Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Executive summary
Soft Drinks Bounces Back
After a somewhat subdued performance in 2006 due to a recurrence of
the pesticides controversy, soft drinks sales bounced back strongly to record
double-digit volume growth in 2007. With carbonates growth back on a positive
upward curve alongside burgeoning sales of fruit/vegetable juice and bottles
water, soft drinks showed impressive growth in 2007. Off-trade volumes grew
slightly faster than on-trade volumes, driven by higher consumption of
packaged and branded soft drinks at home and on the go. The emergence of
supermarkets/hypermarkets, heavy consumer promotions and various new
product launches played a key role in driving off-trade volume growth.
drinks such as 100% juice and mineral water. In addition, soft drinks such as
sports drinks and juice-based carbonates are also expected to fare well over
the forecast period as consumers perceive them to be healthy.
Beverage Industry
EMERGING BEVERAGE TRENDS
The beverage industry is a shifting landscape as volume leading categories
such as soft drinks and beer continue to
functional and health & wellness oriented categories enjoy double-digit volume
growth:
Soft Drinks
-3.9%
Domestic Beer
-1.2%
Energy Drinks
+53%
Bottled Water
+25%
RTD Tea
Sports Drinks
+23%
+19%
PROJECT BACKGROUND
BEVERAGE MARKET
INDIAN HISTORY
India is home to one of the most ancient cultures in the world
dating back over 5000 years. At the beginning of the twenty-first century,
twenty-six different languages were spoken across India, 30% of the
population knew English, and greater than 40% were illiterate. At this time, the
6
nation was in the midst of great transition and the dichotomy between the old
India and the new was stark. Remnants of the caste system existed alongside
the worlds top engineering schools and growing metropolises as the
historically agricultural economy shifted into the services sector. In the
process, India had created the worlds largest middle class, second only to
China.
A British colony since 1769 when the East India Company gained control
of all European trade in the nation, India gained its independence in 1947
under Mahatma Ghandi and his principles of non-violence and self-reliance. In
the decades that followed, self-reliance was taken to the extreme as many
Indians believed that economic independence was necessary to be truly
independent. As a result, the economy was increasingly regulated and many
sectors were restricted to the public sector. This movement reached its peak in
1977 when the Janta party government came to power and Coca-Cola was
thrown out of the country. In 1991, the first generation of economic reforms
was introduced and liberalization began.
Whatever route Indian firms take to deal with competition from MNCs it is
imperative for them to keep track of global strategies of these firms. Often the
strategies undertaken at the local level are only part of the global strategies,
because it is difficult for any firm to allow significant differences in approach in
different markets.
Coca-Cola controlled the Indian market until 1977, when the
Janta Party beat the Congress party of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. To
punish Coca Colas principal bottler, a Congress party stalwart and long time
Gandhi supporter, the Janta government demanded that Coca Cola transferred
its syrup formula to an Indian subsidiary. Coca Cola backed and withdrew from
the country.
India now left without both Coca Cola and Pepsi became a
protected market. After Coca Cola made its exit from Indian market in1977,
there was a vacuum in the soft drink market, advantage was taken by Parle and
Pure drinks. Parley launched Thumps Up and gained a substantial and robust
market share.
In 1977 with a change in the government at the centre led to the
exit of coke, which preferred to quit rather than dilute its equity to 40% in
compliance with the provisions of FERA, the first national cola drink to emerge
was Double Seven.
switched over to Campa Cola, and, by the end of 1970s, Campa Cola was
practically alone in the Cola market.
Parle introduced Thumps Up in the beginning of 1980s,
followed by thrill by McDowells and Double Cola by Double Cola manufacturing
Company (DCMC)-an NRI-run outfit with its plant at Nasik. An additional
dimension to the Indian soft drink industry was that of fruit drinks, which were
valued at Rs. 40 Crores and among the brands in the market, the leader was
Parles Fruity with about 40% of the market share. The other players in this
segment who have posed challenges to Parle are Godreg(with Jumpin) and
Ahemdabad bases Pioma Industries Rasna Cola-Cola.Setup in 1949, by 1978,
9
Parle led the Indian soft drinks market with a share of 33%. Gold Spot and
Limca were the clear winners, and later, Thumps Up also started contributing to
its growth. Thus, Parley touched a market share of around 60% in 1990.
However, with the arrival of Pepsi, Parles share decreased to 53% and Pepsi
quickly attained a market share of about 20 percent.
Till 1990, Parles chief rival was Pure Drinks, which was
steadily losing out to Parley. After the arrival of Pepsi, the market share of Pure
Drinks further deteriorated. This was mostly because Pure Drinks had smaller
number of bottling plants and a limited distribution network exactly the same
reason why Pepsi could not do much against Parle. Parle had 60 bottlers
against Pepsis 20 and 2.1 lakh retailers against Pepsis 1.5 Lakh.
