Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Going Humbly
From Do They Know I'm Running?
David Corbett
the time, despite the presence of the statehouse and one of the country’s largest
universities, Ohio State. Before I left, this was changing; African Americans were
gaining ground politically, economically and socially, the university’s international draw
in both students and faculty was quite literally changing the face of the local community,
and Columbus was growing into the major metropolis it has become. But I saw firsthand,
at times within my own home, the sometimes subtle and other times quite blatant
The word “nigger” was a constant drumbeat among the working class white guys
I hung out with, so much so that by the time I made my first black friend—his name was
Adrian Bennett, we were both fourteen, working together as volunteers at the Center for
Science and Industry—I was startled by how “normal,” how like myself, he was.
I felt embarrassed by this reaction and still do. Although I was not paralyzed by
white guilt I realized I was by no means innocent. I bore the emotional and conceptual
baggage of my place and time and no amount of feel-good hipness could cure me
completely.
In a way racism is not unlike alcoholism. The tendency cannot be escaped, merely
controlled, and the control requires insight, honesty and discipline. Put differently, it
requires one to become more fully human. And like an alcoholic, I very much wish I did
not have the thoughts and feelings and impulses I still sometimes observe within myself.
I wish I was colorblind, race-blind. Instead, I have tried to become insightful and
conscientious, I’ve learned to question and control my impulses, I’ve learned to listen and
observe.
neighborhood so diverse I once reflected, during our yearly Nationwide Night Out get-
together, that I and my neighbors looked like we’d been transplanted from a Jonathan
genuine warmth and fondness. We look out for each other and involve ourselves in each
other’s lives.
Angeles restaurant with a largely Mexican staff. I was supervised by a waiter named
Ramon, who asked me to help him learn French, in return for his help in teaching me
Spanish. But Ramon was not merely generous and curious. He was also proud, world-
wise and reserved. He knew that I, as an Anglo, might easily replace him as head waiter
if the Caucasian owners saw fit or if customers groused. The other Mexican waiters also
treated me with a mix of helpfulness and detachment; one actually picked a fight with me
in the dressing room. And though none of the other waiters who were there came to my
defense, none of them jumped in to help my adversary either. The fight was between me
my feelings were at the time than the racism I’d known growing up. There were clearly
tensions between us—and those tensions were the result of our being of different color
and class and culture—but there was also an awareness of each other as human. I’d
known no Latinos in central Ohio; the Great Brown Threat had yet to register on our
radar. I had not been indoctrinated in class or community-wide resentment and fear. Latin
Americans were not the Other, to be feared and mistrusted, controlled and repelled. Not
yet, anyway.
But I remain very much attuned to tone. I have a pretty good radar for bigotry,
due to my own struggles with it. It’s for that reason that I’ve grown increasingly
disturbed at the poisonous distortions that too often overwhelm the immigration debate. I
detect in the shrillness that old familiar fear and guilt and anger, with its gloss of
righteous indignation and “common sense” and its rhetoric of protection—defense of our
borders, our laws, our culture, our way of life. I hear echoes. They are not pleasant ones.
One of the most frequent things one hears is the epithet “illegal immigrant,” with
the underlying insinuation that the undocumented are intrinsically criminals, since their
very existence in this country is testimony to their violating our immigration statutes.
I see the situation somewhat differently. When my wife was dying of cancer, she
was once in such extreme pain that, as I drove her to the emergency room, I ran two stop
signs and a red light, driving over 80 miles per hour in 25 mile-per-hour zones. She later
thanked me, even though what I did was clearly against the law. And I would do it again.
analogous—and much less dangerous to everyone but themselves. They do what they
must for the sake of the well-being of their loved ones. If this is the moral outrage
immigration opponents make it out to be, show me the innocent. Are we to champion as
virtuous the heartless, the indifferent, the scared, the ones willing to just sit there and
watch their families suffer under the oppressive weight of corruption, poverty and crime
that increasingly characterize Mexico and Central America—conditions for which the
United States, though not entirely at fault, is nonetheless far from blameless?
Something else was happening while the anti-immigrant backlash was building:
Latinos were joining the military in unprecedented numbers. Not just that—their
casualties in the Iraq war were disproportionately higher than their representation in the
Interestingly, the reasons Latino recruits gave for enlisting was not just the
expedited path to full citizenship put into effect by Congress at the request of the Bush
administration, though that did frequently remain a motivating factor. A Rand National
Defense Research Institute study revealed that in post-enlistment surveys Latino recruits
listed "patriotism" and "service to country" as the top two reasons for joining the service,
followed by "duty" and "honor." Many soldiers noted that their families were proud of
Despite this, legislation was drafted in the House of Representatives that would
even legal status. And attempts to provide a means to citizenship for the children of
undocumented workers, many of whom arrived as infants and know no other country
To paraphrase the father of a Latino U.S. marine killed in Iraq: On the one hand
they’re recruiting the young men to fight and die, while on the other they’re kicking the
something, to bark back at the distorting invective. I felt it particularly important that
Anglos chime in on the side of Latinos out of a sense of justice and simple decency.
