Sunteți pe pagina 1din 11

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:


http://www.researchgate.net/publication/222482415

HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT IN A


LATENT HEAT STORAGE SYSTEM
ARTICLE in SOLAR ENERGY FEBRUARY 1999
Impact Factor: 3.54 DOI: 10.1016/S0038-092X(98)00128-5

CITATIONS

DOWNLOADS

VIEWS

170

1,902

573

5 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
R. Velraj

Klemens Schwarzer

Anna University, Chennai

Fachhochschule Aachen

85 PUBLICATIONS 1,233 CITATIONS

18 PUBLICATIONS 362 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

SEE PROFILE

Available from: R. Velraj


Retrieved on: 24 July 2015

Pergamon

PII:

Solar Energy Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 171180, 1999


1999 Elsevier Science Ltd
S 0 0 3 8 0 9 2 X ( 9 8 ) 0 0 1 2 8 5 All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain
0038-092X / 99 / $ - see front matter

HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT IN A LATENT HEAT STORAGE


SYSTEM
R. VELRAJ* , , R. V. SEENIRAJ*, B. HAFNER**, C. FABER** and K. SCHWARZER** ,
*Department of Mechanical Engineering, Anna University, Madras 600025, India

**Solar Institute Julich,


Fachhochschule Aachen, Julich,
D-52428, Germany
Received 18 September 1997; revised version accepted 6 October 1998
Communicated by ERICH HAHNE

AbstractCommercial acceptance and the economics of solar thermal technologies are tied to the design and
development of efficient, cost-effective thermal storage systems. Thermal storage units that utilize latent heat
storage materials have received greater attention in the recent years because of their large heat storage capacity
and their isothermal behavior during the charging and discharging processes. One major issue that needs to be
addressed is that most phase-change materials (PCM) with high energy storage density have an unacceptably
low thermal conductivity and hence heat transfer enhancement techniques are required for any latent heat
thermal storage (LHTS) applications. In the present paper the various heat transfer enhancement methods for
LHTS systems are discussed. Three different experiments to augment heat transfer were conducted and the
findings are reported. 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

the LHTS systems. The heat transfer enhancement


required for melting or solidification depends on
the type of application. Some applications require
heat to be charged at a faster rate while others
require heat to be discharged at a faster rate. In
applications like waste heat recovery, where the
process is intermittent and a large amount of
waste heat is to be recovered from the process
stream during a short time, heat transfer enhancement is required for charging. On the other hand,
if the heat is available at a constant rate for a
longer time and it is to be removed in a shorter
time like solar domestic hot water applications,
then the enhancement is required for solidification. As the present work is aimed for solar
domestic hot water and space heating applications
the study is focused on enhancement methods for
the solidification process. This study is performed
for a non dynamic latent heat storage system
without direct contact between the PCM and the
heat transfer fluid (HTF).

1. INTRODUCTION

Efficient and reliable thermal storage systems are


an important requirement for solar applications
due to the anti cyclic nature of heat demand and
availability of solar radiation and also due to the
diurnal variation of solar radiation caused by
weather variations. Among the thermal energy
storage concepts, both sensible heat and latent
heat (i.e., phase change) stores are under investigation. The major advantages of phase
change stores are their large heat storage capacity
and their isothermal behavior during the charging
and discharging process.
In a latent heat thermal storage (LHTS) system,
during phase change the solidliquid interface
moves away from the heat transfer surface. During this process, the surface heat flux decreases
due to the increasing thermal resistance of the
growing layer of the molten / solidified medium. In
the case of solidification, conduction is the sole
transport mechanism, and in the case of melting,
natural convection occurs in the melt layer and
this generally increases the heat transfer rate
compared to the solidification process. This decrease of the heat transfer rate calls for the usage
of proper heat transfer enhancement techniques in

2. REVIEW OF HEAT TRANSFER


ENHANCEMENT METHODS

2.1. Enhancement with fin configurations


There are several methods to enhance the heat
transfer in a LHTS system. The use of finned
tubes with different configurations has been proposed by various researchers as an efficient means
to improve the charge / discharge capacity of a

Paper presented at the ISES Solar World Congress, Taejon,


South Korea, 2429 August 1997.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISES member.
171

