Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
LASMOTEKK
TM
MAZDA 3 SP 25
4 Test Run Summary
4th April - 9th April 2014
REDUCTION RUN 1
=
41.91 %
REDUCTION RUN 2
=
30.18 %
REDUCTION RUN 3
=
REDUCTION RUN 4
38.03 %
26.15 %
633km
858km
Breathe It To Believe it
Breathe It To Believe it
33.98 %
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
(I)
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
INTRODUCTORY BRIEF 1
Plasmotekk [U.F.O.] Plates (below far Right UFOMV-2) were fitted to a 2009 MAZDA 3 SP25 Vehicle
provided by OLDMAC Mazda Brisbane QLD, for the purpose of testing Dramatic Fuel Reduction of the
vehicle. While Reduction of Toxic Emissions to Zero was not a part of the test, It is a known factor
that Dramatic Fuel Reduction brings to Zero / almost Zero, Toxic Emissions by burning all usual
poisonous gases in the process of Internal Combustion within Petrol, Diesel or Gas driven engines.
I
INTRODUCTORY BRIEF 2
The Mazda Factory Fuel Consumption Specifications are displayed on a sticker on the windscreen. Re
Sample of Mazda Factory Fuel &CO2 Specs on windscreen as defined by ADR81/02:
Mazda 3SP25 Factory Fuel Mileage & CO2 Details Defined by ADR81/02
The Plasmotekk fuel consumption test was calculated with REAL LOAD and REAL ROAD
Conditions including Wind Resistance for hundreds of kilometres over 20 hours of actual Road
Driving. Plasmotekk achieved a dramatic Fuel Reduction above and beyond the Fuel
Consumption officially defined by Mazda.
Please Note: Although Emissions was not part of the Fuel Consumption Test, Windscreen
readings of 141 for CO2 are higher for any vehicle under Real Load, and Real Driving
Conditions. Plasmotekk's dramatic on road fuel reduction implies far lower CO2 and CO,
emissions including Nox, Sox NO2 & SO2 which are the most poisonous gas emissions, and the
most difficult to reduce. OLDMAC MOTORS became involved because the Level of Dramatic
Fuel and Toxic Emissions Reduction defined in other Plasmotekk applications was Unique to
Plasmotekk, formalised in other reports of the last 25 years including the California Clean
Airboard / ETS report sigged off by Charles F Sanders a world authority on emission. Oldmac
wanted to establish fuel reduction and investigate Zero Toxic Emissions at a later stage.
INTRODUCTORY BRIEF 4
(i)
.
.
.
(ii)
.
The method by which the Dramatic Fuel Reduction Test was conducted was simply to look at
Comparison of the Fuel Consumption Before the vehicle was Driven with no Device fitted,
and the Fuel Consumption After the Nano Plate Device was fitted to the Mazda vehicles along
the same routes for the same distances, and same times of day.
Mazda vehicles also Engaged the Air Conditioning of the Vehicle at ALL TIMES during the
Before & After Testing periods, and same 2 people with same weight conducted all tests.
The Following tabulation documents the method by which Before and After 4 Comparative
Fuel Consumption Rate Tests of the Mazda 3 SP25 were recorded and collated.
The Method by which all work was recorded were in the 3 Parts shown below
?
?
?
PART A: Method By which the Before Tests were Conducted / 4 Runs Without [U.F.O] Plates
PART B: Method By which the After Tests were Conducted / 4 Runs With [U.F.O] Plates
PART C: Method By which the Comparative Results of Before & After were Tabled in
Field Data 4 Test Run Table on Pge: 4
P2
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
PLASMOTEKK
TM
Registration No
Tank Size
55 Litres
Fuel Type
Petrol
Engine / Transmission
Diesel
Gas
Electric Hybrid
From
:
To
:
Back To :
NERANG
BRISBANE
NERANG
Date :
Time :
From
:
To
:
Back To :
NERANG
BALLINA
NERANG
Date :
Time :
From
:
To
:
Back To :
NERANG
BRISBANE
NERANG
Date :
Time :
From
:
To
:
Back To :
NERANG
BALLINA
NERANG
Date :
Time :
33.98 %
FINAL AVERAGE
REDUCTION
P3
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
TM
Manufacturers Tank
Range:
% REDUCTION OF
SINGLE & TOTAL
AVERAGE
CALCULATIONS
Outside Temp:
3.35 L/100
7.99 L/100
[Delta]
41.927 %
[% Multiplier]
[Ratio]
[Comparative]
REDUCTION RUN 1
= 0.41927
x 100%
_=..
[After]
[Before]
30.183 %
REDUCTION RUN 2
[% Multiplier]
[Ratio]
= 0.30183
x 100%
_=..
_
_
7.99 L/100
4.64 L/100
_
_
1,034 km
5.32 L/100
L per 100 KM %
_
_
1,186.3 km 720.8
7.62 L/100
L per 100 KM %
_
_
688.5 km
4.64 L/100
L per 100 KM
7.99 L/100
KM per L
13.09 L
19.18 L
6.76 L
246.2 km
Date:
8 / 4 / 2014
Time:
1:34PM
11.28 L
TOTAL Distance:
247.1 km
Date:
4 / 4 / 2014
Time:
11:16AM
AFTER
Date:
8 / 4 / 2014
Time:
11:06AM
Date:
4 / 4 / 2014
Time:
9:02AM
BEFORE
RUN: 2
145.8 km
AFTER
BEFORE
RUN: 1
141.2 km
Field Data
4 TEST RUN
COMPARISON TABLE
PLASMOTEKK
P4
7.27 L
141.3 km
Date:
9 / 4 / 2014
Time:
9:03AM
AFTER
21.41 L
246.6 km
Date:
7 / 4 / 2014
Time:
2:58PM
BEFORE
15.77 L
246 km
Date:
9 / 4 / 2014
Time:
11:24AM
AFTER
RUN: 4
_
_
1.069 km
5.15 L/100
3.16 L/100
8.31 L/100
38.026 %
[% Multiplier]
[Ratio]
[Comparative]
[Delta]
[After]
[Before]
REDUCTION RUN 3
= 0.38026
x 100%
_=..
