Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ly 1
functioning better as churches than are many building baring the name (Pahl 298). The article
then ends with Pahls warning that consumers are misled into draining their wallets by the true
purpose often masked by the malls.
In the article, Pahl constantly asserts that through the use of water, lighting, vegetation,
etc., malls have been successful in adopting the sacred symbols into their design. A large part of
the article is devoted to explaining how those elements help make the place sacred. Water. For
example, is thought of by Pahl as a purification that can cleanse shopper of any filthiness and
that can dissolve the boundaries (Pahl 295). The use of light, also pointed out by Pahl, is aimed
to resemble vitality and energy in a religious sense (Pahl 296). Although there is some certain
religious reference in those objects, Pahl seems to go too far in assuming that those materials
really help to turn the mall into a holy place, and hence make a faulty cause-effect relationship in
his argument. There is no guarantee that those symbols are intentionally used with religious
purpose; in fact, many malls are built that way so as to be in accordance with the architecture
principles and business tactic that aims at luring more customers. Those decorations are meant to
make the mall more eye-pleasing, and hence make the shopping experience more pleasurable and
comfortable for the shoppers. Therefore, it can be said that Pahl has not been successful in his
attempt to drive the readers into believing his position by overusing those arguments.
Pahl also is not successful in his generous using of emotional appeal throughout the
article. First of all, Pahl relies too much on his using of heavy-loaded words and religious
terminology that meant to sway the readers perception. Pilgrims, for instance, has been quoted
several times in his article to refer to the shoppers; whereas, there seem to be not much analogy
between the pilgrims, the people who take a long journey to a religious place for a religious
reason, and those shoppers who drive to the mall simply for enjoyment and fulfilling their
Ly 1
satisfaction. Secondly, Pahl really abuses his uses of personal experience and feeling and then
applys them to the readers. The fact that he often experienced headache in his childhood after a
long time in a mall, for instance, has nothing to do with the process of disorientation that he
says most shoppers have to go through in the mall. Moreover, Pahls excessive quoting words of
Zepp and Rouse does not help to make his argument more emotional appealing and persuasive.
By contrast, it lessens the accountability and objectivity of the article as both of them are
religious-favored people, one is a religious study professor and the other is a Protestant follower
(Pahl 295).
Finally, another weakness in Pahls article is the inconsistency in his position. On the one
hand, Pahl attempts to associate the mall with it religious functions and elaborates on how that
sacred place provides shoppers with unity, devotion, love, happiness (Pahl 296). Pahl, on the
other hand, warns the shopper of the profit-driving purpose often masked by malls and concludes
that those promises are just lies (Pahl 298). Clearly, everything has its two sides, but Pahl should
have been consistent in his position in order to make his argument more persuasive to the
readers. Also, Pahl seem to get off his topic a couple of times throughout his article. The
discussion of how different sexes react to the mall, for example, seems to have nothing to do
with his intention of proving the mall as a holy place; thus, those diversions often confuse the
readers in terms of what points the author is trying to convey in his article.
Skipping through the article the first time, readers may be impressed at some eye-opening
facts Pahl has discovered in the mall that they may not have recognized. However, after careful
analysis of the article, readers may realize that several problems arise in Pahls argument and that
he does not seem to be successful in achieving his purpose. Although there may be some
religious factors in the way mall is designed, Pahl seems to go too far in persuading the readers
Ly 1
into believing that it is a wholly sacred place as he does believe. It is, after all, better for us to
simply keep the appropriate level of perspective: mall is just a place of shopping, not a place of
religion.