Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ABSTRACT:
Use of composite materials in the deep sea oil production riser
systems may allow a dramatic decrease in weight, as well as
improved fatigue resistance to loads induced by environmental
conditions. Many concepts have been developed by the
industry and could be available in the next years. However, the
cost of composite components will always be higher than the
one of steel components, and only significant advantages for
particular applications will justify their use by the industry.
Up to now, cost comparisons have been made essentially for
TLP or SPAR riser systems. This paper presents a study that
has been carried out to compare steel and composite riser
solutions for catenary risers, submerged export lines, and
hybrid riser towers in ultra deep water. Specifications were
first proposed, following which steel and composite solutions
were designed and compared. This was done both from the
feasibility point of view as well as from consideration of the
operational advantages resulting from the lightweight and the
fatigue resistance of the composite. Acceptable costs of
composite risers were then deduced.
The main conclusions are that in the mild conditions of the
Gulf of Guinea or of Brazil, both steel and composite solutions
are technically feasible, although steel solutions come close to
their limits. Composite riser joints fabricated in moderately
long lengths seem to be the most interesting solution for
transportation and laying purposes. Large cost advantages may
be obtained, particularly during the laying phase, which can
justify using the composite solution.
INTRODUCTION:
During the nineties, the oil industry proceeded to exploit
offshore fields in 1000 metres water depths and beyond. This
has been done generally by simple extrapolation of existing
architectural floating concepts, such as TLPs and FPSOs, or
by using new ones such as SPAR systems. A significant new
development has been the introduction of Steel Catenary
Risers. Also the exploitation of new lightweight materials has
begun with the introduction of the first mooring systems made
out of polyester ropes. New problems have also arisen such as
the necessity for significant thermal insulation of pipes.
With increasing water depth, and particularly in Ultra Deep
Water (between 2000 - 3000 m), the need to decrease the
weight of the risers and mooring lines will become stronger.
The introduction of lightweight materials may become the best
economic option, or possibly the only technically available
option. Among such materials, high strength composites have
been the subject of intensive industrial research and may
become commercially available for operational purposes in the
present decade.
Up to now attention has been generally focused on weight
sensitive floating systems, such as TLPs, on which the balance
of weight and the advantages induced can be easily deduced.
The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the
technical and economic interest of other pipe systems, such as
catenary risers, export lines, or hybrid towers, where the
balance of weight is only part of the interest, and where steel
solutions have run into barriers including fatigue behaviour,
stiffness, installation loads, thermal insulation, etc. The study
was carried out by IFP on behalf of the CLAROM association.
IFP dimensioned the composite pipes and calculated their
behaviour, while the three offshore contractors calculated the
equivalent behaviour of the steel alternatives. They also
evaluated the installation methods, and the cost difference by
which the composite solutions will have to be justified.
CATENARY WATER INJECTION PIPE:
Catenary risers would appear to be good candidates for
composite applications since composite materials have
excellent qualities of lightness and fatigue resistance. A water
OTC 14017
Composite pipe:
The design of the composite pipe is more complex than the
steel one, due to the anisotropy of the basic material.
However, the empty pipe being naturally buoyant, and its
weight full of water remaining very low, it can be laid full of
water. So there is no requirement for the composite pipe to
resist collapse pressure. Because of its low apparent weight,
the composite pipe is only subject to very small loads, which
leads theoretically to a very thin wall thickness requirement.
Hence the pipe has to be designed on robustness criteria, in
order to be able to withstand shocks and handling loads. To
make the pipe robust two versions were studied with overall
wall thickness of 10 mm and 20 mm respectively.
Four designs were proposed and analyzed (see Table 1), in
which carbon fibers are used to resist structural loads, and
glass is used to increase wall thickness to make the pipe
robust. These designs have been chosen for the following
reasons. Two of them (C10 and C20) have the minimum
thickness of carbon fibers required to withstand the loads, the
remaining thickness being made up of glass fibers in order to
give total thickness of 10 and 20 mm respectively. The two
others (C10 and C20) are made mainly out of carbon fibers,
leading to higher axial stiffness.
The four structures were analyzed and the stresses induced in
the three cases (near, mean, and far positions) were found fully
acceptable.
