REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Defining a way forward for

benchmarking
supply chain management
performance in
Canada

March 27, 2015

INTRODUCTION:

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

The Supply Chain Management Association (SCMA) is the leading and
largest association inCanada for supply chain management professionals.
The organization is a federation, consisting of a national office in partnership
with ten provincial and territorial Institutes.
SCMA and its provincial and territorial Partner Institutes represent
professionals serving in all market sectors, from manufacturing to services
delivery, in both public and private sector, and across a range of career
disciplines that include sourcing and procurement, transportation and
logistics through final disposal.
To promote the goal of advancing and promoting the profession and to
demonstrate the value that professionals in supply chain management
contribute to an organizations success, SCMA seeks to establish a
benchmarking program of supply chain management performance in
Canada.
The program would establish a management database that provides timely
process and performance benchmarks at the appropriate level of industry
segmentation, generating meaningful information for SCMA members and
the supply chain sector. One of the key barriers to producing effective
benchmarking research is the ability to identify meaningful key performance
indicators that multiple sectors have the capacity to track in a similar way,
and also have a willingness to share the data in an anonymous fashion with
the expectation of receiving access to the comparative data as their benefit
from participation.
PROJECT SCOPE:
SCMA is seeking proposals from qualified proponents, capable of providing
the research and business planning process that would guide the
preparation and provision ofa Supply Chain Benchmarking Program in the
following Deliverables Stages:
Phase 1(which represents the full scope of this particular RFP) Through
consultation and research, plan and develop a Supply Chain Benchmarking
Program, tailored to address the parameters described in following sections,
including a detailed implementation plan.
Phase 1 Time-line September 1, 2015through March 31, 2016
Phase 1 Budget Allocation Up to $ Cdn20,000, to include all
expenses
The results of Phase 1 would then inform the following stages of the project,
which are outside the scope of this RFP

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Phase 2 Program Implementation To refine Benchmarking Program
design, through consultation and market testing, including data analysis and
delivery of preliminary reports
Phase 2 Time-line to be confirmed possibly March 31, 2017
Phase 2 Budget to be defined through completion of Phase 1; to be
approved by Board of Directors, prior to activation of Phase 2
Phase 3 On-going Program Delivery and Management Subsequent
proposals may be invited from the successful proponent, to deliver and
manage the Benchmarking Program on a continuing basis
Phase 3 Time-line to be determined (probably 2017 and on-going)
Phase 3 Budget to be determined.
1.1 INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPONENTS
1.1.1 MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
This RFP may contain mandatory requirements. Proposals not
meeting all mandatory requirements will be rejected without further
consideration.
1.1.2 LANGUAGE OF SUBMISSION
The working language of the Committee is English. Proponents may
submit their response to the proposal in either of Canadas two official
languages. Proponents are advised that SCMA may translate their
proposals for evaluation purposes. The Proponent agrees that it will
accept SCMAs translations as being equivalent to their original
proposal.
1.1.3 SHORT LIST
The evaluation procedure may include a short list based on the stated
criteria. The short listed Proponents may be asked to prepare a
presentation prior to the final selection. Should presentations be
planned as part of proposal evaluation, the evaluation process for the
presentations will be explained in the section headed Evaluation
Criteria.
1.1.4 RFP PROJECT TEAM
A cross-functional committee formed by the Corporation will evaluate
the proposals.
1.1.5 EVALUATION AND SELECTION
The RFP Project team will check proposals for compliance with

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

instructions and against the mandatory criteria. Compliant proposals
meeting all the mandatory criteria will then be assessed and scored in
accordance with the Evaluation Criteria. References of the Proponent
or Proponents scoring the highest may be checked.

1.2

PROPOSAL PREPARATION
This section defines the proposal preparation and submission
instructions, which are to be followed by all Proponents. Proponents
are cautioned to carefully read and follow the instructions required by
this RFP, as any deviation from these requirements may be cause for
rejection.
Appendix 1 Signatures must be returned with the proposal at
time of RFP closing.

1.2.1 PROPOSAL FORMAT

Evaluation of proposals is made easier when Proponents respond in a
similar manner. The following format and sequence must be followed
in order to provide consistency in Proponent response and ensure
each proposal receives full consideration. All pages should be
consecutively numbered.
a) Title Page, showing RFP identification, Proponents name and
address, closing date and time, Proponents telephone number,
and a contact person.
b) One page letter of introduction identifying the Proponent and
signed by the person or persons authorized to sign on behalf
of, and bind the Proponent to, statements made in the
proposal.
c)

Table of contents including page numbers.

d) Address the requirements as outlined in Section 3 Project
Requirements. Response Information should be inserted in the
attached Response Grid. (Appendix 2)Proposals may contain
additional information, referencing the specific section(s) to
which it applies, by clause number.