172

R. Velraj et al.

LHTS system. Experimental studies have been


performed by Sparrow et al. (1981) for outward
solidification on a longitudinal finned vertical
tube, viz. for conduction-controlled or naturalconvection-controlled heat transfer. Conduction is
the controlling mode when the liquid is at its
fusion temperature, whereas natural convection
controls when the liquid is above the fusion
temperature. It is concluded that for conduction
control, the enhancement of freezing due to
finning is less than the area ratio of the finned and
unfinned tubes, whereas for natural convection
control, the enhancement is very nearly equal to
the area ratio. It is also stated that when conduction controls, freezing continues more or less
indefinitely, whereas natural convection severely
retards the freezing and ultimately terminates it
altogether in the vertical tube arrangement. Smith
and Koch (1982) have formulated finite difference
equations based on conduction heat transfer for
phase change occurring adjacent to a cooled flat
surface containing fins. They have discussed the
effects of fin conduction parameter and fin dimensions on solidification rate and heat transfer.
Lacroix (1993) has presented a theoretical
model for predicting the transient behavior of a
shell-and-tube storage test unit having annular fins
externally fixed on the inner tube with the PCM
on the shell-side and the HTF flowing inside the
tube. The numerical results have also been validated with experimental data for various parameters like shell radius, mass flow rate and inlet
temperature of the HTF. Padmanabhan and Krishna Murthy (1986) have also studied the phase
change process occurring in a cylindrical annulus
in which (i) rectangular, uniformly spaced longitudinal fins, spanning the annulus (ii) annular fins
are attached to the outer surface of the inner
isothermal tube, while the outer tube is made
adiabatic. They have performed parametric analysis and based on the results they have suggested
working formulae to obtain the volume fraction
solidified at any time for both the cases.
All the earlier work relate to the enhancement
study for outward solidification on finned tubes.
Recently Velraj et al. (1997) have presented
theoretical and experimental work for a thermal
storage unit consisting of a cylindrical vertical
tube with internal longitudinal fins and this tube
assembly is, in turn, placed inside another cylindrical vessel containing water. It was concluded
that this configuration which forms a V-shaped
enclosure for the phase change material gives
maximum benefit to the fin arrangement. Sauer
(1982) describes a latent heat storage concept that

makes use of inward solidification and outward


melting simultaneously. The system consists of
two concentric pipes forming an annulus within
which the PCM is maintained. Through the inner
pipe the warm fluid is circulated and the cold fluid
surrounds the outer tube. Fins are uniformly
placed in the PCM region spanning the entire
annulus. Eftekhar et al. (1984) have experimentally studied a different heat transfer enhancement
method for melting of paraffin by constructing a
model that consists of vertically arranged fins
between two isothermal planes (the bottom one
being hotter than the top) which not only provides
additional conduction paths but also promotes
natural convection within the molten PCM. Their
photographs of the molten zone indicate that a
buoyant flow induced in the neighborhood of the
vertical fin causes rapid melting of the solid wax.
The objective of their research was to study the
enhancement of heat transfer during heating cycle
with paraffin wax as the PCM.

2.2. Other enhancement techniques


Several other heat transfer enhancement techniques for LHTS systems have been studied and
reported by various researchers. A few important
methods among them are, inserting a metal matrix
into a PCM, using PCM dispersed with high
conductivity particles and micro-encapsulation of
PCM.
Siegel (1977) has studied the improvement in
solidification rate in molten salt dispersed with
high conductivity particles. He has presented
results of one dimensional analysis for three
geometrys of practical interest, viz., solidification
on a flat plate, inside a tube and outside a tube.
He has concluded that even though there is
improvement in heat transfer rate, there is a
compensating effect due to the reduction in
volume fraction occupied by the phase change
material. For a reasonable fraction of the particles
in the PCM, moderate improvement in heat
transfer is achieved. He also observed that, compared with a plane layer, the improvement is less
for solidification inside a tube and somewhat
greater for outside a tube. Hoogendoorn and Bart
(1992) have reported that the low value of the
thermal conductivity of the PCMs could be greatly improved by embedding a metal matrix structure in them. A numerical simulation model for
the transient heat transfer in a PCM heat storage
vessel has been formulated by them and is
included in TRNSYS. Khan and Rohatgi (1994)
have studied the heat transfer characteristics during solidification in the presence of cylindrical

