Waste Management Mandaue

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Introduction to Mandaue (Philippines)

Brief Profile of Mandaue City
Mandaue City is located on the coastal plains of Cebu Province as shown in Figure 1. It is
bounded on the north by the Municipality of Consolacion, on the east by the Mactan Channel,
on the southwest by Barangay Banilad (Cebu City), on the northwest by Barangay Talamban
(Cebu City), and on the south by Cebu North Reclamation.11
Mandaue became a Chartered City on June 21, 1969. It is a highly urbanized and
industrialized city which is home to about 10,000 industrial and commercial establishments.
It is home to two major ports, Pier 7 Gothong and Pier 8 Shuttle.
The citys location is very strategic as it connects two other major cities in Metro Cebu, Cebu
and Lapu-Lapu. It is ten minutes away from the Mactan-Cebu International Airport in LapuLapu City and another ten minutes from the Cebu International Port.
Geographical Area Zoning

Mandaue has a land area of 3,487 hectares comprising 27 barangays, all of which are
classified as urban. The most dominant existing land use is industrial followed by residential,
agricultural and commercial users. However, according to the City Planning and
Development Office, small agricultural areas are usually parts of bigger stretches of industrial
areas and classified as such since Mandaue City is the most highly industrialized city in
Metro Cebu and the whole of the province.
The city is predominantly a lowland area and extremely flat. It is about 77.37% within the 08% slope category. Its entire territorial span includes 15% highlands marked by rugged hills
and precipices that form part of the land features of Mandaues three rural barangays.
Of the citys 27 barangays, the biggest barangay in terms of land area is Barangay Banilad,
while the smallest is Barangay Mantuyong. The following table shows the land area of each
barangay and the stretch of land each occupies. On the southernmost area of the city facing
the Mactan Strait is the newly reclaimed Mandaue 2000, a 192-hectare industrial area.2
1
2
Socio-Economic Profile of Mandaue City 2009, CPDO

Ibid.
Extracted from the report Converting Waste Plastics to Fuels Baseline Study Project. Activity II-1: Plastic
Waste Analysis and Characterization Study- B. Mandaue City, Philippines

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 1. Land Area and Distance of Barangays, Mandaue

Name of
Barangay
1. Alang-alang
2. Bakilid
3. Banilad
4. Basak
5. Cabancalan
6. Cambaro
7. Canduman
8. Casili
9. Casuntingan
10. Centro
11. Cubacub
12. Guizo
13. IbabaoEstancia
14. Jagobiao
15. Labogon
16. Looc
17. Maguikay
18. Mantuyong
19. Opao
20. Pagsabungan
21. Pakna-an
22. Subangdako
23. Tabok
24. Tawason
25. Tingub
26. Tipolo
27. Umapad
Mandaue 2000
Land Area (has.)
Distance (km.)
94.94
36.00
281.57
254.35
163.56
33.00
156.17
121.15
224.12
36.24
72.82
40.34
62.78
0.400
1.220
2.410
3.310
2.950
0.520
5.420
5.080
2.620
0.150
5.100
0.780
0.410
112.00
141.35
135.26
151.56
14.75
108.91
88.00
168.12
113.49
156.16
180.11
124.20
148.25
76.00
192.00
4.800
3.100
0.700
1.700
0.450
2.150
4.400
2.950
2.650
2.880
6.200
3.680
1.350
2.00
Source: Socio-Economic Profile of Mandaue City 2009, City Planning &

Development Office

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Figure 1. Mandaue City Zoning Map
Source: Mandaue CPDO
Extracted from the report Converting Waste Plastics to Fuels Baseline Study Project. Activity II-1: Plastic Waste
Analysis and Characterization Study- B. Mandaue City, Philippines

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Population Data
The citys population growth rate is steadily increasing. The latest national census conducted in
2007 places Mandaue population at 318,575 (Table 2).
Table 2. Total Population Mandaue City and Barangays as of August 1, 2007
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Barangay
Population
Alang-alang
12,691
Bakilid
6,387
Banilad
19,505
Basak
9,383
Cabancalan
10,598
Cambaro
8,105
Canduman
14,276
Casili
3,569
Casuntingan
13,472
Centro (Pob.)
3,498
Cubacub
9,048
Guizo
8,303
Ibabao9,624
Estancia
Jagobiao
10,481
Labogon
17,326
Looc
15,250
Maguikay
17,980
Mantuyong
6,461
Opao
10,569
Pakna-an
19,546
Pagsabungan
15,485
Subangdaku
21,223
Tabok
13,902
Tawason
3,949
Tingub
4,668
Tipolo
17,952
Umapad
15,326
MANDAUE CITY 318,575
Source: nso.gov.ph

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Socio and Seasonal Variations

Understanding seasonal variations is essential to determine some factors that affect the overall
solid waste and consequently waste plastics generation due to events and other business
activities. Unlike in Cebu City where most major provincial events are held, Mandaue City as a
small city is limited only to local city events. However, these events contribute largely to waste
generation at certain dates or times of year.
The City Tourism Office of Mandaue lists major events in the area which impacts solid waste
generation particularly of waste plastics. The two major events that falls on the month of January
is the celebration of New Year and the Feast of Sto. Nio. These major events contribute to
massive generation of waste because people from other places visit the Province of Cebu to
participate in the activities of both occasions. During the months of March and April, Lenten
Season and the Founding Anniversary of Mandaue City are celebrated. The activities of the first
event include religious processions participated by a large number of devotees while the event of
the latter celebration, activities such as concerts and parties are commonly observed in the city.
The biggest event in Mandaue City is the celebration of The Mantawi Festival which happens
every 6th day of May. Locals and visitors alike participate in parades and street dancing. And
also during this month the Feast of St. Joseph, patron saint of Mandaue is celebrated in the entire
city. The Charter Day, another major celebration, is celebrated every 30th day of August. Prior to
the Charter, there are at least two weeks of different activities, trade fairs and exhibits. There are
road races, concerts, sports competitions and food fairs.3
The All Saints and All Souls Day (November 1 & 2) are also celebrated everywhere in the city.
The Christmas season starts in September highlighted by gift giving, shopping, and parties. The
kinds of waste that are commonly observed during these days include plastic packaging
materials, plastics shopping bags and kitchen waste which are food remains from parties.
Economy
About 40 percent of Cebus export companies are found in Mandaue. The city is dubbed as the
industrial hub of Region VII and hosts about 10,000 industrial and commercial businesses,
making it a little rich city in the country. It is home to some of the worlds biggest companies
such as San Miguel Corp., Coca-cola Bottling Corp. and Shemberg, the number one exporter of
carrageenan. Mandaue City also accounts for 75 percent of the countrys total exports in the
furniture sector, making the city the furniture capital of the country.4
3
4
Department of Tourism, Calendar of Activities 2009

Mandaue City, Socio Economic Profile, CPDO 2009

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Overview of Solid Waste Generation in Mandaue City

National Solid Waste Profile and Projection
In 2001, World Bank projected waste generation increase in the Philippines from 10.67 million
tons/year in 2000 to 14.05 million tons/year in 2010.5 The figures registered more than 30%
increase in only ten years.
Table 2. National Waste Generation, 2000-2010
REGION
2000
MIL. T/YR.
% OF
TOTAL
2.45
23.0
0.17
1.6
2010
MIL. T/YR.
% OF
TOTAL
3.14
22.3
0.21
1.5
National Capital Region (NCR)

Cordillera Administrative Region
(CAR)
Ilocos
0.50
4.7
0.63
4.5
Cagayan Valley
0.32
3.0
0.40
2.8
Central Luzon
0.96
9.0
1.32
9.4
Southern Tagalog
1.42
13.3
2.11
15
Bicol
0.54
5.1
0.65
4.6
Western Visayas
0.82
7.7
1.00
7.1
Central Visayas
0.74
7.0
1.01
7.2
Eastern Visayas
0.43
4.0
0.51
3.6
Western Mindanao
0.40
3.8
0.53
3.8
Northern Mindanao
0.37
3.4
0.47
3.4
Southern Mindanao
0.70
6.6
0.97
6.9
Central Mindanao
0.33
3.1
0.41
2.9
Autonomous Region of Muslim
0.26
2.5
0.39
2.7
Mindanao (ARMM)
Caraga
0.26
2.4
0.31
2.2
National
10.67
100
14.05
100
Assumptions: Waste production rates2:
National Capital Region: 0.71 kg/person/day
urban population: 0.5 kg/person/day
rural population: 0.3 kg/person/day
It was assumed that the urban population would increase their waste production rate by 1 percent
per year due to rising income levels (based on GHK/MRM International Report). Urban and rural
population and growth rates by region are based on National Statistical Office, data for 2000.
Source: Philippine Environment Monitor, World Bank 2001
World Bank, Philippine Environment Monitor 2001 Solid Waste, 2001.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
The National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) reports that the countrys solid
waste generation per day is at 30,000 tons. It is composed of 73% from households, 26% from
commercial establishments, industries, institutions and 1% from healthcare facilities.6
Based on RA 9003, LGUs are the lead implementing agency for SWM programs. The LGUs
operate under the National Solid Waste Management Framework that clearly defines the
Philippine 3R strategy as: Avoid, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Treat, and Dispose. Local policies,
programs and projects in managing solid waste revolve around this strategy.
Although RA 9003 requires the mainstreaming of waste recycling and recovery, these are mainly
taken up by the informal sector. For instance, only 6% of solid waste was recycled in Metro
Manila in 1997 which increased to only 25% in 2007. As of the second quarter of 2008, only
2,361 Materials Recovery Facilities (MRF) are established serving 2,634 barangays nationwide,
based on the NSWMC database. This is only .05% of the 42,000 barangays nationwide that
should have established their own facility.
As provided by the law, all open dumpsites and controlled disposal facilities should have been
closed by February 16, 2004 and February 16, 2006, respectively. Currently, more than 1,000
open dumpsites and controlled disposal facilities are still operating. Conversion of these disposal
sites to sanitary landfills encounter sitting and financing difficulties. 7
City Solid Waste Profile

