Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Faculty of Engineering
AET/Fall 2010
Independent Studies
December, 2010
Abstract:
Green Roofs have become a very important component of sustainable urban
development within the last 30 years in developed countries. Green Roofs have many
benefits on urban development including environmental, energy and economic
advantages. The focus of this research is to study the environmental and energy
impact of green roofs in Cairo which is now considered to be one of the most air
polluted cities in the world.
The World Health Organization reports that the Air Pollution in
Downtown Cairo is 10 to 20 times what is considered a safe limit. The US
environmental Protection Agency states that above the safe limit, the risk of
developing serious respiratory diseases and cancer from inhaling particulates in air is:
2 for every 1000 persons. (
The main aim of this research is to prove that green roofs can move the Air
Pollution in Cairo towards the safe limit stated by the World Health Organization and
reducing energy consumption thus protecting Cairo inhabitants from the threats facing
them.
Roof substructure
Waterproofing
Roof parapets, roof penetrations and adjacent building parts
Roof slope
Roof construction
Assumed load
Roof Drainage
Irrigation
Access to the roof
Additional functions
1.1.2.
There are many different chemical substances that contribute to air pollution.
Among the many types of air pollutants are NO2, SO2, O3, PM10 and organic
compounds that can evaporate and enter the atmosphere. The biggest causes are
the operation of fossil fuel-burning power plants and automobiles that combust
fuel. (6)
1.1.3. Smog
Smog is caused by many factors. The smog that enters the atmosphere consists of
over 100 chemicals, many coming from different sources. Particulates present in
smog include carbon monoxide, dirt, soot, dust, and ozone. To really create the
smog effect, sunlight, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides have to mix together.
Major producers of smog include automobiles, fires, waste treatment, oil
production, industrial solvents, paints, coatings and the operation of fossil fuelburning power plants. (7)
1.2.1.
Private Benefits
Green Roofs has many private advantages like the increased roof life, reduced
noise levels, thermal insulation, heat shield and the use of space.
1.3.
1.3.1.
1.3.2.
1.3.3.
1.4.1.
Basic Green Roof Planning
1.4.1.1.
Checklist
1.4.1.1.1. Roof substructure
Green Roofs can be realized on different types of roofs. Wooden
constructions, metal sheeting as well as reinforced concrete can be
considered as appropriate roof substructures. The base for the Green
Roof is a waterproof roof construction with appropriate load bearing
capacity. (4)
1.4.1.1.2.
Waterproofing
Over a period of time roots can damage the waterproofing and roof
construction if there have been no corresponding protection measures
taken. If the waterproofing is not root resistant an additional root
barrier has to be installed. Aside from the roof surface, the upstands,
perimeters, joints and roof edges also have to be protected against root
penetration. (4)
Figure 8, Waterproofing,
IGRA
For Green Roofs, the following upstand and perimeter heights have to be considered:
Upstand height for adjacent building parts and penetrations: minimum of 150
mm (6 in).
Upstand height for roof edges: minimum of 100 mm (4 in).
Important: The upstand height is always measured from the upper surface of the
Green Roof system build up or gravel strip. Clamping profiles guarantee reliable
protection and a tight connection of the upstand areas. In special cases ("Wheelchair
accessible apartments", for example) reduced upstand heights are possible, in this case
special constructions are necessary. Roof penetrations (e.g. water connections,
building parts for the usage of the roof area, etc.), when possible, should be grouped
in order to keep roof penetration to a minimum. (4)
1.4.1.1.4.
Roof slope
1.4.1.1.5.
Roof construction
Non ventilated roof ("warm roof"): Depending on the design load, different types
of Green Roofs are possible. A high-quality vapour barrier should be emphasised
right from the design or planning stage.
ventilated roof ("cold-roof"): The low load bearing capacity of the upper layer
allows for low weight Green Roof constructions. The cooling effect of the Green Roof
system build-up influences the aeration between the layers of the roof construction.
Inverted Roof: The thermal insulation for inverted roofs is installed above the
waterproofing, and therefore in an area with variable moisture levels. The sheets and
layers used for the Green Roof build-up must not prevent vapour diffusion processes
from the insulation.
DUO roofs: DUO roofs are roof constructions with additional thermal layers which
act as a drainage element and are credited as thermal insulation. This build-up
combines the advantages of the "warm roof" with those of the inverted roof (4)
1.4.1.1.6.
Assumed load
1.4.1.1.7.
