Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
91,
no. 8. Aug. 1991. pp. 277-285.
Introduction
Many leaching systems are characterized by non-linear
leaching behaviour, in which the initial and final rates
cannot be fitted simultaneously by the use of a single rate
constant in classical generalized models such as the
shrinking-core model!. The object of the present study
was to characterize such a non-linear leaching system, in
terms both of actual leaching rates and of a suitable
model to account for the non-linear behaviour.
The system chosen for this study was the leaching of
pyrolusite in an acidic ferrous medium. In this system,
leaching is rapid, approaching maximum extraction
within five minutes. This precluded monitoring of the
progress of the reaction by conventional sample extraction and analysis. A method involving continuous measurement of the redox potential of the leaching solution,
with parallel calibration of the redox potential versus the
manganese extraction, was therefore applied.
The first section of the paper deals with the kinetics
of the reaction background information, experimental
procedure (including validation of the technique used),
and the results of the leaching experiments.
The second section is a comparison of the results
achieved in the application of two models to the pyrolu-
Department
of Chemical
Engineering,
University
of Cape Town,
OF THE SOUTH
AFRICAN
INSTITUTE
of Leaching Kinetics
Selection of Method
The reaction studied was the reductive leaching of manganese dioxide in pyrolusite by use of an acidic ferrous
sulphate solution. The reaction in its basic form is
MnO2+2 Fe2+ +4 H+~Mn2+ +2 Fe3+ +2 H2O.
As the reaction progresses, both the solution pH and
redox potential can be expected to increase.
The reductive leaching of manganese dioxide has been
studied by several workers, the most thorough attempts
at explaining the kinetic behaviour being those of Cornelius and Woodcock2, Koch3, and Majima et al.4. Their
findings were similar in most respects: pH affected the
rate only when it was too high to prevent the precipitation of ferric hydroxide, although the addition of acid
did not always eliminate this; the initial concentration of
ferric ions had no effect on the rate, and the increase in
rate with temperature indicated an activation energy
slightly higher than is normally associated with diffusion
control. These workers differed about the dependence of
the reaction rate on the initial concentration of ferrous
ions: Cornelius and Woodcock, using an ore containing
50 per cent manganese, found first-order dependence,
whereas Majima et al., using a lower-grade ore, observed
a reaction order of 0,85. Koch reported zero-order de-
JOURNAL
OF THE SOUTH
AFRICAN
INSTITUTE
500
500
490
490
480
470
470
460
-;E
450
'-"
440
+ 70,5[Mn]
+ 420
0,9996
460
-;-
E
'-"
w
450
440
430
430
420
420
410
410
400
400
100
Fig. 1-lncrease
200
time
in redox potential
300
400
during leaching
460
~l
~
480 -
470
--------
460
>
450
w 440
--
I
~I
-=-
-----
430
---------
420 410
---------L
400
0
1000
2000
time
Fig. 2-Redox
3000
_L
4000
--I
420
-;-
E
'-"
400
380
360
340
320
300
0
,2
,4
,6
[Mn] (g/I)
,8
Fig. 3-Relationship
between redox potential
concentration
in solution
(a) Initial (Fe3+1
= 0,01M
(b) No initial (Fe3+1
and manganese
Aspects Examined
The various aspects that were examined included
reproducibility, electrode response, stirrer speed, concentrations of interest, and reaction temperatures.
Duplicate tests performed under identical solution conditions and additions of ore showed that the reproducibility of the results was excellent.
Tests were done to establish the response speeds of the
redox electrode since the change in redox potential is rapid
at the start of a run. The results of a typical step-cha,nge
test carried out by the addition of concentrated ferric solution to the initial leaching solution is shown in Fig. 4.
5000
500
(s)
iI
440
,8
500
490
,4
,6
[Mn] (g/I)
,2
500
(s)
480
-18,1[Mn]'
,2
480
-;E
400
'-"
w
350
300
0
100
time
200
(s)
300
400
AUGUST 1991
279
520
2000 'pm
500
480
,-...
>
E 460
........
w
440
420
400
0
200
400
600
800
1000
time
Fig. 5-Effect
1200
1400
1600
1800
200G
(s)
500
490
Oynamlc values
Equilibrium values
480
470
460
,-...
E
w
450
440
430
420
TABLE I
CONDITIONS
components in the ore were being leached at rates different from that at which the manganese dioxide was being
leached, a relationship obtained from equilibrium data
would not be applicable to the dynamic situation prevailing during leaching.