According to the City Profile 2009, the total volume of garbage disposed is 195 tons per day. It
also places the total volume of waste being composted to 80 tons and being recycled and reused
to 70 tons. Although there is no data directly coming from the city or barangays, this figure could
be attributed to the few barangays practicing community-based waste management such as
Subangdaku and Canduman.
The dumping site is a five-hectare area in Barangay Umapad which has been closed recently to
un-segregated load of barangay trucks.
Currently only five city-owned trucks are operating since the closure of the dumpsites. Most of
the mobile garbage bins which used to total 2,502 have been removed from street corners.
There are 712 industries with functional pollution control facilities according to the city profile.
Still, common garbage disposal practices include dumping, burning, burying in individual pits,
throwing in rivers and esteros and vacant lots.8
6
Aguinaldo, E. 2008, National and Local Initiatives on Solid Waste Management and Implementation of 3Rs in the Philippines,
Environment and Livable Cities 08, Manila, Philippines.
7
Ibid.
8
Mandaue City, Socio-Economic Profile 2009

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization

METHODOLOGY
Waste Sectors
In the study, three major waste sectors were analyzed:
Commercial Sector - Wastes disposed by businesses, institutions and market places that
that are collected and transported by private and government haulers.
Residential Sector - Wastes disposed by households collected and transported by private

and government haulers.
Industrial Sector - Waste generated from industrial areas and transported by private and
government haulers.
Some limitations and difficulties

The WACS team encountered several difficulties and limitations in the conduct of the study.
These consequently affected how the study was conducted and the extent of data gathered
throughout the study.
The city mayor Jonas Cortes has already recognized the solid waste problem in the city: first is
because the five hectares Umapad Dumpsite has already exceeded its capacity. Because of this,
the mayor looked into the possibility of rehabilitating the site. Due to this consideration, actual
waste characterization was rescheduled several times. To address the concern, the team
considered doing barangay-level WACS. However, the DGS officers advised the research team
to wait a few weeks more since only five out of 27 barangays are practicing solid waste
management and the mayor would like the barangays to engage first in barangays-led SWM
before any activities initiated by outside groups are conducted.
Eventually, in response to E.O. 774, the mayor closed the dumpsite to barangay trucks with unsegregated waste load. DGS collection was stopped for one week and continued after with only
five trucks operating the service following the revised routes.
Barangay officials were busy addressing the temporary disposal crisis and WACS at source was
simply impossible to conduct. After the operation of the DGS garbage trucks and the new route
assignments were normalized, the team was able to conduct the WACS at the Umapad Dumpsite.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Sampling
Sampling Schedule
To be able to cover a whole period of the citys waste cycle, the schedule for the sampling
activities was arranged as follows:
Sampling Day
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Table 4. Sampling Schedule

Date
Day of the
Week
June 19, 2009
Friday
June 20, 2009
Saturday
June 21, 2009
Monday
June 22, 2009
Tuesday
June 23, 2009
Wednesday
June 24, 2009
Thursday
June 25, 2009
Friday
Shift
Day shift
Day shift
Day shift
Day shift
Day shift
Day shift
Day shift
No nightshift was scheduled since the changes resulting from the closure of the dumpsite
included reduction of dumping trips, reduction in the number of operating collection trucks. The
sampling was also done daily since separate and smaller samples were gathered for the moisture
content analysis. Drying lasted only a couple of days finishing the landfill activities two days
after the last sorting day.
Collection of Samples
A total of 36 garbage trucks set as samples within a period of 7 days were distributed that
represented all areas covered by DGS waste collection. The study did not utilize a random
numbers table to determine the truck samples, since there were only five DGS trucks operating at
that time.
Since there was no working truck scale at the landfill, trucks had to go to the private weight
master9 for the net and gross weights. This process had to be coordinated at three points: the
dispatching area at the DGS Office, where the truck drivers were given instruction by the DGS
In-charge, the weighting area of a private weight master, where the weight of loaded and
eventually unloaded trucks were recorded, and the disposal area, where the identified trucks were
intercepted before dumping for the team to be able to extract the required amount of waste for
each specific sample.
The summary of the truck samples with their corresponding weights can be found at Appendix
6.4, Table 22 on page 44.
9
Weight Master from Tinguan Enterprises is Mr. Arturo Ardo

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Actual Waste Characterization

At the side of the Umapad Landfill, the site was prepared and cleared to be used as the sorting
area. Designated spaces were properly labeled according to the type and source of waste placed
into them. Before the start of the first sample extraction, needed equipments were prepared on
site.10
Each identified truck, after finishing waste collection in their designated areas, goes to the weight
master to be weighed before proceeding to the landfill. 11 Upon entering the landfill, the
collection crew extract a portion of the waste load from the truck. To facilitate immediate
extraction of required sample, wastes were taken from the upper, outer portion of the truck load.
Extraction of sample which is 30 kilos for each truck load was obtained based on the same study
conducted in Cebu City. A 50-kilogram weighing scale was used to weigh 30 kilograms of waste
which were then brought to the sorting area for characterization.
The waste samples were sorted into the prescribed material categories and recorded on FORM
No.4. Wastes are classified into seventeen material types since there was no previous study
conducted for waste characterization in the city. Plastics 1 to 7 based on the Plastic Identification
Code 12 , Wood, Paper, Glass, Metal, Electronics, Organic, Hazardous Waste, Construction
material, Special waste, and Mixed Residue is the other waste categories. For waste plastics
which are not identified in the first six types were placed in Other Plastics category.
Figure 2. Position of the representative sample extracted per truck
Back of
the truck
Waste
A
Sample
Front of
the truck
Aside from Plastics, Wood and Paper were specifically sorted. This is because the objective of
the study is to provide baseline data for a possible demonstration project that will convert waste
plastics into fuel. P2F conversion technologies often require the mixing of waste plastics with
waste paper and waste wood as additional resource material.13
10
Appendix 6.7 on lists all the materials and equipment used during the actual characterization.
The truck goes back to the weight master after dumping of its load to get the net weight of the truck.
12
The Plastic Identification Code, March 20, 2009 <http://www.plastics.org.nz/_attachments/docs/plasticscode-7.pdf>
13
Guidelines for Assessment of Waste Plastics, UNEP-DTIE,IETC, 2009
11

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Materials were sorted according to the seventeen material types and placed into separate labeled
containers. 14 Before weighing, the materials were checked and verified against the Waste
Classification Guide provided to the sorting crew. These are then weighed on a five-kilogram
digital weighing scale.
The accuracy and operation of the scale were checked against a known reference weight. And
since the digital scale is very sensitive and registers weight per single gram, it was place on a
clean, flat surface and the level of scale was adjusted when necessary. The materials were
weighed as is, but bottles, cans and containers were emptied of their contents before weighing.
The weight of each material (wet basis) was recorded on FORM No.2.
Presentation of Data
Data is shown in pie graphs and tables. Presentation of data starts from Plastics (material types 1
to 7) and Other Wastes (8 to 17). Tables present data by material types 1 to 17, total Plastic (Nos.
1-7), total Other Waste (8-10) and Total Waste (100%).
In the discussion of the key findings, the quantity of waste plastics is presented in three ways:
first, the proportion of the total waste plastic against total waste composition; second, is the
proportion of Plastics (material types 1 to 7) against the total waste composition; third is the
proportion of Plastics (Material types 1 to 7) against the total number of waste plastics.
Since the dumpsite was closed to barangay trucks with un-segregated waste load only DGS
trucks were selected as samples. During the conduct of the study, only five DGS trucks were
plying the major thoroughfares collecting mixed wastes from non-point residential and
commercial sources (and probably minimal industrial wastes as well) in any or all of the areas.
Because of this, specific sector-based data is not established. However, waste profile as well as
quantities and projection were determined from the results of the study and would still serve its
purpose for the minimum requirement of waste profiling, quantification and projection.
14
See Appendix 6.4 for data capture forms