Wind uplift
A Green Roof must be tight to the roof, especially in cases of strong wind. When
designing and installing the Green Roof, safety measures against wind uplift are to be
considered. (4)
1.4.1.1.8.
Roof Drainage
1.4.1.1.9.
Irrigation
Simple Extensive Green Roofs with drought resistant plant species have to be
irrigated only during planting and installation maintenance over the first year. After
its establishment, the annual rainfall is sufficient to sustain the vegetation. In contrast,
the requirements are more involved for Intensive Green Roofs with lawn, shrubs,
bushes or trees. An adequate number of precisely dimensioned hoses with automatic
irrigation units make plant maintenance during drought periods more manageable. In
order to lower the consumption of drinking water, roof gardens can also be irrigated
with cistern water. (4)
2.1.1.2.
Study Site
This study took place in Chicago, Illinois, which is located along the
southwest shore of Lake Michigan. The total area of the city is 588.3 sq. km.
Chicago is the third most populous city in the U.S with a population of 2.9
million in 2000. According to American Lung Association (ALA 2007), over 2
million people in Chicago were at heightened risk for health problems resulting
from acute exposure to O3 and particulate matters. (9)
Chicago is ranked number one in terms of total area of installed green roofs
among North American cities. According to Taylor (2007), green roofs were
installed on 300 buildings resulting in a total area of 27.87 ha by June 2007. (9)
2.1.1.3.
2.1.1.4.
In this study, a big-leaf resistance model was used to quantify the dry deposition
of air pollutants. The structure of the model and how the input parameters were
fitted are explained below. (9)
The removal of a particular air pollutant at a given place over a certain time
period was calculated as (Nowak, 1994):
Q=FxLxT
(1)
Hourly air pollution data including NO2, SO2, O3, and PM10 concentration
from an air pollution monitoring station in central Chicago between 8/1/2006 and
7/31/2007 were obtained from the U.S. EPA. Hourly surface meteorology (9)
2.1.1.5. Results
The information about the green roofs is shown in Table 2. Among the 71
green roofs, half had an area larger than 500 m2 and 23 green roofs were larger
than 1000 m2. (9)
Based on the analysis of aerial photographs, the 19.8 ha of green roof
consisted of 63% short grass and other low growing plants, 14% large
herbaceous plants, 11% trees and shrubs, and about 12% various structures and
hard surfaces. The monthly air quality between August 2006 and July 2007 in
Chicago is shown below (Fig. 16).
It can be seen from Fig. 16 that
O3 was the main air pollutant in
Chicago. PM10 ranked second while
the SO2 pollution was low. PM10
and O3 pollution peaked in summer
while SO2 and NO2 peaked in winter. (9)
The monthly mean deposition velocities for air pollutants calculated for
different vegetation types showed a seasonal trend (Table 3). The deposition
velocities for all air pollutants were highest in May and lowest in February. (9)
The modeled monthly uptake of air pollutants by green roofs is shown in
table-3
The total air pollution removal by 19.8
ha of green roofs was 1675 kg between
August 2006 and July 2007. If the reported
27.87 ha of green roofs were all completed
and had the same ratio of extensive vs.
intensive green roofs, the air pollutants
removed could reach 2388 kg. (9)
Among the four air pollutants, the
uptake of O3 was the largest, 52% of the
total uptake followed by NO2 (27%), PM10 Figure 15 Concentrations of criteria air pollutants
(14%), and SO2 (7%). Seasonally, the highest in Chicago between August
uptake occurred in May and the lowest in
February. The annual removal rate among different vegetation types is compared in
Table 4. (9)
If all remaining roofs in Chicago were planted with intensive green roofs, the
direct removal of air pollutants could reach as high as 2046.89 metric tons,
assuming the same level of air pollution as
20062007. (9)
2.1.1.6.
Conclusion
If this case study proved that a total of 1675 kg
of air pollutants were removed by 198,000 sq.m.
extensive and intensive green roofs in one year;
it can be concluded that for a 200 sq.m. green
roof, 1.66 kg of air pollutants can be removed.
2.1.2.2.
The 13,200 sq.ft. roof is planted with 5,600 pots of sedums, including varieties
such as Sedum reflexum and 8,400 pots of fescue and 8,400 pots of June Grass.
The runoff from the roof goes into a 30,000 cubic foot rainwater collection
cistern. This water is then used for toilet flushing and irrigation of other
landscaping. (8)
2.1.2.3.