Before 1992 , the Indian soft drink industry had not grown fast
mostly due to high excise duties and government encouragement of fruit drinks
over carbonated drinks. The Limca was largest selling brand of bottled soft
drinks in India, from consumers point of view Cola was the most popular flavor.
It accounted for about 40 percent of the market. Lime and Lemon drinks
followed with about 30 percent, and Orange drinks had only about 20 percent
of the market share. Carbonated soft drinks accounted for the rest 10 percent.
From 1984 to 1992, the Rs, 1,200 Crore Indian soft drink industry grew at an
average of 2.5 to 3 percent, the highest being 12.4 percent during 1984-1985.
Pepsi had begun its efforts in mid 1980s but only in 1990 it
was able to make an entry in the Indian Cola market. In early 1985, the then
government rejected a proposal with RPG GROUP. This involved the export of
fruit juice concentrate from Punjab in return for the import of Cola concentrate.
The deal offered was a 3:1 EXIM ratio.
The revised proposal made by Pepsi also met lots of
resistance. The strongest opposition to the proposal came from the food and
civil supplies ministry, which argued that India should be promoting fruit juices,
not carbonated soft drinks. Opposition also came from CSIR, one of whose
laboratories developed its own soft drink flavors. After more than 5 years of
10
acrimonious battles Pepsi was finally launched in India in June 1990. To obtain
the license for India, Pepsi had to export $5 of locally made products for every
$1 of materials imported, and it had to agree to help the Indian government to
initiate a second agricultural revolution. Pepsi has also had to take on Indian
partners. Pepsi Co, Punjab Agro Industries Co-Operation (PAIC) and Voltas
promoted the project.
Pepsi had a very significant first mover advantage in the
Indian market. It did not have the condition of divestment of 49 per cent equity
in downstream ventures attached to it when it received permission to invest in
India. Pepsi had obtained the government approval for its downstream ventures
prior to the FD1 guidelines that made Indian equity holding mandatory. Thus, in
its original clearance, Pepsi was not only allowed to hold 100 per cent equity .in
its holding company but was also allowed to carry out bottling and marketing
operations.
The government approval, moreover, had
allowed Pepsi to earn* out acquisition of assets to expand its business in
the country. Pepsi used this clause in its approval to buy out 100 per cent
stake in some of the domestic bottling companies including its high profile
buyout of Gujarat Bottling Company, the former Coke franchisee in
Ahmedabad. (Industry ministry sources have clarified that while Pepsi would
be required to seek fresh government approval if it picks up shares in
domestic bottling companies as part of its portfolio investment, it does not
need such approval if the assets are acquired for expansion.)
There was now a triangular battle between Parle,
Pepsi and Pure Drinks. Pepsi launched 250 ml bottles in June 1990 to
capture the 250 ml bottle-market of Thums Up (launched in November
1989). As a response, Thums Up ran ads downgrading Pepsi's taste and
declared that it was a fast drink. Thums Up entered the brand war totally with
blind taste test ads.
11
12
The companies have continued to wage their war in India. Coke, with
the strategic move of buying out Parle, gained a huge market share
overnight. Hut Pepsi is sparing no efforts to gain a larger share of the
market. The potential in the Indian market is tremendous. The Indian market
is roughly more than Rs 1,200 crore; moreover, the per capita consumption
of three bottles in India is lagging way behind the US's astounding 700
bottles per capita consumption.
Both Coke and Pepsi have rightly realized that the immediate priority is in
expanding the market by increasing the growth rates. The Indian market
averaged a growth rate of 2.5 per cent between the years 1984-92. From
1992, when the Cola war took a serious turn, the growth rate has almost
doubled. In 1995 the market grew by 20 per cent in volume term, with
estimated sales of 140 million cases (one case :- 24 bottles of 300 ml each)
up from 115 million cases in 1994.
The industry, prior to 1990, was witnessing sluggish growth rates
(CAGR: around 5 per cent) with two domestic players: Parle and Pure
Drinks. The entry of the cola giants, Coke and Pepsi, led to a rapid
expansion in the size of the market (CAGR for the first half of the 1990s:
around 20 per cent). Coke's acquisition of Parle has turned the market into
a duopoly. Also not only the market size is increasing, there is also a
shift of consumer preference between the different soft drink segments.
Whereas in 1990, cola was accounting for a third of all soft drinks sold, today
it accounts for well over a half.
13
COMPANY PROFILE
14
COMPANY PROFILE
In 1902 the Pepsi Cola Company was launched in the back room of
pharmacy and was applied in patent office for a trademark. The business
begins to grow on June 16, 1903 Pepsi Cola was officially registered with the
US patent office. That year Cola sold 7,968 gallons of syrup using them in
exhilarating aids digestion. It also awarded for franchised to bottle Pepsi to
independent investors, where number grew from just two in 1905 in cities of
charlotte and Durham, to 15 the following year, and 40 by 1907.