______________________________________________________________________________________________
FINDINGS
Quantities of Waste
A total of 187,205 kg (187.21 tons) with the average of 26,744 kg (26.74 tons) garbage wastes
were collected by the DGS in Mandaue City within the study period. The quantities associated
with waste plastics disposed in the same period based on the sample quantity of 30 kg (0.03 tons)
per sample are 206 kg (0.21 tons) and has the average of 51 kg (0.05 tons). A total of 1,080.17
kg sample collected in the study period. Waste plastics represent approximately 19.06% (205.87
kg) while other wastes account to 80.94% (874.30 kg) during the sampling period. Table 5 shows
the aggregated data and the quantity of municipal solid waste and waste plastics on daily
samples.
Table 5. Quantity of Municipal Waste and Waste Plastics for Mandaue City
Daily Samples
Aggregated Data
DayMSW
Waste
MSW
Waste
Day
Sample No.
(kg)
Plastics (kg)
(kg)
Plastics (kg)
1-1
4810.00
4.34
1 31280.00
31.58
1-2
4640.00
5.00
2 20225.00
22.55
1-3
6620.00
4.56
3 30560.00
28.85
1-4
2360.00
4.66
4 26740.00
29.07
1-5
6970.00
6.71
5 23700.00
35.97
1-6
5880.00
6.32
6 25970.00
30.78
2-1
4610.00
4.14
7 28730.00
27.06
187205.0
2-2
4860.00
3.16
Total
205.87
0
Averag
2-3
2685.00
4.50
e 26743.57
51.47
2-4
3160.00
4.98
2-5
4910.00
5.78
3-1
4100.00
7.38
3-2
6770.00
10.70
3-3
4840.00
3.68
3-4
6820.00
3.46
3-5
8030.00
3.63
4-1
6950.00
5.98
4-2
6300.00
6.13
4-3
4830.00
4.55
4-4
4800.00
6.07
4-5
3860.00
6.34
5-1
4090.00
7.82
5-2
7390.00
7.52
Percentag
e (%)
0.10
0.11
0.09
0.11
0.15
0.12
0.09
0.11
0.19

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Daily Samples
DayMSW
Waste
Sample No.
(kg)
Plastics (kg)
5-3
4760.00
5.93
5-4
4100.00
8.10
5-5
3360.00
6.60
6-1
3110.00
7.10
6-2
4590.00
8.20
6-3
5280.00
4.23
6-4
8150.00
8.05
6-5
4840.00
3.21
7-1
6020.00
6.66
7-2
6170.00
7.06
7-3
8480.00
5.65
7-4
4850.00
5.74
7-5
3210.00
1.97
Day
Aggregated Data
MSW
Waste
(kg)
Plastics (kg)
Percentag
e (%)
Waste Composition
This report presents the result of the garbage collected by DGS trucks. A total of 1,080.17 kg
from 36 garbage truck samples were characterized. The results are presented in pie charts
showing the summary of waste composition and a table showing the waste type, by weight and
precision levels at 80% confidence level.
Table 6. Number of Samples for Waste Composition for Selected Confidence Levels
C.L. 95%
C.L 90%
C.L 80%
C.L 70%
Material
Residen Comme Residen Comme Residen Comme Residen Comme
s
tl.
rl.
tl.
rl.
tl.
rl.
tl.
rl.
Newspri
22469858-600 170-991
16-150
48-223
9-58
21-101
nt
2397
3563
Cardboa
899- 533-997 225-499 134-250
58-123
35-64
27-66
17-30
rd
1955
Alumin
27575470-350
19119-92
60-275
10-42
23-123
um
1437
4399
1100
Ferrous 194-554
55250-139 138-953
14-37
36-214
8-18
17-97
3411
Glass
145-619
59639-155 149-501
19-61
39-126
6-19
19-58
2002
Plastic
261- 422-783
67-275 107-195
18-70
28-61
10-32
14-24
1100
Organic
12-47
26-92
5-14
8-25
3-5
4-8
3-4
3-5
Source: Guidelines for Assessment of Waste Plastics, UNEP-DTIE-IETC, 2009

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Due to rounding, numbers may not sum exactly to totals or subtotals.

In this report, waste plastics were presented in three presentations as mentioned in the
presentation of data. However, waste per sectors could not be presented due to some limitations
and difficulties as discussed above.
More categories were used in classifying materials in Mandaue City since no previous study was
conducted on waste characterization. Figure 3 shows the percentage of waste plastics against the
total amount of other wastes disposed in the landfill.
Aggregate Data
Figure 3. Overall Percentage of Waste Plastics from total waste disposed
Plastics,
19.06%
Other
wastes,
80.94%
Figure 4 shows the result of each material type, 60.93% of waste disposed is organics, followed
by paper (14.61%). The next most common material is plastic (HDPE) with approximately
10.64%. Other categories such as Glass (2.04%), Mixed Residue (1.92%), Metal (0.70%), Wood
(0.51%), Electronics (0.19%) and Hazardous Waste (0.05%) were also noted and found with
minimal amount of moisture. No special waste was recorded during the sampling period.
Table 7 shows the result of overall waste characterization in Mandaue City. The detailed overall
waste characterization findings are shown in Table 9.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Figure 4. Overview of Overall Waste Characterization, Mandaue City

Hazardous Waste,
0.05%
SpecialWaste,
0.00%
M ixed Residue,
1.92%
PET,0.12%
PVC,3.23%
HDPE,10.64%
LDPE,0.02%
PP,0.06%
Organic,60.93%
PS,0.58%
Paper,14.61%
Other Plastics,
4.41%
Wood,0.51%
Glass,2.04%
M etal,0.70%
Electronics,0.19%
Table 7. Result of Overall Waste Characterization, Mandaue City

Types of Waste
1. PET
2. HDPE
3. PVC
4. LDPE
5. PP
6. PS
7. Other Plastics
8. Paper
9. Wood
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL PLASTICS
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
TOTAL SAMPLE
Percentage
(%)
0.12
10.64
3.23
0.02
0.06
0.58
4.41
14.61
0.51
2.04
0.70
0.19
60.93
Variance
+/-
0.034953619
20.85662924
2.757887905
0.001320333
0.002542476
0.055182952
1.190198905
48.78240095
0.462450333
4.950573286
0.64796581
0.117495952
185.4310468
0.24
5.85
2.13
0.05
0.07
0.30
1.40
8.95
0.87
2.85
1.03
0.44
17.44
0.05
0.006507667
0.10
0.00
0.00
1.92
19.06
0
0
2.854793238
-
0
0
2.17
-
80.94
100.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
A total of 205.87 kg of sample waste were characterized. Findings on waste plastics reveal that
more than half of waste plastics found are HDPE with the highest percentage of 55.82% disposed
(Figure 5). Moreover, Other Plastics (23.14%) and PVC (16.95%) were also abundantly
observed. PS (3.07%), PET (0.65%), PP (0.30%) and LDPE (0.08%), were found to be minimal.
Table 8 shows the result of waste plastics characterization in Mandaue City. The detailed
findings of waste plastics characterization are shown in Table 9.
Figure 5. Overview of Waste Plastics Characterization, Mandaue City
PVC,16.95%
HDPE,
55.82%
LDPE,0.08%
PP,0.30%
PS,3.07%
Other
Plastics,
23.14%
PET,0.65%
Table 8. Results of Waste Plastics Characterization, Mandaue City

Types of Waste
Plastics
Percentage
(%)
1. PET
0.65
2. HDPE
55.82
3. PVC
16.95
4. LDPE
0.08
5. PP
0.30
6. PS
3.07
7. Other Plastics
TOTAL SAMPLE
23.14
100.00
Varianc
e
0.034953
619
20.85662
924
2.757887
905
0.001320
333
0.002542
476
0.055182
952
1.190198
905
-
+/0.24
5.85
2.13
0.05
0.07
0.30
1.40
-

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 9. Characterization of Overall Waste Compositions

Weight of Waste per Classification, kg
Types of Waste
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Total Waste
per
Classificatio
n, kg
Percenta
ge (%)
1. PET
0.11
0.14
0.01
0.58
0.08
0.24
0.18
1.33
0.12
2. HDPE
16.85
9.71
14.60
15.42
25.10
16.90
16.34
114.92
10.64
3. PVC
5.81
3.57
8.11
4.50
3.90
5.54
3.45
34.89
3.23
4. LDPE
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.17
0.02
5. PP
0.13
0.04
0.05
0.12
0.04
0.09
0.16
0.62
0.06
6. PS
0.65
0.86
0.57
1.25
0.95
1.06
0.99
6.31
0.58
7. Other Plastics
TOTAL
PLASTICS
8.03
8.24
5.51
7.20
5.90
6.90
5.85
47.63
4.41
31.58
22.55
28.85
29.07
35.97
30.78
27.06
205.87
19.06
8. Paper
18.48
16.38
33.90
16.59
19.94
30.70
21.80
157.80
14.61
9. Wood
1.87
0.89
0.88
1.39
0.00
0.23
0.26
5.52
0.51
10. Glass
1.42
2.90
1.58
7.75
2.05
4.14
2.22
22.05
2.04
11. Metal
0.58
0.90
0.41
2.81
0.72
0.93
1.22
7.58
0.70
Variance
0.034953
619
20.85662
924
2.757887
905
0.001320
333
0.002542
476
0.055182
952
1.190198
905
48.78240
095
0.462450
333
4.950573
286
0.647965
81
+/-
0.24
5.85
2.13
0.05
0.07
0.30
1.40
-
8.95
0.87
2.85
1.03
Extracted from the report Converting Waste Plastics to Fuels Baseline Study Project. Activity II-1: Plastic Waste Analysis and Characterization Study- B.
Mandaue City, Philippines

