Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Nomenclature
ACE = Area Control Error
AGC = Automatic generation control
Bi = Frequency bias constant
Di = PDi / fi = Load frequency constant
f = Nominal System frequency
Hi = Inertia constant
i = Subscript referring to area (i = 1, 2)
Kpi = 1/Di = Gain of power system
Pri = Rated Power (a12 = Pr1 / Pr2)
Ri = Speed regulation parameter
T12 = Synchronizing Coefficient
Tg = Steam governor time constant
Kr = Steam turbine reheat constant
Tr = Steam turbine reheat time constant
Tt = Steam turbine time constant
Tpi = 2Hi /f*Di =Time constant of power system
Ptie = Incremental change in tie-line power
fi = Incremental frequency deviation
PGi = Incremental generation change
XEi = Incremental change in governor valve position
PDi = Incremental load change
Abstract This paper aims to investigate the application of
biogeography based optimization (BBO) technique to load
frequency control (LFC) problem for improving power system
dynamics with governor dead band and boiler dynamics type of
nonlinearities. Two-area all thermal types interconnected power
system network is considered for design and analysis purpose.
The thermal areas are equipped with single and double reheat
turbine, simultaneously. The designed problem is considered as
an optimization problem and BBO algorithm is applied to search
optimal gains of classical PID-controller which is used in AGC
problem. The behavior of the test system is also investigated with
the analysis towards the different cost functions such as integral
square error (ISE) and integral time absolute error (ITAE).
Small load perturbation (SLP) is considered in area-1 for
studying the dynamic behaviors of the designed power system
unit. To validate the effectiveness and superiority of proposed
controller, the performances are compared with the results
obtained by differential evaluation (DE) and particle swarm
optimization (PSO) techniques. Simulation study exhibits
significant effect of the designed controller on the dynamics of
concerned power system network.
Index Terms Automatic generation control, Area control
error, Dead-band, Boiler dynamics, Integral square error,
Integral time absolute error, Biogeography based optimization
Subrata Banerjee
Professor, EE Department
NIT-Durgapur, Durgapur
West Bengal, India
bansub2004@yahoo.com
I. INTRODUCTION
GPS =
K PS
1 + sTPS
(3)
KPS and TPS are gain and time constant of power system unit
respectively.
1 1 + sK r Tr
(4)
Gt =
1 + sTt 1 + sTr
Gt =
(5)
[(B f ) + (P ) ].T
JITAE =
i =1
N
( f
i =1
tie
+ Ptie ).t.T
(6)
(7)
Fig. 1(a): Block diagram of two-area all thermal power system network with governor dead band and boiler dynamics
Initialize random
set of habitats
Compute and
for each habitat
based on HIS (old)
Ds
Migration
Recomputed HSI
value (new)
if
new > old
(9)
1 + TF s
K2
0.095
K3
0.92
CB
200
TD
40
TIB
90
KIB
0.02
TF
25
Mutation
No
yes
TRB
69
Stop
k = I (1 k )
(11)
0.15
Fitness value
(10)
0.145
0.14
0.135
0.13
0.125
0
20
40
60
Number of Generation
80
100
5.6
x 10
-5
5.4
5.2
5
Fitness value
k
n
0.155
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
4
3.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
Number of Generation
Fig. 1(d): Convergence curve of BBO algorithm using ISE criterion
x 10
-3
0
frequency deviation (Hz)
k = E
0.16
-5
single-stage turbine
two-stage turbine
-10
-15
-20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
time in sec
Fig.2: Frequency error without any constraint using ITAE criterion
Ki1
1.9993
1.9998
Ki1
1.99
1.9946
Ki1
1.977
1.999
Kd2
1.9992
0.3097
Kd2
1.9998
0.4863
Kd2
0.0034
1.5106
Objective
function (J)
2.172x105
0.1771
Objective
function (J)
3.764x105
0.2420
Objective
function (J)
1.7383x105
0.0961
x 10
-3
0.005
0
-2
two-stage turbine
single-stage turbine
-4
-6
0
Area-1
Area-2
-0.005
-0.01
-0.015
-8
-0.02
-10
-12
0
-0.025
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
time in sec
Fig.6: Frequency error with two-stage and DB using ITAE criterion
15
20
25
30
time in sec
Fig.3: Frequency error without any constraint using ISE criterion
x 10
10
-6
single-stage turbine
two-stage turbine
1
0.5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2.5
0
15
20
25
30
time in sec
Fig.4: Tie-line power error without any constraint using ISE criterion
x 10
10
single-stage
two-stage
-2
-3
-4
-6
0
-3
5
10
15
20
25
30
time in sec
Fig.7: Tie-line power error with DB using ITAE criterion
x 10
-3
-2
single-stage turbine
two-stage turbine
-4
-6
-8
0
Frequency deviation (Hz)
-1
-5
-2
-6
1.5
x 10
-2
-4
Area-1
Area-2
-6
-8
-10
-12
-10
-14
-12
-14
0
-16
0
10
15
20
25
30
time in sec
Fig.5: Frequency error with DB only using ISE criterion
5
10
15
20
25
30
time in sec
Fig.8: Frequency error with two-stage, DB and Boiler Dynamics
using ITAE criterion
Table-III: Transient performance specifications of two-area all thermal systems (OS = Overshoot, ST = Settling time)
Single-stage reheat type steam turbine
Double stage reheat type steam turbine
Deviation of frequency
Without any physical constraints
Deviation of frequency
Without any physical constraints
and tie-line power
and tie-line power
f1
f2
Ptie
f1
f2
Ptie
Performance indices
OS
ST
OS
ST
OS
ST
Performance indices
OS
ST
OS
ST
OS
ISE
0.0016 8.59 0.0013 13.69 2.19x10-4 16.76
ISE
1.149x104 9.21 1.149x104 9.21 1.128x107
ITAE
0.0015 7.84 9.57x10-4 9.73
1.79x10-4 14.23
ITAE
1.148x104 4.895 1.148x104 4.887 9.002x106
Deviation of frequency
With DB non-linearity
Deviation of frequency
With DB non-linearity
and tie-line power
and tie-line power
f1
f2
Ptie
f1
f2
Ptie
Performance indices
OS
ST
OS
ST
OS
ST
Performance indices
OS
ST
OS
ST
OS
ISE
0.0029 13.32 0.0029 13.32 9.038x107 19.38
ISE
7.26x104 3.24 7.15x105 7.28 2.96x105
ITAE
0.0027 10.85 0.0029 11.205 1.761x104 6.719
ITAE
1.501x104 6.25 1.499x104 4.139 0.0017
Deviation of frequency
With DB and boiler dynamics
Deviation of frequency
With DB and boiler dynamics
and tie-line power
and tie-line power
f1
f2
Ptie
f1
f2
Ptie
Performance indices
OS
ST
OS
ST
OS
ST
Performance indices
OS
ST
OS
ST
OS
ISE
0.0018 11.92 0.0017 12.96 1.264x104 8.979
ISE
4.23 x 10 - 5 3.307 4.123x10-5 10.42 1.919x105
ITAE
0.0061 11.16 0.0041 11.86 9.105x104 11.48
ITAE
1.541x10-4 1.128 4.774x10-5 3.378 1.837x10-5
ST
14.24
5.695
ST
26.4
3.838
ST
12.86
10.78
0.2
0.1
Area-1
Area-2
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
time in sec
Fig.9: Frequency deviation with DB and Boiler dynamics using ISE criterion
0.01
0.005
Area-1
Area-2
0
-0.005
-0.01
-0.015
-0.02
-0.025
0
10
20
30
time in sec
40
50
Fig.10: Frequency error with DB and Boiler dynamics using ITAE criterion
f1
OS
ST
0.0194 12.97
0.0167 12.95
0.0016 8.59
0.0015 7.84
f2
OS
0.0136
0.0110
0.0013
9.57x10-4
Ptie
ST
OS
ST
15.67 0.0037 15.92
15.32 0.0029 15.75
13.69 2.19x10-4 16.76
9.73 1.79x10-4 14.23
0.005
-0.005
BBO-ITAE
BBO-ISE
PSO
DE
-0.01
-0.015
-0.02
-0.025
0
10
15
20
25
time in sec
Fig.11: Comparative frequency responses in area-1 with GDB
30
VIII. CONCLUSION
This study presents the design and analysis of BBO optimized
PID-controller for AGC of an interconnected two-area thermal
power system with governor dead band non-linearity. ISE and
ITAE criterion are presented in this paper in order to minimize
the performance indices under different operating conditions.
Simulink results shows that double stage reheat turbine with
optimized controller by ITAE criterion gives better results
compare to others. Finally, the study is extended to a realistic
REFERENCES
[1] A. Khodabakhshian et. al., A new PID controller design for automatic
generation control for hydro power plant, Electrical power systems and
research, 32, 2010: 375-382.
[2] Thomas E Bechert et. al., Area automatic generation control by
multipass dynamic programming, IEEE Trans. on power apparatus and
systems, vol. PAS-96, No. 5, September/October 1977: 1460-1469.
[3] Y.L.Karnavas et. al., AGC for autonomous power system using
combined intelligent techniques, Electrical power systems and research,
62(3), 2002: 225-239.
[4] Ranjit Roy et. al., Evolutionary computation based three area AGC,
Expert systems with applications, 37, 2010: 5913-5924.
[5] Rishabh Verma et. al., Fuzzy gain scheduled AGC of two-area multi
unit power system, IEEE trans. on power system, 2013.
[6] Padmaghanda Mishra et. al., Multilayer perception neural network
controller for AGC of multi-area thermal power system, North
American Power Symposium (NAPS), 4-6 August 2011: 1-7.
[7] Swasti R. Khuntia et. al., A novel approach for AGC of a multi-area
power system, IEEECCECE 2011, 8-11 May 2011:001182-001187.
[8] Swasti R. Khuntia et. al., Simulation study for AGC of a multi-area
power system by ANFIS approach, Applied soft computing, 12, 2012:
333-341.
[9] Wan-Chun Chan et. al., Automatic generation control of interconnected
power systems using variable-structure controllers IEEPROC, Vol. 128,
Pt. C, No. 5, September 1981: 269-279.
[10] M. Ouassaid et. al., Observer-based nonlinear control of power system
using sliding mode control strategy, Electrical power systems and
research, 84(1), 2012: 135-143.
[11] M.I.R Sheikh et. al., Application of self-tuning FPIC to AGC for load
frequency control in a multi-area power system, 2009 IEEE Bucharest
Power Tech Conference, June 28th - July 2nd, 2009: 1-7.
[12] K. Vrdoljak et. al., Sliding mode based load-frequency control in power
systems, Electrical power systems and research, 80(5), 2010: 514-527.
[13] Z. Al-Hamouz et. al., Optimal design of a sliding mode AGC controller:
Application to a nonlinear interconnected model Electrical power
systems and research, 81(7), 2011: 1403-1409.
[14] Ibraheem et. al., Recent philosophies of AGC strategies in power
system, IEEE Trans. power system, 20(1), 2005: 346-357.
[15] IEEE Recommended Definitions of Terms for Automatic Generation
Control on Electric Power Systems, September 1991: 1-10.
[16] J.Nanda et. al., Some new findings on AGC of an interconnected hydrothermal system with conventional controllers, IEEE Trans. energy
conversion, 21(1), March 2006: 187-194.
[17] Umesh Kumar Rout et. al., Design and analysis of differential evolution
algorithm based automatic generation control for interconnected power
system, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 4(3), 2013: 409-421.
[18] Subhojit Malik et. al., Survey on biogeography based optimization
algorithm and application of biogeography based optimization to
determine parameters of PID controller, IJARCCE, 3(2), 2014:5625-29.
[19] Tripathy et. al., Effect of superconducting magnetic energy storage on
automatic generation control considering governor dead-band and boiler
dynamics, IEEE Trans. on power systems, 7(3), 1992: 1266-1273.
[20] Haiping Ma et. al., An analysis of the equilibrium of migration models
for BBO, Information Science, 180(18), 2010: 3444-3464.
[21] Wenyin Gong et. al., A real-coded BBO with mutation, Applied
mathematics and computation, 216(9), 2010: 2749-2758.
[22] Itishree Ghatuari et. al., Performance analysis of AGC of a two-area
interconnected thermal system with non-linear governor using PSO and
DE algorithm, 2013 International conference on Energy Efficient
Technology for Sustainability, 10-12 April, 2013: 1262-1266.
APPENDIX-1
Pr1 = Pr2 = 2000MW, f = 60 Hz, B1 = B2 = 0.425 p.u MW/Hz, R1 = R2 = 2.4
Hz/p.u MW, Tsg = 0.08 sec, Tt1 = Tt2 = 0.3 sec, Tps1 = Tps2 = 120 sec,
Kps1 = Kps2 = 20, Kr1 = Kr2 = 0.5, Tr1 = Tr2 = 10 sec, T12 = 0.0866 p.u., a12 = 1.