Heat transfer enhancement in a latent heat storage system

reinforcements, including graphite, alumina, iron


and copper in an aluminiumsilicon alloy base
and lead-base composite. They have reported that
the rate of movement of interface is strongly
dependent on the thermal conductivity ratio of
reinforcement to the melt. Tong et al. (1996) have
done a theoretical heat transfer study on a vertical
annular space filled with water (as PCM) and
aluminium matrix. Their numerical results are
presented in the form of solidliquid interface
movements, isotherms, streamlines and heat transfer rate for some representative cases. The heat
transfer rates for enhanced cases show an orderof-magnitude increase over the base case, where
no metal matrix is inserted.
Stovall and Arimilli (1988) have evaluated
three methods to enhance the thermal conductivity
of the thermal storage media using LiH as the
PCM. One method is to replace a portion of the
PCM with a reticulated metal. The second method
uses fins made of SS304 with fin volume fraction
ranging from 5 to 50%. The third method uses Li
in the form of LiH salt and molten Li slurry.
Chow et al. (1996) have evaluated two thermal
conductivity enhancement techniques. The first
technique focuses on placing PCM in capsules of
various shapes in a liquid metal medium. The
second technique involves a metal / PCM composite. The work was stimulated by the need of high
temperature energy storage for future space power
generation systems.
3. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

In the present work three different heat transfer


enhancement methods are investigated (see Fig.
1). The first enhancement technique uses internal

Fig. 1. Paraffin storage tube cross section and thermocouple


locations for the configurations (a) plain tube (b) with fins (c)
with lessing rings (d) with bubble agitation.

173

longitudinal fins inside a cylindrical vertical storage tube containing paraffin. In the second method, the tube is filled with lessing rings of 1 cm
diameter which are commonly used in the chemical reactors to enhance the surface contact, and
the molten paraffin is poured into the tube. These
lessing rings are made of steel and have a thinwalled hollow cylindrical structure with a partition. Without partition these rings are known as
Raschig-rings. A photographic view of the lessing
rings is shown in Fig. 2. The molten paraffin
occupies 80% of the storage volume. In the third
method a very small amount of water is poured
into the tube. Molten paraffin is then added and
the tube is evacuated by a vacuum pump. The
vacuum is maintained such that the saturation
temperature of the water inside the tube is nearly
equal to the phase change temperature of the
PCM. The intention is to create steam bubbles
inside the PCM during the phase change that
would promote the heat transfer.

3.1. Experimental setup


Fig. 3 is a schematic of the storage unit. It
consists of the vertical cylindrical storage tube
made of aluminium, with an outside diameter of 6
cm, an inside diameter of 5.4 cm and an active
length of 60 cm. The tube is, placed inside
another cylindrical vessel with 25 cm diameter
and having the same height as the tube, containing
water and the vessel is well insulated. The
temperature of the water bath is controlled by a
thermostat, having a variable heating coil capacity
of 500, 1000 and 2000 W. A magnetic stirrer is
provided at the bottom of the trough to have a
uniform temperature in the axial direction of the
cylindrical vessel. A small top portion of the tube
unit is kept above the water level to provide
convenient thermocouple connections and for
easy handling of the tube from outside. While
conducting experiments with fins, an assembly of
four aluminium fins with the dimensions of 0.15
cm thickness, 2.7 cm height and 50 cm length
each, and forming a cross shaped cross-section is
placed inside the tube and welded at the top and
bottom of the tube. The intermediate length of the
fin was thermally bonded to the tube by solder.
For all the experiments, NiCrNi thermocouples are placed in two different horizontal planes,
at a distance of 20 cm and 35 cm from the bottom
of the tube as shown in Fig. 3. The position of the
thermocouples in one plane for all the configurations is shown in Fig. 1. The thermocouples are
mounted at suitable locations where the end
effects (heat flow from the bottom of the tube

174

R. Velraj et al.

Fig. 2. A photographic view of the lessing rings.

which could cause heat flow in the axial direction


within the paraffin) are not present. Three thermocouples are located in the surrounding water
bath at different heights to monitor and ensure
that there is minimum temperature variation in the
axial direction. The thermocouples are connected
to a recorder, which can provide instantaneous
analog and digital outputs. The recorder has an
accuracy of 60.05% of the reading 1 0.58C, and
a resolution of 0.18C for the measurements with K
type thermocouple. Molten paraffin is poured into
the tube carefully avoiding cavities. For the
experiments with the plain tube, paraffin RT 58
was used and for the experiments with heat
transfer enhancement methods, paraffin RT 60

was used. Both paraffin have the same thermophysical properties except for the phase change
temperature. RT 60 has a phase change temperature range of 58 to 608C and RT 58 has a phase
change range of 58 to 598C. Table 1 summarizes
the thermophysical properties of paraffin RT 58
and RT 60.

