Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kinki University, 3-4-1, Kowakae, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
Department of Civil Engineering, King Mongkuts University of Technology North Bangkok, 1518, Pracharat 1 Rd., Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
The Kanden L&A Company, Ltd., 1-3-12, Shinmachi, Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0013, Japan
h i g h l i g h t s
" The compressive strength of the CWA mortars was similar to that of the RS mortars.
" The chloride concentration of the CWA mortars was lower than that of the RS mortars.
" The CWA mortars had lower apparent chloride diffusion than the RS mortars.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 16 August 2012
Received in revised form 11 October 2012
Accepted 21 November 2012
Available online 28 December 2012
Keywords:
Porcelain insulator waste
Mortar
Chloride ingress
W/C
EPMA
a b s t r a c t
In reinforced concrete structures, chloride ingress causes deleterious consequences due to corrosion of
steel reinforcement. With no protective means, the service life of the structures is shortened proportionately to the rate of chloride ingress designated as a coefcient of chloride diffusion. Previous experimental study using the rapid chloride migration test has indicated that the use of ceramic waste aggregate
(CWA) is effective in lowering the chloride diffusion coefcient of the 0.5 water to cement (W/C) ratio
mortars and thus making mortars more durable.
In this study, further experiments were conducted to seek visual evidences of the inhibiting of chloride
ingress in the CWA mortars using a silver nitrate (AgNO3) solution spray method and an electron probe
microanalysis (EPMA) after 24 weeks submersion in 5.0 wt.% sodium chloride solution. The CWAs tested
at this time were electrical porcelain insulator wastes from an electric power company, which were
crushed and ground in a recycle plant. In particular, the test program was extended to investigate the
CWA mortars at a wider range of W/C ratios, i.e. 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6. All the CWA mortars were also compared with their counterpart mortars made of typical river sand (RS). It is visually found that, at the
W/C ratio of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6, the CWA mortar is more effective in resisting chloride ingress (having lower
coefcient of apparent chloride diffusion) than the RS mortar. Moreover, the compression test was carried
out. It is worth noting that the CWA has no adverse effect on the compressive strength of mortars in relation to river sand.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The innite use of resources to meet consumer demand results
in the continual increase of industrial wastes, which is one of the
major environmental problems worldwide. To dispose industrial
wastes [1,2], a recycling process is preferably an attractive solution
because the availability of landlls is limited [3]. Many researchers
Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 66 721 2332; fax: +81 72 995 5192.
E-mail address: h-hirosi@civileng.kindai.ac.jp (H. Higashiyama).
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.078
1022
Connect pin
Porcelain insulator
Metal socket
Fig. 1. Suspension insulator.
2. Experimental program
2.1. Ceramic waste aggregate
A recycled porcelain insulators as shown in Fig. 1 was rst received from an
electric power company in Japan. It was subsequently transformed to ne aggregate
namely ceramic waste aggregate (CWA) at a recycle plant (The Kanden L&A Company, Ltd.) via the processes developed primarily by Sano et al. [26] as follows.
Firstly, it was broken by using a hammer and a jaw crusher to small pieces ranging
100
80
Passing (%)
From the literature review, mechanical and permeation properties of the porcelain insulator wastes as aggregates in cementbased materials have been investigated by Hata et al. [5], Senthamarai et al. [7,16], Jacintho et al. [15], Takeda et al. [18], and Sekar
et al. [19]. When ne aggregates in concrete were partially replaced with CWA powder, Hata et al. [5] found that the compressive strength of concrete was increased. They stated that it was
because of the micro-ller effect. In the case of crushing porcelain
insulator wastes as coarse aggregate, Senthamarai et al. [7,16]
found no different on mechanical and permeation properties between conventional concrete and CWA concrete. Jacintho et al.
[15] investigated a performance related to the compressive
strength and absorption index of mortars made of crushed CWA
as ne aggregate. Takeda et al. [18] used CWA as coarse aggregate
in porous concrete. Sekar et al. [19] performed mechanical tests on
CWA concrete. The authors [21,22] also examined the mortars containing CWA recycled from porcelain insulator wastes on their
compressive strength and their resistance to chloride penetration.
We found that the replacement of entire ne aggregates with the
CWA in mortar increases the compressive strength and reduces
the chloride penetration depth and the cumulative pore volume
in mortar when compared with the river sand (RS) mortar. The
CWA in mortar not only increases the tortuous pathways in the
matrix but also reduces the transportation of chloride ion through
itself. The CWA in mortar thus has a dilution effect on the chloride
penetration.
