Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
C 2013.
doi:10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/25
The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
1 Institut f
ur Ionenphysik und Angewandte Physik, Universitat Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; roland.wester@uibk.ac.at
Department of Surface and Plasma Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, 18000 Prague, Czech Republic
3 Department of Physics, AlbaNova, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
4 Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
Received 2013 May 29; accepted 2013 August 8; published 2013 September 23
ABSTRACT
Absolute photodetachment cross sections of two anions of astrophysical importance CN and C3 N were measured
to be (1.18 (0.03)stat (0.17)sys ) 1017 cm2 and (1.43 (0.14)stat (0.37)sys ) 1017 cm2 , respectively, at the
ultraviolet (UV) wavelength of 266 nm (4.66 eV). These relatively large values of the cross sections imply that
photodetachment can play a major role in the destruction mechanisms of these anions particularly in photondominated regions. We have therefore carried out model calculations using the newly measured cross sections to
investigate the abundance of these molecular anions in the cirumstellar envelope of the carbon-rich star IRC+10216.
The model predicts the relative importance of the various mechanisms of formation and destruction of these species
in different regions of the envelope. UV photodetachment was found to be the major destruction mechanism for
both CN and C3 N anions in those regions of the envelope, where they occur in peak abundance. It was also found
that photodetachment plays a crucial role in the degradation of these anions throughout the circumstellar envelope.
Key words: circumstellar matter stars: abundances stars: AGB and post-AGB stars: carbon
Online-only material: color figures
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Molecular Anions in Space: Observation
and Astrophysical Relevance
Kumar et al.
Kumar et al.
Table 1
Abundances of Parent Species Used in the Model
Table 2
Cross Sections (1017 cm2 ) from a Few Sets of Measurements on CN and
C3 N at 266 nm Together with the Average Values and the Values from the Fit
to Equation (2)
Parent Molecule
CS
SiO
SiS
CO
C2 H2
HCN
CH4
NH3
SiH4
SiC2
H2 O
HCl
HCP
C2 H4
HF
H2 S
N2
Mg
He
Abundance Relative to H2
7.0 107
1.8 107
1.3 106
6.0 104
8.0 105
2.0 105
3.5 106
2.0 106
2.2 107
2.0 107
1.0 107
1.0 107
2.5 108
2.0 108
8.0 109
4.0 109
2.0 104
1.0 105
1.0 101
No. of Measurements
CN
C3 N
Average
1.14
1.32
1.18
1.39
1.21
1.58
1.18
1.43
2.84
5.19
Kumar et al.
0.06
0.035
2
0.05
0.03
1
0.025
vertical in mm
vertical in mm
0.02
0.015
-1
0.01
-3
-2
-1
0
1
horizontal in mm
0.03
-1
0.02
0.01
0.005
-2
0.04
-2
-3
-2
-1
0
1
horizontal in mm
Figure 1. Tomography images for the CN ions for two different ion density distributions in the trap. The numbers on the color bars are in units of s1 . The cross
sections determined from these distributions agree to within 4%. Similar results were also obtained for C3 N (not shown).
(A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)
(a)
(b)
Figure 2. Fractional abundances of the important anions, as well as the electron fraction, as a function of radius in the circumstellar envelope of IRC+10216 without
(a) and with (b) shells.
(A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)
Table 3
Possible Contribution of Errors (%) in Calculating the Cross Sections of CN and C3 N
Source of Error
Laser energy fluctuation
Absorption of laser by window
Reflection coefficient of beam splitter
Imaging aspect ratio
Integration limits for ion signal
Background subtraction
Overlap of laser beam with wires
Total
Error (CN )
Error (C3 N )
7.6
0.5
1.0
0.8
0.9
2.2
1.3
10
1
2
2
2
3
1.5
12.3
0.5
1.0
0.8
3.9
5.9
1.3
15
1
2
2
4
8
1.5
14.3
21.5
25.7
33.5
Notes. The various contributions are assumed to be independent. Integration limits and background subtraction are in fact not completely
independent. However, the dependence is not systematic. Further, this correction does not make any significant difference in the estimation of
errors.
Kumar et al.
Table 4
Calculated and Observed Column Densities (in cm2 ) of Anions in IRC+10216
Anion
Using from
Millar et al. (2007)
Using from
Millar et al. (2007).
Model with Shells
Using Experimentally
Determined
Using Experimentally
Determined .
Model with Shells
CN
C3 N
6.9 1011
1.0 1012
8.3 1011
1.2 1012
5.5 1011
6.9 1011
7.0 1011
8.7 1011
C
6 + N C3 N + C3
(3)
C
6 + N CN + C5
(4)
(5)
(6)
HNCCC + e C3 N + H.
(7)
(8)
Kumar et al.
Agundez, M., Fonfra, J. P., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A48
Andersen, L. H., Bak, J., Boye, S., et al. 2001, JChPh, 115, 3566
Best, T., Otto, R., Trippel, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 63
Bradforth, S. E., Kim, E. H., Arnold, D. W., & Neumark, D. M. 1993, JChPh,
98, 800
Brunken, S., Gupta, H., Gottlieb, C. A., McCarthy, M. C., & Thaddeus, P.
2007, ApJL, 664, L43
Cernicharo, J., Guelin, M., Agundez, M., McCarthy, M. C., & Thaddeus, P.
