Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Cardiac Output
Clinical Monitoring and Management
Joseph S. Carey, M.D., and Richard K. Hughes, M.D.
150
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
(1)
O2 uptake
x 100,
A-V 0, difference
(2)
300
C.O. cc./min. = -x 100.
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
151
Zmg.
C(t)dt or F =
(4)
C(t)dt
0
In the absence of recirculation, the concentration curve would gradually diminish at an exponential rate as new blood flowed into the
system and replaced the blood containing the indicator (B in Fig. 1).
However, in practice the blood containing the indicator recirculates
and contaminates the downslope of the curve (A in Fig. 1). Ordinarily,
~~
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
7,
NO. 2, FEB., 1 9 6 9
153
the recording site. The injection and sampling sites must thus be relatively close together. Nevertheless, cardiac output has been determined
by thermodilution from injections on the right side of the heart and
sampling on the left with reasonable accuracy in normal patients,
perhaps because of the insulating effect of air in the lungs [64]. Pathological conditions like pulmonary edema and pulmonary vascular or
parenchymal disease may cause considerable error, and thermodilution
has not as yet found a place in the monitoring of the seriously ill patient.
Various radioactive substances have been used as indicators for the
recording of dilution curves [28,35, 36, 50-52, 75, 781. Gamma-emitting
isotopes must be used, since the only significant external radiation resulting from internally located radioisotopes comes from gamma rays.
The most commonly used isotope is I131-taggedalbumin, because Calibration may be accomplished by allowing the indicator to completely
equilibrate with the circulation. Since it is well known that the measurement of blood volume by I131-taggedalbumin in acutely ill patients is
frequently in error due to improper mixing of the indicator, the
dependence on this equilibration may lead to error when radiocardiography is used to measure cardiac output. In addition, as pointed out
by Conn [28], the equilibration count over the heart covers a larger field
of radiation than the original recording of the first pass of indicator,
since contamination by isotope in adjacent vessels may occur.
T h e equipment required for radiocardiography includes a crystal
scintillation counter, a photomultiplier system, an electronic amplifier,
a count rate meter, and an electronic recorder. A collimating shield is
used to avoid pickup of radioactive scatter when the counter is positioned over the precordium. T h e system may be focused in order to
reduce to a minimum the errors due to radioactive scatter, positioning
of the collimator, and amounts of intervening tissue. T h e disadvantages
of equipment required and potential errors due to positioning and
anatomical variations are offset by the advantage that arterial cannulation is avoided. Kloster and his associates [75] obtained a 3.2% average
variation between paired cardiac output determinations by radiocardiography, and an 8.4% average difference when compared to the Fick
method. These results compare favorably with those obtained by comparison of the dye-dilution with Fick techniques [57].
T h e indicator-dilution curve recorded by isotope dilution is not as
smooth as the dye-dilution curve, and because of its passage through
each ventricle a double-peaked curve is recorded. This makes the
calculation by integration of the curve somewhat more difficult. However, a method has been developed by which the integration procedure
may be performed without extrapolation of the downslope [51]. Further
refinements of this technique may be expected in the future, some of
which are discussed below.
154
COLLECTIVE REVlEW:
Cardiac Output
CALCULATION OF CARDIAC O U T P U T
FROM INDICA TOR-DILUTION CURVES
T h e procedure for the calculation of cardiac output by the dyedilution technique will now be described in detail, since this is the
method most frequently used at the present time. However, much of
the discussion also pertains to other indicator-dilution methods.
T h e recording apparatus for the dye-dilution curve includes a dye
densitometer and an amplifier-recorder system. Arterial blood is withdrawn at a constant rate (usually 20 to 40 cc. per minute) through a
cuvette in the densitometer. T h e dye curve is recorded on a linear
recorder. T h e classic method of deriving cardiac output from indicatordilution curves was proposed by Stewart and refined by Kinsman,
Moore, and Hamilton [72]. T h e area under the curve is determined by
measuring the concentration at specific time intervals on the replotted
curve (B in Fig. 1). Cardiac output is then obtained from formula 4.
T h e following aspects of this technique should be noted.
Sites of Injection and Sampling. T h e more peripheral the site of
injection, the greater will be the dilution volume of the dye. This will
result in a curve with a lower peak concentration and a more gradual
washout. When the washout is gradual, the downslope of the curve is
more likely to be contaminated by recirculation [93]. Figure 2 illustrates
the difference between dye curves recorded from the femoral artery
after injection of dye into the ascending aorta and left atrium in a
patient with a large left atrium. T h e dilution of the dye in the large
left atrium results in a much lower peak concentration and a non-
VOL.