______________________________________________________________________________________________
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
TOTAL SAMPLE
0.04
120.7
6
0.01
100.9
9
0.05
0.54
0.00
0.79
0.63
2.05
0.19
82.87
89.21
87.97
81.22
95.04
658.06
60.93
0.10
0.00
0.04
0.20
0.02
0.16
0.00
0.51
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.16
148.4
2
180.0
0
5.38
127.4
5
150.0
0
1.43
121.1
5
150.0
0
1.91
120.4
0
149.4
7
3.33
114.0
3
150.0
0
1.75
119.9
1
150.6
9
1.77
122.9
4
150.0
0
20.74
1.92
874.30
80.94
1080.17
0.117495
952
185.4310
468
0.006507
667
0.44
17.44
0.10
0
0
2.854793
238
-
0
0
2.17
-
100.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Moisture Content
Table 10. Raw Weight and Moisture Content of Collected MSW in Mandaue City
Types of Waste
1. PET
2. HDPE
3. PVC
4. LDPE
5. PP
6. PS
7. Other Plastics
TOTAL PLASTICS
8. Paper
9. Wood
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
TOTAL
Raw Weight
(kg)
1.33
114.92
34.89
0.17
0.62
6.31
47.63
205.87
157.80
5.52
22.05
7.58
2.05
658.06
0.51
Moisture Content,
MC (%)
1.92
15.97
9.64
0.40
2.79
7.86
12.18
26.40
10.72
2.32
3.87
0.53
44.36
1.44
Dry Weight
(kg)
1.31
96.56
31.52
0.17
0.60
5.81
41.83
177.8
116.14
4.92
21.53
7.28
2.04
366.14
0.50
0.00
0.00
20.74
0.00
0.00
13.03
0.00
0.00
18.04
874.30
1080.17
536.59
714.39
Figure 6, shows the moisture content analysis of waste plastics. The amount of moisture
is high for almost all waste plastics considering the heavy rains experienced during the
study period. The highest moisture is HDPE (15.97%), which is commonly observed as
waste plastics from wet market. For other plastics (12.18%), PVC (9.64%) and PS
(7.86%) it shows high amount of moisture. Other types of waste plastics such as PP
(2.79%), PET (1.92%) and LDPE (0.40%) also shows significant moisture content. This
reflects the fact that waste plastics disposed has high moisture content that turns into
leachate that could contaminate to ground water. Table 12 shows the result for moisture
content analysis of waste plastics.
Extracted from the report Converting Waste Plastics to Fuels Baseline Study Project. Activity II-1:
Plastic Waste Analysis and Characterization Study- B. Mandaue City, Philippines

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Figure 6. Moisture Content of Plastics and Other Wastes
50
O th e r
% Moisture
w a ste s,
3 8 .6 3 %
40
30
20
P la stic s,
13 .6 3 %
10
0
Types of Wastes
Table 11. Result for Moisture Content of Plastics and Other Wastes
Types of
wastes
Wet wt.
Dry wt.
Plastics
Other wastes
Total
205.87
874.3
1, 080.17
177.8
536.59
714.39
Amount of
Moisture, kg
(Initial weight-Final
weight)
28.07
337.71
365.78
% Moisture (amount
of moisture/initial
weight)*100
13.63
38.63
33.86
% M oisture
Figure 7. Moisture Content Analysis of Waste Plastics

20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
15.97%
12.18%
9.64%
7.86%
2.79%
1.92%
0.40%
PET
HDPE
PVC
LDPE
PP
Types of Waste Plastics
PS
Other
Plastics

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 12. Results for Moisture Content Analysis of Waste Plastics

Types of
Waste
Plastics
1. PET
2. HDPE
3. PVC
4. LDPE
5. PP
6. PS
7. Other
Plastics
% Moisture
Day 1 Day 2
1.09
2.93
15.21 16.57
9.66
9.32
0.00
0.00
4.66
0.95
8.44
8.89
12.37
11.62
Average
%
Day 3
0.00
16.78
10.98
0.00
1.96
7.19
Day 4
3.40
16.77
8.81
0.00
4.93
7.99
Day 5
1.94
16.90
11.00
0.00
1.11
6.13
Day 6
2.40
15.29
8.57
1.92
3.33
8.69
Day 7
1.67
14.26
9.12
0.89
2.56
7.72
1.92
15.97
9.64
0.40
2.79
7.86
12.21
12.64
11.31
12.32
12.79
12.18
Figure 8 shows the result of moisture content for other wastes. Organic materials have
the highest moisture content at 44.36%. Paper (26.40%), Mixed Residue (13.03%) and
Wood (10.72%) found also to have high moisture content. As with the other materials
such as Metal (3.87%), Glass (2.32%), Hazardous Waste (1.44%) and Electronics
(0.53%), there is minimal amount of moisture content observed.
Table 13 shows the result of moisture content analysis of other wastes.
44.36%
26.40%
13.03%
10.72%
2.32%
3.87%
0.53%
1.44%
0.00%
0.00%
Gla
ss
Me
ta
l
Ele
ctr
on
ics
Or
Ha
ga
za
nic
r
d
Co
ou
ns
sW
tru
as
cti
te
on
Ma
Sp teri
a
ec
ial l
Wa
Mi
ste
xe
d
Re
sid
ue
50.0
45.0
40.0
35.0
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Pa
pe
r
Wo
od
% M oisture
Figure 8. Moisture Content Analysis of the Other Wastes Categories
Types ofWaste Plastics

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 13. Result of Moisture Content Analysis of the other Wastes Categories
% Moisture
Averag
Types of Waste
e%
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
8. Paper
26.31 26.57 24.36 26.55 28.59 26.56 25.88
26.40
9. Wood
14.44
9.74 12.18 14.94
0.00
6.54 17.23
10.72
10. Glass
1.57
0.70
1.41
3.33
2.85
3.45
2.91
2.32
11. Metal
4.02
1.66
3.14
5.57
3.93
5.01
3.79
3.87
12. Electronics
0.48
0.00
1.43
1.47
0.00
0.26
0.06
0.53
13. Organic
47.08 48.10 45.90 45.55 45.13 41.45 37.31
44.36
14. Hazardous
Waste
1.13
0.00
1.05
2.31
1.54
4.05
0.00
1.44
15. Construction
Material
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16. Special
Waste
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17. Mixed
Residue
17.25 14.22 14.66 14.60 10.33 10.13 10.04
13.03
For Table 14, wet weight is also compared to the weight of dry material. In addition, the
table shows the composition of waste plastics based on Phyllis, a website database on
the composition of biomass and other wastes15.
Table 14. Waste Composition for Mandaue City
Types of
Waste
1. PET
2. HDPE
3. PVC
4. LDPE
5. PP
6. PS
7. Other
Plastics
TOTAL
PLASTICS
8. Paper
9. Wood
10. Glass
11. Metal
12.
Electronics
15
Wet
Weight
(kg)
1.33
114.92
34.89
0.17
0.62
6.31
Dry
Weight
(kg)
1.31
96.56
31.52
0.17
0.60
5.81
Composition
C
Ash
62.2
86.1
40.1
85.7
85.5
92.7
4.2
13
5.1
14.2
14.3
7.9
32.9
0.9
0.6
0.1
0.2
-
0.05
-
0.7
0.1
-
47.63
41.83
205.87
157.80
5.52
22.05
7.58
177.8
116.14
4.92
21.53
7.28
2.05
2.04
ECN Phyllis, The Composition of Biomass and Waste, June 1, 2009, <http://www.ecn.nl/phyllis/>

______________________________________________________________________________________________
13. Organic
658.06
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.51
15.
Construction
Material
0.00
16. Special
Waste
0.00
17. Mixed
Residue
20.74
TOTAL
OTHER
WASTES 874.30
TOTAL 1080.17
366.14
0.50
0.00
0.00
18.04
536.59
714.39
Waste Projection
The factors and formula used in computing population and waste projection can be
found on Table 16 on page 35 and Table 17 on page 36.
Waste generation projection shows that the city will generate approximately 67,251 tons
of waste in 2009. With the population growth of 2.84% the city population will arrive at
almost half a million in 2020. By this time the city will generate approximately 102,108
tons of waste per year.
Table 15. Projected Population and Waste Generation 2009-2020
Year
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Projected Population
336, 927
346, 496
356, 336
366, 456
376, 863
387, 566
398, 573
409, 892
421, 533
433, 505
445, 817
458, 478
Tons, per year

67, 251
69, 854
72, 557
75, 365
78, 282
81, 311
84, 458
87, 725
91, 119
94, 643
98, 303
102,108