3.2. Experimental procedure


Several experimental runs were performed to
find the temperature distribution within the paraffin during solidification. Initially the experiments
were performed without fins (plain tube configuration) as detailed below. Subsequently, experiments were conducted for the heat transfer enhancement configurations, following the similar
procedure.
The temperature of the water was maintained at
Table 1. Thermophysical properties of paraffin RT 60 and RT
58 (from manufacturers a data)
Property

Value

Latent heat of fusion


Specific heat capacity
Thermal conductivity
Density
Solid
Liquid

214.4 kJ kg 21
900 J kg 21 K 21
0.2 W m 21 K 21

Fig. 3. Experimental setup.

850 kg m 23
775 kg m 23

Manufacturer address: Hans-Otto Schuemann GmbH & Co


KG, Worthdamm 1327, D-2000, Hamburg, FRG.

Heat transfer enhancement in a latent heat storage system

a constant value, slightly above the solidification


temperature through a thermostat control till the
entire PCM region attained thermal equilibrium
with the surrounding. The temperature of the
water was lowered suddenly to a temperature
below the solidification temperature and maintained at a constant value. This was achieved by
removing part of the water from the surrounding
water bath and adding cold water. Due to the
presence of the magnetic stirrer at the bottom, a
nearly uniform temperature was achieved within a
short time. This is confirmed from the readings of
the thermocouples located at three different
heights in the water bath. The total time lag
between the removal of water from the bath and
the attainment of nearly uniform temperature was
approximately 3 to 4 min.
The thermostat is then set to the new surrounding water temperature and the recorder was also
switched on. The water bath was maintained at a
constant temperature (within a range of 60.28C)
throughout the experiment by thermostat control.
The transfer of fusion heat from the PCM increases the temperature of the surrounding water.
The mass flow rate of the water is hence varied
and kept at just sufficient value to maintain a
constant temperature during the process. During
the initial stage, a slightly higher flow of about 10
to 15 kg h 21 was required to prevent the temperature from rising. This is due to a larger amount of
heat transferred from the PCM to the surrounding
coolant during the initial stages of the process.
Subsequently, a flow of only about 2 kg h 21 was
required. As the solidification proceeds, the temperature vs time readings were recorded and
monitored. The experimental readings were obtained till all the thermocouples showed temperatures well below the solidification temperature.

3.3. Determination of h using experiments on


plain tube configuration
Since the height of the paraffin-filled plain tube
is high and the rate of circulation of the water is
low, convection currents would occur on the
outside tube surface. Due to the presence of the
magnetic stirrer at the bottom of the vessel, an
expression to determine h for this type of
agitating / circulating flow outside vertical surfaces
is not readily available. To obtain more accurate
results, the h value is determined by conducting
experiments on the plain tube configuration, and
matching the results with the numerical model for
the same. For this and for all further theoretical
work, the numerical model developed by Velraj et
al. (1997) based on the enthalpy method is used.
This model which was originally developed for

175

Fig. 4. Experimental and simulated (with h 5 400 W m 22 K 21 )


temperature variation within the paraffin for the plain tube
configuration at the thermocouple locations shown in Fig. 1(a).

vertical internally finned tube configuration is


reduced for plain tube configuration by assuming
the fin thickness equal to zero. The model is
initially validated with the exact solution of
London and Seban (1943) for inward cylindrical
solidification. This is done by obtaining the
complete solidification time from the model and
comparing it with that obtained from the exact
solution for different sets of input parameters. The
results are in close agreement and the deviations
are within 62% for the selected grid size and
time step in the numerical model.
To estimate the value of h, the experimental
temperature variation was obtained for three
different thermocouple locations shown in Fig.
1(a). Repeated numerical runs were made by
varying the h value in the model keeping all the
thermophysical properties of the paraffin at a
constant value, until close matching of the numerically computed temperature profile with the
experimental results was obtained. Such numerical results obtained are referred to as simulated
results. The value of h thus obtained was of the
order of 400 Wm 22 K 21 . This value of h was
used in the computations involved with other heat
transfer enhancement methods. Fig. 4 shows the
experimental and simulated temperature variation
for the above value of h, at the locations of the
thermocouples shown in Fig. 1(a). The numerical
and simulated temperature variation are in close
agreement with each other.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fig. 5 shows the experimental and predicted


temperature variation within the paraffin for the
fin configuration at the locations of the thermocouples shown in Fig. 1(b). The predicted
temperature variation at the above locations is

