Sunteți pe pagina 1din 63

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUANTITATIVE METHODS
WORKBOOK
WORKBOOK
ENRICHMENT EXERCISES
WITH SOLUTIONS

Page 1

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

Page 2

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION

TOPIC

PAGE NO

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

BASIC PROBAIBLITY

13

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS

19

HYPOTHESIS TESTING

25

LINEAR REGRESSION AND CORRELATION

32

TIME SERIES AND FORECASTING

39

DECISION ANALYSIS

49

APPENDIX 1

FORMULAE

55

APPENDIX 2

TABLES

58

Page 3

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SECTION A

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Page 4

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 1
The monthly fuel bills (in $) of a random sample of 50 motorists in a certain city in the US, who commute to work daily
by car, was recorded in a recent survey. The data is presented in the table below.
289
350
510
285
256
365
394
425
350
390

278
560
350
614
400
368
294
533
646
486

616
262
446
364
386
512
444
275
346
318

295
265
495
285
400
288
460
293
668
378

662
602
548
356
528
636
414
385
544
335

1.1 Define the random variable and its data type.


1.2 Display the data as a less-than cumulative frequency distribution using seven classes of equal width.
1.3 Calculate the mean, median, mode and standard deviation of the grouped data.
Interpret the meaning of the standard deviation with reference to the above data.
1.4 Represent the grouped data using the following graphical forms.
1.4.1 Histogram.
1.4.2 Frequency polygon.
1.4.3 Less-than ogive.
1.5 Use the ogive to determine:
1.5.1 The 80th percentile
1.5.2 The interquartile range.
1.6 Calculate the coefficient of variation for monthly fuel bills. Comment on the value obtained.
1.7 Assume that the cost of fuel is $2 per litre and that there are 25000 motorists who commute to work daily from
this city. Estimate the most likely amount of fuel used by all car commuters in a month.

Page 5

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 2
The table below gives the number of kilolitres of water used in a certain month by 50 randomly selected residents of
a small town.
17

11

20

13

21

22

13

22

17

21

21

15

19

15

23

20

20

18

20

19

18

23

14

22

18

17

15

19

20

20

16

18

18

12

12

22

16

22

16

17

19

12

10

14

14

15

18

19

17

19

2.1 Define the random variable and its data type.


2.2 Arrange the above data in a less-than frequency distribution using 5 classes of equal width.
2.3 For the grouped data of 2.2, Calculate each of the following:
2.3.1 Mean.
2.3.2 Median.
2.3.3 Mode.
2.3.4 80th percentile.
2.3.5 Interquartile range.
2.3.6 Mid 70% range.
2.3.7 Standard deviation.
2.4 Calculate the coefficient of variation and comment on the value obtained.

Page 6

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 1
1.1 Random variable: monthly fuel bills (in $), Data type: numeric, ratio-scaled, continuous.
1.2 Max = 256, min = 668 Class width = (668

256)/7 =58.9 60.

Class

Freq

< Cum. Freq

250 < 310

12

12

310 < 370

10

22

370 < 430

31

430 < 490

35

490 < 550

42

550 < 610

44

610 < 670

50

1.3

Class midpt, x

Freq, f

fx

fx2

280

12

3360

940800

340

10

3400

1156000

400

3600

1440000

460

1840

846400

520

3640

1892800

580

1160

672800

640

3840

2457600

=20840

=9406400

Interpretation: approx. 68.3% of fuel bills lie between $295.60 and $539.00
approx. 95.4% of fuel bills lie between $174.40 and $660.20
approx. 99.7% of fuel bills lie between $53.20 and $781.40
Page 7

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

1.4.1

Histogram of Monthly Fuel Bills


15

14
13
12
11

Frequency

10

9
8
7
6
5
4
3

2
1
0
190

250

310

370

430

490

550

610

670

Monthly Fuel Bills ($)

Page 8

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

1.4.2

Frequency Polygon: Monthly Fuel Bills


14
12

Frequency

10
8
6
4
2
0

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Monthly Fuel Bills ($)

Page 9

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

1.4.3

Less than Ogive: Monthly Fuel Bills


60

Cumulative Frequency

50

40

30

20

10

Q1
0
200

300

400

500

600

700

Monthly Fuel Bills ($)

1.5.1 P80 =520 + 0.75x20 = $535


1.5.2 Q1 = 300 + 20x0.75 = $315
1.6

Q3 = 500 + 0.7x20 = $514 IQR = 514 315 = $199

Interpretation: Data is relatively widely dispersed around the mean.


1.7. Most likely monthly fuel bill = number of motorists x average cost = 25000 x 416.8
Most likely average fuel consumption = most likely monthly fuel bill/cost per litre
= 416.8 x 25000/2 = 521000 litres
Page 10

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 2
2.1 Random variable: Monthly water usage (no. of kilolitres). Data type: Numeric, ratio-scaled, discrete.
2.2 Max = 23

Min = 10

Class width = (23-10)/5 = 2.6 3

Class

Freq

< cum freq

10 12

13 15

14

16 18

14

28

19 21

15

43

22 24

50

2.3
Class
midpt, x

Freq, f

fx

fx2

11

55

605

14

126

1764

17

14

238

4046

20

15

300

6000

23

161

3703

= 880

=16118

2.3.1

kl

2.3.2

18.36 kl

2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.5

19.33 kl
(

kl

IQR = Q3 Q1
(

15.5 kl

20.9 kl

IQR = 20.9 15.5 = 5.4 kl


Page 11

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

2.3.6 Mid 70% range = P85 P15


(

21.9 kl

kl

Mid 70% range = 21.9 13.83 = 8.1 kl


2.3.7

kl

2.4.
Data is relatively moderately spread around the mean.

Page 12

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SECTION B

BASIC PROBABILITY

Page 13

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 1
In a survey of companies, it was found that 45 were in the mining sector, 72 were in the financial sector, 32 were in
the IT sector and 101 were in the production sector.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5

Display the data in a percentage frequency table.


What is the probability that a randomly selected company is in the financial sector?
If a company is selected at random, what is the probability that this company is not in the production sector?
What is the likelihood that a randomly selected company is either a mining company or an IT company?
Name the probability rule (addition, multiplication, etc) used in 1.3 and 1.4 above

QUESTION 2
The human resources department of an insurance company analyzed the qualifications profile of their 129 managers
in terms of their highest qualification achieved. The findings are shown in the accompanying two-way pivot table.

Qualification
Matric
Diploma
Degree
Total

Section Head
28
20
?
53

Managerial Level
Dept Head
14
24
10
?