Because the time required for collecting and filtering
samples during leaching was long (30 seconds) in relation to the rapidity of the reaction, it was not possible
to obtain samples reflecting the solution composition at
a given time. It was possible, however, to take samples
and to filter and analyse them in order to establish redoxextraction values during the course of a run. A comparison of these values with those for a calibration run would
demonstrate whether they showed the same relationship.
A pair of runs was accordingly carried out: the fir~t
was a normal calibration run and the second a dynamic
run, during which three samples were taken. and analy~ed
for redox potential and manganese extraction. The fust
sample was taken before the ore was added, th~ second
shortly after the addition of the ore, and the thud after
about 90 seconds. The last two samples were filtered
rapidly to stop leaching. The redox values for the filtered
samples were obtained by placing them in a water-bath
at the temperature used for the run. Duplicate runs were
also done as. a check on the reproducibility.
The results for one pair of runs is shown in Fig. 6. It
is clear that the redox-extraction values for the samples
taken during leaching fall on the line derived from the
calibration run. This indicates that the use of equilibrium relationships established from calibration runs in the
determination of the manganese extraction during leaching runs is valid.
410
EXPERIMENTS
400
Run no.
Temp
QC
FeSO4
g/l
Fe2(SO4h
g/l
H2S04
mill
MnSO4
g/l
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
40
60
20,0
20,0
20,0
40,0
10,0
20,0
20,0
20,0
20,0
20,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
6,0
0,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
5,0
12,5
2,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
10,0
0,0
0,0
Fig. 6-Comparlson
JOURNAL
,2
,4
[Mn]
,6
(g/I)
,8
of redox-extraction
under dynamic and
equilibrium conditions
OF THE SOUTH
AFRICAN
INSTITUTE
1,2
---'
'
~-'
10
/'
"3
c:
0
/"/"
,8
,6
~c:
:::!: ,4
.~
2
0
CD
a.
1
U1
0
0
0
Ore added
Fig. 7-Manganese
0----0- 0
+2Fe3+ +2HzO,
Fez + :Mnz +
Fe3 + :Mnz +
HZSO4:Mnz+
Theory
-2,03
2,03
-3,57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-2,16
-1,98
-2,02
-2,03
-2,07
-2,01
-2,11
-1,96
-2,11
-1,93
2,13
2,08
2,04
2,07
2,07
2,13
2,01
1,91
2,16
2,20
-3,92
-3,80
-3,97
-4,16
-3,72
-4,06
-4,09
-3,77
-3,88
n/a
Average
-2,04
2,08
INSTITUTE
-3,93
c
~
3
added
2
Ore
4
(9/1)
Run
AFRICAN
e-
Fig. 8-Species
TABLE 11
MEASURED RATIOS OF SPECIES .CONSUMED:PRODUCED
OF THE SOUTH
-<r
+4H+~Mnz+
..-
- -0----.
-
=--:--:--==-&-_-==--=:-=--=--
(g/I)
- --<:>..-.
-
H,SO.
Fe'+
Fe'+
Mn'+
-.0.....
UI
~,2
JOURNAL
i:"5
CD
0
c: 4
0
0
3
'-'
"--- --0--
:;
'--'0)
---er-(r~
--0--
0.14 M
,8
.......
'---
,6
c:
~ ,4
,2
0
0
Fig.
9-Effect
100
200
time
300
400
500
(s)
on leaching rate
TABLE III
DATA USED IN THE MODELLING
Mn2 + concentration
4
5
Time
Run no.
