Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
MONUMENTS
IN THE ROMAN
PROVINCES
PROCEEDINGS
OF
TH
THE 13 INTERNATIONAL
COLLOQUIUM ON ROMAN
PROVINCIAL ART
CORPUS SIGNORUM
IMPERII ROMANI
Editor
Cristina-Georgeta Alexandrescu
Imgines
Studies in ancient arts and iconography
3
Series editor Cristina-Georgeta Alexandrescu
Printed with the financial support of the Romanian Academy.
Editor: Cristina-Georgeta Alexandrescu.
Editorial board: Cristina-Georgeta Alexandrescu, Liana Oa, Mihaela Mnucu-Adameteanu.
Front cover: Fortuna relief found reused in the baths of the Roman auxiliary camp of Iliua, Bistria-Nsud County
(Complexul Muzeal Bistria-Nsud, Bistria, inv. no. 23022; photo C.-G.Alexandrescu, ArheoMedia).
Back cover: Detail of the Fortuna and Pontos statue from Tomis (Muzeul de Istorie Naional i Arheologie Constana
inv. no. 2001; photo O. iei).
First published 2015.
Institutul de Arheologie Vasile Prvan & the authors.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic,
mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any
information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the author and editor.
This book is not for sale. The distribution of printed volumes is to be made through publication exchange and gift.
CONTENT
8
9
13
23
33
43
55
63
73
87
97
107
Jasna Jelii-Radoni
The Cult of Dionysus or Liber Votive Monuments in Salona
Marija Kolega
Sculptures and votive monuments of deities in Aenona
Ante Rendi-Mioevi
A reconstruction of the central part of the Nymphaeum (fountain) at Varadinske Toplice (Aquae
Iasae) with a relief depiction of Nymphs
Adriana Antal
Consecratio in formam Veneris in Roman Dacia
Iphigeneia Leventi
The relief statue base of Nummius Nigreinos, sacred herald of the Eleusinian mysteries. The
iconography of Eleusinian cult initiates and officials in Roman Imperial times
Georgia Aristodemou
Mars Victor, Victoria and Nemesis Invicta. Three votive reliefs from the ancient theatre of Philippi
(Kavala) reconsidered
Aleksandra Nikoloska
The world of Dionysos on monuments from the Republic of Macedonia
Exhlale Dobruna-Salihu
Three significant reliefs of grapevine and forest deities in Dardania
Wolfgang Wohlmayr
Gottheiten und Kulte im nrdlichen Teil Noricums nach Aussage der Weihedenkmler. Ein Blick auf
Iuvavum (Salzburg) und sein Umland
121
129
139
Ilona Skupinska-Lvset
Incense Altars and Visualization of Incense Offerings in Roman Syria
Sorin Nemeti
I rilievi dei Cavalieri Danubiani. Spunti per linterpretazione diacronica delle varianti regionali
Mirjana Sanader
Der Januskult in den Provinzen des Rmischen Reiches unter besonderer Bercksichtigung der
Ikonographie zweier Reliefs aus Dalmatien und Dakien
149
163
173
191
201
211
223
233
Nade Proeva
Les croyances funraires des Macdoniens: lhrosation et la divinisation des dfunts lpoque
romaine
Delphine Seigneuret
Les panneaux sculpts de Khirbet edh-Dharih (Jordanie centrale): remarques sur la restitution, la
technique et liconographie
Luca Bianchi
Edifici in miniatura ed esigenze dapparato: ledicola funeraria pannonico-dacica
Maria Weiss
Der brtige Ruhende auf den Seitenregistern der Mithrasmonumente
Piotr Dyczek
Sculptures from the templum Aesculapii et Hygiae in the Legionary Hospital at Novae (Moesia
Inferior)
Jutta Ronke
Fortuna-Fragmente aus der Germania superior. Zur antiken Glcksgttin von der Baustelle
Varia/disputationes
253
263
Manfred Hainzmann
SAGUM Zu problematischen Datierungsanstzen eines keltisch-rmischen Kleidungsstckes
277
287
295
305
315
Fulvia Ciliberto
Un rilievo con zodiaco nabateo a Gerusalemme
321
329
343
359
375
378
379
Judit Zldfldi
Conditions for successful provenance studies on marble
Guntram Koch
Some Considerations on the Sarcophagi of Roman Imperial Times in the Provinces of the Balkans,
especially Moesia Inferior
Program of The 13th International Colloquium on Roman Provincial Art
Organisers
List of participants
The works of ancient writers are quoted using the recommendations in Der Neue Pauly III (1997) S.
XXXVIXLIV and Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Index (1900).
The abbreviations are using the guidelines of the German Archaeological Institute published on
http://www.dainst.org/publikationen/publizieren-beim-dai/richtlinien.
Further bibliographical abbreviations are listed at the end of each contribution.
Online sources:
EDH
Epigraphische Datenbank Heidelberg
http://www.epigraphische-datenbank-heidelberg.de/
uel
ubi-erat-lupa
http://www.ubi-erat-lupa.org/
ArheoMedia
http://www.arheomedia.ro/monumente/.