176

R. Velraj et al.

Fig. 5. Experimental and predicted temperature variation within the paraffin for the tube with fin at four thermocouple locations
shown in Fig. 1(b).

obtained from the numerical model. The theoretical and the experimental curves are in rather
close agreement with each other, except that in
the theoretical curves, the rate of temperature drop
is slower during phase change and faster after
phase change is completed at any location whereas in the experimental curves, there is not much
change in the rate of temperature drop even after
the lower limit of the phase change temperature
range is reached. This could be due to the
solidified paraffin, that may still have some
amount of latent heat even after the lower limit of
the phase change temperature range is reached.
This implies that the phase transition temperature
range is actually wider than that specified by the
manufacturer. This fact has also been observed by
Abhat (1983) for most of the paraffin. However,
the major phase change takes place within the
specified temperature range. This shift of a small
amount of latent heat for a short range below the
lower limit of the phase change temperature range
is also useful from the application point of view.
This reduces the sub-cooling of the solidified
layer and makes it possible to extract the energy
at nearly constant temperature even during the
solidification of the paraffin at the center of the

region between the adjacent fins. Further, in the


theoretical case, the initial temperature was fixed
at 60.58C for the entire domain, whereas it can be
observed from Fig. 5 that in the experiments the
initial temperatures could only be maintained at
60.560.38C. However, as soon as the temperature
of the water bath is lowered, the whole region
attains the temperature of saturated liquid.
It is also seen from the above figure that
initially the temperature drop is faster at thermocouple location 2 than in location 1 and vice
versa after a certain interval of time. This could
be because location 2 is more closer to the fin and
this fin conduction is more pronounced initially.
Later, the corner effect (cooling effect from the
fin and the boundary wall) predominates at location 1 and this results in a faster drop in temperature. This kind of temperature variation is observed both in the theoretical and experimental
curves. A similar corner effect is discussed by
Shamsundar and Sparrow (1975) for the case of a
square container.
The unique feature in the numerical model
(Velraj et al., 1997) is that it takes into account
the heat flow in the circumferential direction
along the tube wall. Initially, when the numerical

Heat transfer enhancement in a latent heat storage system

trials were done without taking into account the


circumferential heat flow from the fin tip to the
wall, more time was taken to lower the fin
temperature. Consequently, the time for complete
solidification was much higher than the experimental value. When the above circumferential
heat flow is taken into account, it is observed that
approximately 80% of the total heat flow from the
fin is through this path. This is because the
convective surface area at the fin tip is not
sufficient to pass away all the heat from the fin
directly into the surrounding fluid.
Fig. 6 shows both the experimental and simulated temperature distribution within the paraffin
for the enhancement technique employing paraffin-lessing ring mixture at the thermocouple locations shown in Fig. 1(c). The numerical model for
the plain tube configuration was used to find the
effective thermal conductivity, k e , for this heat
transfer enhancement method. For this method,
the experimental temperaturetime variation obtained from three different thermocouple locations
was used as a base (standard). The value of k e
was varied by trial and error in the numerical
model until close matching of the predicted
temperature profile with the experimental results
was obtained. The value of c p was obtained by
mixture rule and was used in the energy equation.
Since the paraffin occupies only 80% of the total
volume, the corresponding reduction in amount of
latent heat per unit of the total volume is taken
into account in the energy equation by assuming
the value of the density of the paraffin as 80% of
its actual value. The value of k e thus obtained was
2 Wm 21 K 21 which is ten times greater than the
k of paraffin. Hence, the thermal conductivity
enhancement factor which is defined as the ratio

Fig. 6. Experimental and simulated (with k e 5 2 W m 21 K 21 )


temperature variation within the paraffin for the tube with
lessing rings at three thermocouple locations shown in Fig.
1(c).