Division Head
?
6
14
28

2.1 Complete the above table


2.2 Define the two random variables, their measurement scale and data type
2.3 What is the probability that a manager selected at random:
2.3.1 Has only a matric qualification?
2.3.2 Is a section head and has a degree?
2.3.3 Is a department head given that the manager has a diploma?
2.3.4 Is a division head?
2.3.5 Is either a division head or a section head?
2.3.6 Has a matric or a diploma or a degree?
2.3.7 Has a degree given that the person is a department head?
2.3.8 Is either a division head or has a diploma or both?
2.4 For each of the probabilities calculated in the above state:
The type of probability, i.e marginal, joint or conditional.
Which probability rule, if any, was applied, i.e addition rule, multiplication rule.
2.5 Are the events in 2.3.5 and 2.3.6 mutually exclusive? Why?

Page 14

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 3
A company has three production sections: S1, S2 and S3, which contribute 40%, 35% and 25% respectively to the
total production output. The following percentages of faulty units produced in these sections have been observed.
Section
S1
S2
S3

Faults
2%
3%
4%

There is a final check before the output is dispatched.


3.1 Draw a probability tree to represent the above situation.
3.2 Calculate the probability that a unit found faulty at this check came from section S1.

Page 15

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 1
1.1
Sector
Mining
Financial
IT
Production
Total

Count
45
72
32
101
250

% frequency
18
28.8
12.8
40.4

1.2 P(Financial) = 72/250 = 0.288 = 28.8%


1.3 P(not Production) = 1 P(production) = 1 101/250 = 0.596 = 59.6%
1.4 P (Mining or IT) = P(Mining) + P(IT) = 45/250 + 32/250 = 0.308 = 30.8%
1.5 Complementary rule used in 1.3
Addition rule for mutually exclusive events used in 1.4

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 2
2.1

Qualification

Section Head

Managerial Level
Dept Head

Division Head

Matric

28

14

Diploma

20

24

88
6

Degree

5
53

10

14

48
8

28

Total

2.2 Managerial level categorical, ordinal scaled, discrete.


Qualification level categorical, ordinal scaled, discrete.
2.3.1 P(matric) = 50/129 = 0.3876
2.3.2 P(Section head

Degree) = 5/129 = 0.0388

2.3.3 P(Dept Head Diploma) = 24/50 = 0.48


2.3.4 P(Div head) = 28/129 = 0.2171
Page 16

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

2.3.5 P(Div head


2.3.6 P(Matric

Section head) = (53+28)/129 = 0.6279


Diploma

Degree) = (50+50+29)/129 = 1.0

2.3.7 P(Degree | Dept. head) =10/48 =0.2083


2.3.8 P(Div head
2.4

Diploma

Both) = (28+50-6)/129 = 0.5581

2.4.1 Marginal probability


2.4.2 Joint probability, multiplication rule
2.4.3 Conditional probability
2.4.4 Marginal probability
2.4.5 Addition rule for mutually exclusive events
2.4.6 Collective exclusive set of events and addition rule for mutually exclusive events
2.4.7 Conditional probability
2.4.8 Addition rule for non-mutually exclusive events

2.5 Yes. Outcomes cannot occur simultaneously.

Page 17

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 3
3.1

FAULTY (0.02)

S1 (0.4)

GOOD (0.98)
FAULTY (0.03)

S2 (0.35)
GOOD (0.97)

TREE DIAGRAM

S3 (0.25)

FAULTY (0.04)

GOOD (0.96)

3.2 Let PS1, PS2 and PS3 denote the probability that a randomly chosen unit came from S1, S2 and S3 respectively,
and let PF1, PF2 and PF3 denote the probability that a faulty item came from S1, S2 and S3 respectively.
PS1 = 0.40

PS2 = 0.35

PS3 = 0.25

PF1 = 0.02

PF2 = 0.03

PF3 = 0.04

The probability that a randomly chosen faulty unit has come from S1 is

Page 18

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SECTION C

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS

Page 19

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 1
Once a week a merchandiser replenishes the stocks of a particular product brand in the six stores for which she is
responsible. Experience has shown that there is a one in five chance that a given store will have run out of stock
before the merchandisers weekly visit.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4

Which probability distribution is appropriate in this problem? Why?


What is the probability that, on a given weekly round, the merchandiser will find exactly one store out of stock?
What is the probability that at most two stores will be out of stock?
What is the mean number of stores out of stock each week?

QUESTION 2
A market research company has found from experience that three in ten people are willing to participate in focus
group interviews. The company has been commissioned to conduct a focus group interview on the consumption
patterns of bread for a bakery client.
2.1 If 12 people are approached, what is the probability that only 2 are willing to participate in the interview?
2.2 Five people are required for the interview. What is the probability that the company will find sufficient
consumers to participate in the interview if 12 people are approached?
2.3 What is the probability that the company will recruit more than the required five consumers for the interview
session if it randomly approached 12 people?
QUESTION 3
A motor spares dealer sells, on average, 4 car batteries per week.
3.1 What is the probability that the dealer will sell no more than 2 batteries in a given week?
3.2 If the dealer has 3 batteries in stock at the beginning of a given week, what is the probability that the
dealer will run out of stock in that week?
QUESTION 4
Airline passengers arrive randomly and independently at the passenger screening facility at a major international
airport. The mean arrival rate is 10 passengers per minute. Calculate the probability of:
4.1 no arrivals in a one-minute period.
4.2 at least 2 arrivals in a one-minute period.
4.3 exactly 8 arrivals in a 15-second period.

Page 20

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 5
The lifetime of a certain type of automatic washing machine is normally distributed with a mean of 3.1 years and a
standard deviation of 1.1 years.
5.1 If this type of washing machine is guaranteed for one year, what percentage of the original sales will require
replacement if they fail within the guarantee period?
5.2 What percentage of the washing machines is likely to be operating after 4 years?
5.3 If the manufacturers of these washing machines wants to ensure that no more than 5% of the machines will be
replaced within the guarantee period, what new guarantee period should they choose?
QUESTION 6
The service time of the first service of a BMW car is found to be normally distributed with a mean of 70 minutes and a
variance of 81 minutes2.
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4

If a BMW car is brought in for its first service, what is the probability that the car will be ready within one hour?
What is the probability that the service will take more than 90 minutes?
What percentage of first services will be completed between 50 and 60 minutes?
The BMW dealer has a policy to give its customers a 15% discount on the cost of the first service if the service
is not complete within 80 minutes. From a sample of 80 customers who brought their BMW cars in for the first
service, how many are likely to receive the 15% discount?
6.5 If the BMW dealer wants to ensure that no more than 5% of all first services will take longer than 80 minutes,
what should the mean service time be?

