Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol
Data on contamination of sediments from industrial areas fill the informational gap in the
field of contamination of the Central Europe by chlorinated paraffins.
Abstract
Wide distribution of chlorinated paraffins in the environment has already been demonstrated in several studies; however, information about
their levels in the Central Europe is still very limited. First study focused on the SCCP contamination of the Czech aquatic environment have
been performed recently, and its results motivated the authors to analyze sediments from a wide set of the Czech rivers in order to obtain more
detailed information. Thirty-six sediment samples from eleven rivers and five drainage vents neighboring the chemical factories were analyzed;
special attention was paid to the industrial areas. For the first time in the Czech Republic, medium-chain in addition to short-chain chlorinated
paraffins were analyzed using GC-ECNI-MS. Chlorinated paraffins were detected in sediment samples on the concentration levels up to
347 ng g1 for short-chain chlorinated paraffins, and 5575 ng g1 for medium-chain chlorinated paraffins. Average chlorination degree of
SCCPs was 65%.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Chlorinated paraffins; Polychlorinated n-alkanes; Sediment; Gas chromatographyeelectron capture negative ion trap mass spectrometry; Czech
Republic
1. Introduction
Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) are industrially produced
mixtures of compounds with the general formula of
CnH2n 2zClz. Based on the chain length, they are classified
into three categories: short-chain (C10eC13; SCCPs), mediumchain (C14eC17; MCCPs), and long-chain (C>17; LCCPs)
chlorinated analogs of the straight-chain alkanes from which
they are manufactured (Tomy et al., 1998). They can be further
categorized according to the degree of chlorination: 40e50%,
50e60%, and 60e70%. Chlorinated paraffins have various
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 420 54 949 5149; fax: 420 54 949 2840.
E-mail addresses: pribylova@recetox.muni.cz (P. Pribylova), klanova@
recetox.muni.cz (J. Klanova), holoubek@recetox.muni.cz (I. Holoubek).
0269-7491/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.020
249
Table 1
Chlorinated paraffins in the sediment and sludge samples
P
Country
Concentration in
MCCPs
sediment/sludge
(mg g1)
P
SCCPs
United Kingdom
Germany (sludge)
Germany (River Lech)
German Bight, North See
Baltic Sea
Switzerland (sludge)
Switzerland (Lake Zurich)
Norway
Japanese
USA (sludge)
USA (Sugar Creek)
Canada (Lake Fox)
Canada (Lake Ontario)
0.112
0.377
P
CPs
65
65
0.7
0.146
0.499
30
19
0.005
11
40
50
10
0.011
0.257
0.049
2.2. Instrumentation
A centrifuge Jouan BR4 (Jouan Technology for life, Winchester, VA,
USA) was used. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a gas chromatograph Finnigan Q-GC connected with a Finnigan GCQ mass spectrometer
(Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA, USA). A gas chromatograph was equipped
with a split/splitless injector (Finnigan 2200) and a silica capillary column
(30 m, 0.25 mm i.d.) coated with 0.25 mm film of DB5-MS stationary phase
(5% phenyl/95% methylpolysiloxane, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA).
2.3. Samples
Sediment samples from 11 rivers (Labe, Bilina, Ohre, Vltava, Jihlava,
Dyje, Svitava, Morava, Becva, Mala Becva, and Drevnice), and five drainage
vents in the Czech Republic were taken. Sampling sites were selected with
250
Table 2
Chlorinated paraffin levels in the Czech river sediment and sludge
Matrix
River
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sludge
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Labe
Labe
Labe
Labe
LibiseLabe
Bilina
Bilina
DrainageeBilina
Bilina
Ohre
Ohre
Ohre
Vltava
Jihlava
Dyje
Dyje
Dyje
Svitava
Morava
Morava
Morava
Morava
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sed
Sludge
Morava
Morava
Morava
Morava
Morava
Becva
Becva
Becva
Mala Becva
Drevnice
Drainage
Drainage
Drainage
Drainage
Sampling site
Valy
Obristvi
Srnojedy 1
Srnojedy 2
Neratovice
Usti nad Labem
Most upstream
Chemopetrol Zaluzi
Most downstream
Kynsperk
Sokolov upstream
Sokolov downstream
Zelcin
Jihlava
Znojmo
Postorna
Moravska Nova Ves
Svitavy
Zabreh
Olomouc
Kromeriz
Kromeriz confluence
Mala Becva
Otrokovice
Uherske Hradiste
Chropyne
Spytihnev
Lanzhot
Prerov
Valasske Mezirici
Zubri
Za Plesovcem
Malenovice
Spolchemie Usti
Spolchemie Usti
Spolchemie Usti
Spolchemie Usti
Sampling
date
TOC
(%)
P
C14
30.7.2003
29.7.2003
19.11.2003
19.11.2003
2003
16.8.2001
22.5.2004
22.5.2004
22.5.2004
22.5.2004
22.5.2004
22.5.2004
28.7.2003
5.2004
5.2004
5.2004
5.2004
5.2004
5.2004
5.2004
5.2004
4.6.2004
n.a.