177

of k e obtained with lessing rings to that of the


paraffin, is ten for this configuration. This enhancement is achieved with a loss of 20% volume
of paraffin for the particular tube diameter of 5.4
cm and lessing ring diameter of 1 cm. The
increase in effective thermal conductivity depends
on the ratio of the diameter of the tube and the
dimensions of the ring and it is well known that
for larger tube diameter this enhancement is much
higher.
Fig. 7 shows the experimental temperature
distribution within the paraffin for the case employing bubble agitation at the thermocouple
locations shown in Fig. 1(d). It is found that there
is not much increase in heat transfer during
solidification. Though the movement of bubbles
induces convection during melting, the vapor
pocket or cavity entrapped within the solid paraffin during solidification reduces the conduction
heat transfer as the vapor is a poor conductor of
heat. Initially when the temperature of the PCM is
above saturation temperature, the water is present
in vapor form. During solidification the water
condenses and since it is denser than paraffin, it
slides down over the solidified paraffin. When this
water comes in contact with the interior paraffin
which is at a higher temperature, again it evaporates and forms steam bubbles which tend to raise
up. This water condensing and bubble formation
takes place alternately throughout the solidification process. During this process some steam
bubbles may get entrapped within the solidified
paraffin and will affect the conduction heat transfer. However from melting experiments conducted
(not reported in the present work), it was observed
that the increase in heat transfer during melting is
appreciable, which may be suitable for some
waste heat recovery applications where the pro-

Fig. 7. Experimental temperature variation within the paraffin


for the tube with enhancement through bubble agitation at
three thermocouple locations shown in Fig. 1(d).

178

R. Velraj et al.

cess is not continuous and large quantity of heat


should be stored in a short period. This bubble
formation was observed by conducting the initial
experiments with glass tube instead of aluminium
tube. Since there was no remarkable augmentation
effect on solidification and also due to the complexities of the process, further analysis was not
attempted.
Fig. 8 shows the time for complete solidification (obtained from the numerical model) of the
paraffin with the surrounding water bath temperature at 508C for the plain tube and for the two
heat transfer enhancement configurations shown
in Fig. 1(b) and (c). These results are obtained
from the numerical model, since experimentally it
is difficult to determine the portion of the PCM
which solidifies at the end, and place the thermocouple in the appropriate location, especially
for the fin configuration. The fins occupy 7% of
the tube volume and it is seen from the figure, that
the time for complete solidification is approximately one-fourth that of the plain tube. In the
other method the lessing rings occupy 20% of the
tube volume and the time for complete solidification is nearly one-ninth that of the plain tube.
Comparing the volume occupied by the fins and
the lessing rings, the latter occupy more volume

without proportionate reduction in time for complete solidification. However, the time factor
which is defined as the ratio of time for complete
solidification with heat transfer enhancement to
that of plain tube configuration, depends on the
diameter of the tube for the lessing ring configuration. The time factor in this case decreases with
increase in diameter of the tube. With the fin
configuration, it was observed from the numerical
runs that the time factor remains more or less
unchanged for a fixed number of fins irrespective
of the diameter of the tube. The figure also shows
the heat stored which represents the amount of
latent heat that can be stored per unit meter length
in a tube with 5.4-cm inner diameter with paraffin
RT 60 as PCM. In the plain tube configuration
490 kJ of energy can be stored per meter tube
length and with fins and lessing ring configurations the reduction in energy stored is 7 and 20%
respectively.
In a LHTS system the total resistance to the
heat flow is the sum of convective resistance on
the tube surface and the conductive resistance of
solidified PCM. During the extraction of heat
from the system, as the solidification proceeds,
the conductive resistance offered by the PCM
increases whereas the convective resistance is

Fig. 8. Comparison of total solidification time and total quantity of heat stored for different configuration.

Heat transfer enhancement in a latent heat storage system

constant throughout the process for a given flow


condition. Hence the variation of surface heat flux
depends on the predominance of the convective
resistance (fixed resistance) and the conductive
resistance (variable resistance). When the convective resistance is dominant nearly uniform surface
heat flux with time can be achieved from the
LHTS system and if the conductive resistance is
dominant the surface heat flux will have a decreasing trend with respect to time. In a LHTS
system when water is the heat transfer fluid, the
convective resistance is less and the variable
conductive resistance offered by the PCM becomes dominant during the process and hence it is
very difficult to achieve a uniform surface heat
flux. The surface heat flux variations with water
as heat transfer fluid has been discussed by Velraj
et al. (1997). However, when air is the heat
transfer fluid, nearly uniform surface heat flux can
be achieved as the surface convective resistance is
high compared to the variable conductive resistance. Based on the above observation the following configurations are suggested for water heating
and air heating applications.
For domestic solar hot water applications, when
used as single LHTS unit, the surface heat flux
will not be uniform. Therefore a combined sensible and latent heat storage system with a innerfinned tube configuration such as that shown in
Fig. 9 is recommended. This type of storage
system utilizes the advantages of both sensible
and latent heat storage systems. For domestic
water heating, the hot water may be required at a
higher rate for a short duration and this requirement can be met by the sensible heat of the water
in the storage tank. Before the next usage, the
water in the tank is allowed to heat up again by
slow extraction of latent heat from the PCM.
Thereby the problem of nonuniform heat flux
during the withdrawal of heat from the LHTS
system is minimized

Fig. 9. Latent heat storage system for solar thermal applications.