2.1.2.4.
a) Membrane Base
Hot fluidapplied rubberized asphalt membrane, layer of spun-bounded
polyester fabric reinforcing
sheet, 60 mm thick uncured
neoprene flashing. (8)
b) Root
barrier/
course
protection
Figure 17(Green Roof Cross Section, King County Roof Case Study
Reports)
c) Rigid Insulation
Extruded polystyrene rigid foam insulation board, compressive strength of
60 psi max., water absorption by volume 0.1%, R-5 per inch and free of
HCFC blowing agents. (8)
e) Filter fabric
Systemfilter SF non-woven, polymeric, geotextile fabric (8)
f) Soil mix
The engineered soil mix used for the City Hall garden roof included
pumice, sand, compost and nutrients. (8)
g) Plants used
2.1.2.5.
(8)
The current irrigation schedule is once a week for 45 minutes during summer.
The irrigation system designed for the project landscape was not adequate to
support the plants during the establishment period. This system was later
supplemented with more sprinkler heads for adequate watering of plants.
The water from the green roof goes into a storage tank and is reused for toilet
flushing. Therefore no fertilizers are being used in order to prevent water
contamination.
Because of the large amount of weeds growing on the roof, regular
maintenance is required. The weeds are wind-blown or dropped by birds.
Several weeds such as clover leaf, dandelion and black berries are pervasive on
the roof. This summer 50 to 60% of the roof was covered with leaf clovers.
Clovers can smother other plants causing them to rot and die. (8)
2.1.2.6.
Challenges
d) Access to the roof is through a small room that has a vertical ladder and a
hatch on top that opens onto the roof. It is very difficult for the
maintenance staff to carry tools and weeds through this access. The
gardener had to retrofit a pulley to take things up and down. (8)
e) The project was designed to collect rainwater from the roof and reuse it
for flushing toilets. However, the water from the conventional roof and
the green roof go to a single drain and the water is yellow in color
because of the green roof soil. This discolored water resulted in a lot of
complaints from the building occupants. (8)
Figure 19b (38, Abdullah Ben Taher St., Nasr City) Google Earth
The selected local application is a residential building located in Nasr City, Cairo with
a roof area of 400 m2 and will be planted with an extensive Green Roof.
Using the above guidelines, the schematic section in figure 19a was drawn for
this application.
Figure 20(3D rendering for building no. 38 before and after building green roof using 3ds max)
Figure 23 (3d rendering showing the buildings in the selected area before and after creating the Green Roofs)
The total area of the selected land is 1,300,000 m2. If it can be assumed that the
average area of a single building is 500m2, and the number of buildings is 1400
buildings then: 1400x500=700,000 m2
The total area of green roofs can be assumed to be 80% of total roof areas which
can be calculated as: 700,000x0.8= 560,000 m2
4.3.
Conclusion
As it was concluded from Chicago case study, for every 200m2 of green roofs, 1.66
kg of pollutants are removed. The total removal of pollutants can be calculated as:
(560,000/200) x 1.66= 4648kg
This means that 4648kg of pollutants can be removed annually by creating
extensive green roofs all over the selected area in Cairo.
REFERENCES
(1) Dr. Salah Hassanein, Air Pollution in Cairo - The Cost Arab World Books
Articles 11-2010 http://www.arabworldbooks.com/articles1.html
(2) Green Roofs Benefits, International Green Roof Association
11-2010, http://www.igra-world.com/benefits/index.php
(3) Types of Green Roofs, International Green Roof Association
11-2010, http://www.igra-world.com/types_of_green_roofs/index.php
(4) Green Roofs Engineering, International Green Roof Association
11-2010, http://www.igra-world.com/engineering/index.php
(5) Air Pollution, 12-2010,
http://library.thinkquest.org/26026/Economics/pollution_problems_in_the_
thir.html
(6) Causes of Air Pollution, 12-2010
http://library.thinkquest.org/26026/Environmental_Problems/air_pollution_
-_causes.html
(7) Smog, 12-2010
http://library.thinkquest.org/26026/Environmental_Problems/smog.html
(8) Seattle City Hall, 11-2010
http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/cms/groups/pan/@pan/@sustainableblding/d
ocuments/web_informational/dpdp_020117.pdf
(9) Removal of air pollutants by green roofs, 12-2010
http://www.slrss.cn/download/08_SCI/Quantifying%20air%20pollution%20r
emoval%20by%20green%20roofs%20in%20Chicago.pdf