n.a.
<0.05
<0.05
n.a.
n.a.
7.96
10.10
1.53
4.61
2.91
1.06
<0.05
3.36
5.43
0.59
0.33
<0.05
<0.05
1.15
1.93
0.82
0.1
0.2
n.d.
n.d.
16.1
0.6
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
3.1
1.5
0.9
<LOD
n.d.
2.1
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
1.8
6.9
n.d.
n.d.
65.9
6.9
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
18.4
4.6
2.7
<LOD
n.d.
4.5
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.8
0.9
n.d.
n.d.
126.7
2.5
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
24.3
5.3
2.6
<LOD
n.d.
5.2
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
3.6
3.9
n.d.
n.d.
138.7
7.1
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
43.2
20.8
8.3
<LOD
n.d.
16.4
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
4.1
6.5
n.d.
n.d.
277.7
4.4
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
1098.2
92.1
61.4
<LOD
n.d.
195.9
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
7.0
14.8
n.d.
n.d.
206.1
10.7
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
1394.6
193.4
93.6
<LOD
n.d.
250.3
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
5.2004
4.6.2004
4.6.2004
4.6.2004
5.2004
5.2004
5.2004
4.6.2004
4.6.2004
4.6.2004
14.1.2004
14.1.2004
28.1.2004
28.1.2004
0.81
2.49
1.65
0.22
1.81
<0.05
2.21
0.61
0.32
0.54
24.40
25.90
25.60
24.50
<LOD
1.1
<LOD
2.5
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
0.5
0.3
1.5
31.3
24.9
33.6
31.2
<LOD
4.1
<LOD
16.0
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
1.7
0.8
6.3
68.6
42.9
74.7
54.3
<LOD
5.5
<LOD
64.2
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
17.7
0.6
9.9
109.7
63.1
112.9
86.5
<LOD
17.0
<LOD
67.0
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
26.6
2.0
36.5
132.7
74.8
175.7
110.0
<LOD
93.7
<LOD
36.8
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
10.4
33.5
154.1
192.1
116.5
366.3
165.2
<LOD
138.1
<LOD
32.4
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
9.9
35.9
317.8
225.0
235.6
547.9
230.5
C15
P
SCCPs
6.9
51.7
n.d.
n.d.
1114.6
16.0
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
3082.7
314.6
152.5
<LOD
n.d.
311.1
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
6
12
n.d.
n.d.
347
17
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
89
32
15
<LOD
n.d.
28
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
18
73
n.d.
n.d.
1598
31
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
5575
600
308
<LOD
n.d.
757
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
24
85
n.d.
n.d.
1946
48
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
5665
632
322
<LOD
n.d.
785
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
<LOD
184.5
<LOD
124.1
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
99.9
43.7
420.8
395.8
384.2
1387.1
408.7
<LOD
28
<LOD
150
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
60
4
54
342
206
397
282
<LOD
416
<LOD
193
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
120
113
893
813
736
2301
804
<LOD
444
<LOD
343
n.d.
<LOD
<LOD
180
117
947
1155
942
2698
1086
C16
MCCPs
CPs
Sampling
site
number
Sed, sediment; n.a., not analyzed; n.d., not detected; LOD, limit of detection.
