Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Brian Massumi
BR I A N M A SSUM I
Ontopower:
War, Powers,
and the State
of Perception
The author acknowledges the generous support of the Social Science and Humanities Research
Council of Canada (sshrc).
contents
Preface vii
pa r t one: p o w er s
3 Perception Attack
The Force to Own Time 63
6 Fear
(The Spectrum Said) 171
Notes 247
References 275
Index 287
preface
This book began on September 11, 2001: “The day the world changed.”
Hyperbole, of course. There is no event that changes everything. Still,
something changed, and the change was significant. In the aftermath of
9/11, many aspects of contemporary life reconfigured themselves around
a new dominant: preemption. It is the thesis of this book that the doctrine
of preemption that was the hallmark of George W. Bush’s “war on terror”
became the driving force for a reconfiguration of powers that has survived
his administration and whose full impact we have yet to come to terms
with. More than a doctrine, preemption has taken on a life of its own.
It launches into operation wherever threat is felt. In today’s multidimen-
sional “threat environment,” that is everywhere.
This book will argue that preemption, as it operates today, lies at the
heart of a newly consolidated mode of power. A new mode of power de-
serves a new name. In the chapters that follow, it is dubbed “ontopower.”
Ontopower does not replace prior powers. Rather, it reorganizes and re-
integrates them around the new fulcrum of preemption, changing their
object and mode of operation in the process. Ontopower designates a
changing “ecology of powers.” The way in which this ecology of powers
pivots on preemption brings new urgency to what can only be called meta-
physical problems. Preemption is a time concept. It denotes acting on the
time before: the time of threat, before it has emerged as a clear and present
danger. What is this time of the before? How can it be acted upon? How can
that acting upon already constitute a decision, given the ungraspability of
that which has yet to eventuate and may yet take another form?
Preemption does not idly pose these problems concerning the nature
of time, perception, action, and decision: it operationalizes them. It weap-
onizes them. Paradoxically, it weaponizes them in a way that is productive.
Ontopower is not a negative power, a power-over. It is a power-to: a power
viii preface
to incite and orient emergence that insinuates itself into the pores of the
world where life is just stirring, on the verge of being what it will become,
as yet barely there. It is a positive power for bringing into being (hence
the prefix “onto”). The goal of Ontopower is to explore how this operation-
alization works. In particular, the book seeks to plumb the paradox that
a power so productive centers on preemption. Ontopowers are many and
diverse. Preemption is their keystone and cutting edge.
This is not a book of history. It is in equal parts pragmatic (how does
it work?) and speculative (what does how it works tell us philosophically
about the way in which the present- day ecology of powers obliges us to
rethink fundamental categories?). Each chapter sparks from very partic-
ular events in the history of post-9/11 culture and politics. The object of
the analyses, however, is less these historical moments per se than the
driving force of their formation as it passes through them. Preemption
is treated as a formative tendency moving through historical moments. It is
transhistorical.
The project of diagnosing a transhistorical tendency that concerns noth-
ing so much as what has yet to emerge is fraught with difficulties. It not
only raises fundamental philosophical questions; it also raises questions
about how a philosophical consideration of the formative movement of
history relates to historiography. This is the problem of the relation be-
tween speculatively pragmatic thought and empirical study. This problem
is treated in chapter 5, in a self-reflective pause midstream. It is returned
to in the afterword, which is a belated meditation on what comes before:
an afterthought on how the project of thinking the transhistorical force of
the not-yet-fully-emerged must conceive itself, paradoxically, as a “history
of the present.”
The afterword deals with the conceptual issues raised by the speculative-
pragmatic nature of the project at great length, at the same time as it
fulfils many of the functions of an introduction (including a chapter-by-
chapter synopsis). Its main job is to delve into the status of what through-
out the book is called an “operative logic.” This is a term designating that
transhistorical tendencies are in and of themselves speculatively pragmatic
formative forces: they effectively carry a conceptual force of change (in
their way of formatively posing and operationalizing metaphysical prob-
lems). It is also a term for concepts themselves, in that when they succeed
preface ix