Rsum: Cet article se concentre sur trois bas-reliefs votifs sculpts sur les pilastres de la parodos occidentale du
thtre antique de Philippes (rgion de Kavala). L'inscription ddicatoire nomme un certain M. Velleius Zosimus, le
prtre de Nmsis et le dedicant des reliefs. Ces bas-reliefs reprsentent les figures de la triade triomphante de Mars
Victor, Victoria et Nemesis Invicta celle-ci tant identifie dans deux reliefs de plus dans le mme thtre. Ces bas-reliefs ont t sculpts aprs la construction de l'arche d'entre et ils sont associ d'une phase tardive du thtre o au
cours du deuxime sicle aprs J.-Chr. l'orchestre a reu transformations afin d'abriter les combats de gladiateurs
et divers ludi scaenici. La desse Nmsis, ainsi que Mars, sont prsents aussi au thtre de Thasos, reprsents en
bas-reliefs de la mme priode. Leur prsence rvle non seulement leur connexion aux les jeux de gladiateurs, mais
elle reflte aussi l'existence de leurs cultes dans la rgion de Kavala et Thasos et le rle qu'ils ont tenu dans la rgion
au cours du deuxime sicle aprs J.-Chr.
The ancient theatre of Philippi (fig.1a and 1b) was firstly constructed at the age of Phillip II (fourth
century B.C.)1. During the second century A.D. it was converted into a monumental Roman theatre with a
three storied scaenae frons2. Around the late second or early third century A.D. the orchestra (fig.2) was converted into a Roman arena for gladiatorial combats and hunts3. It was abandoned around 400 A.D.
HELLENI
STI
C PERI
OD
ROMAN PERI
OD
OTTOMAN PERI
OD
Collart 1928; Collart 1937, 17577, pl. 25, fig. 21; Lazarides 19611962, 240; Lazarides 1963, 256; KoukouliChrysanthaki Karadedos 1999, 6986; Sear 2006, 423, plan 450; Karadedos Koukouli-Chrysanthaki 2007, 273290;
Koukouli-Chrysanthaki Karadedos 2012, 193207, 208219 (on the restoration project). For detailed bibliography, see,
http://www.diazoma.gr/en/Page_04-01_AT-007.asp.
2
On the scarce architectural remains of the Hellenistic scene building, see Koukouli-Chrysanthaki Karadedos 1999,
74, plan 23, fig. 6. According to the excavators (Karadedos Koukouli-Chrysanthaki 2007, 276) excavations produced
new evidences, leading to an earlier dating of the first Roman phase, into the first century AD. This remains to be further
investigated: Koukouli-Chrysanthaki Karadedos 2012, 195199, figs. 2a-b, 3a-b, 10.
3
A huge underground space used for keeping the beasts before the venationes was unearthed during recent excavations:
Karadedos Koukouli-Chrysanthaki 2007, 276; Koukouli-Chrysanthaki Karadedos 2012, 199203, figs 3a-b, 4a-c, 5a-b.
1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON ROMAN PROVINCIAL ART 2013 (2015), 7385
Georgia Aristodemou
This paper discusses a group of three votive reliefs (fig.3) located on the south and north pilasters of the western parodos of the ancient theatre4. They were carved after the construction of the arch
and are related to a later phase of the theatre when the orchestra received transformations in order to house
gladiatorial combats and hunts. These reliefs depict Nemesis, Victoria and Mars; all figures are made of the
same gross grained marble from Philippi and their surfaces are worn due to weather conditions. They are
all sculpted inside a rectangular concave frame. The same (with minor differences) dedicatory inscription is
carved on the bordure above the figures5:
. [ | []| [] |||
|| | | | ||
(Transl.: M. Velleius Zosimos, priest of the invincible Nemesis, on behalf of the friends of hunting he
made the images of gods by his own means).
Nemesis is depicted in frontal view (fig.4a), standing and leaning on her left foot6. She is dressed
in a long peplos, belted under the chest and forming a kolpos. On her left hand she is holding the scale, while
with her right hand she is holding the measuring stick. A six rayed wheel rests on her right leg. Face and hair
are worn. She recalls the statue type of the Rhamnous Nemesis7.
The winged Victoria is sculpted on the south pilaster (fig.4b), facing the figure of Nemesis8. She is
depicted in frontal view and standing on a globe, with her left leg slightly projecting and thus evoking the flying motion. She is wearing a light peplos belted under the chest, leaving her right breast exposed. At her raised
right hand she is holding a wreath, symbol of triumph, extending outside of the frame, while at her left hand
she is holding a palm branch. The winged Victoria is repeating the iconographical type of Victoria Augusta, as
seen in the bronze coins issued by the roman colonia Philippensis9.
The figure of Victoria is carved at the same pilaster with the figure of Mars. Mars (fig.4c) is depicted
standing and in frontal view, turning slightly to the right10. His iconography derives not from a certain cult
statue type, but from the general military iconography of the Roman legionnaires of the late empire: he wears
a leather cuirass reinforced at the chest with scales. A short sword (parazonium) is adjusted at his belt. On his
head he is wearing a plume helmet. His right arm extends diagonally holding a round object (a phyale?). His
left arm is raised holding a shield and a spear.
