Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Hot Sustained Stress Checking in Caesar II

Hot Sustained Stress Checking in Caesar II


In Laymans term Sustained means always present. So sustained stresses are the stresses which are present in the
system throughout its operating cycle. Weight of piping system and Pressure inside the pipe are examples of
sustained loads which generate sustained stresses in the system. So what is hot sustained case?
While analyzing a piping system you many times will come across with few supports which will take load in
sustained case but are not taking load in operating and design temperature cases (Refer Attached Fig. 1 and Fig. 2
for one such typical example). The support is lifting at that point in temperature case i.e. supports are not
contributing in load and stress distribution while in in operating condition. Still in that situation the weight of pipe
and pressure inside the system will induce sustained stresses. So in my opinion, hot sustained stress is the sustained
stress in pipe operating situation. And we must ensure that the system stress will not fail because of those supports
not sharing any load. That is why many organization make it mandatory to check sustained stresses.

Fig.1: Caesar II Restraint summary showing lifting supports

Methods of Sustained stress checking:


I have come across with two different methods of hot sustained stress check in various organization:
1. Conventional Method followed by many organizations:
In first method the analyst has to run the static analysis as per conventional method.

Now go to restraint summary and note down the support nodes which are lifting or not taking any vertical load
(Sometimes small positive value may be there due to guide and line stop frictions, in that case check the vertical
displacement if it shows positive value consider the same as lifting).

Make a separate Caesar file with name FILE NAME_HOT SUSTAINED.

Open the input screen and delete all lifting supports from the nodes you noted down. Delete only +Y support,
Guide and line stops will be there.

Run the analysis and check sustained stress.

If sustained stress is within allowable limit accept the file as it is else change the support location or routing to
make the system safe.

Fig.2: Caesar II Plot showing lifting support

2. New method followed by very few organizations:


In this method analyst will check the hot sustained stress in the same main file (No need to create separate file).
Some additional load cases are required. Lets assume we will check hot sustained stress in design temperature,
T1 condition (means we will check which supports are lifting in design temp case). So the below mentioned
cases is required for hot sustained stress checking

L1:
L2:
L3:

W+T1+P1
T1
L1-L2

OPE
OPE/EXP
SUS

Check the stresses for load case L3, if the same is within allowable limit then accept the file else make the
system safe.

Notes:
1. Now you may be thinking whether to mark deleted supports in isometric or not. You must mark those supports.
As we have not deleted the supports in actual practice. Supports will be there at site, We simply ensured that
without those supports also system will be safe. However if you want to delete those supports that can be done
if all other stress criteria can met.
2.

Whether we need to check expansion stresses in hot sustained file too? In my opinion if we are using liberal
stress for expansion stress range checking then it is better to check expansion stress (along with sustained
stress) in hot sustained file. Otherwise it is not required as system wont fail in expansion case even after
removing those supports.

S-ar putea să vă placă și