Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
pubs.acs.org/cm
Interplay between Electrochemistry and Phase Evolution of the P2type Nax(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2 Cathode for Use in Sodium-Ion Batteries
Wei Kong Pang,,, Sujith Kalluri,, Vanessa K. Peterson,*, Neeraj Sharma, Justin Kimpton,
Bernt Johannessen, Hua Kun Liu, Shi Xue Dou, and Zaiping Guo*,
School of Mechanical, Materials, and Mechatronic Engineering, Institute for Superconducting & Electronic Materials, Faculty of
Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee DC, NSW 2232, Australia
School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
INTRODUCTION
Since the commercialization of the rst lithium-ion battery
(LIB), featuring a LiCoO2 cathode and graphite anode, by Sony
Corporation in 1991, LIBs are now extensively used for energy
storage due to their relatively high energy-density, long cyclelife, and low cost.1 However, the search is underway for a
replacement technology, mainly because of the limited
abundance of lithium. Sodium is the sixth-highest abundant
element in the Earths crust, making it cheaper to produce, and
sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are now attracting attention as
promising alternatives for large-scale energy storage applications. Sodium is also the next lightest and smallest alkali-metal
after lithium, therefore providing useful gravimetric and
volumetric energy-storage density.25 Beyond these advantages
that sodium has to oer battery technology, sodium also
exhibits a redox potential well suited to battery applications (0.3
V vs Li) with electrochemical function similar to that of lithium
2015 American Chemical Society
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
discharge capacity of 160 mAhg1, where the two electrochemical reactions involved lead to structural instability and
poor cycling performance.15 While P2-type layered oxides such
as Na0.6MnO216 and Na0.7CoO217 have a better initial discharge
capacity than the O3-type layered oxides, again, poor cycling
performance remains a major issue. Environmental concerns
are also driving research aimed at replacing toxic and costly
metals such as Cr and Co with safe and abundant metals such
as Mn, Fe, and Ni, possibly with these intermixed.1820 Safer
and aordable layered sodium metal-oxides containing mixedvalence Fe and Mn, such as the P2-type Nax(FeyMn1y)O2
material (x = 2/3; y = 1/2), have been obtained by solid-state,
coprecipitation, autocombustion, and solgel processes.2024
Importantly, these environmentally friendly materials deliver an
excellent initial discharge capacity of 190 mAhg1 at low
current density in the 1.54.3 V range with an energy density
of 520 mWhg11. These electrodes are therefore comparable in performance with the LiFePO4 (530 mWhg11)
and LiMn2O4 (460 mWhg11) cathodes used commercially
in LIBs and open up a new avenue for the development of
future cathode materials. Unfortunately, the poor cycling
performance of the Nax(FeyMn1y)O2 (x = 2/3; y = 1/2)
materials presents a major hurdle to large-scale commercial
application. The electrochemical behavior of materials is
governed by their structural and chemical evolution. For
example, the delithiation of the P2LixVO2 (x = 0.80) cathode
proceeds through multiple two-phase and solidsolution
reactions to form P2LixVO2 (x = 0.50), leading to structural
instability and poor cycling performance. 1 0 P2
Na2/3(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2 crystallizes in the hexagonal structure
with a P63/mmc space group and is considered a candidate
cathode material for SIBs, with the sodium insertion and
extraction mechanisms studied using ex situ synchrotron X-ray
powder diraction (SXRPD) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS).20 It is reported that the Nax(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2 cathode
rst undergoes a solidsolution reaction up to 3.8 V (from x =
0.66 to 0.4) before a two-phase reaction between P63/mmc
(P2) and P6m2 (OP4) is observed, alongside Fe3+/Fe4+ and
Mn3+/Mn4+ transitions.20 While the established mechanism is
seemingly well-accepted, the ex situ study involved the removal
and postprocessing of composite electrodes from a coin-cell
and therefore did not directly reveal the entire mechanism of
cathode function. Recent studies of the Nax(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2
cathode using operando SXRPD reported that Nax(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2 (x 1) crystallized in the Cmcm space group (also P2-type)
and rst transformed to the P63/mmc symmetry (P2) through a
two-phase reaction upon desodiation. Further desodiation
caused the P2 structure to undergo both solidsolution (0.35
< x < 0.82) and two-phase reactions, transforming into a Z
phase with a high degree of disorder. However, neither report
has explained the structurefunction relationship that underpins the electrochemical properties of this promising SIB
cathode.