For the first excavation report, see BCH 47, 1923, 534535.
Chapouthier 1924, 289290.293.
6
Chapouthier 1924, 288 sq., 292294, figs. 2 and 4; Collart 1928, 108 sq.; Hornum 1993, 4849.60.62.7071, pl.
(Appendix II no.85); Aristodemou 2000, 43.172173.
7
Rhamnous: Paus. 1.33.1; Schweitzer 1931, 195202; Petrakos 1986. On the Rhamnous Nemesis: Despinis 1971; LIMC
VI (1992) 733, 738 nos. 12, 743 nos. 73140, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi); Ehrhardt 1997.
8
Chapouthier 1924, 287292, fig.1 and 3; Collart 1928, 108 sq, fig.20; Hornum 1993, Appendix II no.84.
9
LIMC VI (1992) 758 no. 240 s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi); Kremydi-Sicilianou 2002, 6384; Koukouli Karadedos
2007, 456 fig.28.
10
Chapouthier 1925, 239244, fig.12; Hornum 1993, Appendix II no.86.
4
5
74
Mars Victor, Victoria and Nemesis Invicta. Three votive reliefs from the ancient theatre of Philippi
The above described reliefs are of a minor artistic quality. Their execution is coarse, while the inscription letters are untidy. An approximate date given for the reliefs and the dedication is the late second or the
early third century A.D.
This group is supplemented by two more reliefs (fig.5a and 5b), originally carved on the key stone of
the western arch gate. Nemesis is carved at the interior side, facing the orchestra11. She is dressed in a chiton
belted under the chest and a himation covering the left shoulder following the statue type of the Smyrna
Nemesis12. On her right hand she is holding the scale, while with her left hand she is holding the measuring
stick. A schematically engraved wheel rests on her right leg. Face and hair are worn. The exterior side of the
arch depicts a boukranion. The fleshy skull is carved in high relief, the snout is well rendered, the forehead
Collart 1928, 110, fig.21 (Nemesis) 112, fig.22 (boukranion); LIMC VI (1992) 741 no.38, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
Hornum 1993, 5960, pl..
12
On the twin cult statues of Smyrna mentioned by Pausanias (7.5.23), see Hornum 1993, 1114, 68; LIMC VI (1992)
734, 739 nos. 329, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
11
75
Georgia Aristodemou
is a bit puffy, and the horns are short and pointed. Nemesis figure was probably carved after the boukranion
as deducted from their differences in style and execution, as well as from the finishing traces visible on the
pilasters background13.
Apart from the theatre reliefs, the presence of Nemesis in Philippi is also attested by an inscribed fragment of a funerary relief found in secondary use in the area of the Basilica A14. This relief depicts a Thracian
Rider along with a female deity holding a scale in her right hand and a measuring stick in her left hand, identified as Nemesis.
Figures 5a-b Philippi, Theatre. Western Parodos: a/ detail of the Nemesis relief b/ boukranion detail (G. Aristodemou)
Relevant to the above are some reliefs unearthed at the area of the ancient theater of the neighboring island of Thasos, built as early as the fourth century B.C.15. At the late second century A.D., the orchestra
too, was converted into an arena for gladiatorial combats and hunts. Two fragments of a Doric entablature,
preserving an inscribed marble architrave, and a series of sculpted metopes were found at the ancient theatre
(fig.6). The votive inscription (IG XII 8, no.424) mentions a certain Lysistratos known to be a Theoros who
dedicated the monument to Dionysus16: [ ] [ ] [ ]
The relief figures depicted on the metopes of the theatre faade are recognized as Dionysus17, Mars,
and Heros Equitans (Thracian Rider)18. They belonged to a series of reliefs, of which however nothing else has
been found. The proscaenium fragments have been dated at late second early third century A.D.19. They are
all made from the coarse grained Thasian marble.
Fig.6 Thasos, Theatre proscaenium (after Grandjean Salviat 2000, fig 62b).
The excavations at the theatre area also unearthed a series of fragmentary reliefs depicting Nemesis
(figs 7a-c). These reliefs were considered by Bernard and Salviat to have derived from the same building20.
Based on their resemblance in material and style with the architectural members lying at the theatre, as
well as on chronological criteria and their execution technique, Bernard and Salviat have rightly attributed
these fragmentary reliefs to the lower part of the scene building faade and specifically at the proscaenium
76
Mars Victor, Victoria and Nemesis Invicta. Three votive reliefs from the ancient theatre of Philippi
pilasters21. Dated too at the early third century A.D., these reliefs attest the existence of Nemesis cult on the
island, though her sanctuary has not yet been identified.
Figures 7a-b-c Thasos theatre: a/Nemesis Relief b/Nemesis Relief (after Bernard Salviat
1962, figs 18 and 19) c/Nemesis Triple Relief (after Devambez 194243, fig.9).