Gold Spot is considered as the first branded soft drink in India. It was
introduced by Parle in early forties. Coca-Cola was the first foreign soft drink to
be introduced in Indian markets. The Coca-Cola Company entered India in the
early fifties, when four bottling plants were setup at Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi
and Kanpur. Coca-Cola enjoyed a good beginning and dominated the market.
Parle exports private Ltd. the major domestic player later in 1970 introduced
Limca, a lemon soft drink.
introduced Cola Pepino which was soon with from the market.
In July 1977 Coca Cola left India following a public dispute over share holding
structure and import permits. As per FERA regulations the company was
required to indicate or clear operation. Coca-Cola left a big gap, which was
filled by several companies who came forward pushing different brands in
market.
Parle products introduced their cola Thums Up; pure drinks introduced
Campa Cola along with orange and lemon. Modern Bakeries introduced
Double Seven Thrill Rush and Aprint. At the same time various regional
soft brands played an independent role in their respective territories like Duke
and Mangola etc.
After Coke was asked to leave India Pepsi began to lay plans to enter this huge
market. Pepsi worked with an Indian business group in seeking govt. approval
for its entry over the objections of both domestic soft drink companies and anti15
multinational legislators, Pepsi saw the solution to lie in making an offer that
Indian Govt. would find hard to refuse. Pepsi offered to help India export some
of its agricultural products in a volume that would cover more than the cost of
importing soft drink concentrate. Pepsi also promised to focus considerable
selling efforts on rural areas to help their economic development. Pepsi further
offered to transfer food processing packaging and water treatment to India in
the way Pepsi started its operations in April 1989 for beverages, snack food
and export business. In 1990 first Pepsi, Cola was produced in India.
PepsiCo entered India in 1989 and in the span of a little more than a
decade, has grown to become the country's largest selling soft drinks company.
The Company has invested heavily in India making it one of the largest
multinational investors. The group has built an expansive beverage, snack food
and exports business and to support the operations are the group's 39 bottling
plants in India, of which 17 are company owned and 22 are franchisee owned.
PepsiCo stays committed to providing its consumers with top quality
beverages. Its diverse portfolio of brands include the flagship cola brand Pepsi; Diet Pepsi; 7Up; Mirinda; Mountain Dew; Slice fruit drink; Tropicana
brand 100% fruit juices in various flavors; Aquafina packaged drinking water;
Gatorade plus local brands Lehar Evervess Soda, Dukes Lemonade and
Mangola.
PepsiCo is one of the largest MNC exporters in India and its export
business consist of three categories - agri business, commodities and Pepsi
system sales. PepsiCo has made significant investments with the Punjab
Agriculture
University
to
develop
comprehensive
agro-technology
Programmed that has helped thousands of farmers across India improve the
yield of their farms and the quality of their agricultural products. PepsiCo has
leveraged its knowledge in contract farming to develop seaweed cultivation in
Tamil Nadu and has partnered with the Government of Punjab to help farmers
of the state through the utilization of developed technology for citrus farming.
16
Pepsi entered the cloudy lemon category by launching its Mirinda Lemon
in 1998. In may 1999, a notification, presenting the presentation of food
Adulteration (Fourth Amendment) rules 1999, allowed the use of the blended
artificial sweeteners, as part time and a successful fame potassium in the
formulation of soft drinks, which in what made the entry of diet Pepsi and diet
coke. Coca-Cola also rolled out its popular clear lemon drink sprit in India at
same year, 1999.
Whats in Pepsi?
Pepsi contains:
Carbonated water, High fructose Glucose syrup/or Sugar color, Phosphoric acid,
Caffeine, Citric acid and natural flavors.
17
Calories
100
Sodium (mg)
25
Potassium (mg)
10
27
Sugars (gm)
27
Protein (gm)
Caffeine (mg)
25
sales of bigger SKUs like more than 1 liter pack size has increased this has led
to increase contribution from pet bottles sales up to 75% are in Urban areas.
BRAND PROFILE
PepsiCo Company provides five brands of Soft drinks. In all brands of Pepsi
one is Soda, Second Mineral water and other are running successfully in the
market. At present time Pepsi provides two new soft drinks. Dew Mountain and
Blue Pepsi and above marketed with reasonably good success.
1. Blue Pepsi
2. Pepsi Diet
3. Miranda (Lemon + Mango)
4. Slice
5. 7up
6. Aquafina
7. Dew Mountain
Now here we will discuss about the market shares of each brands of soft
drinks. There market share are as followsSoft Drinks
Market Share
Pepsi
57%
Mirinda (Orange)
16%
Mirinda (Lemon)
2%
Slice
1.5%
Teem Soda
Not Available
7UP
1.5%
Aquafina
3%
Blue Pepsi
2%
Dew Mountain
8%
Pepsi Diet
6%
SOFT DRINKS
Pepsi
Mirinda Orange
Mirinda Lemon
Slice
7up
Teem Soda
Pepsi Diet
Aquafina
Dew mountain
Blue Pepsi
Quantity
200ml, 300ml, 600ml, 1lt, 2lt.
