Teks Debat tentang National Examination

Motion : This House believes that National Examination should be abolished

1st Speaker Government/ Affirmative
Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for the opportunity.
Next, I would like to give our motion today. Our motion today is This House Believe That National
Examination Should be Abolished . The definition of Motion is:

Natinal examination: a standard evaluation system of primary and secondary education in a country.

Abolished: to get away, to erase element/particle from system.

This whole definition is : We on affirmatife team, strongly support that the national examination to
get away or to be erased from education system in indonesia for goodness all elements.

From the motions, we will give our theme line: That we as the affirmative team absolutely agree that the
national examination should be or be erased from education system.
Then our parameter today is that we just talk about the national examination is my country, Indonesia.
Well continue to our team split: Im Bety Anitasari as the first speaker I will deliver my argument from
impacts for students/students parent perspektive. And Abdi Rahim Yudani as a second speaker, who will
deliver arguments from negative impacts for schools and education levels perspective. And last Indah
Puspita Sari as a third speaker who will deliver more proof and brief summary of our arguments.
Next ladies and gentelmen, I would like to give my argument from individual perspective,
we have 2 points:
First point is National Examination give negative impacts for student heathly, because national examination
be a standard graduation from the schools, students beharder to study before ready to face UN. So far,
national examination become a dilemma for student who will past a exam. On one hard, it can make
studentstudy hard before they are face to face with the exam, but on the distrub then healtly many student
had sick befor they are face to exam.
Monday, 16 april 2012, Hendry Kusria a student in SMK BNKP Sirambu Nias. Dead while be was doing the
national examination. Secretariat of minister of education in north Sumatera provincesay that he was dead
because have a complication discasise are brochitis, lier and impertence forfrom before national
examinationbeheld. He was supported from his parents to do the national examination.
From the evidence it clearly that national examination they think they can pass or not and whethe national
examinations report release and they are not able to pass, they will get stress and do many was, wrong or
right way. For example, myfriends she got stress before she face the national examination, and distreub her
memorize because she forget she got wont to havebreakfast in the morning because she too much think
about preparation of national examination.
We can see, national examination give negative impacts in individual perspective to students healty,
psycology and their parents, too so national examination should be abolished we his to propose.
Thank you ladies and gentelmen, that enough for my arguments. It will be continued by the second speaker
later. J
1stSpeaker Opposition/Negative
Okay, ladies and gantleman. We are from the the opposition team, that against this motion. We are strongly
disagree that UN should be abolished. Before we deliver our points of arguments I want to introduce our
teamline and teamsplit.
Our team line is we just strongly oppose that UN should be abolished in my country Indonesia.