The relief inv. no.584 is kept at the Archaeological Museum of Thasos22. Nemesis is iconographically
related to the statue type of the Smyrna Nemesis, without exactly following it. The dedicatory inscription
(IG XII 8,371) carved below the figure mentions a certain Evemeros, son of Dionysius, possibly a gladiator.
Bernard and Salviat place this relief at the left corner of the Doric proscaenium23. This relief belongs to the
same group with the relief inv. no.378, today kept at the Istanbul Archaeological Museum24. Nemesis here
too, follows the Smyrna Nemesis statue type, holding the measuring stick and doing the so-called Nemesis
gesture.
A third relief, also kept at the Istanbul Archaeological Museum is divided in two niches25. Nemesis in
the left niche recalls the Alexandria Nemesis statue type26. She is depicted winged, wearing a cuirass, holding the scales and a sword. The wheel is visible under her feet. On the head she wears a diadem. The double
Nemeseis in the right niche are related to the twin cult statues of Nemesis in Smyrna. They are holding the
measuring stick with their left hand and with the right they are drawing out the neck of their clothing, doing
the so-called Nemesis gesture.
77
Georgia Aristodemou
Apart from the above reliefs, Nemesis importance for the island of Thasos is attested also from a pair
of statues (fig.8) found in 1930 (inv. no.58) and 1962 (inv. no.2106) close to the Agora27. They might have
originally decorated the second century A.D. Odeion. They are dated in the Hadrianic period and derive from
a common prototype, the statue type of the twin Smyrna Nemeseis28. A pair of wings has been added, actually
mixing the iconography of Victoria with that of Nemesis and according to scholars this is probably the earliest
example of the Smyrna Nemesis type with wings29. Both statues hold the measuring stick with the left hand,
while with the right hand, as P. Devambez suggested, they must have been holding the scales, just like on the
Nemesis relief from the Philippi theatre30.
NEMESIS AND THE GAMES
27
Devambez 194243, 216, pl.XII, fig.79; Roley 1964, 496506, figs. 1, 2, 5, 7 and 1, 2, 4, 6; LIMC VI (1992) 740 no.29,
sv. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
28
Devambez 194243, 218220. Two statuary groups of double Nemeseis were discovered in the provinces of Dacia and
Moesia; the most well preserved comes from Tomi (modern Constana), from the votive aedicula of C. Herennius Charito:
ISM II, no. 148, Bordenache 1965, 72, fig. 5. Each figure stands in a separate plinth. They are wearing a chiton and a
himation; they are both holding the measuring stick with their left hand and making the Nemesis gesture with their right
hand. They are depicted wingless. For the relevant discussion, see lately Bauchhen 2013.
29
Roley 1964, 504; Hornum 1993, 13.
30
Devambez 194243, 220.
31
LIMC VI (1992) 761, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
32
For commentaries on the iconography of Nemesis during the classical and the Roman period throughout the
Mediterranean basin, see LIMC VI (1992) 756762 s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi), 768770 (F. Rausa), 772773 (P. Linant
de Bellefonds).
33
Koukouli Karadedos 2007, 457458. The iconographical type of the peplos-wearing Nemesis was quite diffused in
the Balkan provinces during the late second and third century A.D. and it sometimes coexisted with the himation-wearing
Nemesis. See also Bouley 1990, 241251.
34
Hornum 1993, 322325 (Nemesis depictions with the wheel), 63 and 325327 (Nemesis depictions with the
measuring stick), 63 and 321 (Nemesis depictions with the scales), 329330 (Nemesis depictions with the bridle) .
35
Perdritzet 1914, 96; Chapoutier 1924, 295; On the iconographical correlation of Nemesis with other deities, see also,
LIMC VI (1992) 756 nos. 180210, 761 (comment on the Roman iconography) s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
36
Edwards 1990, 533 note 19 (with further bibliography). Also, LIMC VI (1992) 750 nos. 55c, 57, 66a, 69, 180186, and
765 no.265, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi); Pastor 2011, 80 (examples from the Balkan-Danubian provinces).
37
A headless statue standing on an altar and depicting Nemesis as the Tyche of the City comes from the Heraclea
Lyncestis theatre. The statue was dedicated to Tyche by Julia Tertulla (IG X, 2.2.55: /// /
), Dll 1977, 123124, pl.60 a-c.
38
von Premerstein 1894, 402.
39
Schweitzer 1931, 210212 (Niketypus); LIMC VI (1992) 748 nos. 157164 (winged Nemesis, Victoriatypus), 751
nos. 191194, 758, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
40
Chapoutier 1924, 296. This connection is noticeable in Thrace, cf. a votive relief to (first century B.C.)
and an inscription recording Nemesis along with Nike (early imperial period) both from Maroneia (Thrace), Maroneia
Archaeological Collection, AKM 585 and AKM 745. Loukopoulou Parisaki 2005, 382 ( 204) and 475 (374).
