Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
which is equivalent to an action for prohibition against public officers, and as such we
consider it, without passing at this stage of the proceedings on the merits of said action.
In the present case, we cannot consider the question as to the constitutionality of the
circular as this will be decided after the regular hearing.
In view of the foregoing, the order of the court dismissing the petition is reversed, and the
case returned to the Court of First Instance of Tarlac for further proceedings as in an action
for prohibition, without costs. So ordered.
Paras, C. J., Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Reyes, Bautista Angelo, Labrador,
Concepcion and Diokno, JJ., concur.