8.31 L/100
5.15 L/100
L per 100 KM %
_
_
661.5 km
8.31 L/100
_
_
858 km
6.41 L/100
2.27 L/100
8.68 L/100
26.152 %
[% Multiplier]
[Ratio]
[Comparative]
[Delta]
[After]
[Before]
REDUCTION RUN 4
= 0.26152
x 100%
_=..
8.68 L/100
6.41 L/100
L per 100 KM %
_
_
633.5 km
8.68 L/100
11.74 L
141.2 km
Date:
7 / 4 / 2014
Time:
11:41
BEFORE
RUN: 3
= 10.722
42.89 Total L / 4
km
= 194.825
2.77 L/100
8.15 L/100
[% Multiplier]
[Ratio]
[Comparative]
[Delta]
[After]
[Before]
TOTAL AVERAGE
REDUCTION
OF 4 RUNS
33.987 %
= 0.33987
x 100%
_=..
8.15 L/100
5.38 L/100
_
_
L per 100 KM %
_
_
km
4147.3 Total R / 4
= 1036.82
km
2704.3 Total R / 4
_
_
= 676.07
_
_
L / 100
= 8.15
L / 100
75.42 Tot km / L / 4
48.95 Tot km / L / 4
= 12.237
_ _
km/L 18.855 km/L
_ _
= 15.90
63.61 Total L / 4
km
776.1 Total KM / 4
= 194.024
779.3 Total KM / 4
SUM
TOTAL
AFTER
SUM
TOTAL
BEFORE
AVERAGE TOTALS
PLASMOTEKK
TM
11.28 Litres
PLASMOTEKK
PHYSICAL DATA
3
4
141.20 km
TM
REDUCTION RUN 1
=
41.91 %
145.80 km
6.76 Litres
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
PLASMOTEKK
TM
19.18 Litres
PLASMOTEKK
PHYSICAL DATA
3
4
247.10 km
TM
REDUCTION RUN 2
=
30.18 %
246.20 km
13.09 Litres
**
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
PLASMOTEKK
TM
141.20 km
11.74 Litres
PLASMOTEKK
PHYSICAL DATA
TM
7.27 Litres
38.03 %
141.3 km
REDUCTION RUN 3
**
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
PLASMOTEKK
TM
246.60 km
21.41 Litres
PLASMOTEKK
PHYSICAL DATA
TM
REDUCTION RUN 4
=
26.15 %
246.00 km
15.77 Litres
**
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
P9
41.927 %
30.183 %
38.026 %
26.152 %
11:30am
To 4:00PM
9/4/2104
REDUCTION RUN 4
REDUCTION RUN 3
REDUCTION RUN 2
REDUCTION RUN 1
4 Run Test
TM
Points Of Note:
AFTER
Points Of Note:
Use Over If No Space
BEFORE
Points Of Note:
Use Over If No Space
Red Outlines show time of RUN 4 with Maximum wind gusts for the day from
Nerang To Ballina 9th April 2014 producing lowest % Reduction of the 4 Run Test
PLASMOTEKK
Installation Of Plasmotekk
b)
Press case firmly into position and cover the assembly with the boot mat or carpet and the
installation of your PlasmoTekk Car Plate is now complete, ready to provide a lifetime of greater Fuel
Efficiency & Zero Toxic Emission Free motoring.
2.
Please Note:: Once Plates are correctly positioned in the vehicle, start and REV the stationary
vehicle to between 2,000 and 2,500 RPM for 30 seconds. Lift foot off accelerator and repeat process
2 more times or until a change in Engine Tone is heard. This Process Tunes PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.]
Plates to the Engine. (see REV meter below)
Now your vehicle is ready to use and test PLASMOTEKK [U.F.O.] Technology
P 10
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
INITIAL TANK FILL: Fill tank Slowly to capacity. Once pump handle has stopped, continue to
fill tank slowly. When pump clicks/stops a number of times, rock the vehicle a number of
times to let air out, and fill tank until Fuel is Visible in Aperture. Enter Initial Odometer
Reading Above. Begin Run.
FINAL TANK FILL: Return to same Fuel Bowser of Fuel Station and Repeat a) Exactly.
Enter Final Odometer Reading & Litres Of Fuel Used Above.
P 11
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
PLASMOTEKK EMISSION
REDUCTION STATISTICS
Note: BASES ON 20,000 KM / YEAR: 1 KILOGRAM OF PLASMOTEKK CAN PREVENT:
- 4 Tons of Poisonous Carbon Monoxide (CO) from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even more Poisonous NoX from going into the Atmosphere.
- 1 Ton of even greater Poisonous SoX from going into the Atmosphere.
NB: Only CO2 can be absorbed by Forests. NoX and SoX have been exponentially building up
.
in the the Atmosphere since the development of the Internal Combustion Engine almost a
.
100 years ago.
PLASMOTEKK
LASMOTEKK
TM
P 12
DATA INPUT AND TESTING METHOD FOR DERIVATION OF BEFORE AND AFTER FUEL CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVES
PPLASM
LASMOTEKK OTEKK
TM
Breathe It To Believe it
Breathe It To Believe it
Zero Toxic Emissions
TM