78
Mars Victor, Victoria and Nemesis Invicta. Three votive reliefs from the ancient theatre of Philippi
Nemesis statues) is a combination of Victorias and Nemesis attributes41 and corresponds to those cases
where Nemesis is present not as a punishing deity, but as a triumphant one42. Wings are also used as an
indication of the velocity and rapidity of Nemesis acts is called by Mesomedes in his
hymn, as well as , in an epigram from Piraeus43. Priest Zosimos here ascribes to Nemesis a
new epithet: (= the unconquerable). According to Chapoutier, in the world of the palaestrae and the
arena the honour of winning is transferred from Victoria to Nemesis, under the protection of which victory
becomes possible44.
The cult of Mars is diffused in the region of Macedonia and is attested in Philippi as early as the
fourth century B.C.45. Invocations to him are very common throughout the Hellenistic period; however, his
cult gained much greater popularity during the Roman Period, especially after Octavians invocation to Mars
Ultor in Philippi (Suet. Aug. 29). His strong presence in the region is established by his depictions at the proscaenia of the Philippi and the Thasos scene buildings. In Philippi because of his association with Victoria
he receives the characterization of Mars Victor46. As Mars Victor he presides the various arena spectacles
and he receives honors from all those engaged in the arena47. The co-existence of Mars, Nemesis and Victoria
LIMC VI (1992) 740 no.29, 745747 nos. 112130, 138140, 145, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
Chapoutier 1924, 297299; When ever Nemesis is depicted trampling on a prostate figure she usually bears wings. In
these cases Nemesis takes the role of the punishing deity, LIMC VI (1992) 758760, s.v. Nemesis (P. Karanastassi).
43
For Mesomedes, Hymn to Nemesis, Buffiere 1960, 226. For the Piraeus epigram, see Perdritzet 1898, 600.
44
Chapoutier 1924, 296.
45
Cf. the mid-fourth century B.C. inscription (Philippi, Archaeological Museum, inv. no. 1420) found embedded in the
Basilica A, recording land as property of Ares sanctuary: Ducrey 1990, 552554.
46
Chapoutier 1925, 242 for citation of a votive relief to Marti et Victori (CIL VII, 992) and 243 for other examples of
co-appearances of Mars and Victoria.
47
Cf. a monument in Spain dedicated to Deo Marti Victori ob eventum bonum gladiatori muneris (CIL II 2473), or a
statue in Holland dedicated by gladiators to Marti Victori gladiatores classis) G(ermanicae) p(iae) f(idel.is) (CIL XIII, 2,
8831), both cited in Chapoutier 1925, 242.
41
42
79
Georgia Aristodemou
is also known from a votive relief from Rome (CIL VI, 1, 2821)48, as well as from the sacellum of the Carnuntum
amphitheatre, which is actually located close to a Roman camp49.
Epigraphical and archaeological evidence also attest the connection between Nemesis and Artemis50.
In the region of Macedonia the cult of Artemis is widely spread along with her association with Nemesis51.
Artemiss cult in Philippi is confirmed by her sanctuary, identified at the south-eastern slope of the acropolis,
and the numerous rock reliefs, carved at the epitheatron of the Philippi theatre, the vast majority of which
depict her as a huntress52. The identity of Artemis/Diana as the goddess of beasts and patron of the hunters
is here transmitted to Nemesis. Therefore Nemesis like Artemis becomes the undefeated goddess and
also becomes directly related to the beast hunts and beast combats held at theatres and amphitheaters. It
is understandable why in Philippi the association of hunters honoured Nemesis both as the patron deity of
hunters and as the mistress of wild animals.
Epigraphic evidence
The earlier testimonies regarding the association of Nemesis with the Games consist of votive inscriptions found in theatres and amphitheatres and appear as early as the Augustan era and the Julio-Claudian
dynasty53. Dedicatory inscriptions to Nemesis which reveal the relation between Nemesis cult and the arena
monuments are to be found in the West prior to the second or third centuries A.D. and in the East during the
second or third centuries A.D.54.
Among the most interesting features of Nemesis, is not only that she developed to be a dynamic and
flexible deity, but also the fact of the reception of her cult by strikingly different classes of the provincial
society55. As deducted from the votive inscriptions, dedicants belong to various social strata. Nemesis is considered a patron deity of males occupied with gladiatorial combats and hunts (e.g. gladiatores, venatores or
iuvenes). Therefore, among dedicants are those who work at the theatre or amphitheatre or are otherwise
engaged to the arena spectacles56. Nemesis is also strongly connected to the military world, since as Nemesis
campestris is considered the patron deity of soldiers. Therefore, among dedicants are also military men, in
various stages of their careers57.
Quite impressive is the abundance of dedications made by civilians. Among them are those belonging
to the provincial elite classes, such as the citys office holders, i.e. people involved with the administration of
the city, or members of the local collegia and associations, as well as priests58. Worth mentioning are also the
cases of slaves and freedmen59.