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusion and Recommendations

The amount of waste plastics that the city currently disposes to the Umapad Landfill is
at 19.06% of the total waste being disposed. If the city will generate a total 67,251 tons
of waste in 2009, based on projection figures, the total waste plastics to be disposed for
the year will be approximately 12,818 tons. Wood at 343 tons (0.51%) and Paper at
9,825 tons (14.61%) as additional feedstock to a waste to energy or specifically for a
P2F conversion facility. Total is 22,986 tons or approximately 1,916 tons of available
materials a month.
Average moisture for waste plastics content is at 13.63%, as opposed to other wastes at
38.63%. Total average of moisture is at 33.86%. This could be attributed to the weather
condition during the characterization phase which was conducted in June, the start of
the rainy season.
Only recently, a city-government initiated waste recovery from the dumpsite was
started. The recovery was especially focused on waste plastics. The city government
hired 60 waste sorters. In additional to this, there are also several levels of informal
waste recovery in the entire waste flow.
The percentage of recovery should be documented to shed light on the actual plastic
waste generation in the city. This will also give a more thorough understanding of the
waste management systems and practices. For a detailed discussion on current systems
and practices, please see Activity II-2 Report on Plastic Wastes Management Systems
and Practices for Mandaue City.
A further study focusing on waste recovery and diversion systems would further shed
light on how much waste plastics the city generates in different sectors. This study
should also include markets for plastics and costs of different plastic waste materials.
As for the City, a stricter enforcement of solid waste management laws and local
ordinances is needed so that recyclable waste plastics, as well as other materials will be
diverted to environment-friendly projects such as a P2F facility.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Detailed Waste Characterization Tables and Data

Table 18. Characterization of Overall Waste Composition
Weight of Waste per Classification, kg
Types of Waste
Day 1
1. PET
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Total Waste
per
Classificatio
n, kg
Percenta
ge (%)
0.11
0.14
0.01
0.58
0.08
0.24
0.18
1.33
0.12
16.85
9.71
14.60
15.42
25.10
16.90
16.34
114.92
10.64
3. PVC
5.81
3.57
8.11
4.50
3.90
5.54
3.45
34.89
3.23
4. LDPE
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.17
0.02
5. PP
0.13
0.04
0.05
0.12
0.04
0.09
0.16
0.62
0.06
6. PS
0.65
0.86
0.57
1.25
0.95
1.06
0.99
6.31
0.58
7. Other Plastics
TOTAL
PLASTICS
8.03
8.24
5.51
7.20
5.90
6.90
5.85
47.63
4.41
31.58
22.55
28.85
29.07
35.97
30.78
27.06
205.87
19.06
8. Paper
18.48
16.38
33.90
16.59
19.94
30.70
21.80
157.80
14.61
9. Wood
10. Glass
1.87
1.42
0.89
2.90
0.88
1.58
1.39
7.75
0.00
2.05
0.23
4.14
0.26
2.22
5.52
22.05
0.51
2.04
2. HDPE
Variance
0.034953
619
20.85662
924
2.757887
905
0.001320
333
0.002542
476
0.055182
952
1.190198
905
48.78240
095
0.462450
333
4.950573
+/-
0.24
5.85
2.13
0.05
0.07
0.30
1.40
-
8.95
0.87
2.85

______________________________________________________________________________________________
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
TOTAL SAMPLE
0.58
0.90
0.41
2.81
0.72
0.93
1.22
7.58
0.70
0.04
120.7
6
0.01
100.9
9
0.05
0.54
0.00
0.79
0.63
2.05
0.19
82.87
89.21
87.97
81.22
95.04
658.06
60.93
0.10
0.00
0.04
0.20
0.02
0.16
0.00
0.51
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.16
148.4
2
180.0
0
5.38
127.4
5
150.0
0
1.43
121.1
5
150.0
0
1.91
120.4
0
149.4
7
3.33
114.0
3
150.0
0
1.75
119.9
1
150.6
9
1.77
122.9
4
150.0
0
20.74
1.92
874.30
80.94
1080.17
100.00
286
0.647965
81
0.117495
952
185.4310
468
0.006507
667
1.03
0.44
17.44
0.10
0
0
2.854793
238
-
0
0
2.17
-

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 19. Result of Wet (unclean) Waste Plastics

Weight of Waste Plastics per Classification, kg
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Total Waste
per
Classificatio
n, kg
1. PET
0.11
0.14
0.01
0.58
0.08
0.24
0.18
1.33
2. HDPE
16.85
9.71
14.60
15.42
25.10
16.90
16.34
114.92
3. PVC
5.81
3.57
8.11
4.50
3.90
5.54
3.45
34.89
4. LDPE
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.17
5. PP
0.13
0.04
0.05
0.12
0.04
0.09
0.16
0.62
6. PS
7. Other
Plastics
Total Sample
0.65
0.86
0.57
1.25
0.95
1.06
0.99
6.31
8.03
31.58
8.24
22.56
5.51
28.86
7.20
29.07
5.90
35.98
6.90
30.78
5.85
27.06
47.63
205.87
Types of
Waste Plastics
Varianc
e
0.03495
3619
20.8566
2924
2.75788
7905
0.00132
0333
0.00254
2476
0.05518
2952
1.19019
8905
-
+/-
0.24
5.85
2.13
0.05
0.07
0.30
1.40
-

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 20. Results of dry (clean) Waste Plastics

Weight of Waste Plastics per Classification, kg
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Total Waste
per
Classificatio
n, kg
8. PET
0.11
0.13
0.01
0.56
0.08
0.23
0.19
1.31
9. HDPE
14.27
8.09
12.15
12.82
20.88
14.32
14.11
96.56
10. PVC
5.21
3.23
6.83
4.11
3.48
5.05
3.14
31.52
11. LDPE
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.17
12. PP
0.13
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.09
0.16
0.60
13. PS
14. Other
Plastics
Total Sample
0.60
0.78
0.53
1.15
0.89
0.97
0.90
5.81
7.02
27.34
7.06
19.33
4.83
24.40
6.33
25.08
5.23
30.60
6.01
26.72
5.14
23.73
41.83
177.80
Types of
Waste Plastics
Variance
0.0321571
43
14.500095
24
1.8102619
05
0.0011904
76
0.0025619
05
0.0459809
52
0.8256285
71
-
+/-
0.23
4.88
1.72
0.04
0.06
0.27
1.16
-

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 21. Overview of Sample Collection Routes of the DPS, Mandaue City
DaySample
No.
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
5-1
5-2
5-3
Barangay/ Route
From 2nd Bridge to U.N. Ave.,Brgy. Umapad, Alang-alang, Ibabao, Estancia,
Maguikay, Tipolo and Subangdaku
Brgy. Alang-Alang
Brgy. Lo-oc, UC School, Alang-Alang, Ibabao, Estancia, Maguikay,
Casuntingan, and Cabancalan
Brgy. Umapad
Mandaue City Public Market
SB Cabahug St., Rizal St. to Jagobiao
A. del Rosario Ave, Brgy. Mantuyong, Guizo, Tipolo to AS Fortuna St., Brgy.
Bakilid and Banilad.
Public Cemetery to Subangdaku, Sitio Panagdait and Reclamation area.
Mandaue City Central School, City Plaza to Reclamation area, CICC, Cebu
Doctors Hospital, Ceres Bus Liner, Quest, ABB and inside Brgy. Jagobiao.
From Pier area to Brgy. Pagsabungan, Canduman, Casili, Tawason, Cubacub,
Hermag Village and Jagobiao upper

______________________________________________________________________________________________
5-4
5-5
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-4
6-5
7-1
7-2
7-3
7-4
7-5

SB Cabahug St., Rizal St. to Jagobiao
Table 22. Weight Master Summary

Day-Sample
No.
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
TOTAL
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
TOTAL
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
Truck
Number
SPG- 231
SGU- 849
SGP- 232
SHN- 529
SGP- 242
SGP- 241
SGP- 251
SGP- 231
SEZ- 647- D2
SEZ- 617
SGP- 231
SGP- 251
SGP- 232
SGP- 231
SGP- 242
SGP- 210
Gross
Weight
8690.00
8560.00
8900.00
7750.00
9860.00
9050.00
52810.00
10020.00
8730.00
8210.00
8190.00
8790.00
43940.00
9990.00
8850.00
8720.00
9910.00
8710.00
Net Load
4810.00
4640.00
6620.00
2360.00
6970.00
5880.00
31280.00
4610.00
4860.00
2685.00
3160.00
4910.00
20225.00
4100.00
6770.00
4840.00
6820.00
8030.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
TOTAL
5-1
5-2
5-3
5-4
5-5
TOTAL
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-4
6-5
TOTAL
7-1
7-2
7-3
7-4
7-5
SGP- 242
SGP- 232
SGP- 251
SGP- 231
SEZ- 617
SGP- 251
SGP- 242
SGP- 231
SGP- 232
SEZ- 617
SGP- 232
SGP- 242
SGP- 241
SGP- 231
SGP- 251
SGP- 242
SGP- 232
SGP- 231
SGP- 251
SEZ- 617
TOTAL
OVER- ALL TOTAL
46180.00
9880.00
8930.00
9930.00
8680.00
8450.00
45870.00
9980.00
9870.00
8650.00
8970.00
8090.00
45560.00
8940.00
9810.00
8980.00
8700.00
9940.00
46370.00
9890.00
8910.00
8760.00
10060.00
7950.00
45570.00
326300.00
30560.00
6950.00
6300.00
4830.00
4800.00
3860.00
26740.00
4090.00
7390.00
4760.00
4100.00
3360.00
23700.00
3110.00
4590.00
5280.00
8150.00
4840.00
25970.00
6020.00
6170.00
8480.00
4850.00
3210.00
28730.00
187205.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Raw Data
Throughout the waste characterization, the container used for weighing is constant at
0.522 kg- weight of the container (tray).
Table 23. Day 1-Sample 1
[Truck No.: SGP-231]
Initial weight, kg
Final weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
(Clean)
wt. w/o container
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
0.000
2. HDPE
3.329
2.792
3. PVC
0.207
0.188
4. LDPE
0.000
0.000
5. PP
0.044
0.041
6. PS
0.050
0.045
7. Other Plastics
0.708
0.619
TOTAL
4.34
3.69
8. Paper
1.071
0.829
9. Wood
0.011
0.009
10. Glass
0.141
0.139
11. Metal
0.185
0.178
12. Electronics
0.035
0.034
13. Organic
23.780
13.040
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.438
0.367
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
25.66
14.596
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00
18.286
[Truck No.: SGU-849]
Initial weight, kg
Final weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
(Clean)
wt. w/o container
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.048
0.047
2. HDPE
2.100
1.780
3. PVC
1.600
1.429
4. LDPE
0.000
0.000
5. PP
0.027
0.026
6. PS
0.123
0.114
7. Other Plastics
1.100
0.970
%
Moisture
0.00
16.13
9.18
0.00
6.82
10.00
12.57
Ave 7.81
22.60
18.18
1.42
3.78
2.86
45.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.21
Ave 11.02
-
%
Moisture
2.08
15.24
10.69
0.00
3.70
7.32
11.82