Page 21

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 1
1.1 Binomial Distribution. There are only two possible outcomes (in-stock and out-of- tock). Outcomes observed
6 times (n = 6). Probability of observing out of stock outcome (p = 0.2) is constant. The stores (trials) are
independent of one another.
1.2
1.3

1.4

Mean (binomial) = np = 6 x 0.2 = 1.2

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 2
n= 12, p = 0.3
2.1

Page 22

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 3
3.1

= 4 per week

3.2

Dealer will run out of stock if 4 or more batteries are sold per week

)
= 0.5665

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 4
= 10 per minute
4.1
4.2

4.3 = 10 arrivals per minute = 2.5 arrivals per 15 sec interval

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 5
5.1 When x =1, z= (1 - 3.1)/1.1= 1.9091

5.2

When x =4,

5.3

Let xc denote new guarantee period.


P(x < xc ) = 0.05 zc = - 1.645 (look up area 0.5 -0.05 = 0.45)
Thus -

xc = 3.1 - 1.1x1.645 = 1.29 years


Page 23

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 6
6.1

x = 60,

6.2

x = 90,

6.3

x = 50,

6.4

x = 80

No of customers = 0.1335 x 80 = 10.68 11


6.5

P(x > k) = 0.15 Look up area 0.5 0.15 = 0.35

Page 24

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SECTION D

HYPOTHESIS TESTING

Page 25

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 1
The manager of a large shopping mall believes that visitors to the mall spend, on average, 85 minutes in the mall on
any one occasion. To test this belief, the manager commissioned a study which found that, from a random sample of
132 visitors to the mall, the average visiting time in the mall was 80.5 minutes. Assume that the population standard
deviation is 25 minutes and that the visiting time is approximately normally distributed.
1.1 Formulate suitable null and alternative hypotheses for this test situation.
1.2 Which test statistics, z or t, is appropriate for this test? Why?
1.3 Conduct the appropriate statistical test, at the 5% level of significance, to support or refute the managers belief.
What management conclusion would be drawn from the findings?
QUESTION 2
One-litre cartons of milk are advertized to contain 1 litre of milk are being underfilled. To test this claim, a consumer
council measured a random sample of 20 cartons from different supermarkets. It was found that the average fill was
0.982 litres, with a sample standard deviation of 0.069 litres. Assume that the carton fills are normally distributed.
2.1 Formulate suitable null and alternative hypotheses for this test situation.
2.2 Which test statistics is appropriate for this test? Why?
2.3 Conduct an appropriate statistical test, at the 5% level of significance, to support or refute the managers belief.
What management conclusion would be drawn from the findings?
QUESTION 3
Churn is a term used to describe the rate at which a company loses customers to its competitors. In the
telecommunications industry it is believed that the churn rate between cell phone service providers is not more than
15%. A telecommunications analyst surveyed a random sample of 560 cell phone subscribers and established that
90 of them had changed service providers within the past year.
Is there sufficient statistical evidence at the 10% level of significance to conclude that the churn rate is in excess of
15%? Conduct a suitable hypothesis test and report on the findings.

Page 26

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 4
A financial analyst asked the following question: Is the average earnings yield of manufacturing companies the
same as the average earnings yield of retail companies? To examine this, the analyst randomly sampled 10
manufacturing companies and 15 retail companies. The sample statistics are given in the table below.
mean (%)
Standard deviation (%)
Size

Manufacturers
8.45
3.32
10

Retailers
10.22
4.14
15

4.1 What statistical assumptions must the financial analyst make before applying an appropriate hypothesis test
between the two means?
4.2 Can the financial analyst conclude that there is no difference in the average earnings yield between the
companies in the manufacturing and retailing sectors? Provide statistical evidence by conducting a
hypothesis test at the 5% level of significance. Also formulate appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.
QUESTION 5
A random sample of 300 Status cheque accounts of Capital Bank showed that 48 were overdrawn. When 250 Elite
cheque accounts at the same bank were examined, it was found that 55 were overdrawn.
Can the bank manager conclude that, proportionately, more Elite cheque account s are likely to be overdrawn than
Status cheque accounts? Test this hypothesis at the 5% level of significance. What conclusion can be drawn?

QUESTION 6
The quality control manager of a tyre manufacturing plant wants to test a belief that the nature of defects found in
manufactured tyres depends on the shift during which the defective tyre is produced. He compiled the following table
showing the number of defective tyres identified by shift and by nature of defect.
Shift
Morning
Afternoon
Night

Technical
15
26
29

Nature of Defect
Mechanical
42
40
25

Material
11
20
14

Is there evidence to substantiate a claim that there is a statistical association between the nature of defective tyres
and the shift on which they are produced? Perform a statistical test at the 5% level of significance to establish
whether or not these two criteria are statistically independent. What conclusion will the quality control manager
communicate to the production manager concerning this issue?

Page 27

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 1
1.1
1.2

z test (n > 30).

1.3

For = 0.05,

(two-tail test, so look up area 0.5 - 0.0250 = 0.4750 in Z tables)

Since

, there is sufficient statistical evidence to reject H0 at = 0.05.

Population mean value is significantly different from 85 minutes. Visitors to the shopping mall do not spend 85
minutes on average in the mall..

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 2
2.1
2.2

Use t test (n < 30)

2.3

For = 0.05, df = 19,

(one-tail test, so look up area 0.5 - 0.05 = 0.45 in t table)

Since

there is insufficient statistical evidence at the 5% level of

significance to reject H0. Hence it must be concluded that, on average, the mean fill of the 1 litre milk
containers is at least 1 litre. The consumer councils claim that the containers are being underfilled is not
valid.

Page 28

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 3

= 0.10. Apply one-tailed z test (look up area 0.4 in z table)

Since ztest =1.9886 > zcrit =1.28 there is sufficient sample evidence at the 10% level of significance to reject H0.
Conclusion: The churn rate in the telecommunications industry exceeds 15%.

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 4
4.1 The variances of the earnings yield between the two populations is normally distributed.
4.2 Let 1 and 2 denote the mean populations earnings yield (%) of the manufacturing and retailing sectors
respectively.

Use t test statistics since the variances are unknown.


= 0.05, df = 10+15 - 2 = 23 Two tailed test ,

tcalc

x1 x2 ( 1 2 )
(n1 1) s12 (n2 1) s22
n1 n2 2

1
1

n1 n2

Since
reject H0.

there is insufficient evidence at the 5% level of significance to

Conclusion: There is no difference in the mean earnings yield (%) between manufacturing companies and retail
companies..