Ferrous concn (g/l)
Temperature (QC)
o
12,5
25,0
50,0
75,0
100,0
150,0
200,0
250,0
300,0
400,0
500,0
in solution
9
10
20
25
40
25
10
25
20
40
20
60
0,0
0,43
0,59
0,73
0,81
0,84
0,88
0,90
0,91
0,91
0,92
0,93
0,0
0,50
0,69
0,83
0,89
0,92
0,93
0,93
0,93
0,94
0,94
0,94
0,0
0,34
0,47
0,59
0,66
0,71
0,77
0,80
0,84
0,85
0,87
0,89
0,0
0,47
0,63
0,77
0,84
0,87
0,91
0,93
0,93
0,93
0,93
0,93
0,0
0,65
0,77
0,88
0,91
0,92
0,94
0,94
0,94
0,94
0,94
0,94
The extraction data were converted to values of manganese remaining in the ore (as moles of manganese per
litre), use being made of the assay value for manganese
dioxide in the unleached or~. Allowance was made for
incomplete extraction (the maximum extraction was 93
per cent) by the use of a 'refractory' component to account for a small amount of residual manganese dioxide
once leaching had ceased,
,8
'-
da
dt
where y
f
N
3 VCferr
rfilm + rash + rreact
Cferr
,... Ferrous
Co(1-uba)
concentration
Resistances
rfilm
rash
rreact
uoro
Ds
rou[1
(1 -
a) 113]
De(1 - a)1I3
= ks(1
The variables
Liquid-film
diffusion
Solid-layer
diffusion
ro
Reaction
- a)2I3
a
t
V
D:e-EdIRT
and ks
= k:e-Er/RT,
point
Model approximations
O,O4M; T
[Fe'+]
O,OlM; T
~
. [Fe'+]
,02
6.
VI
"Cl>
[Fe'+]
O,14M;T
2S"C
2S"C
= 2S"C
0 ,015
Cl>
,01
.S
c
:::!:
,005
0
300
400
500
0
0
100
200
Time
(s)
shrlnklng.core
,025
-,02
~
VI
"Cl>
.
6.
0
Model approximations
[Fe'+]
O,OlM: T ~ 2S"C
=
[Fe'+] ~ O,O7M: T
= 40"C
[Fe'+]
O,O7M; T ~ 60"C
=
1,015
Cl>
De = aDs.
::
oS
c
,01
:::!:
,005
0
0
100
200
300
Time (s)
400
500
shrinking.
AUGUST 1991
283
of detailed knowledge of the leaching mechanism, ratelimiting factors can be lumped together as an overall
resistance expressed in terms of an activation-energy barrier. This 'activation energy' (E) increases as leaching
progresses: there is a linear dependence of E on the residual metal concentration (Cm) in the ore:
E = Eo(1-a[Cm]
(where ex is a constant).
So, the rate constant, k, is
k = Ae-E/RT,
with E as defined above. With appropriate substitution,
k=e
(DICml-b
T
+C.
-k[Mn]P[F~+]q.
d[Mn]
dt
= -e
DIMnl-b
(-r+
[Mn][F~+t,7
In this equation,
[Mn] is the concentration of manganese remaining in
the ore at any time (mol/I).
[F~ +] is the concentration of ferrous ions in solution
(mol/I).
p is the reaction order with respect to manganese,
and was assigned one of two values: 1 or 2/3.
A value of 1 would imply that the mixture is effectively homogeneous with respect to MnO2.
A value of 2/3, from simple geometric considerations for a single particle size, would allow for
surface-area control to be accounted fors.
,02
'-~
0
Rate
,015
"6
approximations
[Fe2+]
= 0,04M; T = 25'C
[Fe2+] ~ 0,07M; T
= 25'C
[Fe2+] = 0,14M; T ~ 25'C
t>
~
-k.[MnJ'[Fe2+Ja,7
k = e(~+')
a = 29825; b = 2630; c = 6,52
,01
.!:O
:::;;
"
,005
0
Model
0
.
100
200
400
300
Time
500
(5)
model
,025
,02
'-~ ,015
0
Model approximations
[Fe2+]
0,07M; T ~ 25'C
=
t>
[Fe2+]
[Fe2+]
~ 0,07M;
=
0,07M;
T ~ 40'C
T ~ 60'C
Rote ~ -k.[Mn].[Fe2+Ja,7
e(~+')
k =
as well as the three constants involved in the activation- ~
energy expression (a, b, and e).
"6 ,01
A FORTRAN program was used to solve the model .!:O
for given parameter estimates and to perform regressions :::;;
on the data to find values for a, b, and e that yielded " ,005
the closest fit. Optimization was performed according to
an algorithm used by Brittan, which performed a
0
Newton-Raphson type of procedure13,14. Values for the
400
200
300
100
0
Time (5)
reaction-order terms were varied from run to run, and
were not included in the regression. This was done by simply taking a value for p, the manganese term, as either
Fig. 14- The modelling of temperature effects-Brlttan's
0
JOURNAL
OF THE SOUTH
AFRICAN
INSTITUTE
29825;
2630;
6,52
500
model