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
155
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
157
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
60 sec./min. x I mg.
(5)
C ( t ) dt mm.-sec. x CF mg./liter/mm.
Moment-to-moment determinations of cardiac output in experimental and clinical settings can be obtained by analysis of central arterial pulse contour. T h e relationship between pulse pressure and stroke
volume is well known [58, 1011. Enlarging on this concept, Warner and
associates have developed a practical method for computer analysis of
pulse contour in order to determine cardiac output [121-1231.
Stroke volume consists of forward flow during systole and diastole.
Since arteries are elastic tubes, they distend during systole and contract
during diastole. Therefore, forward flow occurs during diastole as well
as systole [123]. Flow relates to pressure and resistance, which are described by central arterial pulse contour. Warner's formula for calculation of stroke volume is
SV = dPmd (1 + Sa/Da).
(6)
Stroke volume (SF') equals a constant ( K ) ,which relates to aortic volume
and is obtained from one determination of cardiac output by the dyedilution method, times the square root of the mean distending pressure
( ~ m d )times
,
one plus systolic (Sa) over diastolic (Da) pressure [121].
Pulse rate times stroke volume gives cardiac output. For detection of
VOL.
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
159
160
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Curdiuc Output
Frick [45] estimated cardiac output from blood volume and circulation time. A correlation coefficient between actual (measured by dye
dilution) and estimated cardiac output of .68 was obtained, with a mean
variance of +24%. These results were considered sufficiently inaccurate
that the method could not be recommended for bedside use. Holm and
his associates [63] utilized a somewhat more elaborate method in which
samples of arterial blood were drawn every two to three seconds for
about one minute after the injection of II3l albumin. An indicatordilution curve was constructed from which cardiac output could be
calculated. Although the apparatus was simple and the results agreed
well with actual flow in model experiments (mean variance as%),the
technique of multiple samples is not justified if continuous recording
of the indicator-dilution curve is available.
Multiplication of the pulse pressure (assumed to be equal to stroke
index) by the heart rate may provide a rough clinical estimation of
cardiac output. A mean variance of +19% to 234% was obtained when
this technique was compared to cardiac output measured by the Fick
method [58]. A corollary to the estimation of stroke index from pulse
pressure is that the volume of the palpated radial pulse will also reflect
stroke index. Although no studies have been performed comparing the
volume of the radial pulse to stroke index, a patient with a strong, full
radial pulse is likely to have a good stroke output and, assuming adequate heart rate, a good cardiac output.
Mixed venous oxygen saturation is indirectly related to cardiac
output. When oxygen uptake and arterial oxygen content remain constant, a reduction in cardiac output will be accompanied by a reduction
in mixed venous oxygen content [118]. Monitoring of the A-V oxygen
difference has therefore been used to estimate indirectly cardiac output
[113, 1271. However, many patients have a reduced oxygen uptake, and
the A-V oxygen difference may be normal in spite of low cardiac output. T h e presence of excess lactic acid in the blood may be indicative
of hypoxic acidosis secondary to poor tissue perfusion. Lactic acid is
elevated in the majority of patients in shock [15, 951, and direct correlation with cardiac output was fair in one clinical study [2]. Measurement
of serum lactic acid may therefore be helpful in evaluating the circulatory state of acutely ill patients.
Central venous pressure and blood volume are readily monitored
in acutely ill patients. Central venous pressure correlates poorly with
cardiac output, but observation of changes is very helpful in evaluating
cardiac function [43, 1271. Correction of blood volume deficits correlated with a rise in cardiac output in most postoperative cardiac surgical
patients [9, 751, but again any level of cardiac output may be present at
a given blood volume.
VOL.
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
161
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
waves (ultrasound) to record motion of the walls of the heart [40, 671.
From the recorded tracing (echocardiogram), changes in ventricular
volume may be calculated. Reasonable agreement with stroke volume
as determined by the Fick principle has been obtained with these
methods, and the instrumentation has the advantage of being completely free of intravascular components.
T h e majority of these techniques have been used in the cardiac
catheterization laboratory, but have not yet been adopted to the monitoring of acutely ill patients. With refinements of instrumentation, this
may be possible in the future.
APPRAISAL OF TECHNIQUES
VOL.
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
163
instrument is particularly suited for bedside use because of its size and
stability, the convenience of the disposable cuvette, and the integrating
circuit, which simplifies calculation of the area under the curve.