Page 29

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 5
Let 1 and 2 denote population proportions of status cheque account clients and elite cheque account clients
respectively

= 0.05, lower tail test. Use z test zcrit = -1.645


p1 = 48/300 = 0.16, p2 = 55/250 = 0.22
pooled proportion:

z test

p1 p 2 1 2
1
1
( p q)
n1 n2

0.16 0.22 0
1
1
0.1873 (1 0.1873)

300 250

1.796

Since ztest = -1.796 < zcrit = -1.645 there is sufficient sample evidence to reject H0 at the 5% level o significance.
Conclusion: Proportionately, more elite cheque accounts are overdrawn compared to status cheque accounts.

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 6
H0 : There is no association (relationship) between nature of defect and shift.
H1 : There is an association (relationship) between nature of defect and shift.
Apply Chi-squared test.. = 0.05, df = (3-1)(3-1) = 4

Shift

= 9.488.

Nature of Defect
Technical

Mechanical

Material

Total

Morning

15

42

11

68

Afternoon

26

40

20

86

Night

29

25

14

68

Total

70

107

45

222

Page 30

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

Since

= 10.082 >

fo

fe

(fo-fe)2/fe

15

21.44

1.935

26

27.12

0.046

29

21.44

2.665

42

32.77

2.597

40

41.45

0.051

25

1.844

11

32.77
13.78

20

17.43

0.378

14

13.78

0.003

=222

=222

=10.081

0.562

= 9.488 there is sufficient sample evidence to reject H0 at the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion: The nature of tyre defects is related to the shift in which the defects occur.

Page 31

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SECTION E

LINEAR REGRESSION AND CORRELATION

Page 32

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 1
The training manager of a company that assembles and exports pool pumps wants to know if there is a link between
the number of hours spent by assembly workers in training and their productivity on the job. A random sample of 10
assembly workers was selected and their performances evaluated. The data is given in the table below

Training hours
20
36
20
38
40
33
32
28
40
24

Output
40
70
44
56
60
48
62
54
63
38

1.1 Draw a scatter plot of the sample data and comment on the likely relationship between the two measures,
i.e hours of training and output.
1.2 Derive a simple regression line equation representing the two measures.
1.3 Calculate the coefficient of determination between the two measures. Interpret the value obtained and advise
the training manager accordingly.
1.4 Estimate the average daily output of an assembly worker who has received only 25 hours of training.

Page 33

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 2
Companies regularly need to invest capital in their business operations to continue to grow and generate profits. A
business analyst examined the relationship within companies between their level of capital investment (expressed as
a percentage of turnover) and their percentage return on investment (recorded in the financial period after the capital
investment). A random sample of 25 companies was included in the study. The data is shown in the table below.
Company
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5

Capital investment
(% of turnover)
62.3
45.8
70.3
43.2
33.7
55.1
28.6
63.6
63.0
48.2
73.2
43.4
42.1
55.7
32.8
66.2
64.4
53.1
79.5
50.2
52.0
53.2
31.7
64.2
59.3

ROI (%)
5.1
1.8
3.7
3.3
4.4
4.8
3.3
4.5
5.6
9.5
3.7
8.7
2.1
3.8
1.1
8.8
8.0
2.4
5.2
4.6
4.4
6.7
1.9
6.8
5.0

Identify the independent and dependent variables in this study.


Draw a scatter plot of the above data. Comment on the plot.
Derive the line regression equation linking the two variables.
Calculate the coefficient of determination and interpret is value.
Estimate the expected return on investment for a company that is planning a 55% level of capital investment.

Page 34

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 1
1.1

Training Hours versus Output


80

Output

70
60
50
40
30
10

15

20

25
30
Training hours

35

40

45

Direct relationship between training hours and output.


1.2 Let x = training hours and y = output
x

x2

y2

xy

20

40

400

1600

800

36

70

1296

4900

2520

20

44

400

1936

880

38

56

1444

3136

2128

40

60

1600

3600

2400

33

48

1089

2304

1584

32

62

1024

3844

1984

28

54

784

2916

1512

40

63

1600

3969

2520

24

38

576

1444

912

=311

=535

=10213

=29649

=17240

Page 35

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

Linear regression equation: y = a + bx

n xy x y
n x ( x )
2

10 x17240 311 535


1.112
10 10213 (311) 2

a y bx =535/10 1.112 x311/10 =18.917

y = 18.917 + 1.112x

1.3 r = 0.807
r2 = 0.652
Training hours can explain 65.2% of variability in worker output. The remaining 34.8% due to other factors.
Since 65.2% is a high level of explained variability, the training programme has been very beneficial to worker
output and should therefore be continued.
1.4 y(25) = 18.917 + 1.112 x 25 =46.7 units

Page 36

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 2
2.1

Independent variable (x) = capital investment as % of turnover.


Dependent variable (y) = return on investment (%)
Company

x2

y2

xy

62.3

5.1

3881.29

26.01

317.73

45.8

1.8

2097.64

3.24

82.44

70.3

3.7

4942.09

13.69

260.11

43.2

3.3

1866.24

10.89

142.56

33.7

4.4

1135.69

19.36

148.28

55.1

4.8

3036.01

23.04

264.48

28.6

3.3

817.96

10.89

94.38

63.6

4.5

4044.96

20.25

286.20

63.0

5.6

3969.00

31.36

352.80

10

48.2

9.5

2323.24

90.25

457.90

11

73.2

3.7

5358.24

13.69

270.84

12

43.4

8.7

1883.56

75.69

377.58

13

42.1

2.1

1772.41

4.41

88.41

14

55.7

3.8

3102.49

14.44

211.66

15

32.8

1.1

1075.84

1.21

36.08

16

66.2

8.8

4382.44

77.44

582.56

17

64.4

8.0

4147.36

64.00

515.20

18

53.1

2.4

2819.61

5.76

127.44

19

79.5

5.2

6320.25

27.04

413.40

20

50.2

4.6

2520.04

21.16

230.92

21

52.0

4.4

2704.00

19.36

228.80

22

53.2

6.7

2830.24

44.89

356.44

23

31.7

1.9

1004.89

3.61

60.23

24

64.2

6.8

4121.64

46.24

436.56

25

59.3

5.0

3516.49

25.00

296.50

1334.8

119.2

75673.62

692.92

6639.50

Page 37

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

2.2

ROI (%)

Capital Invesment versus Rate of Return


10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
20

30

40
50
60
70
Capital investment (% of turnover)

80

90

Comment: There appears to be a weak to moderate association between the companys capital investment and
return of investment.
2.3

Linear regression equation: y = a + bx

n xy x y
n x 2 ( x ) 2

a y bx =
2.4

y = 1.434 + 0.06245x

n xy x y

[n x 2 ( x) 2 ][n y 2 ( y ) 2 ]

Capital investment explains only 13.8% of ROI. This is a very low level of explained variability
Therefore do not invest.
2.5

y = 1.434 + 0.06245x
y(55)=1.434+0.06245(55) = 4.9%
Page 38

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SECTION F

TIME SERIES AND FORECASTING

Page 39

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 1
The following table represents the annual tonnage (in 100000 tons) of coal mined in the Limpopo Province for 16
consecutive years.
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Tonnage
118
124
108
120
132
115
122
148

Year
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Tonnage
160
188
201
174
191
178
146
161

1.1 Calculate the 4-yearly moving average of coal tonnage mined.


1.2 Calculate the 5-yearly moving average of coal tonnage mined.
1.3 Plot both the 4-yearly and 5-yearly moving averages together with the original data on the same graph.
Describe the general pattern of the plots.
QUESTION 2
The number of claims per quarter on household policies submitted by the residents of a certain town to an insurance
company is given in the table below for the years 2007 to 2010.
Year
2007
2008
2009
2010

Jan -Mar
84
81
69
73

Apr - Jun
53
57
37
46

Jul - Sep
60
51
40
39

Oct Dec
75
73
77
63

2.1 Plot a time series graph of household policy claims.


2.2 Isolate the trend effect by deriving a least squares trend line using the zero sum method. Comment on the trend
in claims.
2.3 Estimate the seasonal effect on household policy claims. Interpret the seasonal impact.
2.4 Estimate the likely number of claims on household policy for last quarter of 2011.

Page 40

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 3
The number of microwave ovens sold by an appliance giant in a city is recorded per quarter, for three consecutive
years from 2010 to 2012. The results are presented in the table below.

2010
2011
2012

Q1
195
158
180

Q2
216
228
198

Q3
232
183
200

Q4
300
298
307

3.1. Determine the adjusted seasonal indices.


3.2. Show that the linear regression equation is given by
Hint : Use 1, 2, 3,for Q1 of 2010, Q2 of 2010, Q3 of 2010, .

3.3. Use the results of 3.1. and 3.2. above to estimate the number of microwave ovens sold by the
appliance giant in quarter 4 of 2013.

Page 41

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 1
1.1 & 1.2
Year

Tonnage

118

4MA
-

Centred 4MA
-

5MA
-

Centred 5MA
-

124

108

117.5

119.25

120.4

120.1

120

121

119.875

119.8

119.6

132

118.8

120.5

119.4

123.4

115

122.3

125.75

127.4

131.4

122

129.3

132.75

135.4

141

148

136.3

145.375

146.6

155.2

160

154.5

164.375

163.8

169

10

188

174.3

177.5

174.2

178.5

11

201

180.8

184.625

182.8

184.6

12

174

188.5

187.25

186.4

182.2

13

191

186

179.125

178

174

14

178

172.3

170.625

170

15

146

169

16

161

Page 42

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

1.3

The annual tonnage of coal mined was almost constant for the first 7 years followed by an expansion phase for the
next 4 years. Thereafter the production declined steadily. This could be evidence of a cyclical effect caused by
economic cycles in the demand for coal worldwide.

Page 43

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 2
2.1

Household Policy Claims


90

No.of Claims

80
70
60
50
40
30
0

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Quarters
2.2

Period, t

Claims, y

t2

ty

-15

84

225

-1260

-13

53

169

-689

-11

60

121

-660

-9

75

81

-675

-7

81

49

-567

-5

57

25

-285

-3

51

-153

-1

73

-73

69

69

37

111

40

25

200

77

49

539

73

81

657

11

46

121

506

13

39

169

507

15

63

225

945

=0

=978

=1360

=-828
Page 44

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

Trend line: y(t) = a +bt


b = -828/1360 = -0.609

a = 978/16 = 61.125 y(t) = 61.125 0.609t

Interpretation: There is a downward trend in the household policy claims over the past 4 years
2.3
Year

2007

2008

2009

2010

Quarter

Tonnage

4MA

C4MA

SI

Q1

84

Q2

53

Q3

60

68.00

67.625

0.887

Q4

75

67.25

67.750

1.107

Q1

81

68.25

67.125

1.207

Q2

57

66.00

65.750

0.867

Q3

51

65.50

64.000

0.797

Q4

73

62.50

60.000

1.217

Q1

69

57.50

56.125

1.229

Q2

37

54.75

55.250

0.670

Q3

40

55.75

56.250

0.711

Q4

77

56.75

57.875

1.330

Q1

73

59.00

58.875

1.240

Q2

46

58.75

57

0.807

Q3

39

55.25

Q4

63

Q3

Q4

Total

0.887

1.107

Q1

Q2

2007
2008

1.207

0.867

0.797

1.217

2009

1.229

0.67

0.711

1.33

2010

1.24

0.807

Median

1.229

0.807

0.797

1.217

4.050

Adjusted SI

1.214

0.797

0.787

1.202

4.000

Interpretation: Household policy claims tend to increase significantly in the 1st and 4th quarters of each year
by about 20% on average, while there is a significant decline in claims during the 2nd and 3rd quarters by
about 20% on average.
Page 45

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

2.4 t = 23 for Q4 of 2011 y(23) = 61.125 0.609x23 = 47.12 (trend estimate)


Seasonally adjusted estimate: y(23) = 47.12 x 1.202 56.64
Interpretation: The insurance company can expect to receive 57 policy claims in the last quarter of 2011.

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 3
3.1.
4-Q-M-A

CENTRED AVE

SI

231.13

1.004

228

1.316

223.38

0.7073

217

1.051

219.5

0.8337

218.5

1.364

216.88

0.8300

195

216
235.75
232
226.5
300
229.5
158
217.25
228
216.75
183
222.25
298
214.75
180
219

Page 46

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

198

220.13

0.8995

221.25
200

307

SUMMARY TABLE
Q1

Q2

2010

Q3

Q4

1.004

1.316

0.8337

1.364

2011

0.7073

1.051

2012

0.8300

0.8995

Median

0.7687

0.9753

0.9189

1.340

Typical (Adjusted)

0.7681

0.9746

0.9182

1.339

xy

x2

y2

195

195

38025

216

432

46656

232

696

53824

300

1200

16

90000

158

790

25

24969

228

1368

36

51984

183

1281

49

33489

298

2384

64

88804

3.2.

Page 47

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

180

1620

81

32400

10

198

1980

100

39204

11

200

2200

121

40000

12

307

3684

144

94249

78

2695

17830

650

633604

Linear regression is

3.3.
In Q4 of 2013, number of microwave ovens sold = 245.34 1.339
= 328.51 329 microwave ovens

Page 48

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SECTION G

DECISION ANALYSIS

Page 49

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 1
An entrepreneur is contemplating opening a petrol station. The annual return will depend on the size of the petrol
station and a number of marketing factors related to the oil industry and the demand for petrol. After a careful
analysis the entrepreneur developed the following table.
Size of Petrol Station
Good Market
50000
80000
100000
300000

Small
Medium
Large
Very Large
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4

Annual Return ($)


Fair Market
20000
30000
30000
25000

Poor Market
-10000
-20000
-40000
-160000

What is the maximax decision?


What is the maximin decision?
Develop an opportunity loss table
What is the minimax regret decision?

QUESTION 2
A distributor buys perishable goods at $2 per item and sells them at $5 per item. Demand per day is uncertain and
the items unsold at the end of the day represent a write off because of perishability. If he understocks he loses profit
he could have made. A 300 day record of past activity is given in the table below.
Daily demand (units)
10
11
12
13

Number of days
30
60
120
90

2.1 What level of stock should be held from day to day to maximize profit?
2.2 Draw a decision tree to represent the problem.

Page 50

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

QUESTION 3
A company has developed a new product. It has to decide whether or not to sell the design for $500000, launch the
product without carrying out any tests or to product test and market test the product before launching. The company
has been advised that even though the tests cost money, they increase the likelihood of success for the product. It
has been agreed within the company that it can only market test the product once it has passed product testing.
Launching the product will cost $300000 and estimates of returns are as follows:
Highly successful: $2000000
Moderately successful: $1000000
Low level success: $500000
Failure: $100000
The company gathered the following historical data.
Outcome
High Success
Medium Success
Low Success
Failure

No Testing
0.10
0.20
0.40
0.30

Product Testing
0.10
0.40
0.40
0.10

Product &market Testing


0.20
0.45
0.30
0.05

Product testing costs $100000 and market testing costs $100000. The probability of passing product testing is 0.80
and the probability of passing market testing is 0.90.
Should the product fail either test it is regarded as worthless and the project is abandoned.
Launching the product will cost $300000 and estimates of returns are as follows:
Highly successful: $2000000
Moderately successful: $1000000
Low-level success: $500000
Failure: $100000
With the aid of a decision tree prepare a quantitative report and advise the company on the optimal course of action.

Page 51

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 1
1.1 Maximax = max(50000, 80000, 100000, 300000) = 300000 open very large station
1.2 Maximin = max(-10000, -20000, -4000,-160000) = -10000 open small station
1.3 Opportunity Loss Table
Size of Petrol Station

Annual Return ($)


Fair Market
10000
0
0
500

Good Market
250000
220000
200000
0

Small
Medium
Large
Very Large

Row Max
Poor Market
0
10000
30000
150000

250000
220000
200000
150000

1.4 Min(250000, 220000, 200000, 150000) = $150000


Decision: Open very large plant.

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 2
2.1 Demand probability:
Daily Demand
10
11
12
13

No of Days
30
60
120
90

Probability
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.3

Calculate the conditional profit (CP) and expected profit (EP)


CP = demand x selling price no. bought x cost price.
Demand
10
11
12
13

P
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.3

CP
30
30
30
30

EP
3
6
12
9
50

CP
28
33
33
33

EP = CP x demand probability
EP
2.8
6.6
13.2
9.9
32.5

CP
26
31
36
36

EP
2.6
6.2
14.4
10.8
34

CP
24
29
34
39

EP
2.4
5.8
13.6
11.7
33.5

Optimum strategy: stock 12 units per day

Page 52

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

2.2
Conditional Profit

Order 10 Units

$30.00

Order 11 Units

$32.50
$34.00
Order 12 Units

$34.00

Sell 10 Units, 0.1

$30

Sell 11 Units, 0.2

$30

Sell 12 Units, 0.4

$30

Sell 13 Units, 0.3

$30

Sell 10 Units, 0.1


Sell 11 Units, 0.2

$28
$33

Sell 12 Units, 0.4

$33

Sell 13 Units, 0.3

$33

Sell 10 Units, 0.1

$26

Sell 11 Units, 0.2

$31

Sell 12 Units, 0.4

$36

Sell 13 Units, 0.3


Sell 10 Units, 0.1

Order 13 Units

Sell 11 Units, 0.2

$33.50

$36
$24
$29

Sell 12 Units, 0.4

$34

Sell 13 Units, 0.3

$39

Page 53

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

SOLUTION TO QUESTION 3
High Success, 0.1
$330000
Launch without test
($300000)

Medium Success, 0.2


Low Success, 0.4
Failure,0.3

$2000000
$1000000
$500000
$100000

Sell Design
$500000
High Success, 0.1
$510000
Launch Product
($300000)

$534500

Medium Success, 0.4


Low Success, 0.4
Failure, 0.1

Fail , 0.1 (Abandon)

$2000000
$1000000
$500000
$100000
$0

High Success, 0.2 $2000000

$534500

$705000

Launch
($300000

$327600

Medium Success, 0.45 $1000000


Low Success, 0.3

$500000

Failure, 0.05

$100000

Fail , 0.2 (Abandon)

$0

EMV calculations:
EMV(A) = $2000000x0.1 + $1000000x 0.2 + $500000 x 0.4 + 0$100000x0.3 - $300000 = $330000
EMV(B) = $2000000x0.1 + $1000000x 0.4 + $500000 x 0.4 + 0$100000x0.1 - $300000 = $510000
EMV(C) = $2000000x0.2 + $1000000x 0.45 + $500000 x 0.3 + 0$100000x0.05 - $300000 = $705000
EMV(D) = $705000x0.9 - $100000 = $534500 = EMV(E)
EMV(F) = $534500x0.8 - $100000 = $327600
EMV(sell design) = $500000

Recommendation: Sell Design

Page 54

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

APPENDIX 1

FORMULAE

Page 55

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

Page 56

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

jn
4

jn

F) c
4

Qj L
fQ j

jn
100

jn

F) c

100

Pj L
f Pj

position Q j

position Pj

P A B
P(B)

P A B

P( x)

zcalc

n!
x (1 )n x
x!(n x)!

x
/ n

p ( x)

tcalc

x e
x!

x
s/ n

z calc

(1 )
n

z calc

z calc

2 =

x1 x 2 ( 1 2 )
2
1

2
2

s
s

n1 n2

p A p B ( 1 2 )

1
1
( p q)

n A nB

t calc

x1 x 2 ( 1 2 )
(n1 1) s12 (n2 1) s 22
n1 n2 2

nA p A nB pB
nA nB

1
1

n1 n2

q 1 p

fo fe 2
fe

Page 57

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

APPENDIX 2

TABLES

Page 58

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

TABLE 1: The Standard Normal Distribution

z
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0

0
0.0000
0.0398
0.0793
0.1179
0.1554
0.1915
0.2257
0.2580
0.2881
0.3159
0.3413
0.3643
0.3849
0.4032
0.4192
0.4332
0.4452
0.4554
0.4641
0.4713
0.4772
0.4821
0.4861
0.4893
0.4918
0.4938
0.4953
0.4965
0.4974
0.4981
0.4987

0.01
0.0040
0.0438
0.0832
0.1217
0.1591
0.1950
0.2291
0.2611
0.2910
0.3186
0.3438
0.3665
0.3869
0.4049
0.4207
0.4345
0.4463
0.4564
0.4649
0.4719
0.4778
0.4826
0.4864
0.4896
0.4920
0.4940
0.4955
0.4966
0.4975
0.4982
0.4987

0.02
0.0080
0.0478
0.0871
0.1255
0.1628
0.1985
0.2324
0.2642
0.2939
0.3212
0.3461
0.3686
0.3888
0.4066
0.4222
0.4357
0.4474
0.4573
0.4656
0.4726
0.4783
0.483
0.4868
0.4898
0.4922
0.4941
0.4956
0.4967
0.4976
0.4982
0.4987

0.03
0.0120
0.0517
0.0910
0.1293
0.1664
0.2019
0.2357
0.2673
0.2967
0.3238
0.3485
0.3708
0.3907
0.4082
0.4236
0.4370
0.4484
0.4582
0.4664
0.4732
0.4788
0.4834
0.4871
0.4901
0.4925
0.4943
0.4957
0.4968
0.4977
0.4983
0.4988

0.04
0.0160
0.0557
0.0948
0.1331
0.1700
0.2054
0.2389
0.2704
0.2995
0.3264
0.3508
0.3729
0.3925
0.4099
0.4251
0.4382
0.4495
0.4591
0.4671
0.4738
0.4793
0.4838
0.4875
0.4904
0.4927
0.4945
0.4959
0.4969
0.4977
0.4984
0.4988

0.05
0.0199
0.0596
0.0987
0.1368
0.1736
0.2088
0.2422
0.2734
0.3023
0.3289
0.3531
0.3749
0.3944
0.4115
0.4265
0.4394
0.4505
0.4599
0.4678
0.4744
0.4798
0.4842
0.4878
0.4906
0.4929
0.4946
0.4960
0.4970
0.4978
0.4984
0.4989

0.06
0.0239
0.0636
0.1026
0.1406
0.1772
0.2123
0.2454
0.2764
0.3051
0.3315
0.3554
0.3770
0.3962
0.4131
0.4279
0.4406
0.4515
0.4608
0.4686
0.4750
0.4803
0.4846
0.4881
0.4909
0.4931
0.4948
0.4961
0.4971
0.4979
0.4985
0.4989

0.07
0.0279
0.0675
0.1064
0.1443
0.1808
0.2157
0.2486
0.2794
0.3078
0.3340
0.3577
0.3790
0.3980
0.4147
0.4292
0.4418
0.4525
0.4616
0.4693
0.4756
0.4808
0.4850
0.4884
0.4911
0.4932
0.4949
0.4962
0.4972
0.4979
0.4985
0.4989

0.08
0.0319
0.0714
0.1103
0.1480
0.1844
0.2190
0.2517
0.2823
0.3106
0.3365
0.3599
0.3810
0.3997
0.4162
0.4306
0.4429
0.4535
0.4625
0.4699
0.4761
0.4812
0.4854
0.4887
0.4913
0.4934
0.4951
0.4963
0.4973
0.4980
0.4986
0.4990

0.09
0.0359
0.0753
0.1141
0.1517
0.1879
0.2224
0.2549
0.2852
0.3133
0.3389
0.3621
0.3830
0.4015
0.4177
0.4319
0.4441
0.4545
0.4633
0.4706
0.4767
0.4817
0.4857
0.4890
0.4916
0.4936
0.4952
0.4964
0.4974
0.4981
0.4986
0.4990

Page 59

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

TABLE 2: The t-Distribution

df\p
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

0.4
0.32492
0.288675
0.276671
0.270722
0.267181
0.264835
0.263167
0.261921
0.260955
0.260185
0.259556
0.259033
0.258591
0.258213
0.257885
0.257599
0.257347
0.257123
0.256923
0.256743
0.256580
0.256432
0.256297
0.256173
0.256060
0.255955
0.255858
0.255768

0.25
1.000000
0.816497
0.764892
0.740697
0.726687
0.717558
0.711142
0.706387
0.702722
0.699812
0.697445
0.695483
0.693829
0.692417
0.691197
0.690132
0.689195
0.688364
0.687621
0.686954
0.686352
0.685805
0.685306
0.684850
0.684430
0.684043
0.683685
0.683353

0.1
3.077684
1.885618
1.637744
1.533206
1.475884
1.439756
1.414924
1.396815
1.383029
1.372184
1.363430
1.356217
1.350171
1.345030
1.340606
1.336757
1.333379
1.330391
1.327728
1.325341
1.323188
1.321237
1.319460
1.317836
1.316345
1.314972
1.313703
1.312527

0.05
6.313752
2.919986
2.353363
2.131847
2.015048
1.943180
1.894579
1.859548
1.833113
1.812461
1.795885
1.782288
1.770933
1.761310
1.753050
1.745884
1.739607
1.734064
1.729133
1.724718
1.720743
1.717144
1.713872
1.710882
1.708141
1.705618
1.703288
1.701131

0.025
12.7062
4.30265
3.18245
2.77645
2.57058
2.44691
2.36462
2.30600
2.26216
2.22814
2.20099
2.17881
2.16037
2.14479
2.13145
2.11991
2.10982
2.10092
2.09302
2.08596
2.07961
2.07387
2.06866
2.06390
2.05954
2.05553
2.05183
2.04841

