Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
AbstractThe effects of uncertain input data on the performance evaluation of a distribution system are analyzed. A criterion is introduced for assessing the grade of uncertainty of the results obtained in the calculation of maximum loads, voltage drops,
energy losses, and characteristic reliability indices of a network if
some input parameters are only guesses based on limited experience, measurements, and/or statistical data. Reasonable outputs
bounds are determined based upon the shape of the function measuring the uncertainty. High uncertainty of a result obtained indicates that a re-examination of relevant uncertain input data would
be recommendable for a more precise quantification. The method
proposed is applied to a real life example for illustration.
Index TermsDistribution systems, fuzzy mathematics, operating performances, uncertainty.
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1.
(1)
NAHMAN AND PERIC: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ACCOUNTING FOR DATA UNCERTAINTY
695
It is clear that
(4)
On the basis of the former definitions, the following bounds
for variable values may be taken as most reasonable for engineering decisions made under uncertainty
(5)
B. Calculation Flow
of inputs ,
. If
Presume that is a function
inputs are modeled as FNs, to encompass their uncertainty, then
is also a FN which may be formally expressed as
(6)
has to be conTo define , its characteristic function
structed. In order to determine this function, a series of values
is generated from the whole interval (0,1). For each , the lower
and upper bounds of are determined as
(7)
for
(8)
and
for all define
.
Bounds
equals the minimum of
As can be observed from (7),
if values are within intervals (8). These intervals
function
for for
are determined by the lower and upper bonds of
equals the maximum
which the calculation is performed.
obtained for the same intervals of values.
of function
and
is trivial if
is a monoThe calculation of
tonic increasing or decreasing function with regard to all arguments being within the intervals in (8). In the first case,
is obtained from
for
and
for
,
. In the latter case,
should be inserted to
and
to obtain
. As will be shown hereobtain
after, all distribution network quantities of interest are monotonic increasing functions of their arguments which makes the
analysis easy and straightforward.
(9)
,
are by 1 column vectors of real and
where
,
are
imaginary parts of branch currents while
corresponding column vectors of load demand peak currents.
696
by
Boolean matrix
are
(10)
.
It is implied that
Equations (9) and (10) simply state that the current flowing
through a feeder branch is equal to the sum of the load demand
currents supplied by this branch.
for the feeder in Fig. 2
For illustration, the first 5 rows of
are (see equation at the bottom of the page).
From (9), it follows that the maximum branch currents also
are fuzzy quantities. The rms of the current in branch equals
(11)
row vector built of the row
elements
(18)
where
.
of
is a 1 by
Fig. 3.
(12)
which means, according to (16), that voltage drops are practically monotonic increasing functions of load point demand currents. This facilitates the calculation of their bounds for various
uncertainty levels .
(13)
where
(16)
The rms values of voltage drops at feeder load points are
and
with
and
(17)
being elements of vectors
, respectively. As known, the voltage
(19)
It is clear from (19), that the energy losses are monotonic increasing functions of load demand current maximum, medium,
and minimum values represented as fuzzy variables. It makes it
bounds for various .
possible to easily determine
NAHMAN AND PERIC: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ACCOUNTING FOR DATA UNCERTAINTY
697
TABLE I
LOAD DEMAND CURRENTS
D. Feeder Reliability
TABLE II
BRANCH LENGTHS
TABLE III
NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS
(21)
being the rated network voltage and
year.
with
The total expected energy not supplied annually equals
(22)
The second term in (22) encompasses the energy not supplied
is the uncertain duration of this
during the fault location.
activity.
The system average interruption frequency index is defined
as the ratio of the total number of customer interruptions and
the total number of customers served
(23)
(24)
698
NAHMAN AND PERIC: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ACCOUNTING FOR DATA UNCERTAINTY
TABLE V
CALCULATION RESULTS
6) By inserting
values from the previous step and lower
in (20) and (22), lower
bounds of , , and for
is obtained for
.
bound of
, and for
7) By inserting lower bounds of ,
in (23) and (24), the corresponding lower bounds of
and
are calculated.
8) Determine upper bounds of all fuzzy input data for
from their membership functions.
9) Using the data from step 8 repeat steps 37 with upper
bounds to determine the upper bounds of all considered
.
performance indices for
, and repeat steps 29
10) Increase for, say
for this increased value of to determine lower and
upper bounds of all considered performance indices for
the new value of .
11) Repeat step 10 by gradually increasing values until
is reached. In such a way, the data for the
value
construction of membership functions of all considered
performance indices are obtained.
12) Using (1) and (5) and the data on membership functions obtained in previous steps, determine the uncertainty grades and reasonable bounds of considered performance indices.
C. Calculation Results
Table V quotes the results of the analysis. The effects of uncertain input data upon the uncertainty of the quantities characterizing the distribution system performances are examined. The
first column lists the analyzed outputs. The next three columns
give the calculated kernels (these coincide with the values obtainable using the conventional, crisp approach), and the associated certainty weighted percentage bounds of declination of
kernels. The last column indicates which input quantity is taken
to be uncertain and modeled as the corresponding fuzzy number
according to Tables IIV. Characteristic functions calculated for
the analyzed outputs are presented in Fig. 4.
The maximum load current that is flowing through branch 1
and the maximum voltage drop occurring at node 43 depend on
the load peak currents only. The uncertainty of both of these
699
MWh
(25)
700
Jovan Nahman was born in Belgrade, Yugoslavia. He received the Dipl. Eng.
Grade and the TechD degree in electric power engineering from the Faculty of
Electrical Engineering at the University in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, in 1960 and
1969, respectively.
Currently, he is a Professor with the Power System Department at the University of Belgrade, where he has been since 1960.