But I’m a novelist, not a pundit. And what right does an American mutt like me, a
white boy from the very heart of Middle America, have to depict in fiction the life of a
Latino family?
The old arguments against white authors imagining the lives of people of color
addressed power, maintaining that the servant always understood the master, if only out
of bald necessity and naked survival, but the master was intrinsically self-deluded about
the servant. Such reasoning, with its colonial baggage, elevated the term “insensitivity” to
a cultural death sentence. The damning reception inflicted on William Styron’s The
Confessions of Nat Turner, in which the author tried to mine the inner lives of African
slaves, would be hard to replicate today, and that’s a good thing. No work of art deserves
to be strangled in its crib. But that doesn’t mean we’ve all somehow become sensitive.
I studied math and music, both arguably universal languages. And though I came
appreciation of it through music, perhaps its most accessible art form. Also, being raised
Catholic, I felt a special fascination with the manner that religion took hold in the
southerly Americas, both Gothic and primitive, awake to suffering, fiercely immediate.
From where I sat, Latin culture in general and its music in particular possessed a
vibrancy, a passion, a sense of both the tragic and the absurd I found mesmerizing and
too often lacking in what I saw and heard around me here in the States. Steely Dan was a
hip act but Santana could blister your soul. And Santana led me to Tito Puente, who led
me to Ray Barretto, who led me to Poncho Sanchez and on and on: Willie Bobo to Eric
Bobo to Los Lobos to Celso Piña to Control Machete to Julieta Venegas to Ana Gabriel
to Pescozada . . . The chain hasn’t stopped in thirty years. I pray to God it never does.
Artists steal from each other at will, musicians especially, it’s almost lazy not to. But can
All artists are outsiders to the extent they observe more than they participate, but
everyone joins in to some degree, just as we all reflect. Rather, the crucial question seems
to be at what point does observation fail us, i.e., when do we begin to imagine, and why?
I began with my third novel, Blood of Paradise, because I felt a need to address
the current state of affairs in El Salvador, a country whose current political, social and
economic life was significantly affected by U.S. policy, and which I saw being
also had Salvadoran friends who introduced me to their country, and felt an obligation to
attempt to depict, as best I could, the effect on Latino families of current immigration
policy; the predation on migrants by organized crime and street gangs who now control
the underground railroad that transports not just drugs and guns but human beings into
the U.S.; and the various ills befalling Mexico and Central America. I was moved
because I see these effects all around me in people I know and interact with daily or have
met in my travels, some of whom are not just acquaintances but colleagues, neighbors,
friends, people for whom in many cases I feel not just fondness but admiration, and
whose lives I felt deserved a more fair representation than they were too often getting in
the media.
Roque was partially inspired by a number of young Latino musicians I have met
and befriended during performances at various bay area venues, some of whom reminded
me of my own musical career with its hopes and hardship, the disillusion, the resilience.
Godo was partially conceived after reading accounts of real Latino servicemen
who returned from Iraq, with further inspiration provided by my encounters with Latino-
American men and women in uniform at the U.S. Southern Command and the Western
including a single divorcee I know who lost her job as office manager for a German
construction firm in San Salvador after the 2002 earthquake and was forced to emigrate
to find work, leaving her aging mother behind with the hope of building a better future
young men I know, one a photographer who supports himself by managing the best taco
wagon in my home town, the other who works as a paramedic, tending the injured and
Tío Faustino was a fusion of my own father, who drove a truck to put himself
through college and sometimes dreamed of running his own trucking firm; a handful of
port truck drivers to whom I was introduced by Ron Carver of the International
North, who returned to Guazapa Volcano after twenty years to talk to the survivors of the
The gang members depicted in the book were modeled after real young men (and
their families and friends) whom I met in my travels to Central America or while working
as a private investigator, in the latter case when I was entrusted with protecting their
But in all these cases I blended the true with the imagined, what I knew with what
I felt the story required. And taking that additional step, that leap of imagination, is an act
of presumption, yes, but also an act of love. In a way we imagine each other every day—
are we to believe we never really know the difference, cannot know the difference,
between when we’re loved and when we’re misunderstood—or worse, getting used?
John Coltrane once remarked that when there is something we do not understand
we must go humbly to it. That humility is the test of our honesty. Our art will
demonstrate not just our understanding—our sensitivity, or lack thereof—but how honest
we allowed ourselves to be, not just about our subject matter, but ourselves.
who the artist is or what the work portrays. This is a question not just of execution,
however, but of motive, and all such inquiries are slippery. We can hardly accuse an artist
possibly know. The inner life of the artist is no less inscrutable than the soul of the vato.
But if the era of identity politics is coming to a close, the craving for authenticity
Everybody wants the real dope, even the person who wouldn’t recognize it if it sat on his
head. But the authentic is an illusion, we never possess the truth, we approach it—not just
with our eyes but our imaginations. And, if we are wise like Coltrane, we do so humbly.