251
252
as 5575 ng g1. This sampling site was probably strongly affected by a local factory (GPH, a Nexans company) where
a range of crimping connectors and lugs for aluminum or copper cables are produced. A sale and service of hydraulic and
mechanic equipments for electrical engineering was confirmed
at the same facility as well. Metal working and hydraulic fluids
could increase the CP contamination of Ohre river as well. Eastmen Sokolov, the chemical factory where waterbased dispersions and polymers are produced, is located down the same
river (Ohre). Two sampling sites up (11) and down (12) the
stream from this company have not shown such a heavy contamination (14 ng g1 and 32 ng g1 for SCCPs, 307 ng g1
253
concentration varied between 18 and 5575 ng g1, and chlorinated hexadecanes were the most abundant.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorinated pesticides (OCPs), and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were
determined in most of the samples from this study as well.
PCBs ranged between 7 and 134 ng g1, DDTs between 2
and 43 ng g1, HCHs between 0.5 and 11 ng g1, and PAHs
between 2 and 66 mg g1. There was no correlation observed
between these persistent organic pollutants and detected CP
levels. On the contrary, neither the sample with highest PCB
(134 ng g1) or highest PAH (66 mg g1) levels (both from Bilina river) showed any CP contamination. Similarly, the sites
with highest levels of CPs in sediment showed only very
low PCB, OCP or PAH concentrations.
Total organic carbon was measured in all sediment samples.
No significant correlation between the organic carbon content
and CP concentration in the sediment was found using Spearman correlation analysis. The sewage sludge samples were excluded from the statistical analysis.
4. Conclusion
Results from GC-ECNI-IT-MS analysis of 36 sediments
from 11 Czech rivers confirmed the assumption that chlorinated paraffins are widely distributed in the Czech aquatic environment. The highest concentrations of chlorinated paraffins
were detected in river sediments close to the chemical and
electro engineering industries (GPH, a Nexans company,
Kynsperk, Spolana Neratovice, Spolchemie Usti). Detected
maxima up to 2698 ng g1 for the sum of CPs in the sewage
sludge, and 5664 ng g1 for the sum of CPs in river sediments
correspond to the data about the CP contamination of European rivers published recently.
Medium-chain chlorinated paraffins highly prevailed in all
samples, which is in agreement with the known trends in production and use of SCCPs and MCCPs, but in contrast with
other data previously published. There have only been very
few papers concerned with both, SCCP and MCCP concentrations in sediments; according to available data, however, their
levels were comparable. It is obvious that MCCP/SCCP ratio
is source specific and cannot be simply correlated with a level
of contamination or a distance from the source. Both low and
high ratios were found in contaminated areas close to the sources as well as in remote areas. More detailed study with a row
of samples along the river with various point sources is obviously needed to evaluate the changes in ratio, and to estimate
the mobility of SCCPs and MCCPs in aquatic environment.
This is a subject of our future work.
This project has been carried out as a contribution to the
ongoing national POPs inventory in the Czech Republic,
which is focused on the new types of persistent industrial
substances.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Parlar, Technical
University of Munich, Germany, for providing standards of
254
Nicholls, C.R., Allchin, C.R., Law, R.J., 2001. Levels of short- and mediumchain length polychlorinated n-alkanes in environmental samples from selected industrial areas in England and Wales. Environmental Pollution 114,
415e430.
Ospar Commission, 2001. Short chain chlorinated paraffins.
Reth, M., Oehme, M., 2004. Limitations of low resolution mass spectrometry
in the electron capture negative ionization mode for the analysis of shortand medium-chain chlorinated paraffins. Analytical and Bioanalytical
Chemistry 378, 1741e1747.
Stejnarova, P., Coelhan, M., Kostrhounova, R., Parlar, H., Holoubek, I., 2005.
Analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in sediment samples from the
Czech Republic by short-column GC/ECNI-MS. Chemosphere 58, 253e
262.
Tomy, G.T., Fisk, A.T., Westmore, J.B., Muir, D.C.G., 1998. Environmental
chemistry and toxicology of polychlorinated n-alkanes. Review of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 158, 53e128.
Tomy, G.T., Stern, G.A., Lockhart, W.L., Muir, D.C.G., 1999. Occurrence of
C10-C13 polychlorinated n-alkanes in Canadian midlatitude and arctic
lake sediments. Environmental Science and Technology 33, 2858e2863.
UNECE ad hoc Expert Group on POPs, 2003. Short chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCP) Substance Dossier. Final Draft II, 1e133.