Since the energy density of a battery mainly depends
predominately on the cathode material, the cathode is the
component of focus in the consideration of new SIB systems.
The properties and features of the Nax(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2 cathode
are suciently promising for SIB applications to warrant an indepth understanding of this material both structurally and
electrochemically in the pursuit of overcoming its poor cycling
performance and thus is the subject of the present study. In
particular, an understanding of the reaction pathways that
control performance will enable the rational improvement of
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
constant current of 0.07 mA (equivalent to 0.05 C) during data
collection. SXRPD experiments were conducted on the powder
diraction beamline at the Australian Synchrotron where data were
collected every 3.40 min at 0.68922(1) (determined using the NIST
SRM 660b) during the battery cycle using a MYTHEN microstrip
detector. The lattice response of P2Na2/3(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2 during the
cycle was extracted and examined using a single peak-tting analysis
with the large-array manipulation program (LAMP)31 to track the
changes in peak position, intensity, and width of the 002 and 100
cathode reections during charging and discharging.
Fe and Mn K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES)
spectra were collected using the same cells as per the SXRPD
experiment on the X-ray absorption beamline at the Australian
Synchrotron. The energy step size through the edge was 0.3 eV. The
exposure time per step was xed to 1 s. For the Fe K-edge, FeO and
Fe2O3 powders were used as Fe2+ and Fe3+ references, respectively. Fe
K-edge spectra of [Fe(O)(N4Py)](ClO4)2 were sourced from Rohde
et al.32 For the Mn K-edge, LiMnO2 and MnO2 were used as Mn3+ and
Mn4+ references, respectively.
The electrochemical properties of the P2-type Na2/3(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2
cathode were evaluated in CR2032 coin-cells with a half-cell
conguration as assembled in an Ar-lled glovebox (MBraun,
Germany). Galvanostatic chargedischarge behavior was assessed
using an automatic battery analyzer (Land, China).
site
B (2)
occupancy
Na
Na
Mn
Fe
O
2b
2d
2a
2a
4f
0
1/3
0
0
1/3
0
2/3
0
0
2/3
1/4
3/4
0
0
0.0903(2)
1.5(3)
4.9(4)
0.8(1)b
0.8(1)b
0.54(2)
0.24(1)
0.46(2)
1/2
1/2
1
atom
site
B (2)
occupancy
Na
Na
Mn
Fe
O
2b
2d
2a
2a
4f
0
1/3
0
0
1/3
0
2/3
0
0
2/3
1/4
3/4
0
0
0.06378(8)
1.0(5)
1.0(5)
1.0(5)b
1.0(5)b
0.1(2)
0.26(1)
0.30(1)
1/2
1/2
1
is hexagonal and adopts the P63/mmc space group. Interestingly, the two give dierent lattice parameters (a = 0.0025(2)
and c = 0.012(1) , with NPD yielding a larger a and
smaller c parameter) and dissimilar sodium occupancies (x =
0.14(2)), with the larger Na content determined from the NPD
data approaching the expected value. We note that the
elemental contrast in the NPD data is more advantageous for
understanding the structure than the XRPD data, most notably
the contrast available between the site-sharing Fe and Mn.
Perhaps more importantly, the powders were isolated from air
during the NPD experiment but not the XRPD measurement,
where moisture is known to sometimes cause the decomposition of NFMO and the partial removal of Na. The larger c
and smaller a lattice parameters are consistent with a lower
sodium content. For these reasons, the NPD result was
considered more reliable, and the rened NMFO structure is
illustrated in Figure 2.
In the P63/mmc hexagonal P2-type structure, Na ions occupy
two prismatic sites (2b and 2d, with 24(1) and 46(2)%
occupancies, respectively) that are sandwiched between layers
of hybrid FeO6 and MnO6. An SEM image (Figure 3) shows
the particle morphology and size, and reveals that the material
is composed of nanoparticles without a well-dened morphology that aggregate with particle size 200700 nm.
The electrochemical properties of the NFMO cathode were
measured in coin-cells within the 1.54.2 V range to avoid
unnecessary reactions associated with the degradation of the
carbonate-based electrolytes at high potential, as suggested in
Yabuuchi et al.33 Figure 4a shows the chargedischarge
behavior of a typical NMFO-containing coin-cell for the initial,
second, and 80th cycles at 0.1 C. The rst charge exhibits a at
plateau at around 4.07 V, whereas on the rst discharge two
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
representative of the phase evolution during charge (desodiation) and discharge (sodiation) for that part of the battery.
