Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Employee Code:
Department:
Location:
From:
Yes
To:
No,
Date Completed:
Yes
No,
Date Filed:
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
The Form should be duly signed in the allotted space, by the appraisee,
Reporting Head and Reviewing Head before submitting it to the HR department.
5 points
Very Good
expectations.
4 points
is
consistent
and
exceeds
Good
3 points
job requirements.
Satisfactory
2 points
minimum requirements of the
Performance
is
satisfactory.
Meets
job.
Needs Improvement
1 point
Meets requirements of the job
occasionally.
Unsatisfactory
0 point
requirements of the job.
Performance
Performance
does
not
is
inconsistent.
meet
minimum
SECTION B
Assessment of Job Related Attributes
Please specify the points for each Job Related Attribute by referring to each
category specified in the table Section A 4. When completing the form, the
Reporting Head is required to support his/her points with comments in the spaces
provided for each category. Comments should be specific and explanatory.
S
No
Attributes
Points
by
Self
Points
by
Reporti
ng Head
Comments by Reporting
/Reviewing Head
S No
Attributes
POLICY
COMPLIANCE:
Demonstrates integrity and good
work ethics in the companys best
interest. Actively promotes best
practices
that
save
company
resources and minimize wastage.
LEADERSHIP/MOTIVATION
OF
STAFF: Is a positive role model for
subordinates, motivates staff to
perform better in all areas, delegates
responsibilities
to
subordinates
effectively, Ensures staff receive
timely feedback
Points
by
Self
Points by
Reporting
Head
Comments by
Reporting /Reviewing
Head
10
STAFF
TRAINING
&
DEVELOPMENT: Demonstrates an
interest in the career development of
staff within the department. Is proactive in training new hires and less
experienced staff
Total Score
SECTION C
Assessment of Key Result Areas (2012 - 13)
The Reporting Head should set Key Result Areas (KRA) in the order of their
importance, i.e. the most significant KRA with respect to the job profile should be
KRA1 and KRA5 should be of less significance.
The KRAs, if required can be split into Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Please appraise by specifying the points for each KPI with reference to the performance
categories
Performance Categories: Outstanding - 5 points; Very good - 4 points; Good - 3 points;
Satisfactory - 2 points; Needs improvement - 1 point; Unsatisfactory - 0 point.
KRA 1:
KPI 1
KPI 2
KPI 3
KPI 4
KPI 5
KRA 2:
KPI 1
KPI 2
KPI 3
Point
s by
Self
Points
by
Reporti
ng
Head
Comments by the
Reporting /
Reviewing Head
KPI 4
KRA 3:
KPI 1
KPI 2
KPI 3
KRA 4:
KPI 1
KPI 2
KRA 5:
KPI 1
KPI 2
Total Score for KRA (Out of 100) <<To be filled by HR>> =
SECTION D
Key Result Areas planned for 2013 - 14)
I.
II.
III.
The Reporting Head and the Appraisee should sit together and plan for the
Key Result Areas (KRA) to be set for the next year / next period of appraisal
KRAs have to be mentioned in the order of significance and timeframe should
be allotted for the goals (KRAs) to be achieved
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for the respective KRAs have to be set
alongwith the KRAs
S
No
TIME
FRAME /
WEIGHTAG
E
KRA 1:
KPI1:
KPI2:
KPI3:
KPI4:
KRA 2:
KPI1:
KPI2:
KPI3:
KPI4:
KRA 3:
KPI1:
KPI2:
KPI3:
KRA 4:
KPI1:
KPI2:
KPI3:
KRA 5:
/
KPI1:
KPI2:
SECTION E
Apprasiees Section
For the appraisee to share his/her comments and expectations.
What do you consider to be your most important aims and tasks in the next
year?
Technical :
Behavioral :
How much has your Manager supported / contributed to your success; any
significant learning from him?
What constructive comments would you have with regard to making your
department a better place? What were some of the barriers that prevented
your optimal performance?
10
Please read the statements below and respond: (To be filled by the
appraisee)
(I)
The ratings and comments in this appraisal are a fair and reasonable
assessment of my work performance and development needs
(a) Strongly agree
(b) Agree
Strongly
disagree
(II)
I believe that the goals set are fair and reasonable and I will try to
achieve them
Appraisee:
(b) Agree
Strongly
Reporting Head:
Signature
Signature
Date
Date
:
:
Note: (*) If the response of the appraisee is(c), (d) or (e) for questions in
section E8 the Reporting Head should either discuss and clarify the concerns of
the appraisee or rework on the appraisal, if required.
Strengths:
What quality does make this team member better than anyone else in the team?
What are the major strengths of this team member acknowledged by other
members of the team?
Weakness:
3
Opportunities:
What are the opportunities that will arise by eliminating his/her weaknesses?
Threats:
Is there any change in the job or a change in the demand for the job that this team
member is doing?
RECOMMENDATIONS:
11 What is your plan for the growth of this employee? Where (dept. & location) and
how do you think he /she will grow in SZITPL?
Very Good
Good
Satisfactory
Normal
Yes
No
Remarks
on
Promotion/added
responsibility:
__________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Signature of
Date: