Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Discussion
Insolvency proceedings are the statutory procedures by which a debtor
obtains financial relief and undergoes judicially supervised reorganization or
liquidation of its assets for the benefit of its creditors. 3
Under the FRIA, insolvent shall refer to the financial condition of a debtor
that is generally unable to pay its or his liabilities as they fall due in the ordinary course
of business (illiquidity or equity insolvency) or has liabilities that are greater than its
or his assets (balance-sheet insolvency).4
The FRIA provides for 3 insolvency proceedings, namely, suspension of
payments, rehabilitation and liquidation, to encourage debtors and creditors to
collectively resolve their competing claims.
For individual debtors, they can only avail of either suspension of
payments, if they are insolvent under the illiquidity concept, or they can file for
liquidation if they are insolvent under the balance sheet concept.
Suspension of Payments is a judicial insolvency proceeding by which an
individual debtor submits, for approval by his creditors, a proposed agreement
containing propositions delaying or extending the time of payment of his debts.
It may not be availed of by partnerships and corporations. 5 It is also unavailable
to non-resident citizens and aliens.6
3 Gomez-Somera, S. (2011). Credit Transactions: Notes and Cases, Vol. II, p. 793 citing Blacks Law Dictionary,
Ninth Edition (2009).
6 Section 4 (o) of the FRIA defines an individual debtor as a natural person who is a resident and citizen of
the Philippines that has become insolvent.
7 Gomez-Somera, S. (2011). Credit Transactions: Notes and Cases, Vol. II, p. 1002-1003.
(l) That for a period of thirty (30) days, he has failed, after demand, to pay any
moneys deposited with him or received by him in a fiduciary; and
(m) That an execution having been issued against him on final judgment for
money, he shall have been found to be without sufficient property subject to
execution to satisfy the judgment.
The petitioning creditor/s shall post a bond in such as the court shall direct,
conditioned that if the petition for liquidation is dismissed by the court, or
withdrawn by the petitioner, or if the debtor shall not be declared an insolvent
the petitioners will pay to the debtor all costs, expenses, damages occasioned by
the proceedings and attorney's fees.
first
kind
of
rehabilitation
proceeding
is
court-supervised
When Initiated
Sole proprietorship
Partnership
Corporation
The petition shall be verified to establish the insolvency of the debtor and
the viability of its rehabilitation and include, whether as an attachment or as part
of the body of the petition, as a minimum the following:
(a) Identification of the debtor, its principal activities and its addresses;
(b) Statement of the fact of and the cause of the debtor's insolvency or inability to
pay its obligations as they become due;
In all cases, the petition must allege that rehabilitation of the insolvent
debtor is economically feasible and rehabilitation results in better present value
recovery for the creditors.
On
the
other
hand,
involuntary
proceedings
for
court-supervised
12 Ibid.
(b) a creditor, other than the petitioner/s, has initiated foreclosure proceedings
against the debtor that will prevent the debtor from paying its debts as they
become due or will render it insolvent.
The
second
kind
of
rehabilitation
proceeding
is
pre-negotiated
(d) a summary of disputed claims against the debtor and a report on the
provisioning of funds to account for appropriate payments should any such
claims be ruled valid or their amounts adjusted.15
15 Ibid.
16 Gomez-Somera, S. (2011). Credit Transactions: Notes and Cases, Vol. II, p. 983-984. An Out-of-Court or
Informal Rehabilitation Plan is a consensual contract between an insolvent debtor and its creditors that amends
or modifies the terms of the claims against the debtor.
period does not exceed one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of
effectivity.17
Aside from rehabilitation, a sole proprietorship, a partnership and a
corporation may also avail of liquidation. The juridical debtor must be insolvent
either under the illiquidity or equity concept or balance sheet concept. In every
case, the rehabilitation of the juridical debtor should not be economically feasible
or does not result in better present value recovery for the creditors. As previously
mentioned, the purpose of liquidation is to reduce the debtors assets to cash,
discharging its liabilities and dividing the surplus or re-allocating the loss.
In the case of Philippine Veterans Bank Employees Union-NUBE v. Vega,18 the
Supreme Court distinguished liquidation from rehabilitation. In that case, the
court stated:
Liquidation, in corporation law, connotes a winding up or settling with creditors
and debtors. It is the winding up of a corporation so that assets are distributed to
those entitled to receive them. It is the process of reducing assets to cash,
discharging liabilities and dividing surplus or loss.
On the opposite end of the spectrum is rehabilitation which connotes a
reopening or reorganization. Rehabilitation contemplates a continuance of
corporate life and activities in an effort to restore and reinstate the corporation to
its former position of successful operation and solvency.
It is crystal clear that the concept of liquidation is diametrically opposed or
contrary to the concept of rehabilitation, such that both cannot be undertaken at
the same time. (Citations omitted)
The difference between the 2 proceedings was also highlighted in the case of BPI
v. Sarabia Manor Hotel Corp.19 where the Supreme Court, citing Wonder Book
Corporation v. Philippine Bank of Communications, explained that:
17 Sec. 85, FRIA.
18 G.R. No. 105364, June 28, 2001. While the case was decided before the FRIA took effect, the distinction
between liquidation and rehabilitation is still applicable under the said Act.