2008, ApJL, 688, L83
Cernicharo, J., Guelin, M., Agundez, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, L37
Cordiner, M. A., & Millar, T. J. 2009, ApJ, 697, 68
Cordiner, M. A., Millar, T. J., Walsh, C., et al. 2008, in IAU Symp. 251, Organic
Matter in Space, ed. S. Kwok & S. Sandford (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.
Press), 157
Crosas, M., & Menten, K. M. 1997, ApJ, 483, 913
Dalgarno, A., & McCray, R. A. 1973, ApJ, 181, 95
Deiglmayr, J., Goritz, A., Best, T., Weidemuller, M., & Wester, R. 2012, PhRvA,
86, 043438
Draine, B. T. 1978, ApJS, 36, 595
Eichelberger, B., Snow, T. P., Barckholtz, C., & Bierbaum, V. M. 2007, ApJ,
667, 1283
Gottlieb, C. A., Brunken, S., McCarthy, M. C., & Thaddeus, P. 2007, JChPh,
126, 191101
Guelin, M., Agundez, M., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2011, in IAU Symp. 280,
The Molecular Universe, ed. J. Cernicharo & R. Bachiller (Cambridge:
Cambridge Univ. Press), 21
Gupta, H., Gottlieb, C. A., McCarthy, M. C., & Thaddeus, P. 2009, ApJ,
691, 1494
Harada, N., & Herbst, E. 2008, ApJ, 685, 272
Herbst, E.
2009, in ASP Conf. Ser. 417, Submillimeter Astrophysics and
Technology: A Symposium Honoring Thomas G. Phillips, ed. D. C. Lis,
J. E. Vaillancourt, P. F. Goldsmith, T. A. Bell, N. Z. Scoville, & J. Zmuidzinas
(San Francisco, CA: ASP), 153
Hlavenka, P., Otto, R., Trippel, S., et al. 2009, JChPh, 130, 061105
Kasai, Y., Kagi, E., & Kawaguchi, K. 2007, ApJL, 661, L61
Kawaguchi, K., Fujimori, R., Aimi, S., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, L47
Larsson, M., Geppert, W. D., & Nyman, G. 2012, RPPh, 75, 066901
Mauron, N., & Huggins, P. J. 2000, A&A, 359, 707
McCarthy, M. C., Gottlieb, C. A., Gupta, H., & Thaddeus, P. 2006, ApJL,
652, L141
McDowell, M. R. C. 1961, Obs, 81, 240
McElroy, D., Walsh, C., Markwick, A. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A36
Menshchikov, A. B., Balega, Y., Blocker, T., Osterbart, R., & Weigelt, G.
2001, A&A, 368, 497
Millar, T. J., Herbst, E., & Bettens, R. P. A. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 195
Millar, T. J., Walsh, C., Cordiner, M. A., N Chuimn, R., & Herbst, E.
2007, ApJL, 662, L87
Prasad, S. S., & Huntress, W. T., Jr. 1980, ApJS, 43, 1
Remijan, A. J., Hollis, J. M., Lovas, F. J., et al. 2007, ApJL, 664, L47
Sakai, N., Sakai, T., Osamura, Y., & Yamamoto, S. 2007, ApJL, 667, L65
Sakai, N., Sakai, T., & Yamamoto, S. 2008, ApJL, 673, L71
Sakai, N., Shiino, T., Hirota, T., Sakai, T., & Yamamoto, S. 2010, ApJL,
718, L49
Schmidt, H. T., Johansson, H. A. B., Thomas, R. D., et al. 2008, IJAsB,
7, 205
Smith, D., Church, M. J., & Miller, T. M. 1978, JChPh, 68, 1224
Thaddeus, P., Gottlieb, C. A., Gupta, H., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 1132
Trippel, S., Mikosch, J., Berhane, R., et al. 2006, PhRvL, 97, 193003
Yen, T. A., Garand, E., Shreve, A. T., & Neumark, D. M. 2010, JPCA, 114,
3215
4. CONCLUSIONS
The absolute photodetachment cross sections of two molecular anions of astrophysical importance, CN and C3 N , were
measured at the UV wavelength of 266 nm. The measured cross
sections are relatively high and might indicate the possibility
of strong resonances near the photodetachment threshold. High
cross sections imply that the abundance of these molecular anions can be crucially dependent on their destruction by photodetachment especially in photon-dominated regions. The presented model calculations, carried out to investigate molecular
anions in the circumstellar envelope of IRC+10216, predict the
relative importance of the various mechanisms of production
and destruction of cyano anions in different regions of the envelope. It was found that in regions where these molecular anions
have their peak abundance, photodetachment serves as the most
important destruction mechanism. The calculations also predict
that photodetachment significantly contributes to the destruction
of these anions throughout the circumstellar envelope. Thus,
photodetachment plays a fundamental role in the degradation
of anions in circumstellar envelopes. However, its exact significance can only be determined if more data on other competing
pathways are available. Future experimental investigations on
these processes are therefore vital for our understanding of the
anion chemistry of circumstellar envelopes.
This work has been supported by the European Research
Council under ERC grant agreement No. 279898 and by the ESF
COST Action CM0805 The Chemical Cosmos: Understanding
Chemistry in Astronomical Environments. We thank Eric
Endres for his support during the experiments. Research in
molecular astrophysics at QUB is supported by a grant from
R. ackowledges support by Czech Grant Agency
the STFC. S.
under contract No. P209/12/0233.
REFERENCES
Agundez, M., Cernicharo, J., Guelin, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 478, L19
Agundez, M., Cernicharo, J., Guelin, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 517, L2