In the case of Philippi, the sponsor of the theatre reliefs was not a gladiator, neither a soldier nor a
private citizen, but a priest a high-ranked member of the local elite. Zosimos made this dedication on behalf of his association, the , an association in favour of the hunting games (probably amateur hunters rather than venatores), very popular in the regions of Macedonia and Thrace since the
Hellenistic period. Associations like these are also known in Philippopolis, Tomis, Thasos, Ilion, Pergamon,
Corinth, etc.60 The from Philippi constitute a special case since Zosimos dedication is connected to a
theatre used as an arena and reflects the cult games held there. One can also suggest that through this dedi-
ILS 2096 (from Rome): I(ovi) O(ptimo) M(aximo) et Marti et Nemesi et Soli et Victoriae et omnibus / diis(!) Patriensibus
civ(es) ex prov(incia) Belgica Aug(usta) Viromandu/oru(m) milites Iul(ius) Iustus coh(ortis) I praet(oriae) |(centuria)
Albani et / Firm(us) Maternianus coh(ortis) X praet(oriae) Philippianarum / |(centuria) Artemonis v(otum) s(olverunt)
l(ibentes) m(erito) // Ded(icata) IIII Kal(endas) Iul(ias) / Pr(a)esente et / Albino [co(n)s(ulibus)].
49
Chapoutier 1925, 243 (CIL III Suppl.2, 1407114091).
50
cf. Rhamnous where Nemesis was worshipped along with Artemis /. The connection goes back to a time as
Nemesis was considered a chthonic deity: Futrell 1997, 111; Pastor 2011, 80. On Artemis Oupis, see Natsikopoulos 2009,
32.
51
Lately on Artemiss cult and sanctuaries in Macedonia: Natsikopoulos 2009, especially 4167 (Thasos) and 7273
(Philippi). In Edessa she is worshipped along with Nemesis Drasteios: Hatzopoulos 1987, 404 note 26. Their cult is verified
by a pair of altars found next to the theatre: Petsas 1969, 305306.
52
For the discussion on the about 90 rock cut reliefs depicting Artemis as hunter, in various iconographical types, see
Collart Ducrey 1975, nos. 897, 200227; Abrahamsen 1986. On recent finds see Koukouli-Chrysanthaki Karadedos,
2008, 213219.
53
Hornum 1993, 4748, 56 (and Appendix II, no.46: Salamis theatre, no.240: Ephesos stadium), for the earliest examples
from the Roman East. For Nemesis shrines in amphitheatres, see recently, Wittenberg 2014.
54
Hornum 1993, 4849; Fortea Lpez 1994, 115.
55
Pastor 2011, 82.
56
Pastor 2011, 7678.
57
Papapostolou 1989, 377; Pastor 2011, 80.
58
Pastor 2011, 78.
59
Hornum 1993, 74.
60
Chapoutier 1924, 300; Bouley 1996.
48
80
Mars Victor, Victoria and Nemesis Invicta. Three votive reliefs from the ancient theatre of Philippi
cation, Zosimos actually wished that Nemesis would convey her divine qualities to his association. In that
aspect, this triple dedication should also be seen as a wish and/or a gratitude for the accomplishment and the
success of the games sponsored by the association of the 61.
The presence of Nemesis in the area of the Thasos theatre is also strong judging from her numerous representations in sculpture. All works reflect the established cult of Nemesis in Thasos, though the
actual place of her worship has not yet been located62. The identity of the dedicators of the Nemesis reliefs
at the Thasos theatre proscaenium remains obscure. The French excavators believe that the recorded names
(no.584: IG XII 8,371) and or (no.378: IG XII 8,372) were persons occupied professionally in the arena games probably gladiators and not prominent members of the local elite63.
Starting as an abstract sense of the righteous anger, Nemesis soon developed to a powerful deity of
the Graeco-Roman pantheon, while her cult gained a significant popularity during the Roman period and Late
Antiquity64; one of the most characteristic Nemesis features during the imperial period is her intense presence in spectacle monuments throughout the Empire. Archaeology recovered strong testimonies on the connection between Nemesis, spectacle monuments and the gladiatorial combats and beast-hunts held there65.
The reason why this Greek goddess was associated with the world of the arena in the Roman provinces of the
second and third century A.D. is a fascinating subject. Many scholars believe that the development in Nemesis
cult was probably launched by the military campaigns in the East and the barbaric invasions and movements
of legions to the frontiers, a process that brought great changes in the societies of the border territories66.
The second and third century A.D. were a period of transition, provincial societies entrusted Nemesis a
deity believed to control human destiny with the task of defending their lives. Since the Eastern part of the
empire is closely associated with the great military campaigns and triumphs of the Roman emperors, one is
allowed to assume that Roman legionnaires introduced their patron deities to the places where they camped,
among them Philippi67. It was them, who actually contributed to the diffusion of Nemesis cult in the eastern
provinces68. After Augustus, Philippi developed into a cosmopolitan city, inhabited by Greeks, Romans and
Thracians69. Apart from the Roman troops, numerous prominent Roman families were settled in the region
and their presence helped on forming the proper background so that Roman customs were imported in all
levels of private and public life. Many Roman trends, for instance trends regarding spectacles, were rapidly
diffused in the entire region.