______________________________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL
PLASTICS
8. Paper
9. Wood
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
5.00
2.600
0.300
0.000
0.130
0.000
21.090
4.37
1.873
0.243
0.000
0.124
0.000
10.543
Ave 7.26
27.96
19.00
0.00
4.62
0.00
50.01
0.082
0.081
1.22
0.000
0.000
0.801
0.000
0.000
0.629
0.00
0.00
21.47
25.00
13.49
Ave 12.43
30.00
17.86

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.016
2. HDPE
2.000
3. PVC
0.486
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.018
6. PS
0.039
7. Other Plastics
2.000
TOTAL
PLASTICS
4.56
8. Paper
4.900
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.000
11. Metal
0.046
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
19.420
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
1.070

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.016
0.00
1.720
14.00
0.448
7.82
0.000
0.00
0.017
5.56
0.036
7.69
1.660
17.00
3.90
3.580
0.000
0.000
0.044
0.000
10.835
Ave 7.44
26.94
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
44.21
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.880
0.00
0.00
17.76

______________________________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
25.44
15.34
Ave 9.33
30.00
19.24

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
3.120
3. PVC
0.400
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.014
6. PS
0.076
7. Other Plastics
1.050
TOTAL
4.66
PLASTICS
8. Paper
2.943
9. Wood
0.673
10. Glass
1.167
11. Metal
0.041
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
19.720
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.018
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.781
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
25.34
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00
[Truck No.: SHN-529]

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.650
15.06
0.365
8.75
0.000
0.00
0.013
7.14
0.070
7.89
0.945
10.00

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.045
2. HDPE
3.800
3. PVC
1.620
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.009

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.043
4.44
3.196
15.89
1.442
10.99
0.000
0.00
0.009
0.00
4.04
2.095
0.553
1.139
0.049
0.000
10.090
Ave 6.98
28.81
17.83
2.40
2.50
0.00
48.83
0.017
5.56
0.000
0.000
0.667
0.00
0.00
14.60
14.61
Ave 12.05
18.65

______________________________________________________________________________________________
6. PS
7. Other Plastics
TOTAL
PLASTICS
8. Paper
9. Wood
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.162
1.072
0.147
0.935
9.26
12.78
6.71
2.600
0.803
0.033
0.106
0.007
19.150
5.77
1.902
0.672
0.032
0.101
0.007
9.975
Ave 7.62
26.85
16.31
3.03
4.72
0.00
47.91
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.597
0.000
0.000
0.504
0.00
0.00
15.58
23.29
13.19
Ave 11.44
30.00
18.96

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
2.500
3. PVC
1.500
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.021
6. PS
0.200
7. Other Plastics
2.100
TOTAL
PLASTICS
6.32
8. Paper
4.370
9. Wood
0.085
10. Glass
0.078
11. Metal
0.072
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
17.600
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.127
14.92
1.342
10.53
0.000
0.00
0.020
4.76
0.183
8.50
1.889
10.05
5.56
3.290
0.072
0.076
0.069
0.000
9.440
Ave 6.97
24.71
15.29
2.56
4.17
0.00
46.36
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
16. Special Waste

17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.000
1.472
0.000
1.209
0.00
17.87
23.68
14.16
Ave 11.10
30.00
19.72

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
2.580
3. PVC
0.400
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.021
6. PS
0.075
7. Other Plastics
1.059
TOTAL
PLASTICS
4.14
8. Paper
2.374
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.000
11. Metal
0.165
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
22.127
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
1.197
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
25.86
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.130
17.44
0.359
10.25
0.000
0.00
0.020
4.76
0.069
8.00
0.981
7.37

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.100
2. HDPE
2.064
3. PVC
0.313
[Truck No.: SGP- 231]

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.096
4.00
1.721
16.62
0.289
7.67
3.56
1.761
0.000
0.000
0.159
0.000
11.503
Ave 6.83
25.82
0.00
0.00
3.63
0.00
48.01
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.961
0.00
0.00
19.72
14.3
17.94
Ave
9.72
-

______________________________________________________________________________________________
4. LDPE
5. PP
6. PS
7. Other Plastics
TOTAL
PLASTICS
8. Paper
9. Wood
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.000
0.011
0.113
0.558
0.000
0.011
0.101
0.480
0.00
0.00
10.62
13.98
3.16
4.800
0.463
0.075
0.463
0.000
20.510
2.70
3.505
0.379
0.074
0.450
0.000
10.579
Ave 7.56
26.98
18.14
1.33
2.81
0.00
48.42
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.531
0.000
0.000
0.442
0.00
0.00
16.76
26.84
15.43
Ave 11.44
30.00
18.13

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
2.218
3. PVC
1.161
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.003
6. PS
0.289
7. Other Plastics
0.830
TOTAL
PLASTICS
4.50
8. Paper
1.900
9. Wood
0.037
10. Glass
2.821
11. Metal
0.271
12. Electronics
0.014
13. Organic
20.020
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
[Truck No.: SEZ-647 D2]

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
1.842
16.73
1.074
7.49
0.000
0.00
0.003
0.00
0.267
7.61
0.750
9.64
3.94
1.403
0.031
2.760
0.266
0.014
10.098
Ave 5.92
26.16
16.22
2.16
1.85
0.00
49.56
0.000
0.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.000
0.000
0.435
0.000
0.000
0.357
0.00
0.00
17.93
25.5
14.93
Ave 11.39
30.00
18.87

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.021
2. HDPE
2.495
3. PVC
1.306
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.002
6. PS
0.358
7. Other Plastics
0.794
TOTAL
PLASTICS
4.98
8. Paper
3.851
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.000
11. Metal
0.000
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
19.390
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
1.783
TOTAL OTHER
PLASTICS
25.02
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00
[Truck No.: SEZ-617 D2]

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.020
4.76
2.109
15.47
1.159
11.26
0.000
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.324
9.50
0.718
9.80
4.33
2.600
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
9.872
Ave 7.26
32.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.09
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.47
Ave 8.16
16.8

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.017
2. HDPE
0.350
3. PVC
0.392
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.000
6. PS
0.023
7. Other Plastics
5.000
TOTAL
PLASTICS
5.78
8. Paper
3.455
9. Wood
0.390
10. Glass
0.000
11. Metal
0.000
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
18.942
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
1.434
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
24.22
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.016
5.88
0.292
16.57
0.353
9.95
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.021
8.70
4.135
17.30

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
3.000
3. PVC
0.714
4. LDPE
0.011
5. PP
0.019
6. PS
0.234
7. Other Plastics
3.400
TOTAL
PLASTICS
7.38
8. Paper
6.400
9. Wood
0.600

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.540
15.33
0.644
9.80
0.011
0.00
0.018
5.26
0.221
5.56
2.979
12.38
4.82
2.715
0.334
0.000
0.000
0.000
7.203
Ave 8.34
21.42
14.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
45.43
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
1.195
0.00
0.00
16.67
11.45
16.27
6.41
4.900
0.436
Ave 9.79
-
Ave 6.90
23.44
27.33

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.258
0.055
0.000
14.890
0.255
0.054
0.000
8.459
1.16
1.82
0.00
43.19
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.417
0.000
0.000
0.366
0.00
0.00
12.23
22.62
14.47
Ave 10.92
30.00
20.88

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.007
2. HDPE
4.100
3. PVC
6.000
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.000
6. PS
0.018
7. Other Plastics
0.570
TOTAL
10.70
PLASTICS
8. Paper
7.600
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.000
11. Metal
0.000
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
11.550
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.153
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
19.3
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.007
0.00
3.398
17.12
4.909
18.18
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.016
11.11
0.498
12.63
8.83
5.484
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.209
Ave 8.43
27.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
46.24
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.130
0.00
0.00
15.03
11.82
Ave 8.91
20.65

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
2.500
3. PVC
0.441
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.005
6. PS
0.093
7. Other Plastics
0.645
TOTAL
PLASTICS
3.68
8. Paper
1.500
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.780
11. Metal
0.152
12. Electronics
0.028
13. Organic
23.560
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.293
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
26.32
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.062
17.52
0.410
7.03
0.000
0.00
0.005
0.00
0.088
5.38
0.581
9.92

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
2.700
3. PVC
0.236
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.000
6. PS
0.065
7. Other Plastics
0.460
TOTAL
PLASTICS
3.46
8. Paper
15.600
9. Wood
0.162

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.201
18.48
0.210
11.02
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.061
6.15
0.389
15.43
3.15
1.204
0.000
0.760
0.144
0.026
12.320
Ave 5.69
19.73
0.00
2.56
5.26
7.14
47.71
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.251
0.00
0.00
14.33
14.71
17.86
2.86
11.301
0.133
Ave
9.67
-
Ave 7.30
27.56
17.90

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.000
0.024
0.018
10.500
0.000
0.023
0.018
5.925
0.00
4.17
0.00
43.57
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.239
0.000
0.000
0.201
0.00
0.00
15.90
26.54
17.60
Ave 10.91
30.00
20.46

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
2.300
3. PVC
0.722
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.022
6. PS
0.155
7. Other Plastics
0.430
TOTAL
3.63
PLASTICS
8. Paper
2.800
9. Wood
0.115
10. Glass
0.538
11. Metal
0.180
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
22.370
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.038
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.329
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
26.37
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
1.945
15.43
0.658
8.86
0.000
0.00
0.021
4.55
0.143
7.74
0.384
10.70
3.15
2.149
0.097
0.520
0.172
0.000
11.459
Ave 6.75
23.25
15.65
3.35
4.44
0.00
48.78
0.036
5.26
0.000
0.000
0.277
0.00
0.00
15.81
14.71
Ave 11.65
17.86

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.178
2. HDPE
2.120
3. PVC
0.603
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.027
6. PS
0.052
7. Other Plastics
3.000
TOTAL
PLASTICS
5.98
8. Paper
2.394
9. Wood
0.273
10. Glass
0.157
11. Metal
0.197
12. Electronics
0.372
13. Organic
20.040
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.124
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.465
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
24.02
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.172
3.37
1.785
15.80
0.548
9.12
0.000
0.00
0.025
7.41
0.048
7.69
2.670
11.00

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.030
2. HDPE
3.400
3. PVC
1.200
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.002
6. PS
0.800
7. Other Plastics
0.700
TOTAL
PLASTICS
6.13
8. Paper
3.800
9. Wood
0.223

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.029
3.33
2.790
17.94
1.109
7.58
0.000
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.742
7.25
0.605
13.57
5.25
1.800
0.245
0.151
0.184
0.371
11.457
Ave 7.77
24.81
10.26
3.82
6.60
0.27
42.83
0.122
1.61
0.000
0.000
0.420
0.00
0.00
9.68
14.75
Ave 9.99
20
5.28
2.752
0.182
Ave 7.10
27.58
18.39

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.226
0.247
0.027
18.730
0.222
0.239
0.027
10.451
1.77
3.24
0.00
44.23
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.619
0.000
0.000
0.524
0.00
0.00
15.35
23.87
14.40
Ave 9.22
30.00
19.68

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.063
2. HDPE
2.700
3. PVC
0.300
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.014
6. PS
0.168
7. Other Plastics
1.300
TOTAL
4.55
PLASTICS
8. Paper
4.400
9. Wood
0.217
10. Glass
0.629
11. Metal
0.552
12. Electronics
0.107
13. Organic
18.770
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.052
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.728
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
25.45
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.060
4.76
2.285
15.37
0.271
9.67
0.000
0.00
0.013
7.14
0.152
9.52
1.150
11.54
3.93
3.265
0.182
0.610
0.523
0.103
9.800
Ave 8.29
25.80
16.13
3.02
5.25
3.74
47.79
0.049
5.77
0.000
0.000
0.619
0.00
0.00
14.97
15.15
Ave 12.25
19.08

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.129
2. HDPE
3.000
3. PVC
1.700
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.048
6. PS
0.097
7. Other Plastics
1.100
TOTAL
PLASTICS
6.07
8. Paper
3.400
9. Wood
0.359
10. Glass
6.400
11. Metal
1.356
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
12.200
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.024
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.190
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
23.93
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.124
3.88
2.455
18.17
1.540
9.41
0.000
0.00
0.045
6.25
0.088
9.28
0.956
13.09

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.181
2. HDPE
4.200
3. PVC
0.700
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.026
6. PS
0.129
7. Other Plastics
1.100
TOTAL
PLASTICS
6.34
8. Paper
2.600
9. Wood
0.320
[Truck N0.: SEZ-617]

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.178
1.66
3.505
16.55
0.642
8.29
0.000
0.00
0.025
3.85
0.121
6.20
0.946
14.00
5.21
2.509
0.302
6.020
1.263
0.000
6.204
Ave 8.58
26.21
15.88
5.94
6.86
0.00
49.15
0.023
4.17
0.000
0.000
0.159
0.00
0.00
16.32
16.48
Ave 12.45
21.69
5.42
1.879
0.275
Ave 7.22
27.73
14.06

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.334
0.456
0.030
19.470
0.327
0.429
0.029
10.953
2.10
5.92
3.33
43.74
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.449
0.000
0.000
0.374
0.00
0.00
16.70
23.66
14.27
Ave 11.36
30.00
19.69

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
5.700
3. PVC
1.300
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.006
6. PS
0.214
7. Other Plastics
0.600
TOTAL
7.82
PLASTICS
8. Paper
3.040
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.756
11. Metal
0.130
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
18.000
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.013
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.238
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
22.18
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
4.653
18.37
1.161
10.69
0.000
0.00
0.006
0.00
0.204
4.67
0.538
10.33
6.56
1.954
0.000
0.752
0.122
0.000
9.693
Ave 6.29
35.72
0.00
0.53
6.15
0.00
46.15
0.012
7.69
0.000
0.000
0.210
0.00
0.00
11.76
12.74
19.30
Ave 10.8
-

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
5.800
3. PVC
0.500
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.000
6. PS
0.123
7. Other Plastics
1.100
TOTAL
PLASTICS
7.52
8. Paper
2.100
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.093
11. Metal
0.019
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
20.080
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.187
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
22.48
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
4.736
18.34
0.441
11.80
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.115
6.50
0.976
11.27

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.061
2. HDPE
3.700
3. PVC
0.700
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.018
6. PS
0.146
7. Other Plastics
1.300
TOTAL
PLASTICS
5.93
8. Paper
2.500
9. Wood
0.000

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.058
4.92
2.980
19.46
0.605
13.57
0.000
0.00
0.017
5.56
0.133
8.90
1.145
11.92
6.27
1.502
0.000
0.090
0.018
0.000
10.498
Ave 6.84
28.48
0.00
3.23
5.26
0.00
47.72
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.167
0.00
0.00
10.70
12.28
Ave 9.54
18.55
4.94
1.750
0.000
Ave 9.19
30.00
0.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.153
0.411
0.000
19.940
0.146
0.388
0.000
10.450
4.58
5.60
0.00
47.59
0.003
0.003
0.00
0.000
0.000
1.063
0.000
0.000
0.978
0.00
0.00
8.00
24.07
13.72
Ave 9.58
30.00
18.66

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.021
2. HDPE
5.500
3. PVC
0.600
4. LDPE
0.009
5. PP
0.000
6. PS
0.074
7. Other Plastics
1.900
TOTAL
8.10
PLASTICS
8. Paper
4.800
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.620
11. Metal
0.009
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
15.140
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
1.327
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
21.90
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.020
4.76
4.770
13.27
0.542
9.67
0.009
0.00
0.000
0.00
0.070
5.41
1.690
11.05
7.10
3.580
0.000
0.595
0.009
0.000
8.590
Ave 6.31
25.42
0.00
4.03
0.00
0.00
43.26
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
1.234
0.00
0.00
7.01
14.01
Ave 7.97
21.11

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
4.400
3. PVC
0.800
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.011
6. PS
0.388
7. Other Plastics
1.000
TOTAL
PLASTICS
6.60
8. Paper
7.500
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.427
11. Metal
0.152
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
14.810
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.515
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
23.40
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL
[Truck No.: SEZ-617]

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
3.737
15.07
0.726
9.25
0.000
0.00
0.011
0.00
0.368
5.15
0.880
12.00

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
2.800
3. PVC
1.138
4. LDPE
0.030
5. PP
0.013
6. PS
0.314
7. Other Plastics
2.800
TOTAL
PLASTICS
7.10
8. Paper
2.000
9. Wood
0.015

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.339
16.46
1.039
8.70
0.029
3.33
0.013
0.00
0.293
6.69
2.401
14.25
5.72
5.750
0.000
0.419
0.148
0.000
8.750
Ave 5.92
23.33
0.00
1.87
2.63
0.00
40.92
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.442
0.00
0.00
14.17
15.51
Ave 8.29
21.23
6.11
1.512
0.012
Ave 7.06
24.40
20.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
1.316
0.151
0.000
19.418
1.243
0.144
0.000
12.426
5.55
4.64
0.00
36.01
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.9
15.34
30.00
21.45