200ml, 300ml, 600ml, 1lt, 2lt
200ml, 300ml, 600ml, 1lt, 2lt
250ml, 500ml
200ml, 300ml, 2lt
300ml, 600ml
330ml, 500ml
1lt
200ml
500ml
21
CONVENTIONAL
RETAILERS
NON-CONVENTIONAL
RETAILERS
IN PET
12 Bottles * 1000 ml
9 Bottles * 2000 ml
12 Bottles * 1500 ml
= 1 cartoons
= 1 cartoons
= 1 cartoons
TETRA
CANS
respect
media,
events,
distribution,
pricing,
communication,
endorsements and so on... Every year it consistently emerges as one of the top
23
Specific case: zone wise and genre wise advertising for Pepsi and Coke
have led over Coca-Cola's brands in terms of market share in this period.
25
PepsiCo will soon join the elite band of companies with $l-billion
sales in India. The company currently has sales of $700 million. Since 1989 the
$27 -billion food and beverages giant has invested $700 million in India and
seen a steady double-digit growth in its volumes. "We are on track to make it
the second or third largest," Steve Reinemund, chairman & CEO PepsiCo told
the media in New Delhi. Reinemund's visit was preceded by that of E Neville
Isdell, chairman of the board and CEO of The Coca Cola Company, who chose
to visit India on taking charge of Coke's global operations a few months ago.
Reinemund said PepsiCo's Rs5-per-packaffor_bility strategy initiated by
Coke and Pepsi had worked well in India and helped the company increase its
consumer base from 150 million to 250 million. He said with the strategy
PepsiCo had attained critical mass. "It is time now to increase the depth of
consumption," he says.
However, he admitted that the company was forced to hike its prices
recently as there was an affordability challenge all over the world. "We have
learnt this lesson and reverted to higher price points (in India) after having
achieved our objective of 150 million consumer footprints.
Pepsi Co is now making operating profits in India and its exports are
worth over $60 million, up from just $3 million in 1991. Reinemund was
especially upbeat about the company's snacks business Frito Lay, in India,
which he said was the fastest growing segment for five consecutive years.
"India is clearly one of our priority markets," he said.
The company had no plans to make any structural changes
in India said Reinemund, since of the 37 bottling plants in the country, 17
26
Pepsi's Products
28
29
30
The company has also installed deep freezers models of 100lt, 250lt
&1000lt. This cooling equipment is the property of the company, which are
installed at outlets to serve the customer. They are in stalled at those outlets,
which have a deposit of 12 crates of empties upon each 10 liter capacity of the
order & a potential of selling four carats annually on each Liter capacity of the
cooler. The retailers are required to keep only PepsiCo product in these
coolers.
The capacity of coolers varies from 65 liters to 330 liters. Most of the
models have a transparent door, which makes the product visible. These
models are called VISI coolers.
MARKETING SCHEMES
1. Free Flavors, To Retailers:
Company offers few bottle flavors free to retailers on purchase of one
carat of flavor on some specific days. The free flavors scheme varies from one
bottle to many bottles.
2. Display Rack Scheme:
This scheme is only for retailers. In this scheme company provides a
Pepsi rack to retailer. The rack is filled with different bottles of Pepsi. The
retailers are instructed that if they will maintain their racks in the same condition
as it was when it was purchased. After completion of one-month different gift
packs are distributed to the retailers.
3. Hai Koi Jawab:
This scheme was launched on 300ml bottle of Pepsi. This is U.T.C.
scheme meaning Under the Crown. In this scheme some number are given
under the bottle of Pepsi and company announces some lucky number. If this
31
number is matched with the number under the crown number then the owner of
that bottle wins different cash prizes.
4. Miranda U.T.C:
This scheme was launched on 300ml bottle of Miranda. This is U.T.C.
Scheme meaning under the crown. In this scheme some dollar amount is given
under the bottle and the consumer may collect these dollars and add it.
Company provided different gift packs on different crown number.
Their schemes are offered by the company to maintain the competition at it is
offered on those days when Coca-Cola offers any similar scheme.
4 PS
4 Ps is the main features that directly affect the organization without 4
Ps organization is not able to produce the product. 4 Ps represent the main
features of product. Many possibilities can be collected into four groups of
Variables know as Four Ps i.e. product, price, place, promotion.
Product: Product means the good and service combination of the company
offered to the target market. Company changes the sizes, variety, flavor brand
name of the product after one or two year.
Price: Price is the amount of money which customers have to pay to obtain the
product calculates suggested retails prices that its dealers might charge for
sources. But dealers rarely charge the full sticker price.