0.01
31.82052
6.96456
4.54070
3.74695
3.36493
3.14267
2.99795
2.89646
2.82144
2.76377
2.71808
2.68100
2.65031
2.62449
2.60248
2.58349
2.56693
2.55238
2.53948
2.52798
2.51765
2.50832
2.49987
2.49216
2.48511
2.47863
2.47266
2.46714

0.005
63.65674
9.92484
5.84091
4.60409
4.03214
3.70743
3.49948
3.35539
3.24984
3.16927
3.10581
3.05454
3.01228
2.97684
2.94671
2.92078
2.89823
2.87844
2.86093
2.84534
2.83136
2.81876
2.80734
2.79694
2.78744
2.77871
2.77068
2.76326

0.0005
636.6192
31.5991
12.924
8.6103
6.8688
5.9588
5.4079
5.0413
4.7809
4.5869
4.4370
4.3178
4.2208
4.1405
4.0728
4.0150
3.9651
3.9216
3.8834
3.8495
3.8193
3.7921
3.7676
3.7454
3.7251
3.7066
3.6896
3.6739

Page 60

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

29
30
inf

0.255684
0.255605
0.253347

0.683044
0.682756
0.67449

1.311434
1.310415
1.281552

1.699127
1.697261
1.644854

2.04523
2.04227
1.95996

2.46202
2.45726
2.32635

2.75639
2.75000
2.57583

3.6594
3.6460
3.2905

TABLE 3: The Chi-Square Distribution

df\p

0.995

0.99

0.975

0.95

0.9

0.75

0.5

0.25

0.1

0.05

0.025

0.01

0.005

0.00004

0.00016

0.00098

0.00393

0.01579

0.10153

0.45494

1.32330

2.70554

3.84146

5.02389

6.63499

7.87944

0.01003

0.02010

0.05064

0.10259

0.21072

0.57536

1.38629

2.77259

4.60517

5.99146

7.37776

9.21034

10.5966

0.07172

0.11483

0.21580

0.35185

0.58437

1.21253

2.36597

4.10834

6.25139

7.81473

9.34849

11.3449

12.8382

0.20699

0.29711

0.48442

0.71072

1.06362

1.92256

3.35669

5.38527

7.77944

9.48773

11.1433

13.2767

14.8603

0.41174

0.55430

0.83121

1.14548

1.61031

2.67460

4.35146

6.62568

9.23636

11.0705

12.8325

15.0863

16.7496

0.67573

0.87209

1.23734

1.63538

2.20413

3.45460

5.34812

7.84080

10.6446

12.5916

14.4494

16.8119

18.5476

0.98926

1.23904

1.68987

2.16735

2.83311

4.25485

6.34581

9.03715

12.0170

14.0671

16.0128

18.4753

20.2777

1.34441

1.64650

2.17973

2.73264

3.48954

5.07064

7.34412

10.2189

13.3616

15.5073

17.5346

20.0902

21.9559

1.73493

2.08790

2.70039

3.32511

4.16816

5.89883

8.34283

11.3888

14.6837

16.9199

19.0228

21.6669

23.5894

10

2.15586

2.55821

3.24697

3.94030

4.86518

6.73720

9.34182

12.5489

15.9872

18.3079

20.4832

23.2093

25.1882

11

2.60322

3.05348

3.81575

4.57481

5.57778

7.58414

10.3410

13.7007

17.2750

19.6751

21.9201

24.7259

26.7569

12

3.07382

3.57057

4.40379

5.22603

6.30380

8.43842

11.3403

14.8454

18.5494

21.0261

23.3367

26.2179

28.2995

13

3.56503

4.10692

5.00875

5.89186

7.04150

9.29907

12.3398

15.9839

19.8119

22.3629

24.7356

27.6883

29.8195

14

4.07467

4.66043

5.62873

6.57063

7.78953

10.1653

13.3393

17.1169

21.0641

23.6848

26.1199

29.1412

31.3194

15

4.60092

5.22935

6.26214

7.26094

8.54676

11.0365

14.3389

18.2451

22.3071

24.9958

27.4884

30.5779

32.8013

16

5.14221

5.81221

6.90766

7.96165

9.31224

11.9122

15.3385

19.3689

23.5418

26.2962

28.8454

31.9999

34.2672

17

5.69722

6.40776

7.56419

8.67176

10.0852

12.7919

16.3382

20.4887

24.7690

27.5871

30.1919

33.4087

35.7185

18

6.2648

7.01491

8.23075

9.39046

10.8649

13.6753

17.3379

21.6049

25.9894

28.8693

31.5264

34.8053

37.1565

19

6.84397

7.63273

8.90652

10.1170

11.6509

14.5620

18.3377

22.7178

27.2036

30.1435

32.8523

36.1909

38.5823

20

7.43384

8.26040

9.59078

10.8508

12.4426

15.4518

19.3374

23.8277

28.4120

31.4104

34.1696

37.5662

39.9969

21

8.03365

8.89720

10.2829

11.5913

13.2396

16.3444

20.3372

24.9348

29.6151

32.6706

35.4789

38.9322

41.4011

22

8.64272

9.54249

10.9823

12.3380

14.0415

17.2396

21.3370

26.0393

30.8133

33.9244

36.7807

40.2894

42.7957

23

9.26042

10.1957

11.6886

13.0905

14.8480

18.1373

22.3369

27.1413

32.0069

35.1725

38.0756

41.6384

44.1813

24

9.88623

10.8564

12.4012

13.8484

15.6587

19.0373

23.3367

28.2412

33.1962

36.4159

39.3641

42.9798

45.5585

25

10.5197

11.5240

13.1197

14.6114

16.4734

19.9393

24.3366

29.3389

34.3816

37.6525

40.6465

44.3141

46.9279

Page 61

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

26

11.1602

12.1982

13.8439

15.3792

17.2919

20.8434

25.3365

30.4346

35.5632

38.8851

41.9232

45.6417

48.2899

27

11.8076

12.8785

14.5734

16.1514

18.1139

21.7494

26.3363

31.5284

36.7412

40.1133

43.1945

46.9629

49.6449

28

12.4613

13.5647

15.3079

16.9279

18.9392

22.6572

27.3362

32.6205

37.9159

41.3371

44.4608

48.2782

50.9934

29

13.1212

14.2565

16.0471

17.7084

19.7677

23.5666

28.3361

33.7109

39.0875

42.5579

45.7223

49.5879

52.3356

30

13.7867

14.9535

16.7908

18.4927

20.5992

24.4776

29.3360

34.7997

40.2560

43.7739

46.9792

50.8922

53.6729

Page 62

MANCOSA MBA Yr 1: Quantitative Methods - Questions and Solutions

Page 63

S-ar putea să vă placă și