In the present study, the inuence on chloride ingress into CWA
mortars with different water to cement (W/C) ratios was investigated by comparing with RS mortars. Unlike the previous studies
[21,22], the CWAs were crushed and ground at a recycle plant in
The Kanden L&A Company, Ltd. and were used as received. Their
performances in mortar on the chloride ingress were visually
investigated by using a silver nitrate (AgNO3) solution spray method [23] and an electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) [24,25]. Furthermore, the apparent chloride diffusion coefcients of mortars
made of the CWA and the RS, which were calculated from chloride
concentration proles obtained by EPMA, were compared. The
chloride concentration prole obtained by EPMA is useful for the
estimation of the apparent chloride diffusion coefcient [25].
60
40
20
CWA
RS
0
0.075 0.15
0.3
0.6
1.2
2.5
3 4 5 6
Sieve size (mm)
5.0
10.0
from 50 to 100 mm size. Next, by using a cone crusher, these pieces were crushed to
small grains at a particle size of 30 mm or smaller. These particles have very sharp
edges like a knife edge at this stage, which are still dangerous to supply as aggregate
for mortar and concrete. Therefore, the CWA with the safety shape of particle edge
was subsequently achieved by a grinding machine. Finally, the particle size ranging
from 0.075 to 5.0 mm by sieving (see Fig. 2) was used in this study. The grain size
distribution of the CWA after going through the above process and the RS used here
is presented in Fig. 3 along with the grading requirements (dashed lines) of JIS A
5005 [27]. The grain size distribution of the CWA is within the grading requirements only except for one particle size of 2.5 mm. As reported in Table 2, the neness modulus of the CWA and the RS is 3.20 and 2.39, respectively.
Table 1
Chemical composition.
Chemical compositions (wt.%)
Cement
CWA
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
Na2O
K2O
TiO2
P2O5
MnO
SrO
S
Cl
20.68
5.28
2.91
64.25
1.40
2.10
0.28
0.40
0.28
0.25
0.09
0.06
0.015
70.90
21.10
0.81
0.76
0.24
1.47
3.57
0.33
Loss on ignition
1.80
1023
CWA
River sand
5.0
2.40
0.70
3.20
5.0
2.59
1.73
2.39
5 % NaCl solution
80
60
40
20
CWA mortar
RS mortar
0
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
W/C ratio
25 mm
Fig. 5. Example of a fresh split surface showing white silver chloride precipitation
after sprayed a 0.1 N silver nitrate solution.
25 mm
25
CWA mortar
20
RS mortar
15
10
5
0
0.4
0.5
0.6
W/C ratio
Fig. 9. Chloride penetration depths for all mixtures measured.
The CWA used as ne aggregate was compared with the RS in mortar mixes. The
chemical composition of the CWA and the cement is presented in Table 1. The
chemical composition of the CWA used is similar to that of sanitary ceramic wastes
[13,20]. The physical properties of both CWA and RS are shown in Table 2. In addition, the cement used here was an ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with the specic
gravity of 3.15 and the specic surface area of 3360 cm2/g. The cement used was
equivalent to ASTM Type I as shown in Table 1.
1024
In this study, the W/C ratio of the mortars was varied with three different values, i.e. 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 by weight. The sand to cement (S/C) ratio was kept constant
to 2.0 by weight. Hence, there were six mortar mixtures in total. Preliminarily, the
CWA was dried out in an oven for 24 h. After that, the CWA was kept in an uncontrolled laboratory (R.H.: 4050%) until mortar making. The CWA was mixed in an
air-dry condition due to its low water absorption while the RS was mixed in a saturated surface-dry condition.
dia. 200 mm cylindrical specimens for the test of chloride ingress. After casting,
all specimens were covered with a plastic waterproof sheet for 24 h. Subsequently,
they were demoulded and cured in a water tank at 20 2 C.
At the age of 28 days, the 50 mm dia. 100 mm cylindrical specimens were
tested in compression using a 500 kN capacity universal testing machine. The loading speed was constant at 0.2 N/mm2/s according to JSCE-G 505 [28].
At the age of 7 days, the 100 mm dia. 200 mm cylindrical specimens were
prepared for the one dimensional ingress of chloride as follows. They were cut into
150 mm height with the 50 mm top end discarded to eliminate the inuence of segregation. After they were allowed to dry in a room condition at 20 2 C and R.H.
65 5% for 24 h, they were epoxy coated leaving only one sawn surface free of coating and were proceeded to dry the epoxy resin for additional 24 h. Then, they were
fully immersed in a 5.0 wt.% NaCl solution in hermetic tanks at 20 2 C as shown
in Fig. 4 for 24 weeks. After the immersion was completed, one of the two 100 mm
dia. (200 mm cylindrical specimens was examined with a silver nitrate spray method whereas another was followed with the EPMA method.