The radioisotope-dilution technique avoids arterial sampling by
counting directly over the heart. As a result of central sampling, peripheral injections give better curves with radioisotopes than with dye, since
peripheral sampling is usually used for dye curves. Central injection is
therefore not a necessity with the radioisotope technique. As discussed
above, it is preferable to keep the dilution volume to a minimum by
approximating the injection and sampling sites. By allowing peripheral
injection and central, external sampling, the radioisotope technique
may be preferable to the dye-dilution method for postoperative monitoring. Radioisotope-dilution curves may be recorded 5 to 6 times in
one day. When more frequent measurements are required, dye curves
should be used. Radioisotope curves are somewhat more time-consuming, because they require a 15-minute delay before the equilibration
concentration is recorded. Determination of the area under the radioisotope-dilution curve also takes slightly longer than for the dye curve,
because the recorded curve contains two concentration peaks (as the
indicator passes through each ventricle), and the tracing is slightly more
irregular. T h e cost of the equipment for the performance of radioisotope or dye-dilution curves is essentially the same, about $5,000.
Determination of cardiac output from pulse-contour analysis offers
the only available continuous monitoring of cardiac output. It is thus
particularly suited to postoperative monitoring. This method is relatively new, and its accuracy has yet to be proved in the variety of clinical
settings where monitoring of cardiac output is desirable. Nevertheless,
where time-sharing facilities for on-line computer analysis are available,
the pulse-contour method of Warner et al. [I 221 is well worth a trial.
A less elaborate pulse-contour method, described by Herd and
associates [60], utilizes simple electrical circuits that multiply the difference between mean and diastolic aortic pressure by heart rate. This
method may be used for continuous monitoring of cardiac output without the need for on-line computer analysis. Progressively simplifying
the basic assumption that the pressure pulse is proportional to the
stroke volume, the product of pulse pressure (as recorded in the arm)
and heart rate gives a rough estimate of cardiac output. Finally, a sensitive finger on the radial pulse may be as reliable as the most sophisticated computer analysis of pulse contour, when the finger is attached
on-line to a well-programmed human brain.
Other simple measurements, such as mental alertness, urine output,
and acid-base balance, are easy to obtain and usually reflect the effectiveness of blood flow. Indeed, it has been suggested that the number
obtained by cardiac output measurement is in itself unnecessary in the
164
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
event that blood flow appears effective as judged by other studies [1151.
T h e same has been said of blood pressure. However, since the clinician
wishes to restore the homeostatic balance of his critically ill patient, this
should include the return of normal blood pressure and cardiac output
as well as normal acid-base balance and urine output. It is well known
that cardiac output can be quite low while all other parameters are in
the normal range. Indeed, most preoperative patients with acquired
heart disease have low cardiac output and normal blood pressure, urine
output, and acid-base balance. T h e superimposition of surgical trauma,
prosthetic valve replacement, anesthesia, and other unknown variables
may alter the homeostatic balance of such a patient so that a new level
of blood flow may be required. Borderline clinical studies may not reflect low cardiac output. Furthermore, directional changes in cardiac
output may not be immediately signaled by changes in secondary variables.
In the light of the foregoing discussion, it appears desirable, but
not essential, that cardiac output be monitored in acutely ill patients in
general and in postoperative cardiac surgical patients in particular. T h e
convenience and expense of the method must therefore be a consideration. Outside of the well-equipped shock unit, the indicator-dilution
method has not achieved a place in routine monitoring, for obvious
reasons. T h e results are not as immediately available and, in the absence
of highly competent technical personnel, not as accurate as the observations of the experienced clinician. On the other hand, as a spot check
in the difficult situation, a reasonably well-performed indicator-dilution
cardiac output determination can be very helpful.
It appears likely that for routine monitoring of cardiac output
some variation of the pulse-contour technique will become the procedure of choice. As described by Warner et al. [122], the information
produced by pulse-contour analysis is instantaneously available for use
to nurses; and with storage of data, events occurring in the past are
readily reviewed. Such information significantly improves the effectiveness of the clinician as well as the quality of immediate patient care by
allowing review of pertinent events that might have gone unnoticed.
This method provides the necessary spontaneity and simplicity required
of monitoring devices. With the increasing availability of time-sharing
facilities for computer analysis, monitoring by this technique could be
made available by telephone connection even to remote areas, since the
only technical procedure required is placement of a catheter in or near
the aortic arch.
M A N A G E M E N T OF LOW C A R D I A C O U T P U T
Normal cardiac output varies between 2.5 and 4.5 liters per minute
per square meter of body surface. T h e mean of a large number of reVOL.
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
165
ported measurements in normals using the Fick and dye methods was
3.6 liters per minute per square meter, with most studies revealing a
mean between 3.2 and 3.8 [119].