179

For air heating applications, since more or less


uniform heat flux can be achieved as discussed
above, the LHTS system can be used as a single
large module and the performance of the unit can
be improved by increasing the effective thermal
conductivity of the PCM by the addition of high
conductivity material like lessing rings into the
PCM. The addition of high conductivity material
increases the surface heat flux and also more
uniform surface heat flux can be achieved as the
maximum conductive resistance (variable resistance) gets reduced.

5. CONCLUSION

A detailed investigation of the different heat


transfer enhancement methods for the latent heat
thermal storage system has been carried out. The
heat transfer enhancement with fin configuration
for storage tubes and by using lessing rings in
storage tanks is appreciable, and these two methods are highly suitable for solidification enhancement. The storage configuration employing bubble agitation may be suitable for applications
where heat transfer enhancement for melting is
required. Though the two LHTS systems suggested are technically feasible, their commercialization requires an economical analysis. Ongoing
research and close cooperation with industry will
bring the LHTS system more simple and costeffective in the near future for many applications.

REFERENCES
Abhat A. (1983) Low temperature latent heat thermal energy
storage: Heat storage materials. Solar Energy 30, 313332.
Chow L. C., Zhong J. K. and Beam J. E. (1996) Thermal
conductivity enhancement for phase change storage media.
Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer 23, 91100.
Eftekhar J., Sheikh A. H. and Lou D. Y. S. (1984) Heat
transfer enhancement in a paraffin wax thermal storage
system. J. Solar Energy Eng. 106, 299306.
Hoogendoorn C. J. and Bart G. C. J. (1992) Performance and
modeling of Latent heat stores. Solar Energy 48, 5358.
Khan M. A. and Rohatgi P. K. (1994) Numerical solution to a
moving boundary problem in a composite medium. Numerical Heat Transfer 25, 209221.
Lacroix M. (1993) Study of the heat transfer behavior of a
latent heat thermal energy unit with a finned tube. Int. J.
Heat Mass Transfer 36, 20832092.
London A. L. and Seban R. A. (1943) Rate of ice formation.
J. Heat Transfer 65, 771778.
Padmanabhan P. V. and Krishna Murthy M. V. (1986) Outward
phase change in a cylindrical annulus with axial fins on the
inner tube. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 29, 18551866.
Siegel R. (1977) Solidification of low conductivity material
containing dispersed high conductivity particles. Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer 20, 10871089.
Sauer E. (1982). Energietransport-speicherung und verteilung.
Rheinland,
Technischer Verlag Resch, Koln: Verlag Tuv
Germany.

180

R. Velraj et al.

Shamsundar N. and Sparrow E. M. (1975) Analysis of


multidimensional conduction phase change via the enthalpy
model. J. Heat Transfer 97, 333340.
Smith R. N. and Koch J. D. (1982). Numerical solution for
freezing adjacent to a finned surface. In Proceedings of the
Seventh International Heat Transfer Conference, Grigull U.,
Hahne E., Stephan K. and Straub J. (Eds.) pp. 6974,

Munchen,
Germany.
Stovall T. K. and Arimilli R. V. (1988). Transient thermal
analysis of three fast-changing latent heat storage configuration for a space-based power system. In Proceedings of the
23 rd Inter Society Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, pp. 171177, Denver, Colorado.

Sparrow E. M., Larsen E. D. and Ramsey J. W. (1981)


Freezing on a finned tube for either conduction-controlled or
natural-convection-controlled heat transfer. Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer 24, 273284.
Tong X., Khan J. A. and Amin M. R. (1996) Enhancement of
heat transfer by inserting a metal matrix into a phase change
material. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A 30, 125141.
Velraj R., Seeniraj R. V., Hafner B., Faber C. and Schwarzer K.
(1997) Experimental analysis and numerical modeling of
inward solidification on a finned vertical tube for a latent
heat storage unit. Solar Energy 60, 281290.

S-ar putea să vă placă și