(a)
(d)
(b)
(e)
(c)
(f)
Fig. 10. Area analysis of the chloride concentration distribution by EPMA, (a) CWA mortar (W/C = 0.4); (b) CWA mortar (W/C = 0.5); (c) CWA mortar (W/C = 0.6); (d) RS
mortar (W/C = 0.4); (e) RS mortar (W/C = 0.5); and (f) RS mortar (W/C = 0.6).
1025
(a)
35
W/C = 0.4
Corresponding to the W/C ratios, the compressive strength results of both CWA and RS mortars are plotted in Fig. 8. It is observed that the compressive strength was linearly decreased with
the W/C ratio. Besides, at all W/C ratios, the compressive strengths
of CWA and RS mortars were fairly similar. That is contrast to our
previous ndings [21,22] in which, at a constant W/C ratio of 0.5, a
10% greater compressive strength was found in a CWA mortar corresponding to a RS mortar. In that case, the grain size distribution
of the CWA was adjusted manually to match that of the RS in the
laboratory. In this study, however, the modication of the grain
size distribution was omitted. But, the CWA as received from the
recycle plant was used instead. The CWA obtained was much coarser than the RS (neness modulus of 3.20 compared with 2.39).
Thus, the compressive strength is possibly dependent on the grain
size distribution of the CWA.
Jacintho et al. [15] presented that the compressive strength of
mortar with the above 50% substitution of CWA was increased in
proportion to the amount of the CWA. They explained that the pozzolanic reaction and the lower permeability due to the ne crushed
porcelain possibly cause the strength gain. In this study, at the age
of 28 days, the pozzolanic reaction of the CWA was not observed.
When compared with the compressive strength of the CWA mortar
at W/C ratio of 0.47 by Jacintho et al. [15], the compressive
strength of the CWA mortar shown in Fig. 8 is close to their result.
30
W/C = 0.5
25
W/C = 0.6
20
15
10
5
0
0
(b)
35
W/C = 0.4
According to the silver nitrate spray method, the freshly split surface of mortars
was sprayed with a 0.1 N silver nitrate solution. To determine the chloride penetration depth, the white silver chloride precipitation appeared on the sprayed surface
was measured. By using a caliper, the measurement was made at three points along
the penetration front, i.e. one was at the middle and the other two points were on
the left and right at 25 mm apart from the middle, as shown in Fig. 5.
For the EPMA method, the test specimens were cut into 25 mm width and
60 mm length as shown in Fig. 6. The JEOL JXA-8200 instrument presented in
Fig. 7 was used to obtain chloride content and chloride concentration prole. Then,
the apparent chloride diffusion coefcient was calculated. The measurement conditions consisted in accelerating voltage of 15 kV, beam current of 2 107 A, a pixel
size of 200 lm, a probe diameter of 150 lm, and the number of mapping points of
400 400 pixels referring to JSCE-G 574 [29].
30
W/C = 0.5
W/C = 0.6
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
1026
points along the penetration depth. Yet, in the CWA mortars, such
correlation was reverse within the range of 9 mm depth from the
exposed surface. Regarding that, further studies are needed for a
better understanding.
The apparent chloride diffusion coefcient and the surface chloride concentration were determined by tting the chloride concentration results to the following Ficks second law.
x
Cx; t C 0 1 erf p
2 Da t
(d)
35
(a)
Exp.
30
Fit.
25
20
15
10
5
0
35
Exp.
30
Fit.
25
20
15
10
5
0
(e)
35
(b)
Exp.
30
Fit.
25
20
15
10
5
35
Exp.
30
Fit.
25
20
15
10
5
(f)
Chloride concentration (kg/m3)
35
Exp.
30
Fit.
25
20
15
10
5
1
35
Exp.
30
Fit.
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
0
0
0
(c)
Fig. 12. Curve tting of chloride concentration proles, (a) CWA mortar (W/C = 0.4); (b) CWA mortar (W/C = 0.5); (c) CWA mortar (W/C = 0.6); (d) RS mortar (W/C = 0.4); (e)
RS mortar (W/C = 0.5); and (f) RS mortar (W/C = 0.6).
Table 3
Apparent chloride diffusion coefcient for all mixtures.
W/C ratio
0.4
0.5
0.6
RS mortar
0.610
1.001
1.776
2.064
2.367
2.669
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the nancial support of Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kinki University and The
Kanden L&A Company, Ltd. Furthermore, the authors are also
grateful to Mr. K. Nakayama and Mr. T. Kitanobo of Chuken Consults Co., Ltd. for their valuable comments on the chloride ingress
analysis.