And our team split Im NURUL HUDA & YENNY SARIANTI we are the 1st speakers that and refuse the
affirmative side. And deliver argument in individual puspective and I MADE GILER PERMADI as and
speaker who will repuse the points affirmative and deliver argument from economic, social, and education
respective and last JELLIN ELISABETH SIRINGO RINGO as the third speaker that rebuttals the all points
of affirmative side and brief summary our argument reply speech by me.
Next ladies and gantleman first, I will refuse the affirmative side and then YENNY SARIANTI will give our
points. We wiil show the good split, because we are the best soulmate?
1. the first points was health. They said that UN give negative impacts for students healthy. Because UN be a
standart graduation from the school we halce to responses, it clearly that is not on by UN be standart
graduation from the school. But from 2010 in Indonesia. The minister of education firm up the roles that
graduation will determine from60% result of UN 40% result of UAS. And if we UN think that UN is only
one to deternine the graduation, we sure feel stress but factually is not true. UN is not only one to determine
graduation UAS be an important scone too.
2. their second point was psychology they said that national examination can disturb the students
psychology. We have to responses, first 1 the porpose of an exam in school, UAS or UN is to practice our
mental to pace the vations exam this is very usefull to continue higher education abd get work doatest.
Basically, UN and us are same, its differences are UN make from capital by kemendigbud and UAS from
school. Government try to show the fairmuse for all students in Indonesia so they firm up UN disturb
students psychology ? its just parlittle part of all students in Indonesia it connot be areason to abolish UN.
UN can give positive impact for all elemen for the affirmative argument lets us see best argument of
student, teacher, parents and government
Thank you nurul huda
Nexy ladies and gentelmen i will deliver our points in individual i perspective. We have there points.
On the first point, UN can be score competition among the students. The score competition whice pust the
students to do their but, with the time, ways absolutely, study harder and take a courses before fact the
national examination and having a study guidance t the school diligently.
For example in SMAN 1 SimpangEmpat from november all students have a study guedenc at the school, to
prepare to fact UN 6 subjects UN are math, indonesia, englis, biology, physic, and chemistry that they pust
prepare they do many various qustion with their teacher trough vaious metode. We can see, it clearly that
UN can when their ability, intellegency, and competence trough a score competition of UN with high
motivation and strong beliefe so, it can fix the character of students especially in study harder to reach their
dreams. UN also helps in delceiping ones own personally and convidence. On the second point, UN to
knowing the students competence, if we know our abillity and competence we will to continue hig her
education or get a work easity (university) and the third point, UN helps to get sholat ship which will bring
to have a good job iiy senior in junior hing school, M. Aditya Rulianyah get a sholar ship to continue senior
hing school in Bandung because has got the best score UN in SMP. And now he is in turlay to continue
higher education that in univesity because he get hest score in UN for senior its again from evidence.
See advantges UN for students are very WOW and they can be a motivation for me and for you as a student,
without exams student would be more and more stupid, lazier and less motivated to learn. okey ladies and
gentelmen, ill keep my stance and back to propose.
ThankYou J
2ndSpeaker Affirmative
2nd AFF ladies and gentelmen. Im as the second speaker affirmative. At the first i want to refuse the
opposition side i have 3 points.
First you said that UN can be a score competition of UN he have responses. Do you think a score
competition of UN is good ?
No, a score competition is not good especially for our country indonesia in fact, you know and you can see
that many studen make cheats and buy the answer key before they face the national exames they do that
because they want to get best score of a score competion UN like you have said.
Like you have said

Seconde you said that it can fix the character personalitiy and convidence students. We have to response it
really wrong. Basically UAN is a test thyat multiple choice but the roles of UN are very make difficualt for
students and it can their convidence be down and their spirit be down too best they very fraid, nevous make
cheats and buy the answer keys, they are not good habit but dangerous habit, it is a simply pactise of
dishone. It is absulutley can andemine and decrease the moral students as the ypung generation.
Third, you said that UN can be used to knowing the students coupetence. We are to responses
chargingstudents with UN as graduation stipulation is not a best wary to improve students competance. UN
i have 6 subjects how the studens does not have potenly between 6 subject? It is not fair for some students
that have potaniy in other subject. Such as history, islamic and other ladies.
I have refused the opp side and then i will deliver aguments in economic, social, education, perspeetive. I
have 3 poins on the first point. In economic perspective. From the first implementation of un until last year,
UN make big expediture for studens parents school and goverment especially goverment to face UN and get
best score students need many things and they absolutly need a lot of money such as take a courses, buy
tools, buy some books and even the key answe too. They are not cheap especlally key answe, certain people
sell the answer kets before or while face the UN with expensive cost , that is about millior, we know that
many students pareats in indonesia have diffecully of condition of economy.
On the second point, in social perpective. Preparry UN need many time to study, practise and prepare i they
can make the students can not play they will always in house because they are very fraide if they can pass
UN or not it can make the students does not sleep and having breap fast lunch and dinner regulary and if
they have got bad result it will affect their feturu from the fist implementation of UN until last year, we
havent seen the result UN used require the experrsive cost buy the result is only doubt and uncertainty as ne
can see, last year the education and caltuns minister, say government. Spent expensive cost that is about
billion ruplans and factually the billion rupians yield many cause of iligal way that be done by sone school.
In 2008 while the second day of UN there is a practise of dishonest from 16 teachers SMAN Lubuk Pakam 2
From evidence it clearly that expensis cost that was spent by goverment doesnt have the positive result for
students beg to propose so im strongly agree with this motion beg to perpose. J
2ndSpeaker Opposition
Hello ladies and gentleman . Im the 2 nd speaker opposstion will oppose the affirmative side.
National examination have positive impacts for all elements . so, moreover many country in a world use
national examination a standart graduation in their education development. So, why national examination
should be abolished? Is there better way if without national examination ?i belive there is no, until a better
form of demonstrating know legde comes along , UN must be still best pleace at the first , I want to refuse
the AFF side, you said that UN
Make big expenditure for students parents like take a courses , buy books and key answer we have to
responses.that is not true . first students should not to take a courses because school always help the study
guidare after in every years.second, students is not advisable to by book, ducation minister time give many
helping for all schools in Indonesia, especially books . so, students enough study ang borrow some books
from library in their school.and key answere . it is not necessary because it is a farlt in process of national
examination, it needs an extra socialitation so, students but it is not reason to abolish UN from curriculum of
education an Indonesia because there is still many students ta=hat do a true way to prepare the national
examination
On the second point , you said that UN doesnt have positive result as a burgeon country , Indonesia still
need time to adapt with national examination until Indonesia can make the best method of help of national
examination
With the result , kemendigbud can mapping the education levels and knoeing condition of education
development
Okay, I have refusedthe AFF side, noe I will deliver my argument education development in Indonesia .
national examination as a form that is used by government to slow a fairness to all student in Indonesia
National examination made by professional person in kemendigbud far before the national examination be
help, kemendigbud give some lattice of national examination