Place: They are mostly available in al place but easily available in the Urban
Market but not frequently found in Rural Market.
32
Promotion: Promotion means activities that communicate the merit of the product
and persuade target customers to buy it. The measurement factor to promote
the Pepsi product is to increase good transportation in rural market. If the Pepsi
is available to capture the rural market then it is certain that it will occupy first
position of soft drinks industry.
Product
Price
Product Variety
Quality Sizes
Features Services
Brand Name
Warranties
Packaging- Returns
List Price
Discounts
Allowances
Payment Period
Creditors
Target
Customers
Intended
Positional
Place
Advertising
Personal Setting
Sales Promotion
Public Relations
Promotion
Channels
Coverage
Assortments
Locations Logistic
Inventory
Transportation
33
DETAILS
Dow Jones Composite
Dow Industrials
S&P 100
S&P 500
S&P 1500 Super Comp
Consumer Goods
Beverages - Soft Drinks
92,400
Index Membership:
Sector:
Industry:
Employees (last reported count):
OFFICERS
Pay
Mr. Muhtar Kent ,
58 Chief Exec. Officer, Pres, Director and Member of
Exec. Committee
Mr. Gary P. Fayard ,
$ 5.60M
Exercised
$0
$ 1.83M
$0
$ 1.59M
$0
$ 1.86M
$0
$ 2.13M
$0
51 Exec. VP and Pres of Bottling Investments &
Supply Chain
Dollar amounts are as of 31-Dec-08 and compensation values are for the last fiscal
year ending on that date. "Pay" is salary, bonuses, etc. "Exercised" is the value of
options exercised during the fiscal year.
.
34
In 2001, after almost a decade of lagging rival Pepsi in the region, Coke
India re-examined its approach in an attempt to gain leadership in the Indian
market and capitalize on significant growth potential, particularly in rural
markets. The foundation of the new strategy grounded brand positioning and
marketing communications in consumer insights, acknowledging that urban
versus rural India were two distinct markets on a variety of important
dimensions. The soft drink categorys role in peoples lives, the degree of
differentiation between consumer segments and their reasons for entering the
category, and the degree to which brands in the category projected different
perceptions to consumers were among the many important differences
between how urban and rural consumers approached the market for
refreshment.
In rural markets, where both the soft drink category and individual
brands were undeveloped, the task was to broaden the brand positioning while
in urban markets, with higher category and brand development, the task was
to narrow the brand positioning, focusing on differentiation through offering
unique and compelling value. This lens, informed by consumer insights, gave
Coke direction on the tradeoff between focus and breadth a brand needed in a
given market and made clear that to succeed in either segment, unique
marketing strategies were required in urban versus rural India.
Rural Success
Comprising 74% of the country's population, 41% of its middle class,
and 58% of its disposable income, the rural market was an attractive target
and it delivered results. Coke experienced 37% growth in 2003 in this
segment versus the 24% growth seen in urban are as.
35
Driven by the launch of the new Rs. 5 product, per capita consumption
doubled between 2001-2003. This market accounted for 80% of Indias new
Coke drinkers, 30% of 2002 volume, and was expected to account for 50% of
the companys sales in 2003.
segments primary need was out-of-home thirst-quenching and the soft drink
category was undifferentiated in the minds of rural consumers. Additionally,
with an average Coke costing Rs. 10 and an average days wages around Rs.
100, Coke was perceived as a luxury that few could afford.
In an effort to make the price point of Coke within reach of this highpotential market, Coca-Cola launched the Accessibility Campaign, introducing
36
a new 200ml bottle, smaller than the traditional 300ml bottle found in urban
markets, and concurrently cutting the price in half, to Rs. 5. This pricing
strategy closed the gap between Coke and basic refreshments like lemonade
and tea, making soft drinks truly accessible for the first time. At the same time,
Coke invested in distribution infrastructure to effectively serve a disbursed
population and doubled the number of retail outlets in rural areas from 80,000
in 2001 to 160,000 in 2003, increasing market penetration from 13 to 25%.
Cokes advertising and promotion strategy pulled the marketing plan
together using local language and idiomatic expressions. Thanda, meaning
cool/cold is also generic for cold beverages and gave Thanda Matlab CocaCola delicious multiple meanings. Literally translated to Coke means
refreshment, the phrase directly addressed both the primary need of this
segment for cold refreshment while at the same time positioning Coke as a
Thanda or generic cold beverage just like tea, lassi, or lemonade. As a result
of the Thanda campaign, Coca-Cola won Advertiser of the Year and Campaign
of the Year in 2003.
38
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
39
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Objectives of the study
Objectives of this research study are1. To study the brand preference for different kind of soft drinks.
2. To determine the factors that influences the consumer choice of a
particular soft drink.
3. To study the consumption pattern & behavioral aspects of consumes
such as frequency of consumption, quantity of consumption, place of
consumption etc.
4. To study the sales promotion tool techniques sources of media that
attracts consumers most.
METHODOLOGY
Data collection
The type of data collected for the research was primary as well as secondary.
Primary data was collected through:
Various journals
Universe
The universe or population is the specific group of people is the specific group
of people from conditions, activities, etc. which form the pivotal point of the
project. For developing and using sample, it becomes the primary duty of
researcher to define the population from which she\he intends to draw the
sample. The universe of my project is about 130 consumers of Kurnool town,
which formed the pivotal point of my project.
Sampling frame
A sampling frame may be defined as the listing of the general components of
the individual unit that comprise the defined population.In case of my project,
sampling frame is various consumers frame is various consumers including
lower middle class, middle class and rich class.
Sampling procedure
After defining the sampling frame, other important point to be discussed is
which sampling procedure to be adopted.A simple random sampling technique
will be used to understand customers outlook towards the soft drinks.
Sample size
130 consumers of kurnool city an attempt will be made to make the sample
representative of the whole population under study.
41
Research instrument:
Questionnaires were used to find out Factors influencing consumer choice of
soft drinks in Kurnool with the help of the questionnaire, filled by 130
consumers, the result was analyzed.
The process was followed to prepare a questionnaire:
1. Specify the information needed.
2. Determined the types of questions to be asked.
3. Deciding the number and sequence of questionnaire.
4. Preparing preliminary draft of questionnaire.
5. Revised and protested the questionnaire.
Limitations
Although the research was conducted in a way to ensure accurate results but
certain errors might have occurred due to some unavoidable reasons. Some of
the limitations of the project are:-
Data collection
1. Non-response by some of the respondents.
2. Since the population is not homogeneous, some biasness might have
creped in.
3. The sample of convenience, thus it is not the true representative of the
complete.
MEASUREMENT ERROR
There was certain degree of misinterpretation by the respondents about the
points raised in the interview.
42
ANALYSIS
&
INTERPRETAYION
43
Males
Females
Total
No. of Respondents
70
60
130
In%
54%
46%
100%
Graph 1.1
Interpretation:
44
As the above graph shows that there were equal male and female respondents,
males were little higher than females by only 4%.
Male
Female
Total
10-20
years
12
14
26
In %
21-30
years
17%
23%
20%
28
20
48
In %
31-40
years
40%
33%
37%
21
16
37
In %
More
than 40
years
In %
Total
30%
27%
28%
9
10
19
13%
17%
15%
70
60
130
Graph 2.1
45
Graph 2.2
Interpretation:
As the above graph clearly depicts that most of males respondents
[40%] were youth as fall into the category of 21-30 years. As the above graph
clearly depicts that most of females respondents [33%] were also youth as they
fall into the category of 21-30 years.
Male
Female
Total
Service
In %
Business
In %
Professionals
In %
Other [Students
housewives
etc.]
In %
28
10
38
40%
17%
28.%
14
0
14
20%
0%
10%
9
8
17
13.%
13.%
13.%
19
42
61
27%
70%
47%
Graph 3.1
46
Graph 3.2
Interpretation:
As the above graph clearly shows that there were most of males
respondents [40%] were service category. As the above graph clearly shows
that there were most of females respondents [43%] were housewives category
In %
Rs. 10,000
Male
Female
Total
37
42
79
10,000-
In %
15,000
53%
70%
61%
9
4
13
15,000-
In %
20,000
13%
7%
10%
9
8
17
More than
In %
20,000
13%
13%
13%
15
6
21
21%
10%
16%
Total
70
60
130
Graph 4.1
47
Graph 4.2
Interpretation:
As the above graph clearly shows that there were most of males
respondents [53%] were income group of Rs. Less than Rs. 10,000. As the
above graph clearly shows that there were most of females respondents [70%]
were income group of Rs. Less than Rs. 10,000.
48
Graph 5.1
Interpretation:
The above graph shows that Mango Flavor is preferred most by the male
customers than next is Cola & Lemon is least preferred by them.
The above graph shows that Orange Flavor is preferred most by the
female customers than next is Mango & Cola is least preferred by them.
Cola
Pepsi
Thums up
Fanta
Slice
Mirinda
Limca
Fruity
Maza
70%
60%
60%
65%
60%
40%
45%
55%
60%
49
the mind
recall
Unaided
recall
30%
40%
40%
35%
40%
60%
55%
45%
40%
Graph 6.1
Interpretation:
As the above graph shows that comparatively coke is at the top of the
mind recall by most of customers [70%] and next is Pepsi. In Unaided brand
recall Maza and Fruity.