It is generally accepted that spectacles like the munera gladiatoria and the venationes were a public display of imperial power, commemorating war triumphs and symbolizing the public destruction of the
Roman state enemies70. The presence of Nemesis in the Roman arena confirms, enforces and supports the
imperial propaganda of the second century A.D.71. Nemesis appears to guarantee both the legitimacy and the
effort of the emperors military campaigns72.
The relation between the arena monuments (theatres, amphitheatres) as the symbol of Roman presence and power in the provinces, the emperor as the image of the Imperium Romanum, and Nemesis, as an
imperial ally and defender of the just rule, remains strong throughout the second and third century A.D.
Therefore, the discussed triad of Nemesis Invicta, Mars Victor and Victoria in the entrance of the Philippi
theatre could be seen both as a triptych of triumph as well as a testimony of the roman influence upon the
region of Macedonia73.
Chapoutier 1924, 301.
Hornum 1993, 6162.
63
Bernard Salviat 1962, 603; Hornum 1993, 72.
64
On the Nemesis cult prior to the Roman imperial period, see Hornum 1993, 614.
65
The association of Nemesis cult with the games has been a subject of study by scholars, such as Posnansky 1890; von
Premerstein 1894; Volkmann 1928; Foucher 1974; Dll 1977, 121126; Canto 1984; Hornum 1993 (with all previous
bibliography); Futrell 1997; Pastor 2011, 7589. Epigraphic material has been gathered by Hornum 1993, 153317.
66
Hornum 1993, 7074; Futrell 1997, 112113; Pastor 2011, 80.
67
Chapoutier 1925, 243244.
68
Futrell 1997, 113.
69
The administrative organization of the colony followed the jus Italicum, whilst all members of the Roman community
retained their roman citizenship: Koukouli-Chrysanthaki 2011, 447.
70
Hornum 1993, 8487; Wiedemann 1995, 90; Moreover, an inscription from the Stobi theatre postscaenium records a
dedication to Nemesis as Ultrix Augusta, offered by two Augustales and is probably referring to games sponsored by them:
Papazoglou 1951; Bouley 1986, 359364; Papapostolou 1989, 353 note 13; Hornum 1993, 40 note 25;
71
Hornum 1993, 90.
72
Pastor 2011, 83.
73
Futrell 1997, 113; Gounari 2010.
61
62
81
Georgia Aristodemou
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abrahamsen 1986
V. Abrahamsen, The Rock reliefs and the Cult of Diana at Philippi (Cambridge 1986).
Adam-Veleni 2012
P. Adam-Veleni (ed.). , , 8. , //Archaia Theatra tes
Makedonias. Archaia Theatra, 8. Diazoma Editions (Athens 2012).
Aristodemou 2000
G. Aristodemou, , ,
// The idealistic sculpture of theatres in the Roman Provinces of Epirus, Macedonia, Achaia and Asia. Unpublished
MA Thesis. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Thessaloniki 2000).
Bauchhen 2013
G. Bauchhen, Nemeseis statuettes and a votive aedicula from Tomi/Constanta, in: C.-G. Alexandrescu (ed.) Jupiter on your
side... Gods and humans in the Antiquity in the Lower Danube area, Exhibitions in Bucharest, Alba Iulia and Constana
(Bucharest 2013) 7986.
Bernard Salviat 1962
P. Bernard Fr. Salviat, Inscriptions de Thasos, BCH 86, 1962, 596603.
Bonias 2012
Z. Bonias, , in: Adam Veleni 2012, 225244.
Bordenache 1965
G. Bordenache, Il deposito di sculture votive di Tomis. Aspetti cultuali e artistici, Eirene 4, 1965, 6779.
Bouley 1986
E. Bouley, Jeux et enjeux politiques internationaux au IIe sicle avant J.-C., Dialogues dhistoire ancienne 12, 1986, 359364.
Bouley 1990
E. Bouley, Le culte de Nmsis et les jeux de lamphithtre dans les provinces balkaniques et danubiennes, in: C.
Domergue Ch. Landes J.-M. Pailler (eds), Spectula. I, Gladiateurs et amphithtres: actes du colloque tenu Toulouse
les 26, 27, 28 et 29 mai 1987 (Lattes 1990), 241251.
Bouley 1996
E. Bouley, Le thtre romain de Philippopolis en Thrace, Ktma 21, 1996, 109116.
Buffiere 1960
F. Buffiere (transl.), Anthologie Grecque, vol. (Paris 1960).
Canto 1984
A. M. Canto, Les plaques votives avec plantae pedum dltalica, ZPE 54, 1984, 189193.
Chapouthier 1924
F. Chapouthier, Nmsis et Nik, BCH 48, 1924, 287303.
Chapouthier 1925
F. Chapouthier, Un troisime bas-relief du thtre de Phillipes, BCH 49, 1925, 239244.
Collart 1928
P. Collart, Le thtre de Philippes, BCH 52, 1928, 74124.
Collart 1937
P. Collart, Philippes, ville de Macedoine, depuis ses origines jusqu la fin de lepoque romaine. Travaux et mmoires des
anciens membres trangers de lEcole et de divers savants. cole franaise dAthnes (Paris 1937).
