Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Criteria
Understands the
question and the
nature of the task
HD
Evidence of an in-depth
understanding of all aspects of
the task
D
Evidence that all
aspects of the task
were wellconsidered
Clear evidence that
images have been
carefully
considered with a
view to responding
to the question and
the key text.
Thorough
engagement with
the written text
and identification
of key ideas
Visual material is
well analysed and
analysis is used
quite effectively
Well integrated to
produce an
informed response
C
Demonstrates good
understanding of the
task overall
P
Demonstrates some
understanding of aspects
of the task, but not all.
N
Little or no
understanding of the
task
Identifies
appropriate visual
material
Little evidence of
considered choice of
images.
Sophisticated, in-depth
engagement with the written
text and synthesis of key ideas
Good identification of
ideas but engaged in a
rather general manner
Little or no evidence of
engagement with the
written text
Critically analyses
visual material
Little or no visual
analysis.
Sophisticated integration of
visual and textual analysis to
produce an independent
response
Good integration of
visual and textual
material.
Little or no integration
Communicates in a
effective and
appropriate manner
Sound skills in
written expression.
Clear, concise and
coherent.
Solid expression.
Generally clear but
with some lapses
Adequate written
expression but requires
development.
References
thoroughly
Thorough understanding of
scholarly conventions of
referencing. Used very well
Very sound
understanding of
scholarly
conventions of
referencing. Used
well
Solid understanding of
scholarly conventions
of referencing. . Minor
errors in application of
it.
Some misunderstanding
of the use of referencing
conventions.
referencing.
Little to no adherence to
scholarly conventions of
referencing