Male
1
2
3
4
Female
1
5
3
2
50
Social Gathering
Packaging
Ads & offers
Status
5
6
7
8
4
6
8
7
Graph 7.1
Interpretation:
Taste ranked as first factor affecting consumer choice by both male &
female consumers. Price is ranked second by male consumers whereas health
factor is ranked by female consumers which affect their choice of soft drinks.
Male
Female
total
Less
than 5
times
In%
6-10
times
In%
More
than 10
times
In%
Undecided
In%
Total
47
44
91
67%
74%
70%
12
8
20
17%
13%
15%
2
0
2
3%
0%
2%
9
8
17
13%
13%
13%
70
60
130
51
Graph 8.1
Graph 8.2
Interpretation:
From the above graph we can say that most of the consumers [70%] are
not having any regular schedule of consuming soft drinks. Both males [13%] &
females [13%] consumer said that it is undecided and only 1.54% consumer
said that they drink more than 10 times in week so it is not definite.
200ml.
In%
300ml.
In%
500ml.
In%
More than
500ml.
In%
Total
23
24
47
33%
40%
37%
28
24
52
40%
40%
40%
19
12
31
27%
20%
23%
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
70
60
130
52
Graph 9.1
Graph 9.2
Interpretation:
From the graphs we can say that [Both males & females] majority of the
consumers [40%] prefer to drink these soft drinks in the quantity of 300 ml. at
once & than next is 200 ml. with [37%] but there is big difference in consumer
response for the rests of the options.
Male
Female
Total
With group
In%
Alone
In%
Total
58
54
112
82.86%
90%
87.69%
12
6
18
17.14%
10%
12.31%
70
60
130
Graph 10.1
Graph 10.2
54
Graph 10.3
Interpretation:
From the above it is clearly visible that mostly customers [87.69%]
enjoy drinking these soft drinks when they are with group.
In %
Outside
location
In %
Cinema
Halls
In %
Social
In
B/C
Gathering
parties
In %
55
Male
Female
Total
14
20
34
20%
33%
26%
30
18
48
43%
30%
37%
12
18
30
17%
30%
23%
5
4
9
7%
7%
7%
9
0
9
13%
0%
7%
Graph 11.1
Graph 11.2
Graph 11.3
Interpretation:
As the about graphs show that mostly [37%] customers prefer drinking at
outside location & at home/office and cinema halls. This means customer drink
these drink whenever they go for outing locations.
12. Consumer choice when multiple choices are given without price.
Soups
In %
Hot
drinks
In %
Soft
Drinks
In %
Fruit
juices
In %
Total
56
Male
Female
Total
14
16
30
20%
27%
23%
9
10
19
13%
17%
15%
28
20
48
40%
33%
37%
19
14
33
27%
23%
25%
70
60
130
Graph 12.1
Graph 12.2
Graph 12.3
Interpretation:
From the above graph it is seen that when multiple choice are given
to customers without any charge for that i.e. when price factor is excluded, then
more than 37% customers prefer to drink soft drinks and next is Fruit juices,
soups, tea/coffee respectively.
In %
T.V.
ads
In %
Hoarding
In %
By
retailers
In %
Total
57
Male
Female
12
6
17%
10%
42
42
60%
70%
12
10
17%
17%
4
2
7%
3%
70
60
Total
18
14%
84
64%
22
17%
5%
130
Graph 13.1
Graph 13.2
Graph 13.3
Interpretation:
From the above graph it is clearly visible that main source of information
to customers regarding soft drinks is T.V. ads according to 64% customers.
Yes
49
In %
70%
No
21
In %
30%
Total
70
58
Female
Total
24
73
40%
36
57
60%
60
130
Graph14.1
Interpretation:
From the above graph clearly depicts that here is a big difference among
the response of male & female customer, as in the opinion of most of the male
customers [70%] Brand ambassador influences their choice whereas in the
opinion of female majority [60%] said that there is no impact of any Brand
Ambassador upon their choice.
In %
Sports
Celebrities
In %
Both
In %
Other
celebrities
In
%
Total
59
Male
Female
Total
30
16
46
43%
27%
35%
12
28
40
17%
46%
31%
23
12
35
33%
20%
27%
5
4
9
7%
7%
7%
70
60
130
Graph15.1
Graph 15.2
Graph15.3
Interpretation:
As the graph depicts that highest 35% people said that bollywood
celebrities should be the brand ambassador of soft drinks and than 27% were
with both but here is big difference among the choice of male & female
customers.
60
Buy 2 get
1 free
Male
Female
Total
12
14
26
Scratch/
Magic
cards
7
8
15
Price
discounts
30
22
52
Extra
Quantity
offer
14
10
24
Something
free
Total
7
6
13
70
60
130
Graph 16.1
Graph 16.2
Graph 16.3
Interpretation:
As per the analysis of above graphs that of the customers [40%] prefer
price discounts then there is buy 2 get 1 free offer.
