXPORT PERFORMANCE
1. Overall export of marine products
Export of Marine Products during April March 2011-12 have achieved the US$ 3.5 billion
mark by registering a growth of 6.02% in quantity, 28.65% in Rupee Value and 22.81% in
US$ realization compared to the same period of last year. This is the first time in the
history of Marine Products industry that we are achieving the 3.5 billion mark. Average
unit value realization has also gone up by 15.87%.
For the Second year in succession, exports have grown by more than 25%, one of the
very few sectors to have achieved such growth in the country during this difficult period.
Export during 2011-12 compared to 2010-11
Export details
Quantity Tones
Value Rs.crore
US$ Million
AprilMarch 201112
862021
16597.23
3508.45
AprilMarch 201011
813091
12901.47
2856.92
Growth %
6.02
28.65
22.81
Page | 3
Page | 4
Page | 5
Page | 6
Page | 7
Page | 8
Page | 9
During the year under report, the contribution of cultured shrimp and scampi showed increase
compared to the previous year, particularly because of the increase in export of L.vannamei. As
per the provisional figures (April 2011- February 2012) of export of Black tiger, L.Vannamei
and scampi for the financial year 2011-12, the total export of cultured shrimp export is 106935
MT valued at Rs.5139.5 crore (US $1.102 Billion ), registering increases of about 30% in
quantity, 38% in Rupee terms and 34% in Dollar terms).
Table 6
Contribution of cultured shrimp in the export production
2011-12 (*)
2010-11
Item
Qty in
Mt
Value in
Rs.Crore
Tiger
3330.44
Vanname
i
6740
5
3690
2
Value
in US$
Million
716.81
1658.72
353.06
Scampi
2628
150.34
White
1504
67.09
10843
9
5206.59
Total
Qty in
MT
Value in
Rs.Crore
Difference
Value
in US$
Million
689.00
6844
6
1204
7
3125.47
480.96
106.71
32.30
2069
113.26
24.93
14.20
1127
44.31
8368
8
3763.99
1116.3
7
Qty in MT
Value in
Rs.Crore
Value
in
US$ Million
-1041
(-1.52%)
24855
(206.32
%)
55
(27.02%)
205
(3.68%)
1177.76
(244.8%
)
37.08
(32.74%
)
22.78
(51.41%
)
1442.60
(38.33%
)
27.81
(4.04%)
246.35
(230.86%)
9.69
377
(33.45%)
830.34
24751
(29.58%)
7.37
(29.56%)
4.51
(46.54%)
286.03
(34.45%)
C.TRADE ISSUES
1.
EIC Executive Instruction
Changes have been effected in the Export Inspection Council [EIC] Executive Instruction,
which has affected the smooth flow of production and shipments of marine products to both EEC
and Non EEC countries. Costs of testing for antibiotic residues, heavy metals and other
parameters have also increased, in addition to increase in costs for approval and renewal. A
series of discussions between SEAI and EIC have taken place. Some issues have been addressed
appropriately, but many more issues remain unaddressed. Further discussions are taking place
to address the issues fully.
2.a
6th Antidumping Administrative Review.
US DOC in its final determination fixed a duty for India as given below.
M/s. Falcon Marine
de minimus
M/s. Apex Exports
2.51%
Country average
2.51%
b
7th Antidumping Administrative Review
The US Department of Commerce has initiated the 7 th Administrative Review of antidumping
duty on certain warm water shrimp from Indian in February 2012. The review covers the period
from 1st February 2011 to 31st January 2012.
About 21 Indian shrimp exporters to the US requested for a review. The petitioners had
requested DOC for review 347 Indian Seafood Companies, including the aforesaid 21
companies. DOC selected the following as the mandatory respondents for the 7 th review.
M/s. Devi Fisheries Pvt. Ltd
M/s. Apex Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd
3.
Registration of Seafood Processors under FSSAI
Page | 10
The seafood processing establishments manufacturing processed seafood for 100% export are
covered by the Export (Quality Control & Inspection) Amendment Act, 1984. The Act covers the
seafood processing, fishing and pre-processing centers in its entirety and the Export Inspection
Council of India has been designated as the Competent Authority for the seafood export sector.
The establishments are inspected and approved for export by an Assessment Panel of Experts
(APE) who inspects the establishments as per the norms laid down in the Executive Instructions
for Approval and Monitoring of Fish & Fishery Products for Export. These norms have been
formulated after taking into considerations the food safety requirements of India and all the
countries to which seafood exports are made. Constant monitoring of the establishments is
conducted as per the protocols of the Executive Instructions and every establishment is required
to renew their approval after a period of two years. We also understand that the EIC has also
been notified by FSSAI as an agency for monitoring of food business operators under the Act.