The capacity of the custom coin-cell during the operando
SXRPD experiment was lower than anticipated (Figure S4,
Supporting Information), indicating that within this sampled
volume there are parts of the cathode that are inactive. The
synchrotron beam passes through a hole in the outer battery
casing, and it is well-established that this can result in poor
contact between the electrode layers and cause areas of
inactivity.37 Despite the lower amount of extracted and inserted
Na calculated from the SXRPD data, the data show denitively
the mechanism of transformations for the NFMO cathode
during the chargedischarge process.
Figures 7, 8, and 9 show the results from the single peaktting routines applied to the 002 and 100 NFMO reections.
Figure 7. Results of peak tting of the NFMO (a) 002 and (b) 100
reections illustrating changes in the 2-values (peak shifts). The
voltage prole is also presented, and the shaded regions represent twophase transitions (purple and orange), the OP4 phase (green) and the
P2-orthorhombic phase (blue).
SXRPD data during charge and discharge within 1.5 and 4.2 V
vs Na, respectively, at 0.07 mA (equivalent to 0.05 C). The
operando SXRPD data for the other regions are shown in Figure
S3 (Supporting Information). We note that the synchrotron
beam interacts with the sample in a region 2 1 mm in
transmission geometry and that the operando data are therefore
3154
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
Figure 8. Results from peak ts of the NFMO (a) 002 and (b) 100
reections illustrating changes in the reection intensity. The voltage
prole is also presented, and the shaded regions represent two-phase
transitions (purple and orange), the OP4 phase (green) and the P2orthorhombic phase (blue).
Figure 9. Results of peak ts of the NFMO (a) 002 and (b) 100
reections illustrating changes in the peak width. The voltage prole is
also presented, and the shaded regions represent two-phase transitions
(purple and orange), the OP4 phase (green) and the P2-orthorhombic
phase (blue).
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
that during the Fe3+/Fe4+ transition (within the OP4-type
structure), further evidencing the dierent redox-active centers
at the two voltage ranges. As one can expect from the Shannon
radii of Mn (rMn3+ = 0.58 and rMn4+ = 0.53 ) and Fe (rFe3+ =
0.645 and rFe4+ = 0.565 ), the 2.2/2.0 and 4.1/3.4 V plateaus
likely arise from the Mn3+/Mn4+ and Fe3+/Fe4+ couples,
respectively.44 Upon discharge (sodiation), the reverse
reactions (OP4-P2) are observed. When the coin-cell is
discharged below 2.0 V, the P2-hexagonal phase undergoes a
two-phase reaction, transforming into a P2-type orthorhombic
phase with a Cmcm space group, the same structure reported by
Mortemard de Boisse et al.39 On the basis of the operando
SXRPD results, the phase evolution of the P2
Nax(Fe1/2Mn1/2)O2 cathode during charge and discharge
obtained from operando SXRPD is shown in Scheme 1.
Figure 10. (a) Discharge curves of typical NFMO-containing coincells at the initial and 80th cycle at 0.1 C when cycled in the 1.54.0,
2.04.0, and 2.04.2 V voltage windows and (b) the corresponding
cycle stability.
P63
P63/mmc
Cmcm
structure type
volume per formula (3)
hexagonal
36.7
hexagonal
41.6
orthorhombic
42.9
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
by a relatively greater gain in the cycle retention (59%). We
note that this material is considered for use in not yet
commercially available sodium-ion batteries, an emerging
technology, where materials development is in its infancy.
Our results demonstrate that electrochemical properties of
electrode materials can be optimized by a detailed knowledge of
the phase and structural evolution gained using operando
structural methods such as SXRPD.
CONCLUSIONS
The P2Nax(Ni1/2Mn1/2)O2 nanoparticulate cathode has been
successfully prepared via a solgel method, and its electrochemical properties are investigated. Although the cathode
delivers a high initial capacity of 180 mAhg1 and excellent
energy-density of 495 mWhg11, the energy eciency and
cycle stability are reasonably poor within the 1.54.2 V vs Na
operating range. To understand the origin of the capacity fade
during cycling, operando synchrotron X-ray powder diraction
was used to determine the phase evolution of the cathode
during charge and discharge within this voltage window. The
work showed that the P2 hexagonal phase undergoes a solid
solution reaction during the Mn3+/Mn4+ redox transition and a
solidsolution-like two-phase reaction at 4.1 V and above,
accompanying desodiation during the Fe3+/Fe4+ transition.
