Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Session 12
INSPECTION AND DETECTION
SYSTEMS
Coenraad Esveld
TU Delft
QUALITY CONTROL
Define quality
measurements
on-line analysis
store results
analyze results
feed back/test
was maintenance effective?
adjustment of decision algorithm?
maintenance/
renewal
MEASUREMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Track geometry
Rail defects
Mechanical properties
Clearance gauge
Catenary
a.
b.
c.
d.
TRACK GEOMETRY
quasi-static
dynamic
periodic phenomena
peak values
various wavebands
Interaction vehicle/track
How does train respond to track?
TU Delft, Railway Engineering
RAIL DEFECTS
Ultrasonic inspection
horizontal fissures
vertical fissures
star cracks
Eddy current
surface defects
CONVENTIONAL ASSESSMENT
OF TRACK QUALITY
Track geometry via track recording car
NS standards
cant:
< 1.0 mm
level:
< 1.5 mm
alignment
< 1.0 mm
TU Delft, Railway Engineering
TRANSDUCERS
8 mm
70
70
70
TEST AREA
0
CRACK
10
Time
2nd Backwall echo
Defect area
1st Backwall echo
Defect area
Water interface
Transmission
TU Delft, Railway Engineering
11
RELEVANT WAVEBANDS
PHENOMENON
MONITORING
1 - 30 cm
corrugations
1 - 100 cm
poor welds
poor wheels
rail accelerations
2-3m
rolling defects
3 - 25 m
medium waves
conventional
25 - v/f m
long waves
stabilized platform
70 - m
design geometry
quasi static
12
measured amplitude
|H| =
actual amplitude
3 - points
(Mauzin AL)
2
Mauzin
level
inertia (NS)
[m]
2.5
5
NS
10
20
50
100
3dB 70 m
TU Delft, Railway Engineering
13
14
15
~ 4
4
T
1
2
= y ( t )dt
T 0
2
16
i
= r 2 = e
i a
17
DIGITAL ANALYSIS
Cant
Level
Alignment
Gauge
On-line Off-line
Sampling
at
0.25 m
200 m
Twist
Exceedences
Level-1 Maintenance
Level-2
Safety
Planning
Data
per
5-10
km
MAINS
B
M
S
Evaluation
- bad welds
- corrugations
Bad
Welds
Corrugations
A
Track
Recording
System
B
M
S
1
VRA
FFT
VRA
Evaluation Track
Quality
Indices
Evaluation Reactions
Transfer
Functions
19
..
zB
V
h
ztrack
z = z B + c1t + c2 h
TU Delft, Railway Engineering
20
Time
Filtering
Length ()
TU Delft, Railway Engineering
21
d
ps er
las
vel
a
r
t
f
o
on
directi
tion
a
l
u
g
n
a
tri
distance
or
r
r
i
m
g
n
rotati
22
23
Rail Profiles
24
Image Recognition
25
26
27
Data transfer to a
central computer
Modem
Software: peak, RMS
per wheel
Electronic equipment
Wheel triggers
Accelerometers
28
LEVEL
1.4
1.1
0.8
GT
M
0
0
1
/
0.6 mm
2.4
0.5
T
G
M
0
0
/1
m
m
40
tamping
tamping
1.7
tamping
BMS [mm]
50
60
70
29
BMS [mm]
weld treatment
all sections
tamped + stabilized
1.0
track renewal
1.5
0.5
tonnage
20
40
60
80
[MGT]
30
DETERIORATION
Influence axle load, tonnage and speed
E = kT P V
Phenomenon
Rail fatigue
Surface defects
Fatigue of other components
Rail geometry
3
1
3
1
3
3.5
3
3
Renewal
70 %
Manual
maintenance
20 %
Mechanical
Maintenance 10 %
TU Delft, Railway Engineering
Inspections
Measurements
Planning
Infrastructure
MAINS
Work carried
out
Costs
33
INFRA DATA
34
maintenance history;
vertical geometry;
lateral geometry;
short-wave rail geometry;
infra data
35
Analyses
DATA BASE
Regression
Correlation
Plotting
costs
''
..............
''
..............
Central Data Base
for Infrastructure
36