In %
Not Brand
In %
Total
61
Male
Female
Total
28
18
46
40%
30%
35%
loyal
42
42
84
60%
70%
65%
70
60
130
Graph 17.1
Interpretation:
As the above graphs show there are 35% customers who brand loyal but
males are having much loyalty in comparison to females customers.
Findings
62
1. No. of Respondents:
There were total 130 respondents out of which 70 were males &
60 were females.
2. Age group:
20% respondents fall into the age group of 10-20 years.
37% respondents fall into the age group of 21-30 years.
28% respondents fall into the age group of 31-40 years.
15% respondents fall into the age group of more than 40years.
3. Occupation of respondents:
28% of the respondents were Service.
10% of the respondents were Business
13% of the respondents were Professionals
47% of the respondents were Students & housewives etc.
4. Income group of respondents:
61% of the respondents fall into the income group of less than
Rs.10,000.
10% of the respondents fall into the income group of 10,00015,000.
13% of the respondents fall into the income group of 15,00020,000.
16% of the respondents fall into the income group of more than
Rs.20,000.
5. Ranking of factors that influence the consumer choice of soft drink:
Taste ranked as first factor affecting consumer choice by both
male & female consumers.
Price is ranked second by male consumers whereas health factor
is ranked by female consumers which affect their choice of soft
drinks.
63
Conclusion
Through this research study we conclude that
consumer. Cola & mango are also popular among male & female
consumer respectively.
Generally people are not having any regular timing or drinking soft
drink but we can assume that on an average every customer drink
these drinks less than 5 times in a week.
Generally people prefer to drink 300 ml. quantity of soft drink at
once.
Most of consumer s drinks such soft drinks in group.
Generally people drink these drinks at outside locations whenever
they go for outing & cinema halls.
If price factor is not taken into consideration & multiple choices
are given to consumer then they prefer soft drink most.
The most popular source of information regarding soft drink
brands is T.V.
Brand ambassador has the influence on choice of most of the
male consumer. But there is comparatively less influence on
female consumer.
According to most of the male consumers bollywood celebrities
should be the brand ambassador where as according to the most
66
67
Suggestions
Promotion of mango flavor :
Companies should focus more on the promotion of mango flavors of soft
drinks because comparatively to cola drinks mango flavored drinks are
very less advertised & promoted by soft drink brands where as according
to our result cola flavor is more preferred by most of the consumers.
Maintaining taste & keep launching innovative flavors :
Companies should maintain the taste of its flavored drinks should keep
improving the taste & quality of its drinks, companies may also launched
some innovative mixed flavors of drinks where two flavors in one drink
can be provide like orange-pineapple etc. it will give a different taste of
customers.
Reduction in price :
Price is also major factor of consumers choice of soft drinks. So
companies should try to decrease its price by decreasing its
extravagant expenditure in advertisement to trap the market of those
customers whose choice is very much affected with the price of soft
drinks.
Diet drinks :
Health is also a major factor influencing consumer choices of many
consumers. So fruit juice are giving tough competition to soft drinks.
Companies should advertised its product in a manner in which its
reflects that consuming their drinks will not harm any body. As coke &
Pepsi have already lunched its drinks for the segment which is very
much health conscious i.e. Diet Coke & Diet Pepsi respectively which
are fat free. But companies should launch diet drinks in other flavors
also. Especially in mango flavor as it is preferred by most of the
68
Annexure
Questionnaire for the study of factors affecting consumer choice of soft-drinks
Name
Gender:
[ ] Male
[ ] Female
Age group: [ ] 10-20 years
[ ] 21-30 years
[ ] 31-40 years
[ ] More than 40 years
Occupation: [ ] Service
[ ] Business
[ ] Professional
[ ] Student
[ ] Housewife
[ ] Others________
Income group (p.m.) [ ] Less than Rs.10,000
[ ] 10,000-15,000
[ ] 15,000-20,000
[ ] More than Rs. 20,000
1. Please rank the following flavors of soft drinks that you like most.
Cola_______
Orange________
Mango_____
Lemon________
2. Please name the brands of soft drinks, which you remember.
_________________________________________________
3. Please name the brand/s of soft drinks that you like most for following flavors.
Cola_______
Orange________
Mango_____
Lemon________
4. Please name the following that influence your decision when you purchase a
soft drink? (On 1-8 scale, where 1 is highest & 8 is lowest rank)
Taste________
After effects/Health_________
Price________
Occasion/Social Gathering_______
Packaging______
Advertisement & offers_________
Weather/Heat_____
Status__________
5. How many times you drink these beverages in a week?
[ ] Less than 5 times
[ ] 6-10 times
[ ] more than 10 times
[ ] Undecided
6. How much quantity of these do beverages do you consume at once?
[ ] 200 ml.
[ ] 300 ml
[ ] 500 ml.
[ ] More than 500 ml..
70
71
BIBLIOGRAPHY
72
Bibliography:
73
74