Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
REPORT
ON
Of
Submitted By
SAURABH YADAV
ROLL NO.-1401470018
Certificate
This is to certify that Mr. Saurabh Yadav a student of MBA III Semester has
completed his Research Project Report titled Training and Development
assigned by MBA Department and under my supervision.
It is further certified that he has personally prepared this report that is the result of
his personal survey/observation. It is of the standard expected to MBA student and
hence recommended for evaluation.
Date:
Declaration
This project has been undertaken as a partial fulfillment of the requirement for the
award of the degree of Master of Business Administration of U.P. Technical
University, Lucknow.
The project was executed during the fourth semester under the guidance of
MR.S.K.SUMAN, Faculty of Management Science, Shri Ram MurtiSmarak
College of Engineering and Technology.
Further I declare that this project is my original work and the analysis and
finding are for academic purpose only. This project has not been presented in any
seminar or submitted elsewhere for the award of any Degree or Diploma.
(SAURABH YADAV)
MBA
IIIrd
Semester
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Introduction and Scope
1-29
15
24
29
30
39-40
3.1Introduction
39
40
3.3 Population
40
40
40
41-52
4.1: Introduction
41
41-50
4.3: Findings
51
4.4: Limitations
52
Chapter: 6 Bibliography
53
Annexures:
1: Questionnaire
55
2012
Two patents filed for making a total number of 12 for security systems & 2 for
interiors.
2011
SAP Implementation in all Units
Acquired Electronics ESS Business for After Market from Minda Valeo
Business of E Bike controllers with TAA from NEC corporation, Japan was sta
2008
Four wheeler division hived off into a separate company - Minda Valeo Securi
Systems Pvt. Ltd.
2007
Company renamed as .
2006
2005
2004
2003
Major re-layout Completed in a drive towards lean Manufacturing
2002
Supply of Electronic Security Systems to Two & Four Wheeler OEM's Initiate
2001
Joined CII - ACT Cluster Project for Productivity & Quality Improvement
Q.S. 9000 Certification Obtained
1999
ERP Implemented
1997
1995
Joint Venture formed with Huf Hlsbeck & Frst GmbH & Co. KG
Introduction to Four wheeler Locksets
1994
Introduction to Auto CAD for product design
1989
Minda Corporatation Ltd. commences operation under the name of Minda Swi
1985
Auto Pvt. Ltd. and started manufacturing Ignition Switches for Indian Automo
Industry
Innovative
As a group we have been at the forefront of innovation. We intend to
increase our focus on innovation in products and technologies,
organizational structure, and optimizing efficiencies. We also are committed
to change management as a way of life to enable us to meet the emerging
challenges of the Industry.
Profitable
We want to emerge in the Global arena as a leading automotive player and
realize profitability in business so as to sustain and enhance our efforts
towards emerging as a leader in the industry.
5
Global
We are already Global and will continue to expand to meet the global
requirements of OEMs and be a significant player globally, in our own
domain. In spreading globally we will not focus on any specific country or
region but take decisions based on our core interests in the automotive
sector.
Automotive
We will stick to being a significant player in the automotive domain and
emerge as a systems supplier. We will not deviate from our core sector but
will expand to include different components and systems that align and have
synergy with our products and technologies.
Mission
'Our mission is to be an automotive System Solution provider and Build a
7
Society
We will always be conscious of our responsibilities towards the society at
large and undertake welfare activities for the community.
8
Values
Commitment to Stakeholders
Demonstrate loyalty and dedication to the organization.
Passion for Excellence
Relentlessly improving and continuously raising the bar in everything we
do.
Open Communication
Reasoning, Knowledge, Experience Sharing, confronting fearlessly for the
good of the organization.
Integrity & Fairness
Fair and upright in intention and actions - always complying with
conscience.
Nurture Talent, Competency & Willingness
Create challenging opportunities and provide support for development of
self and team members. Encourage experimentation & willingness to accept
challenges.
Respect & Humility
Must be Courteous, Compassionate, Caring, Humane and Humble in all our
9
interpersonal dealings.
Innovation & Improvement Orientation
Challenge status quo. Demonstrate creativity for improvement and break
through.
Partnering
Leverages Interdependence, Cooperative, Readily provides support and
assistance to others.