Collart Ducrey 1975
P. Collart P. Ducrey, Philippes I: Les reliefs rupestres, BCH Suppl.2 (Paris 1975).
Daux 1968
G. Daux, Guide de Thasos (Paris 1968).
Despinis 1971
G. Despinis, (Athens 1971).
82
Mars Victor, Victoria and Nemesis Invicta. Three votive reliefs from the ancient theatre of Philippi
Devambez 194243
P. Devambez, Sculptures Thasiennes, BCH 6667, 194243, 200227.
Ducrey 1990
P. Ducrey, , in: , ,
911 1986, ( 1990), 551558.
Dll 1977
S. Dll, Die Gtterkulte Nordmakedoniens in rmischer Zeit (Mnchen 1977).
Edwards 1990
M. Edwards, Tyche at Corinth, Hesperia 59, 1990, 529542.
Ehrhardt 1997
W. Ehrhardt, Versuch einer Deutung des Kultbildes der Nemesis von Rhamnus, Antike Kunst 40.1, 1997, 2939.
Gounari 2010
E. Gounari, he Roman mosaics from Filippi: evidence of the presence of Romans in the city, XVII International Congress
of Classical Archaeology. Meetings between Cultures in the Ancient Mediterranean, Roma, September 2008, Bollettino di
Archeologia on line I, Volume speciale (2010), 2738.
Hatzopoulos 1987
M. Hatzopoulos, Artmis Digaia Blaganitis en Macdoine, BCH 111, 1987, 397412.
Holtzmann 1994
B. Holtzmann, la Sculture de Thasos. Corpus des reliefs de Thasos II,1. tudes Thasiennes 15 (Athnes/ Paris 1994).
Hornum 1993
M. B.Hornum, Nemesis, the Roman State and the Games (Leiden 1993).
Kremydi-Sicilianou 2002
S. Kremydi-Sicilianou, Victoria Augusta on Macedonian Coins. Remarks of Dating and Interpretation, Tekmeria 7, 2002,
6384.
Koukouli-Chrysanthaki 2011
Ch. Koukouli-Chrysanthaki, , in: R. J. Lane Fox (ed.), Brills Companion to Ancient Macedon: Studies in the Archaeology and History of Macedon,
650 BC 300 AD (Leiden 2011) 437452.
83
Georgia Aristodemou
Lemerle 1934
P. Lemerle, Inscriptions latines et grecques de Philippes. I. Inscriptions Latines, BCH 58, 1934, 448443.
Papazoglou 1951
F. Papazoglou, Linscription du Nmseion et la date du thtre de Stobi, ivaAnt 1, 1951, 279292.
Pastor 2011
S. Pastor, The divinities of the world of the amphitheater in the Balkan-Danubian provinces: Archaeological, epigraphic
and iconographic evidences of the cult of Nemesis, ActaArchHung 62, 2011, 7589.
Perdritzet 1898
P. Perdritzet, Reliefs grecs votifs: Nmsis, BCH 22, 1898, 599600.
Perdrizet 1914
P. Perdrizet, Nmsis, BCH 38, 1914, 89100.
Petrakos 1986
V. Petrakos, , in:
, vol. II. ( 1986), 295326.
Petsas 1969
Ph. Petsas, Chronicles, ADelt 24, 1969, 305306.
Picard 1989
O. Picard, Thasos dans le monde romain, in: S. Walker A. Cameron (eds.), The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire.
Papers from the 10th British Museum Classical Colloquium (London 1989) 174179.
Posnansky 1890
H. Posnansky, Nemesis und Adrasteia. Breslauer Philologische Abhandlungen 5, Heft 2 (Breslau 1890).
Premerstein 1894
A. von Premerstein, Nemesis und ihre Bedeutung fr die Agone, Philologus 53, 1894, 400415.
Rolley 1964
C. Rolley, Sculptures nouvelles a lAgora de Thasos, BCH 88, 1964, 496524.
84
Mars Victor, Victoria and Nemesis Invicta. Three votive reliefs from the ancient theatre of Philippi
Salviat 1960
Fr. Salviat, Le Batiment de Scne du Thtre de Thasos, BCH 84, 1960, 300316.
Schweitzer 1931
B. Schweitzer, Dea Nemesis Regina, JdI 46, 1931, 175246.
Sear 2006
F. Sear, Roman Theatres: An Architectural Study (Oxford 2006).
Volkmann 1928
H. Volkmann, Studien zum Nemesiskult, Archiv fr Religionswissenschaft 26, 1928, 294321.
Wiedemann 1995
T. Wiedemann, Emperors and Gladiators (London 1992. 19952).
Wittenberg 2014
T. Wittenberg, Kult bei der Arena: Nemesis-Heiligtumer im Kontext romischer Amphitheater, BARIntSer 2615 (Oxford
2014).
85