In these circumstances, we requested FSSAI that the inspection of the processing facility under
FSSAI Act Chapter 2, Section 2.1.4 (4) be waived in view of the stringent auditing of the facilities
of the processing establishments by an Assessment Panel of Experts who has Fishery specific
knowledge, and that further inspection by officers or designated personnel of FSSAI would only
be duplicating the assessment already done. Consequently, we also requested that the approval
granted to the seafood export processing establishments by the Competent Authority may be
treated as fulfilling the requirements under the section 2.1 of the Act and waive the requirement
for further inspection and monitoring. We are expecting a favorable decision from FSSAI soon.
4.
Page | 11
b) Registration of Farms:
MPEDA is very actively pursuing registration of farms which cannot be otherwise covered
for registration by CAA. Such a process of registration also effectively deals with the
issue of traceability requirement of the Health Authorities in importing countries.
c) Pre Harvest Testing:
The concerns of SEAI on the existing Pre-hearvest testing system and its effectiveness
vis--vis
a. Action protocol on farms and hatcheries on detection of Antibiotic Residues and
b. Its applicability in terms of requirement for exports to non-EEC countries,
were discussed in detail with MPEDA, Ministry of Commerce and EIC. As a result
of a series of dialogues, MPEDA and EIC have worked on improvement of the
effectiveness of the PHT system and the action protocol on farms and also on
reaching out to all farms.
SEAI has again raised issues on its practicality and deficiencies on effectively
operating this system in West Bengal and Orissa. This issue is being closely
followed up by SEAI with the help and support of MPEDA.
6.
Trade issues with importing countries
Indian seafood exporters often face certain obstacles in their attempts to capture overseas
markets. Common problems include the lack of awareness on customs procedures, frequent rate
changes in customs and other levies, procedural complications with regard to customs, absence
of a specified nodal agency in the importing country, ambiguity regarding technical standards,
discriminatory testing norms compared to competitors, unfamiliarity with various rules and
regulations and frequent change in policies of importing countries, without any advance
information etc.
Recent changes in specifications and regulations of some of our most important markets such
as the EU and the US have highlighted the need to address trade impediments in a systematic
manner. Although Indian seafood has strong footing in the EU market, the continuing economic
slowdown has started affecting our seafood exports.
On the other hand, concerned with the increasing uncertainties in world food safety, the US
government has revised norms of imports. The new Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) is one
of those interventions. This has given rise to a number of complicated requirements for food
manufacturers, processors, packagers, etc. who export to the US. FSMA requires companies to
register with FDA, to designate a US Agent for FDA communication, and to file prior notice, i.e.,
notify FDA before shipments arrive in the US instead of after arrival. The law also grants power
Page | 12
to US FDA to suspend a companys food facility registration and to proactively detain food for 30
days if suspected of adulteration or misbranding. Failure to make required electronic filings,
including registrations, process filings, prior notices, will also lead to detention. Additionally, the
law grants US FDA the power to order, rather than merely request, the recall of tainted food. As
part of each companys food facility registration, the company is required to agree to permit
inspection by US FDA. Importers are required to establish programs to verify the safety of all
shipments of imported food, and US FDA may require certifications of safety for each shipment.
SEAI is closely watching the new regulations and seeking assistance of the Government of India
for a solution.
ACHIEVEMENTS
1.
India International Seafood Show -2012
The 18th India International Seafood Show 2012 (IISS-2102) was jointly Organized by MPEDA and
SEAI, at Chennai Trade Centre, Chennai, from29th February to 2 nd March 2012.
His Excellency, the Governor of Tamil Nadu, Dr. K.Rosaiah, inaugurated the event on 28 th
February, 2012 in a grand function at CTC Chennai. Shri.Ganandeep Singh Bedi, IAS, Secretary,
Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Government of Tamil Nadu delivered
the Keynote address and Chairman, MPEDA welcomed the gathering on the occasion. Secretary
General, SEAI spoke on the status and issues of the marine product exports sector. The
President, SEAI gave a vote of thanks on the occasion.
Technical sessions to the benefit of the seafood processing entrepreneurs were arranged by
Indian and overseas experts on different aspects. There were 210 exhibitors and over 2000
delegates and visitors for the show. The exhibitors included seafood exporters, processors,
buyers and allied Industries related to seafood sector from India and Japan, USA, EU, Vietnam,
Taiwan, Malaysia, Argentina, Singapore, China, USA, Japan, UAE, Turkey, Lebanon and Thailand.
The show had a separate Japan pavilion and a sizeable number of Japanese exhibitors and
delegates attended the show.
In the inaugural ceremony, awards were given to the top exporters in different categories.
Veterans in the Industry were also suitably honorued.
2.
The Foreign Trade Policy continues to be supportive of the sector, at reduced levels.
Efforts are being made to strengthen these supports.
3.
Participation in the European Seafood Exposition-2012 at Brussels.