Responsibility
Take ownership for the consequences of ones decisions and actions.
Cross Cultural Diversity
Build a vibrant workforce with different ethnicity, cultural orientation with
no prejudice due to sex / caste / creed / color and to cherish our diversity.
Core Values
Passion for Excellence
Nurture Talent, Competency & Willingness
Respect & Humility
10
Core Purpose
To be a happy, inspiring and proud place to work, setting benchmarks and
delivering products that give customers an edge in their businesses.
Section 1.5
MEASURING THE IMPACT OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
Management Team
Home About us Management Team
Security Division
Corporate :
Mr. Sudhir Kashyap
: Head Corporate HR
Corporate :
Mr. Sanjay Aneja
: CFO
: Head Financial
12
LEVELS OF EVALUATION
Research & Development
Plant Locations
Minda Corporation Limited
Investor Relations
Minda Corporation Limited (NSE: MINDACORP) is a diversified
automotive components manufacturer with a product portfolio that
encompasses Safety, Security and Restraint Systems; Plastic Interior
Systems and Driver Information & Telematics Systems for auto OEMs
across the globe. It has manufacturing facilities at India, South-East Asia and
Europe.
The objective of Minda Corporation Investor Relations is to ensure
continuous and open communication with its shareholders and all financial
market participants.
Investor Presentation
14
Company Profile
Company Announcements
Earnings Call Transcripts-June 02, 2015
Sharcholding Patterns
Shareholding Pattern as of June 30, 2015
Other Disclosures
Appointment Letters of Independent Directors
Financial Results
Q1 FY2015 Standalone Financial Results
Shareholding Patterns
Shareholding Pattern as of June 30, 2014
Company Announcements
Notice of Board Meeting to be held on August 12, 2014
Other Disclosures
Postal Ballot Form dated July 26, 2014
Annual Report
FY2014 Annual Report
Financial Results
16
Shareholding Patterns
Shareholding as of June 30, 2013
Corporate Governance
Q2 FY2014 Corporate Governance Report
Annual Report
FY2013 Annual Report
Financial Results
Q1 FY2013 Standalone Financial Results
Shareholding Patterns
Shareholding as of June 30, 2012
Corporate Governance
Q1 FY2013 Corporate Governance Report
17
Other Disclosures
Outcome of AGM Sep 24, 2013
Annual Report
FY2012 Annual Report
Financial Results
Q1 FY2012 Standalone Financial Results
Shareholding Patterns
Shareholding as of June 30, 2011
Corporate Governance
Q1 FY2012 Corporate Governance Report
Other Disclosures
Outcome of AGM Mar 16, 2012
18
19
Section 1.6
Vision
' To be a Dynamic, Innovative And Profitable Global Automotive
Organization for Emerging as the Preferred Supplier and Employer, to
Create Value for all Stakeholders'
20
21
Quarterly results / press release of the Company are also sent to the
Directors.
23
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
24
(i) the Chief Executive Officer or the Managing Director or the Manager;
(ii) the Company Secretary;
(iii) the Whole-Time Director;
(iv) the Chief Financial Officer; and
(v) such other officer as may be prescribed.
Material
Related
Party
Transaction,
transaction
entered
into
following:
1. A person or a close member of that persons family is related to a
company if that person:
a. is a related party under Section 2(76) of the Companies Act, 2013 which
are as follows:
(i) a director or his relative ;
(ii) a key managerial personnel or his relative ;
(iii) a firm, in which a director, manager or his relative is a partner ;
(iv) a private company in which a director or manager is a member or
director ;
(v) a public company in which a director or manager is a director or holds
along with his
relatives, more than two per cent of its paid-up share capital ;
(vi) any body corporate whose Board of directors, managing director, or
manager is
accustomed to act in accordance with the advice, directions or instructions of
a
director or manager ;
(vii) any person under whose advice, directions or instructions a director or
manager is
27
accustomed to act :
Provided that nothing in sub-clauses (vi) and (vii) shall apply to the advice,
directions or instructions
given in a professional capacity;
(viii) any company which is
(A) a holding, subsidiary or an associate company of such company ; or
(B) a subsidiary of a holding company to which it is also a subsidiary ;
(ix) Director or key managerial personnel of the holding company or his
relative with
reference to a company; or
b. has control or joint control or significant influence over the company; or
c. is a key management personnel of the company or of a parent of the
company; or
2. An entity is related to a company if any of the following conditions
applies:
a. The entity is a related party under Section 2(76) of the Companies Act,
2013; or
b. The entity and the company are members of the same group (which means
that each
parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is related to the others); or
28
30
i) All Related Party Transactions shall require prior approval of the Audit
Committee. However, the
Audit Committee may grant omnibus approval (valid for a period not
exceeding one year and
shall require fresh approval after the expiry of one year) for Related Party
Transactions proposed
to be entered into by the Company subject to the following conditions:
a) Omnibus approval shall be accorded as per the laid down criteria and in
line with the policy on
Related Party Transactions of the Company and such approval shall be
applicable in respect of
transactions which are repetitive in nature.
