Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ABSTRACT: Stress analysis using numerical modeling is widely accepted for design
of underground excavations due to their ability to incorporate most of the
complexities and their reliability to produce realistic information. This paper
presents the results of stress analysis carried out to bring out the effect of Adit-II. The
effect of discontinuities and the intersection of Adit -II with chambers were brought
out in these studies. Actual jointing details like dip, dip direction and locations
supplied by the project authorities were simulated in the analysis explicitly. The
shotcrete and Rock bolts were able to reduce the deformations to a small extent only
as the existing support system was inadequate. Strengthening of the support systems
in the walls of the chambers may be required near the Adit -II junctions to an extent
of 20m on either side of the Adit -II walls. As the additional support system
consisting of cable anchors has little effect, longer bolts of 12m length were
recommended. As seen from the performance of the bolts, majority of the yielded
bolts exist in the vicinity of Adit -II region. The spacing of the bolts may be reduced
to 1.2 m on either direction to reduce their percentage of failure.
1.
INTRODUCTION
predominantly augen gneiss with 5 sets of joints and several shear seams. These
chambers have access through two numbers of D shaped Adits -I & II
The final support system for desilting chambers consists of 6m long 32mm
diameter fully grouted rock bolts at 1.6x2m spacing in the roof and at 2x2m in the
walls along with shotcrete of 50mm in the roof and 100-150mm in the walls. These
support measures were simulated (Dasgupta, 1999) in stress analysis using FLAC
(Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continuum) software. He reported that the failure
zones would extend up to 1m in the roof and 4-5m in the walls and the forces
induced in the support system are with in their safe limits
During October 1999, 100m3 of rock fall was observed at the junction of Adit 2
with Chamber II. Similar rock falls were observed at the junctions of Chamber III
and IV during May 2005. The Panel of Experts for the projects recommended a fail
safe system of supports consisting of 3 rows of 20m long cable anchors of 60T
capacity at 7.5m spacing in the walls. National Institute of Rock Mechanics was
requested to review the support system suggested by POE and its adequacy.
This paper presents the results of for analysis carried out to bring out the
effect of Adit-II on the walls of chambers 2 and 3. The effect of discontinuities and
the intersection of Adit -II with chambers were brought out in these studies. Actual
jointing details like dip, dip direction and locations supplied by the project
authorities were simulated in the analysis explicitly. The joint samples were
collected and tested in the laboratory for their stiffness and strength properties.
2.
COMPUTATIONAL MODEL
= 13.3 GPa
Poissons ratio
= 0.23
Density
= 2650 kg/m 3
= 1.3 MPa
of rock mass
= 45
Joint Properties
Average Shear Stiffness JKs
= 1.0 GPa/m
= 40.0 GPa/m
Cohesion
= 0.3 MPa
Friction
= 25
Cover
Sv MPa
Sh MPa
SH MPa
310
410
8.21
10.86
6.11
7.69
8.89
10.77
490
12.97
8.94
12.27
3.
1, 3 are
(45 + /2)
the walls of the chambers in the reaches away (15m from either wall) from the Adit II walls.
9.8
20.6
62
4.
80
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the stress analysis with and without support systems, following
observations can be made
1. The rock bolts and cable anchors have little effect in reducing the
deformation around the excavation
2. The entire rock mass between the chambers II and III near the Adit -2
reached failure.
3. The extent failure of the rock mass in the pillar between the chambers was
less than 10m from the walls of the chambers in the reaches away (15m
from either wall) from the Adit -II walls.
4. The majority of rock bolts yielded even in the presence of cable anchors in
Adit 2 region, and the entire pillar reached failure, longer rock bolts of
12m length at 1.2m spacing are recommended.
5.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
11:41
dip=
40.00 above
dd = 150.00
center 1.250E+02
5.000E+01
3.250E+02
cut-pl. 0.000E+00
mag =
2.00
cycle
0
2E+01
vector scale
5E-01
Figure 2. Displacement Vectors over Cross section near Adit Wall without Support System
Three Dimensional Discontinuum Analysis of Desilting Complex - with 13m Trace Length & Support System
3DEC (Version 2.00)
Cross section plot:
3-Sep-01 10:14
geometric scale
2E+01
vector scale
5E-01
Figure 3. Displacement Vectors over Cross section near Adit Wall with Rock Bolts
Three Dimensional Discontinuum Analysis of Desilting Complex - with 13m Trace Length & Cable Anchors
3DEC (Version 2.00)
Cross section plot:
7-Feb-** 15:50
geometric scale
2E+01
vector scale
5E-01
Figure 4. Displacement Vectors over Cross section near Adit Wall with Rock Bolts and Cable Anchors
Three Dimensional Discontinuum Analysis of Desilting Complex - with 13m Trace Length & Support System
3DEC (Version 2.00)
Cross section plot:
13-Jul-01 11:18
geometric scale
2E+01
vector scale
5E+02
Figure 5. Factor of Safety Values over Cross section through centre of Adit with Rock Bolts
Three Dimensional Discontinuum Analysis of Desilting Complex - with 13m Trace Length & Support System
3DEC (Version 2.00)
Cross section plot:
3-Sep-01 9:37
geometric scale
2E+01
vector scale
2E+03
Figure 6. Factor of Safety Values over Cross section at 15m from Adit Wall with Rock Bolts