After noncardiac operations, cardiac output is usually elevated [ZO,
23, 24, 1061, suggesting a physiological response to increased metabolic
demands. After open cardiac operations, cardiac output is low in the
early postoperative period and usually does not return to preoperative
levels until 24 to 48 hours after surgery [75, 981. This effect is most pronounced after mitral valve replacement, when congestive heart failure
has usually been present preoperatively [75]. Immediately after aortic
valve replacement, cardiac output is usually increased, except when
long-standing congestive heart failure has been present [75]. These findings suggest that when congestive heart failure is present preoperatively,
cardiac output is likely to be decreased for the first few days after corrective surgery.
Assuming that the metabolic demands of the patient are increased
by the operation, the imbalance between available cardiac output and
energy requirements is exaggerated. In spite of this imbalance, Rastelli
and Kirklin [98] and Mundth and his associates [88] found that acidbase balance and oxygen saturation usually remained normal. This
suggests that oxygen consumption is reduced. Reduction in oxygen requirements may be a metabolic compensation that protects patients with
long-standing cardiac disease from developing metabolic acidosis.
The point at which cardiac output becomes critically low is difficult to identify. Because of a compensatory reduction in oxygen requirements, metabolic acidosis may not develop. Blood pressure and urine
output may remain normal by virtue of compensatory autonomic and
renal adjustments. In the absence of the full-blown syndrome of hypotension, oliguria, cyanosis, poor perfusion of extremities, and metabolic
acidosis, it is difficult to attach an adequate or inadequate label to a
given value of cardiac output. However, prolonged inadequate cardiac
output may have deleterious effects on hepatic and renal function [88].
Rising creatinine and bilirubin are signs of inadequate hepatic and
renal blood flow. Mental confusion after surgery may be associated with
low cardiac output [l 11 and may indicate inadequate cerebral perfusion.
It is important to remember that the heart itself has high metabolic requirements and that low cardiac output, by reducing coronary blood
flow, may be self-perpetuating.
Studies during cardiopulmonary bypass identified a critical flow
rate of 1.2 liters per minute per square meter, below which progressive
metabolic acidosis developed [22, 941. Some patients have preoperative
levels of cardiac output in this range without metabolic acidosis. However, since determination of cardiac output in low flow states is frequently in error [93], these values are of questionable accuracy. It is
166
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
likely that a cardiac output of less than 1.2 liters per minute per square
meter is incompatible with life. It is also likely that values between 1.2
and 2.0 liters per minute per square meter will be deleterious to the
patient and should be treated, particularly in the critical early postoperative period when cardiopulmonary, renal, and hepatic complications are likely to occur.
T h e first line of defense against low cardiac output is restoration
of normal blood volume, ventilation, and acid-base balance. Several
authors have pointed out the importance of maintaining high atrial
pressures in postoperative cardiac surgical patients [74, 75, 881. Litwak
and his associates [80] suggested that blood volume deficits were due to
sequestration of blood, but other studies have not substantiated this
finding [9, 74, 1151. It is more likely that deficits occurring in spite of
normal measured blood balance are due to loss of plasma and electrolyte
solutions used during pump priming and transfusion therapy [74].
T h e importance of maintaining adequate ventilation to circulatory
homeostasis in the early postoperative period is well known [23, 24, 331.
Patients with signs of low cardiac output have improved with respiratory assistance alone [77]. In the presence of long-standing pulmonary
hypertension, pulmonary compliance is decreased, and respiratory assistance is often necessary. A paradoxical reduction in central venous
pressure may occur when respiratory assistance is provided to these
patients, rather than the rise that usually occurs with positive pressure
assistance. This effect may be due to a decrease in pulmonary vascular
resistance as a result of better expansion of the lungs and improved
oxygenation, since both pulmonary collapse and hypoxia are known to
increase pulmonary vascular resistance [lo, 18, 42, 541. It is important
to remember that hyperventilation [70, 96, 1171 and increased intrathoracic pressure [30,41, 901 tend to decrease cardiac output. Therefore,
respiratory assistance must be used with care, preferably with intermittent monitoring of arterial blood gases.
The circulatory effects of respiratory alkalosis and acidosis are
fairly consistent. Generally, a decreased pC0, causes a decrease in cardiac output [96, 1171, while a rise in pC0, causes an increase, presumably due to release of catecholamines [701. However, a rise in pC0, may
adversely affect cardiac performance when pH remains constant [6, 891.
There is evidence to suggest that metabolic acidosis accompanies low
cardiac output [24, 34, 941. Experimentally, acidosis itself has little effect
on the heart [6, 891. Arrhythmias are more common in the presence of
acid-base abnormalities, probably due to changes in intracellular and
extracellular potassium concentration 144, 83, 1051 and increased circulating catecholamines [83, 1051.