10 SMA tahat get the highest scores in indonesia , according the evidence, government can helping and
make the comparison of education development in Indonesia
Secondly, must national examination government van devide education budget for every school in Indonesia
fairly we can see, last year SMAN that get the highest scores get many advantages 8 of to 10 from
government . Thank you J
3rd Speaker Affirmative
Hello ladies and gentlemen
Im Indah as the third speaker affirmative.
I have 7 points that Ive found to rebut the opposition team.

First, you said that national examination can be a score competititon among the students.

Do you think its good ? No for the students in Indonesia because its just a little part of million of students
in Indonesia use the honest manner to pass the exams.

Second, you said that national examination to knowing the students competence. Many
ways and procedure to knowing the students competence such as practice , debate, discuss and many other.a
potential of student not only determine trough the multiple choice test like national examination. But in
education, we need to know the process, procedure and their practical in day life. National examination just
give the doubt result so how can I know our potential with the doubt result ?

Third, you said that trough national examination government can knowing the education
development in Indonesia.
I have explained that an education need a process, just not a result .it is just make government easily. But
many elements that disagree with the results of national examination because the know the real condition of
national examinations held.

Forth, you said that national examination is an effective system for education in Indonesia.
Moreover many other countries that use the national examination as the graduation standard.
In basically, the national examination is good for education in their country. But its not an effective for
education system in Indonesia. Before use the national examination, The government shoul fix the
educational units quality in Indonesia such as the teacher quality, Kemendigbuds work and the other
educations system.

And fifth, you said that if a person pass the national examinations and get a good scores, he/
she will get the scholarship. It is not fair for the other clever students that have good potential too. It do not
shows they that have got the good result use the honest manner. As we know, facts in ndonesia shows many
dishonest practices that for the national examinations held such as make cheats, use the electronic tool or
use the key answer. Moreover, many teachers do the dishonest practice too, to help their students while
national examination comes along. And more, how the students that have got the bad result ? it will cause
the problem m in their future. Moreover, if they didnt pass the exam, it candisturb theirpyschology.
60% : 40% it dont helps because 60% is more that 40%.

Sixth, you said that trough National examination, government can shows the fairness for all
students In Indonesia. That is not fairness. Lets we compare the education in border and underprivileged
areas with big cities in Indonesia.in border and underprivileged areas, the education facilities and learning
resources are limited while the big cities have very complete education faicilities and broad success to get
the good learning.

And last, you said that without exams students would be more and more stupid, lazier and
less motivated to learn. Its really and really wrong because national examination that cause the students
would be more and more stupid, more and more lazy, more and more dishonest and absolutely decrease the
students quality in Indonesia. To know the students ability, government should measure the process, just
not a result.
In fact, what did we expect from national examination yield ?