b) The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself the need for such omnibus
approval and that such
approval is in the interest of the Company;
c) Above approval shall specify the name/s of the related party, nature of
transaction, period of
transaction, maximum amount of transaction that can be entered into, (ii) the
indicative base
31
price / current contracted price and the formula for variation in the price if
any and (iii) such other
conditions as the Audit Committee may deem fit;
Where the Company cannot foresee the need for Related Party Transaction
and details
mentioned in (c ) above are not available, Audit Committee may grant
omnibus approval for
such transactions subject to their value not exceeding `1 crore per
transaction.
32
33
34
any Related Party Transaction will abstain from discussion and on the
approval of the Related Party
Transaction.
To review a Related Party Transaction, the Committee will be provided with
all relevant material
information of the Related Party Transaction, including the terms of the
transaction, the business
purpose of the transaction, the benefits to the Company and to the Related
Party, and any other
relevant matters. In determining whether to approve a Related Party
Transaction, the Committee will
consider the following factors, among others, to the extent relevant to the
Related Party Transaction:
Whether the terms of the Related Party Transaction are fair and on arms
length basis to the
Company and would apply on the same basis if the transaction did not
involve a Related
Party;
Whether there are any compelling business reasons for the Company to
enter into the
35
36
Related Party Transaction and shall evaluate all options available to the
Company, including
revision or termination of the Related Party Transaction. The Committee
shall also examine the facts
and circumstances pertaining to the failure of reporting such Related Party
Transaction to the
Committee under this Policy and shall take any such action it deems
appropriate.
In connection with any review of a Related Party Transaction, the
Committee has authority to modify
or waive any procedural requirements of this Policy.
9. Policy Review
In case of any subsequent changes in the provisions of the Companies Act,
2013, or any other
regulations which makes any of the provisions in the Policy inconsistent
with the Act or regulations,
the provisions of the Act or regulations would prevail over the Policy and
the provisions in the Policy
would be modified in due course to make it consistent with law.
38
This Policy shall be reviewed by the Audit Committee as and when any
changes are to be
incorporated in the Policy due to change in regulations or as may be felt
appropriate by the
Committee. Any changes or modification on the Policy as recommended by
the Committee would be
presented for approval of the Board of Directors.
10. Disclosure
Related Party Transactions or contract or arrangement entered shall be
disclosed in the following
manner:
i) Every contract or arrangement, which is not in ordinary course of business
or not on arms length
basis, shall be disclosed in the Board's report to the shareholders along with
justification for
entering into such contract or arrangement.
ii) Details of all material transactions with related parties shall be disclosed
quarterly along with the
compliance report on corporate governance; and
39
40
41
Research instrument
Data was also collected using secondary sources like internet and some books,
whereas mainly, primary data source i-e, questionnaire was used to collect data
from existing employees of selected organizations. Questionnaire consisting of 10
questions is distributed (questionnaire is given in annexure). 5 questions are
related to the training and development programs that are carried out in different
organizations: the remaining 5 questions are to investigate the effect of that
training and development on the performance of the employees. Some data has
been collected through interviews with the existing employees. Interview of a HR
manager will be taken to verify the results.
Type of study
The study is of descriptive nature and it is carried out to find the reasons how and
in which way T&D programs affect the performance of an organization employee.
Population
The population of the study consists of existing employees, managers of Human
Resource and Administrative Departments. Thus the respondents of the study have
been drawn from the employees, managers of Human Resource and
Administrative Departments.