CWA mortar
RS mortar
JSCE
1027
Concrete
References
0
0.3
0.4
0.5
W/C ratio
0.6
0.7
[1] Japan Cement Association. Receiving situation of waste material and byproduct used in cement industry. <http://www.jcassoc.or.jp/cement/1jpn/
jg2a.html> [in Japanese].
[2] Kawai K, Osako M. Reduction of natural resource consumption in cement
production in Japan by waste utilization. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage
2012;14:94101.
[3] Asakura H, Matsuto T, Inoue Y. Adopted technology and basis for selection at
municipal solid waste landll facilities construction in recent years in Japan.
Waste Manage Res 2010;28:68594.
[4] Ay N, nal M. The use of waste ceramic tile in cement production. Cem Concr
Res 2000;30:4979.
[5] Hata H, Nakashita A, Ohmura T, Itou H. Strength development of concrete
containing granulated abandonment insulator. Proc Jpn Concr Inst
2004;26(1):16838 [in Japanese].
[6] de Brito J, Pereira AS, Correia JR. Mechanical behavior of non-structural
concrete made with recycled ceramic aggregates. Cem Concr Compos
2005;27:42933.
[7] Senthamarai RM, Devadas Manoharan P. Concrete with ceramic waste
aggregate. Cem Concr Compos 2005;27:9103.
[8] Correia JR, de Brito J, Pereira AS. Effects on concrete durability of using recycled
ceramic aggregates. Mater Struct 2006;39:16977.
[9] Binici H. Effect of crushed ceramic and basaltic pumice as ne aggregates on
concrete mortars properties. Constr Build Mater 2007;21:11917.
[10] Lavat AE, Trezza MA, Poggi M. Characterization of ceramic roof tile wastes as
pozzolanic admixture. Waste Manage 2009;29:166674.
[11] Gomes M, de Brito J. Structural concrete with incorporation of coarse recycled
concrete and ceramic aggregates: durability performance. Mater Struct
2009;42:66375.
[12] Suzuki M, Meddah MS, Sato R. Use of porous ceramic waste aggregates for
internal curing of high-performance concrete. Cem Concr Res
2009;39:37381.
[13] Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S. Reusing ceramic wastes in concrete. Constr Build
Mater 2010;24:8328.
[14] Torkittikul P, Chaipanich A. Utilization of ceramic waste as ne aggregate
within Portland cement and y ash concretes. Cem Concr Compos
2010;32:4409.
[15] Jacintho AEPGA, Campos MA, Paulon VA, Camarini G, Lintz RCC, Barbosa LAG.
The use of crushed porcelain electrical isolators as ne aggregate in mortars.
In: Castro-Borges P, Moreno EI, Sakai K, Gjrv OE, Banthia N, editors.
Proceedings of Concrete under Severe Conditions 2010. p. 1593600.
[16] Senthamarai RM, Devadas Monoharan P, Gobinath D. Concrete made from
ceramic industry waste: durability properties. Constr Build Mater
2011;25:24139.
[17] Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S. Compressive strength and durability properties of
ceramic wastes based concrete. Mater Struct 2011;44:15567.
[18] Takeda K, Murakami K, Mutaguchi K. The basic characteristics of porous
concrete using insulator for coarse aggregate. Proc Jpn Concr Inst
2011;33(1):146974 [in Japanese].
[19] Sekar T, Ganesan N, Nampoothiri NVN. Studies on strength characteristics on
utilization of waste materials as coarse aggregate in concrete. Int J Eng Sci
Technol 2011;3(7):543640.
[20] Medina C, Snchez de Rojas MI, Fras M. Reuse of sanitary ceramic wastes as
coarse aggregate in eco-efcient concretes. Cem Concr Compos
2012;34:4854.
[21] Higashiyama H, Yagishita F, Sano M, Takahashi O. Compressive strength and
resistance to chloride penetration of mortars using ceramic waste as ne
aggregate. Constr Build Mater 2012;26:96101.
[22] Higashiyama H, Sappakittipakorn M, Sano M, Yagishita F. Chloride ion
penetration into mortar containing ceramic waste aggregate. Constr Build
Mater 2012;33:4854.
[23] Otsuki N, Nagataki S, Nakashita K. Evaluation of AgNO3 solution spray method
for measurement of chloride penetration into hardened cementitious matrix
materials. ACI Mater J 1992;89:58792.
[24] Mejlhede Jensen O, Coats AM, Glasser FP. Chloride ingress proles measured
by electron probe micro analysis. Cem Concr Res 1996;26:1696705.
1028
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]