Importantly, by avoiding the large voltage dierence between
the anodic and cathodic plateaus, we show that with the
alternative operating window, i.e., 2.04.0 V (vs Na), as
informed by our comprehensive understanding of the phase
evolution, the cycling performance can be improved by 25%.
This work demonstrates the importance of understanding the
structurefunction relationship of electrode materials and the
feasibility of operando synchrotron X-ray powder diraction for
studying this.
ABBREVIATIONS
LIB, lithium-ion battery; SIB, sodium-ion battery; XRPD, X-ray
powder diraction; SXRPD, synchrotron X-ray powder
diraction; NPD, neutron powder diraction; XAS, X-ray
absorption spectroscopy; SEM, scanning electron microscopy;
XANES, X-ray absorption near-edge structure; standard
reference material, SRM; NFMO, Nax(Ni1/2Mn1/2)O2
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information
*
REFERENCES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
Notes
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the nancial support provided by the
Commonwealth of Australia and Automotive CRC 2020. N.S.
would like to acknowledge AINSE for support through the
Research Fellowship Scheme. The use of infrastructure and
facilities at ISEM and the UOW Electron Microscopy Centre is
gratefully acknowledged. Part of this research was undertaken
on the Powder Diraction beamline and on the X-ray
3157
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158
Article
Chemistry of Materials
(27) Kimpton, J.; Gu, Q. Synchrotron Radiat. News 2014, 27, 1820.
(28) Pramudita, J. C.; Schmid, S.; Godfrey, T.; Whittle, T.; Alam, M.;
Hanley, T.; Brand, H. E. A.; Sharma, N. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014,
16, 2417824187.
(29) Liss, K.-D.; Hunter, B.; Hagen, M.; Noakes, T.; Kennedy, S.
Physica B 2006, 385386 (Part 2), 10101012.
(30) Roisnel, T.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. In Materials Science Forum,
Proceedings of the Seventh European Powder Diraction Conference
(EPDIC 7); Delhez, R., Mittenmeijer, E. J., Eds.; Scitec Publications,
Ltd.,: Switzerland, 2000; pp 118123.
(31) Richard, D.; Ferrand, M.; Kearley, G. J. J. Neutron Res. 1996, 4,
3339.
(32) Rohde, J.-U.; Torelli, S.; Shan, X.; Lim, M. H.; Klinker, E. J.;
Kaizer, J.; Chen, K.; Nam, W.; Que, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
1675016761.
(33) Yabuuchi, N.; Kubota, K.; Dahbi, M.; Komaba, S. Chem. Rev.
2014, 114, 1163611682.
(34) Gu, Y.; Chen, D.; Jiao, X. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 17901
17906.
(35) Kalluri, S.; Seng, K.; Pang, W.; Guo, Z.; Chen, Z.; Liu, H.-K.;
Dou, S. X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 89538958.
(36) Berry, A. J.; ONeill, H. S.; Jayasuriya, K. D.; Campbell, S. J.;
Foran, G. J. Am. Mineral. 2003, 88, 967977.
(37) Borkiewicz, O. J.; Shyam, B.; Wiaderek, K. M.; Kurtz, C.;
Chupas, P. J.; Chapman, K. W. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2012, 45, 1261
1269.
(38) Lu, Z.; Dahn, J. R. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A1225A1229.
(39) Mortemard de Boisse, B.; Carlier, D.; Guignard, M.; Bourgeois,
L.; Delmas, C. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 1119711205.
(40) Berthelot, R.; Pollet, M.; Carlier, D.; Delmas, C. Inorg. Chem.
2011, 50, 24202430.
(41) Amatucci, G. G.; Tarascon, J. M.; Klein, L. C. J. Electrochem. Soc.
1996, 143, 11141123.
(42) Van der Ven, A.; Aydinol, M. K.; Ceder, G.; Kresse, G.; Hafner,
J. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 29752987.
(43) Laubach, S.; Laubach, S.; Schmidt, P. C.; Ensling, D.; Schmid,
S.; Jaegermann, W.; Thissen, A.; Nikolowski, K.; Ehrenberg, H. Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 32783289.
(44) Shannon, R. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1976, 32, 751767.
3158
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00943
Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 31503158