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.092
2. HDPE
5.900
3. PVC
1.200
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.020
6. PS
0.186
7. Other Plastics
0.800
TOTAL
8.20
PLASTICS
8. Paper
1.800
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.599
11. Metal
0.086
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
18.640
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.033
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.639
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
21.80
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00
Ave 9.06
-

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.090
2.17
4.992
15.39
1.137
5.25
0.000
0.00
0.019
5.00
0.166
10.75
0.692
13.50
7.10
1.357
0.000
0.570
0.081
0.000
10.875
Ave 7.44
24.61
0.00
4.84
5.81
0.00
41.66
0.030
9.09
0.000
0.000
0.570
0.00
0.00
10.80
13.48
Ave 9.68
20.58

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.018
2. HDPE
2.700
3. PVC
1.000
4. LDPE
0.008
5. PP
0.008
6. PS
0.093
7. Other Plastics
0.400
TOTAL
PLASTICS
4.23
8. Paper
8.700
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
0.937
11. Metal
0.036
12. Electronics
0.078
13. Organic
15.840
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.024
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.158
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
25.77
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.017
5.56
2.293
15.07
0.901
9.90
0.008
0.00
0.008
0.00
0.084
9.68
0.367
8.25

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.011
2. HDPE
4.400
3. PVC
1.600
4. LDPE
0.016
5. PP
0.037
6. PS
0.185
7. Other Plastics
1.800
TOTAL
PLASTICS
8.05
8. Paper
10.500
9. Wood
0.000

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.011
0.00
3.760
14.55
1.419
11.31
0.015
6.25
0.035
5.41
0.172
7.03
1.632
9.33
3.68
6.141
0.000
0.923
0.035
0.077
9.332
Ave 6.92
29.41
0.00
1.49
2.78
1.28
41.09
0.023
4.17
0.000
0.000
0.135
0.00
0.00
14.56
16.67
Ave 9.48
20.35
7.04
7.580
0.000
Ave 7.70
27.81
0.00

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.234
0.642
0.006
10.070
0.229
0.604
0.006
5.300
2.14
5.92
0.00
47.37
0.100
0.093
7.00
0.000
0.000
0.400
0.000
0.000
0.355
0.00
0.00
11.25
21.95
14.17
Ave 10.15
30.00
21.21

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.117
2. HDPE
1.100
3. PVC
0.600
4. LDPE
0.000
5. PP
0.016
6. PS
0.280
7. Other Plastics
1.100
TOTAL
3.21
PLASTICS
8. Paper
7.700
9. Wood
0.213
10. Glass
1.050
11. Metal
0.017
12. Electronics
0.005
13. Organic
17.250
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.555
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
26.79
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.112
4.27
0.935
15.00
0.554
7.67
0.000
0.00
0.015
6.25
0.254
9.29
0.921
16.27
2.79
5.655
0.186
1.016
0.016
0.005
10.154
Ave 8.39
26.56
12.68
3.24
5.88
0.00
41.14
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.477
0.00
0.00
14.05
Ave
10.355
17.51
20.3

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.015
2. HDPE
4.900
3. PVC
0.686
4. LDPE
0.013
5. PP
0.013
6. PS
0.377
7. Other Plastics
0.654
TOTAL
PLASTICS
6.66
8. Paper
6.100
9. Wood
0.065
10. Glass
0.079
11. Metal
0.081
12. Electronics
0.200
13. Organic
16.480
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.341
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
23.34
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.015
0.00
4.158
15.14
0.627
8.60
0.013
0.00
0.012
7.69
0.331
12.20
0.559
14.53

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.057
2. HDPE
3.800
3. PVC
1.100
4. LDPE
0.008
5. PP
0.045
6. PS
0.250
7. Other Plastics
1.800
TOTAL
PLASTICS
7.06
8. Paper
6.000
9. Wood
0.123

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.056
1.75
3.307
12.97
1.004
8.73
0.008
0.00
0.045
0.00
0.238
4.80
1.604
10.89
5.72
4.700
0.053
0.074
0.076
0.200
10.543
Ave 8.31
22.95
18.46
6.33
6.17
0.00
36.03
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.277
0.00
0.00
18.77
Ave
10.871
15.92
21.64
6.26
4.429
0.095
Ave 5.59
26.18
22.76

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.227
0.070
0.032
15.790
0.224
0.067
0.032
10.118
1.32
4.29
0.00
35.92
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.697
0.000
0.000
0.648
0.00
0.00
7.03
22.94
15.61
Ave 9.75
30.00

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.000
2. HDPE
3.300
3. PVC
0.660
4. LDPE
0.008
5. PP
0.009
6. PS
0.068
7. Other Plastics
1.600
TOTAL
5.65
PLASTICS
8. Paper
4.400
9. Wood
0.014
10. Glass
0.000
11. Metal
0.167
12. Electronics
0.000
13. Organic
19.400
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.376
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
24.35
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
30.00

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.000
0.00
2.865
13.18
0.610
7.58
0.008
0.00
0.009
0.00
0.065
4.41
1.429
10.69
4.99
3.131
0.010
0.000
0.160
0.000
11.906
Ave 5.12
28.84
28.57
0.00
4.19
0.00
38.63
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.352
0.00
0.00
6.39
15.56
Ave 10.66
20.55

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.039
2. HDPE
3.900
3. PVC
0.700
4. LDPE
0.045
5. PP
0.078
6. PS
0.173
7. Other Plastics
0.800
TOTAL
PLASTICS
5.74
8. Paper
3.700
9. Wood
0.000
10. Glass
1.817
11. Metal
0.735
12. Electronics
0.045
13. Organic
17.770
14. Hazardous
Waste
0.000
15. Construction
Material
0.000
16. Special Waste
0.000
17. Mixed Residue
0.200
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
24.26
OVER-ALL
30.00
TOTAL

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.037
5.13
3.411
12.54
0.632
9.71
0.043
4.44
0.074
5.13
0.159
8.09
0.690
13.75

Initial weight, kg
Types of Waste
(Unclean)
wt. w/o container
1. PET
0.068
2. HDPE
0.441
3. PVC
0.301
4. LDPE
0.020
5. PP
0.015
6. PS
0.121
7. Other Plastics
1.000
TOTAL
PLASTICS
1.97
8. Paper
1.600
9. Wood
0.055
[Truck No.: SEZ-617]

Final weight, kg
%
(Clean)
Moisture
wt. w/o container
0.067
1.47
0.364
17.46
0.268
10.96
0.020
0.00
0.015
0.00
0.110
9.09
0.859
14.10
5.05
2.797
0.000
1.746
0.712
0.045
11.264
Ave 8.40
24.41
0.00
3.91
3.13
0.00
36.61
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.179
0.00
0.00
10.50
16.74
Ave 7.86
21.79
1.70
1.168
0.046
Ave 7.58
27.00
16.36

______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Glass
11. Metal
12. Electronics
13. Organic
14. Hazardous
Waste
15. Construction
Material
16. Special Waste
17. Mixed Residue
TOTAL OTHER
WASTES
OVER-ALL
TOTAL
0.101
0.171
0.348
25.600
0.098
0.169
0.347
15.524
2.97
1.17
0.29
39.36
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.160
0.000
0.000
0.148
28.03
17.50
0.00
0.00
7.50
Ave
9.465
30.00
19.2

Waste Management Mandaue

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Waste Management Mandaue

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Introduction to Mandaue (Philippines)

Geographical Area Zoning

Socio-Economic Profile of Mandaue City 2009, CPDO

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Table 1. Land Area and Distance of Barangays, Mandaue

Land Area (has.)

Source: Socio-Economic Profile of Mandaue City 2009, City Planning &

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Figure 1. Mandaue City Zoning Map

Source: Mandaue CPDO

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Table 2. Total Population Mandaue City and Barangays as of August 1, 2007

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Socio and Seasonal Variations

Department of Tourism, Calendar of Activities 2009

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Overview of Solid Waste Generation in Mandaue City

National Capital Region (NCR)

World Bank, Philippine Environment Monitor 2001 Solid Waste, 2001.

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

City Solid Waste Profile

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization

Residential Sector - Wastes disposed by households collected and transported by private

Some limitations and difficulties

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Table 4. Sampling Schedule

Weight Master from Tinguan Enterprises is Mr. Arturo Ardo

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Actual Waste Characterization

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

See Appendix 6.4 for data capture forms

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Due to rounding, numbers may not sum exactly to totals or subtotals.

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Figure 4. Overview of Overall Waste Characterization, Mandaue City

Table 7. Result of Overall Waste Characterization, Mandaue City

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Table 8. Results of Waste Plastics Characterization, Mandaue City

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Table 9. Characterization of Overall Waste Compositions

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Figure 6. Moisture Content of Plastics and Other Wastes

Figure 7. Moisture Content Analysis of Waste Plastics

Types of Waste Plastics

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Table 12. Results for Moisture Content Analysis of Waste Plastics

Figure 8. Moisture Content Analysis of the Other Wastes Categories

Types ofWaste Plastics

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Tons, per year

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Conclusion and Recommendations

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Detailed Waste Characterization Tables and Data

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Plastic Waste Quantification and Characterization Mandaue (2009)

Table 19. Result of Wet (unclean) Waste Plastics