The changes in body composition that occur before and after intracardiac operations were reviewed by Kirklin and Pacific0 [74]. Patients
VOL.
7,
NO. 2, FEU.,
1969
167
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
169
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
NO. 2,
FEB., 1969
171
172
COLLECTIVE REVIEW:
Cardiac Output
7,
NO. 2,
FEB., 1969
173
COLLECTIVE
REVIEW:Cardiac Output
94. Paneth, M., Sellers, R., Gott, V. L., Weirich, W. L., Allen, P., Read, R. C.,
and Lillehei, C. W. Physiologic studies upon prolonged cardiopulmonary
by-pass with the pump-oxygenator with particular reference to (1) acid base
balance (2) siphon caval drainage. J . Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 34:570, 1967.
95. Peretz, D. I., McGregor, M., and Dossetor, B. M. Lacticacidosis: A clinically significant aspect of shock. Canad. Med. Ass. J . 90:673, 1967.
96. Pollock, L., McDonald, K. E., Kjartansson, K. B., Delin, N. A., and Schenk,
W. G. Influence of hyperventilation on cardiac output and renal blood
flow. Surgery 55:299, 1964.
97. Rapaport, E., Wiegand, B. D., and Bristow, J. D. Estimation of left ventricular residual volume in the dog by a thermodilution technique. Circ.
Res. 11:803, 1962.
98. Rastelli, G. C., and Kirklin, J. W. Hemodynamic state early after prosthetic replacement of mitral valve. Circulation 34:448, 1966.
99. Reed, J. H., and Wood, E. H. Use of dichromatic earpiece densitometry
for determination of cardiac output. J. Appl. Physiol. 23:373, 1967.
100. Roberts, W. C., and Morrow, A. G. Causes of early postoperative death
following cardiac valve replacement. Clinico-pathologic correlations in 64
patients studied at necropsy. J . Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 54:422, 1967.
101. Rushmer, R. F. Cardiovascular Dynamics. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1961.
102. Samet, P., Bernstein, W. H., and Levine, S. Significance of atrial contribution to ventricular filling. Amer. J . Cardiol. 15:195, 1965.
103. Samet, P., Bernstein, W. H., and Castillo, C. Validity of indicator dilution
cardiac output determination in patients with mitral regurgitation. Circulation 33:410, 1966.
104. Samet, P., Castillo, C., and Bernstein, W. H. Validity of indicator dilution
determination of cardiac output in patients with aortic regurgitation. Circulation 34:609, 1966.
105. Sealy, W. C., Young, W. C., and Harris, J. S. Studies on cardiac arrest.
T h e relationship of hypercapnia to ventricular fibrillation. J. Thorac. Surg.
28:447, 1954.
106. Shoemaker, W. C., Printen, K. J., Amato, J. J., Monson, D. O., Carey, J. S.,
and OConnor, K. Hemodynamic patterns after acute anesthetized and
unanesthetized trauma. Arch. Surg. (Chicago) 95:492, 1967.
107. Siegal, W., and Gifford, R. W. Efficacy of ethacrynic acid in patients with
refractory congestive heart failure resistant to meralluride. Amer. J . Cardiol.
22260, 1968.
108. Sinclair, J. D., Sutterer, W. F., Fox, I. J., and Wood, E. H. Apparent dye
dilution curves produced by injection of transparent solutions. J. Appl.
Physiol. 16:669, 1961.
109. Sinclair, S., Duff, J. H., and MacLean, L. D. Use of computer for calculating cardiac output. Surgery 57:414, 1965.
110. Sleeper, J. C., Thompson, H. H., McIntosh, H. D., and Elston, R. C. Reproducibility of results obtained with indicator dilution technique for
estimating cardiac output in man. Circ. Res. 11:712, 1962.
111. Smith, H. J., Oriol, A., March, J., and McGregor, M. Hemodynamic studies
in cardiogenic shock. Treatment with isoproterenol and metaraminol. Circulation 35: 1084, 1967.
112. Smith, McK., Geddes, L. A., and Hoff, H. E. Electrical calibration for the
saline-dilution method for cardiac output. Cardiovasc. Res. Cent. Bull.
6:142. 1968.
112a. Sonnenblick, E., Parmley, W., and Matloff, J. Hemodynamic effects of glucagon after prosthetic valve replacement. Circulation 38(Suppl. 6): 183, 1968.
113. Spencer, F. C., Eiseman, B., Trinkle, J. K., and Rossi, N. Assisted circulation for cardiac failure following intracardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary
bypass. J . Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 49:56, 1965.
VOL.
7,
NO. 2, FEB.,
1969
175
176