0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
94 vizualizări1 pagină
This document summarizes a conversation between two writers who have very different approaches - one takes a "dumb" approach while the other takes a "smart" approach. The dumb writer, Kenneth Goldsmith, questions if his ideas are too smart and prefers to copy and reuse existing texts without creating anything new. The smart writer, Christian Bok, spends years on complicated projects, such as designing computer programs to generate poems and injecting those poems into DNA. While Christian could perform what Kenneth does, Kenneth admits he could never perform the complex projects of the smart writer. The document contrasts the approaches of the "dumb" writer who works intuitively versus the "smart" writer who takes a meticulous, complex, elite approach to writing.
This document summarizes a conversation between two writers who have very different approaches - one takes a "dumb" approach while the other takes a "smart" approach. The dumb writer, Kenneth Goldsmith, questions if his ideas are too smart and prefers to copy and reuse existing texts without creating anything new. The smart writer, Christian Bok, spends years on complicated projects, such as designing computer programs to generate poems and injecting those poems into DNA. While Christian could perform what Kenneth does, Kenneth admits he could never perform the complex projects of the smart writer. The document contrasts the approaches of the "dumb" writer who works intuitively versus the "smart" writer who takes a meticulous, complex, elite approach to writing.
This document summarizes a conversation between two writers who have very different approaches - one takes a "dumb" approach while the other takes a "smart" approach. The dumb writer, Kenneth Goldsmith, questions if his ideas are too smart and prefers to copy and reuse existing texts without creating anything new. The smart writer, Christian Bok, spends years on complicated projects, such as designing computer programs to generate poems and injecting those poems into DNA. While Christian could perform what Kenneth does, Kenneth admits he could never perform the complex projects of the smart writer. The document contrasts the approaches of the "dumb" writer who works intuitively versus the "smart" writer who takes a meticulous, complex, elite approach to writing.
I am a dumb writer, perhaps one of the dumbest thats ever lived. Whenever I have an idea, I question myself whether it is sufficiently dumb. I ask myself, is it possible that this, in any way, could be considered smart? If the answer is no, I proceed. I dont write anything new or original. I copy pre-existing texts and move information from one place to another. A child could do what I do, but wouldnt dare to fear of being called stupid. I recently was in a public conversation with my dear friend Christian Bok. If I am the dumbest poet thats ever lived, the Christian is the smartest. His projects are very complicated, taking years to complete. During our talk, Christian went on at length about a project hes been working on for the past decade, one which involved basically giving himself a PhD in genetics. In order to compose two little poems, he had to learn to write computer programs which went through something like eight million combinations of possible letters before hitting on the right ones. And then he injected these poems into a strand of DNA, which was ultimately designed to outlive the extinguishing of the sun. The whole thing involves working with laboratories and has cost a hundred of thousands of dollars. Christian is super-articulate really more like a robot than a person and had the audiences head spinning. When it came my turn to speak, all I could muster was: and I transcribe traffic reports. Christian and I deeply admire each others practices, but the truth is that while he easily could do what I do, I could never do what he does. Christian is smart. Smart is a star student, flawlessly dotting is and crossing ts. Arriving wellprepared and executing tasks with machinic precision, smart has studied its history and is ready to wrestle with the canon. Cultivating circumscription, smarts eyes never leave the prize. Smart is an over-achieving athlete, accomplishing things that mere mortals can only dream of. Complex and deep, exclusive and elite, smart brims with value. Having sweated for what its accomplished, smart plays a handsome dividend to those invested. Smart moves ever-forward. But by playing a high stakes game, smart is always paranoid that it might lose hard-won ground. Smart is always looking over its shoulder. Success or failure, win or lose, smart trades in binaries. Smart is exhausting and exhausted. I am dumb. Dumbs an ill prepared slacker, riding on hunches and intuition, Willfully amnesiac History, whats that? dumb is tabula rasa, full of emptiness. Caring little for progress or