Dynamic and fatigue verifications:
Steel pipe:
Brazil case:
23.8 mm
13.8 mm
1500 N / m
900 N / m
4500 MN
OTC 14017
OTC 14017
60/20
6.5 mm
55
13.5 mm
11 GPa
160 N/m
440 N/m
2100 m
22
2 MPa
The line is always filled with water or treated oil (density 0.8);
no corrosion thickness was required.
OTC 14017
Environmental specifications:
The FPSO is considered as fixed. The buoy is located at a
nominal distance of 1850 m of the FPSO, making an angle of
64 with the axis of the vessel. The movements of the buoy are
described by RAOs. The environmental data (centenary wave
and sea state scatter diagram) correspond to the Gulf
of Guinea.
Steel pipe design and analysis:
The steel pipe design was following:
Nominal diameter:
Steel grade:
Yield limit:
Wall thickness:
Apparent weight full of water:
Apparent weight full of oil:
22, 559 mm
API 5L X 65
450 MPa
25 mm
2850 N / m
2450 N / m
OTC 14017
Core pipe:
The core pipe has to be designed for a 1000 T tension.
Specifications:
The water depth considered is of 2500 m.
Production risers:
Internal diameter:
Maximum service pressure, sea floor :
Normal fluid density:
Service temperature:
103/4, 273 mm
35 MPa
0.8 T/m3
40C
24 / 76
19 mm
0.55
180 N/m
- 290 N/m
1 030 MN
8.3 MN.m2
41 MPa
-0.05.10-6
10.7 m
Fibres orientation:
Wall thickness:
Poissons ratio:
Apparent weight, full of oil:
Apparent weight, empty:
Tensile stiffness:
Bending stiffness:
Collapse pressure:
Thermal elongation:
Critical buckling length:
Wall thickness:
Apparent weight, full of oil:
Apparent weight, empty:
Total weight, full of oil:
Composite pipe
Steel pipe
19 mm
180 N/m
- 290 N/m
45 T
15 mm
758 N/m
290 N/m
190 T
OTC 14017
Thermal aspect:
The case of the hybrid tower has only been studied from a
technical point of view. Composite production risers lead
to large weight savings. However their negative apparent
weight, when full of gas, will induce compressive loads,
needing stiffness or additional weight to keep from
longitudinal buckling. The thermal properties of the
composite materials have not been found to be a
significant advantage, because of their low thermal
capacity. An interesting application of composites could
be to replace the central core pipe by carbon tendons in
very deep water.
OTC 14017
6.
Acknowledgements:
The authors are grateful to all those who participated in the
study and in particular C.P.Sparks from IFP, E.Coche from
Bouygues Offshore, and T.de.Kerdanet from Paragon Litwin.
REFERENCES:
1.
TABLES
DESIGN:
Carbon fibers (, th):
Glass fibers (, th):
Axial stiffness (MN):
Apparent weight (N/m):
C10
C10
C20
C20
90/10, 1.9 mm
55, 8.1 mm
175
95
90/10, 8 mm
10, 2 mm
1020
63
60/20, 2.6 mm
55, 17.4 mm
175
187
90/10, 16 mm
10, 4 mm
2040
118
COMPOSITE SOLUTION
Flowline connector
Flexjoint
Flowline connector
Flexjoint
20%
Raising of flowline
Riser to flowline connection
Riser laying
Riser transfer to the FPSO
10%
Towing
Riser to flowline connection
Riser transfer to the FPSO
80%
20%
Connections:
Cost (*) :
Offshore operations:
Cost (*):
(*): Cost given as a percentage of the steel solution
Table 2: catenary water injection steel and composite version laying operation costs.
OTC 14017
Fibres orientation:
Glass composite wall thickness:
Apparent weight full of water:
Apparent weight full of oil:
Axial modulus:
Design 1
Design 2
+/- 55
34 mm
580 N/m
160 N/m
58 MN(*)
Steel
Composite
Foam
470 J / kg. K
45 W / m. K
7850 kg / m3
900 J / kg. K
0.5 W / m. K
1500 kg / m3
1400 J / kg. K
0.17 W / m. K
850 kg / m3
FIGURES
10
OTC 14017