The 20th edition of the prestigious European Seafood Exposition (ESE) from 24 th to 26th April
2012 at Brussels. witnessed a strong participation of major players from India. ESE, regarded as
the largest seafood show on the globe, had 24 leading seafood exporters from India and
Seafood Exporters Association of India (SEAI) participated along with MPEDA this year.
The Indian Stand had displayed almost all the products produced by the Indian seafood
exporters. Special emphasis was given to promote value added seafood products, particularly
the ready-to-eat and ready-to-cook products which were prominently displayed.
The co-exhibitors praised the arrangements made by SEAI/MPEDA for effective participation in
ESE 2012. The SEAI exhibition space in the India Pavilion had four freezers with display of a
number of product varieties for the buyer to choose. It was considered one among the largest
displays of seafood arranged in the ESE 2012.
4.
Page | 13
Indonesia and 6th ISO/TC 234 scheduled to be held at Reykjavik, Iceland between 6 th to 8th
November 2012.
5.
Common Pre-processing Centre at Balramgarhi- Orissa
The proposal for a Common pre-processing center in Balramgarhi landing Center in Balramgarhi,
duly recommended by SEAI, was submitted to MPEDA in 2009. MPEDA finally communicated the
sanction of the project vide their letter no. 2-7/CPC-BAL/2009/QC/HO Dt. 6.2.2012 advising us to
register the land. The land was duly inspected by MPEDA and the registration of land was
completed on 29.3.2012, jointly in the name of MPEDA and SEAI, at a total expenditure of
Rs.47.81 lac. The land development work like boundary wall, land filling work is under progress.
Members have contributed Rs.55 lac for the project.
F. MANAGING COMMITTEE MEMBERS STATEMENTS
COMPANIES ACT 1958
IN
TERMS
OF
SECTION 217(2AA)
OF THE
Page | 14
G. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In conclusion, on behalf of the Seafood Exporters Association of India, we wish to take this
opportunity to express our deep appreciation to Shri Anand Sharma, the Honble Minister of
Commerce & Industry , Mr.Rahul Kullar, Secretary- MOC, Mr.P.K.Chaudhery, Additional Secretary
and Chairman EIC, Joint Secretaries Mr. D.S.Dhesi, Mr. Rajeev Kher, and the entire Team of
Directors and other officers, who have dealt effectively with the issues of our sector.
Dr. Anup K Pujari, Director General of Foreign Trade, and his entire team, deserve a special
mention of gratitude, by the industry, for having extended their full support to the Industry.
We would also very specially like to thank Ms. Leena Nair IAS, Chairman MPEDA, and the entire
team of MPEDA officials for their totally proactive support and tremendous initiative extended to
the trade. Such an approach has been one of the primary reasons for the growth achieved last
year.
A similar approach, in tandem with MPEDA, by EIC headed by the extremely practically and
humble Dr. Saxena, Director and his team has also contributed very significantly to such a
growth. We would like to thank Dr. Saxena Director, Export Inspection Council of India, and his
entire team for their support and assistance rendered to the industry. We also thank all the
Export Inspection Agency officials throughout the country.
We like to place on record our thanks to Mr. Tarun Shridhar Joint Secretary (Fisheries) who has
always been helpful to the industry.
The entire team of officials in the Ministry of Commerce, Agriculture, Revenue and all other
ministries, have always been helpful to the seafood industry. We record our sincere thanks to
these Officials.
We also would like to place on record our thanks for the assistance received from Port Trusts,
Customs Departments, Shipping Companies, Financial Institutions and the various Central and
State Authorities, Research Institutions like CIFT, CMFRI, CIFNET, FSI, IFP and the State Fisheries
Departments.
We are particularly obliged to the Press and the various media for their service and support and
we look forward for their continued patronage to our Association.
We also like to express our deep gratitude to all the individuals and institutions that have either
directly or indirectly contributed to the welfare of the Association. We also wish to thank all our
members for their wholehearted support and contribution.
We thank all the Regional Presidents and all the office bearers of the regions for their effective
participation and support in the activities of the Association.
Finally, we would like to thank the Secretary and Staff of the Association for their sincere
commitments and hard work in discharging their duties.
CONCLUSION
As we conclude, we want put a thought before you. How much the Industry is prepared to face
the new International scenario? Investing in compliance is much cheaper than being at the
receiving end of a failed inspection or detention in importing countries. Detentions invariably
mean demurrage, laboratory testing fees, warehousing fees, product reconditioning costs,
expense of return freight, and the risk of losing a customer.
The best bet, therefore, is to prepare ourselves to meet the challenge. Moreover, there should
be continuous interaction with our foreign markets through exchange of delegations, enhancing
Page | 15
participation in each other's trade fairs and seminars and facilitating trade through positive
initiatives. Basically, the need of the hour is a consistent and long-term marketing strategy. It is
equally important to focus on developing value-added, high-grade products.
D.B.RAVI REDDY
NATIONAL PRESIDENT
Page | 16