Total number of 30 questionnaires was distributed in these organizations.
42
Sample size
As population size is 30.
Measuring level of Employees performance
Instrument/ Questionnaire used to determine employee performance after
undergoing a T&D program consist of five responses on linkert scale.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agreed nor disagree/Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
43
80%
70%
Preferences
Respondents
Yes
No
Cant say
Total
21
00
Percentage
70%
30%
100%
09
30
70%
60%
50%
Yes
40%
30%
30%
No
Can't Say
20%
10%
0%
Training Programme attended by employees
Interpretation:70% of the employees said that they have gone through training programme and
30% of the employees said that they have not gone through training programme.
44
A
B
C
D
E
Preferences
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
Respondents
Percentage
00
00%
00
00%
01
03%
26
87%
03
10%
30
100%
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
87%
Strongly Agree
Interpretation:87% of the employees agree that training improve their productivity, 10% of the
employees strongly agree and 3% of the employees somewhat agree.
45
A
B
C
D
E
Preferences
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
Respondents
Percentage
00
00%
00
00%
01
03%
26
87%
03
10%
30
100%
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
87%
Strongly Agree
Interpretation:87% of the employees agree that training improve their skill, 10% of the
employees strongly agree and 3% of the employees somewhat agree.
46
A
B
C
D
E
Preferences
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
Respondents
Percentage
00
00
01
03%
26
87%
03
10%
30
100%
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
87%
Strongly Agree
Interpretation:87% of the employees agree that training improve their knowledge, 10% of the
employees strongly agree and 3% of the employees somewhat agree.
47
Preferences
Respondents
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
00
00
09
15
06
30
Percentage
30%
50%
20%
100%
0.2
0.3
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
0.5
Strongly Agree
48
Interpretation:50% of the employees agree that necessary training related to the job is provided,
20% of the employees strongly agree while 30% of the employees somewhat agree
Preferences
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
Respondents
00
03
09
12
06
30
Percentage
10%
30%
40%
20%
100%
49
Percentage
20%
Strongly Disagree
10%
Disagree
30%
Somewhat Agree
Agree
40%
Strongly Agree
Interpretation:40% of the employees agree that training in new technologies is provided, 30% of
the employees somewhat agree, 20% of the employees strongly agree and 10% of
the employees disagree.
Preferences
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
Respondents
27
00
00
03
00
30
Percentage
90%
10%
100%
10%
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
90%
Strongly Agree
51
Interpretation:90% of the employees strongly disagree that the trainingopportunities are unfairly
allocated across work units, while 10% of the employees agree.
Q.8Do supervisors/team leaders support employee efforts to learn outside the job?
DESCRIPTION:-I want to know how many employees have opinion that their
superiors encourage and motivate to increase their skills through attending various
national seminars and training programmes.
TABLE NO 8: The response of employees towards support of supervisors to learn
outside the job.
S.No
.
A
B
C
D
E
Preferences
Respondents
Percentage
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
00
00
00
24
06
30
80%
20%
100%
20%
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
80%
Strongly Agree
52
Interpretation:80% of the employees agree that supervisors are supportive to learn outside the
job and 20% of the employees strongly agree.
Preferences
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
Respondents
00
00
00
27
03
30
Percentage(%)
90%
10%
100%
53
10%
Disagree
Somewhat Agree
Agree
90%
Strongly Agree
Interpretation:90% of the employees agree that appropriate training is provided and 10% of the
employees strongly agree that training programmes are provided appropriate.
54
100%
90%
Preferences
Yes
No
Cant say
Total
Respondents
27
00
03
30
Percentage
90%
10%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
Yes
50%
No
40%
Can't say
30%
20%
10%
10%
0%
Interpretation:90% of the employees are satisfied by the training & development programmes
and 10% of the employees are not satisfied.
55
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WEBSITES:
www.minda.net
57
www.sparkmindas.com
www.scribd.com
www.minda.com
58
ANNEXURES
59
Date:
2
Disagree
Attributes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
1
0
3
Somewhat Agree
5
Strongly Agree
60
Note: Please give your valuable suggestions for improving the low score areas.
Sl. No.
1
2
Suggestions
61