National examination is compatible for the other country, but it is not compatible for educations system in
Indonesia. We can graduate from school or not just by passingan exam, which is held in 3-6days and with
standard scores from education ministry.
How about learning process for 3 years that have ben done by students ? does it mean nothing ? and do you
agree wth that ? No , absolutely No because because national examination will broke the process which
during this followed bystudents. A absolutely decrease the students character.
National examination makes the negative impacts are more thin Indonesia.an the positive impacts for all
elements and also for educations development in Indonesia.
So, we are the affirmative team strongly agree with this motion that National Examination should be
abolished.
Thank you J
3rdSpeaker Opposition
Jellyn as the third speaker opposition
Hello ladies and gentlemen
Now Im jellyn Slingo-lingo as the third speaker will summarize our best argument for our disagreeing to
the motion.
At the firs, I will refuse the opposition side. I have some points.
On the first point, give the negative impacts for students health ? its wrong. It is the little part from all
facts. There is still many students that feel advantages of national examination.
On the second point, they said that national examination can disturb the students psychology. But you dont
see some students that have the true way to face the national examination. Its not a reason to abolish
National Examination. Basically, national examination is same with the other exams ? the other exam that in
form essay but national examination no! it is made in form multiple choice. Or do you have the other
method if without national examination ?
Then I will mention some advantages of national examination for all elements according arguments that
have been delivered by the 1stOpp and 2ndOpp.
First, For students

1. knowing their ability and performance

2. national examination may encourage people to work and learn
3. create the competition score which push the students to their best
4. helps in developing ones own personality and convidence
5. if a person pass the exam and got the good result, it helps to get scholarship which will bring to have
a good job.
Second, for schools

1. Trough national examination the teachers can get the feedback of the student.
2. School can decide the best students untuil stupid students easily
3. If the schools have the best students they will get the appreciation from government or usually we
call Kemendigbud
Third, For Government

1. Mapping the quality of programme and or educational units

2. The basic of selection in to the next educational level
3. Give the appreciation for best shool and best students easily
so, should we abolish the national examnation ?

No , absolutely no. because without exams student would be more and more stupid, lazier and less motivated
to learn. With that argument that have delivered, we are from opposition team strongly disagree with that
motion. National examination should never be abolished.
Thank you J
Reply speech Opposition
Thanks you ladies and gentleman
Now I want to deliver our reply speech. Once again I say that, we are strongly disagree with the motion that
the UN should be abolished at the first, I want to deliver a summary of our point of view.
1.UN give many advantages for all elements, students, school and government too.
2.UN is an effective system that compatible for condition of education in Indonesia
3. UN is a fairness that government has been showed for students
And just I wiil explain why the national exam should not be abolished
1. UN will increase students human resourcesquality
2.UN can be an indicator of students
3. and with UN the gon, in this case ministry of education and culture will be able to know what aspect of
study materials that need to be improved
4. as the burgeon country, indonesiaa, UN is compatible for education system in Indonesia
According our point of view. We still strongly disagree if the UN should be abolished. There is not other
best solution for increase the aducations quality
Thanks you J
Reply Speech Affirmative
Reply speech Affirmative
Hello Ladies and Gentelment
Now I would like deliver our reply speechs affirmative,.
Before I deliver it, I will to convince you that UN is not an effective way for educations development in
Indonesia.
First,
1. For students, UN not give the positive impacts fairly.
2. you said that UN is an effective system, but in fact, UN is not an effective system for education in
Indonesia.
3. you also said that UN can increase the students human resources quality, but with a doubt result, UN can
decrease the students human resources quality, because trough UN many students do the dishonest pradises
such as buy the key answer.
So, what did we exped from national examination yield ? doubt result ? decreasing the students character ?
No, absolutely no.
Before use the UN as a graduation standard national examination test to assess students learning in primary
high school until high school level, kemendigbud and ministry of edv. And culture will search the best
systems to fix the educational units in Indonesia.
One more we are from the aff team absolutlely agree with this motion that UN should be abolished Thank
you ladies and gentlemen
Good afternoon J