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

e) References - Provide name, address, contact person, and
telephone number.
f) Price- To be clearly and fully submitted on Appendix 6
PRICING.
1.2.2 INQUIRIES
SCMA encourages Proponents to make use of the Inquiry Period
(noted in Section 1.2.3 Inquiry Period) within the RFP process to seek
clarification on any requirements, clauses, and/or terminology within
the RFP. This includes any information found within the RFP
document, any attachments, and all terms and conditions.
1.2.3INQUIRY PERIOD
All inquiries related to this RFP are to be directed, via e-mail, to the
following person, or his or her designate. Information obtained
from any other source is not official and may be inaccurate.
Inquiries and responses will be recorded and may be distributed to all
Proponents at SCMAs option.
Name: Cheryl Paradowski
Address: 777 Bay St., Suite 2701 Toronto, ON M5G 2C8
Phone number and email: 416-542-9120
cparadowski@scmanational.ca
Written questions will be accepted until 4:00 p.m. EDT on Thursday,
April 30, 2015.
1.2.4 CLOSING DATE
Four (4) complete hard copies and one complete soft copy (CD, DVD,
or flash drive) in Microsoft Word and/or Microsoft Excel format of the
proposal must be received by4:00pm EDT on Friday, May 15,
2015.
Name: Supply Chain Management Association
Address: 777 Bay St. Suite 2701, Toronto, ON M5G 2C8
Attention: Benchmarking RFP

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Proposals must not be sent by facsimile or email. Proposals and their
envelopes should be clearly marked with the name and address of the
Proponent, and the RFP project title.
1.2.5 LATE PROPOSALS
Late proposals will not be accepted and will be returned to
the Proponent at their expense.
The actual time and date of receipt of a Proposal at SCMA headoffice
as outlined in section 1.2.4shall be deemed to be the acceptance
time and date of a Proposal NOT the time and date that it was sent by
the Proponent.
1.2.6 PROPONENTS EXPENSES
Proponents are solely responsible for their own expenses in preparing
and submitting a proposal and for subsequent presentations or
negotiations with SCMA, if any.
1.2.7 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
The Proponent agrees that if SCMA commits a material breach of this
RFP, SCMAs liability to the Proponent and the aggregate amount of
damages recoverable against SCMA for any matter relating to or
arising from that material breach, whether based upon an action or
claim in contract, warranty, equity, negligence, intended conduct or
otherwise, including any action or claim arising from the acts or
omissions, negligent or otherwise, of SCMA, shall be the lesser of,:
a) the Proposal preparation costs that the Proponent seeking
damages from SCMA can demonstrate; or
b) $10,000.00.
1.2.8 FIRM PRICING
Proposals must be open for acceptance for at least one hundred and
twenty (120) days after the RFP Closing Date. Upon acceptance,
prices will be firm for the entire Term of the Contract unless otherwise
specified.
1.2.9 CURRENCY AND TAXES
Prices quoted are to be:
a)

in Canadian dollars;

b)

exclusive of Harmonized Sales Tax.

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

1.2.10CANCELLATION; NO AWARD
Issuing an RFPimplies no obligation on SCMA to accept any Proposal,
or a portion of any Proposal submitted. The lowest price or any
Proposal will not necessarily be accepted.
Invitations may be cancelled in whole or in part without any penalty,
when a) the price exceeds the funds allocated for the purchase; b)
there has been a substantial change in the requirements after the
RFPhas been issued; c) information has been received by SCMA after
the RFPhas been issued that SCMA feels has substantially altered the
project; or d) there was insufficient competition in order to make an
informed decision.
If no compliant proposals are received in response to this invitation,
SCMA reserves the right to enter into negotiations with one or more
proponentsin order to conduct the project.
SCMA will be the sole judge of whether there is sufficient justification
to cancel the RFP.
No action or liability will lie or reside against SCMA in its exercise of
its rights under the section.
1.2.11DOCUMENT MODIFICATION
SCMA reserves the right to modify the RFP at any time in its sole
discretion. This includes, but is not limited to or the following rights:
a
b
c

the
the
the
the

right to cancel this RFP at any time for any reason,

right to extend the closing time; or
right to alter the RFP requirements or make other changes to
RFP.

If a modification is communicated to the Proponents prior to closing

time, it is the Proponents sole responsibility to ensure that they make
appropriate use of that information.
ADDITIONAL TERMS
1.3.1 SUBCONTRACTING
Utilizing a subcontractor (who must be clearly identified) is
acceptable.

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

SCMA reserves the right to approve the subcontractor before any
Notice of Selection is completed. If during the life of the Contract the
subcontractor changes SCMA must be notified and again reserves the
right to approve new subcontractor.
Subcontracting to any firm or individual whose current or past
corporate or other interests may, in SCMAs opinion, give rise to a
conflict of interest in connection with this project will not be
permitted. This includes, but is not limited to, any firm or individual
involved in the preparation of this RFP.
1.3.2 JOINT SUBMISSION
A joint submission may be made by two Proponents having no formal
corporate links. However, in this case, one of these Proponents must
be designated as the lead Proponent, to take overall responsibility
and this must be defined in the proposal and remain in effect for the
term of the contract or any extension.
1.3.3 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS
This RFP should not be construed as a contract to purchase goods or
services. SCMA is not bound to accept the lowest priced or any
proposal of those submitted. Proposals will be assessed in light of the
Evaluation Criteria. SCMA will not be obligated in any manner to any
Proponent whatsoever until a written contract has been duly executed
relating to an approved proposal.
1.3.4 DOCUMENTS COMPRISING CONTRACT
The issuance of the Notice of Selection to a Proponent is SCMAs
written acceptance of the Proponents Proposal and will be
accompanied by a binding contract for the goods or services as
outlined in the RFP and the Successful Proponents Proposal. The
binding contract will include the RFP, the Proposal received from the
Successful Proponent, any Amendments to the RFP and the Notice of
Selection.
1.3.5 LIABILITY FOR ERRORS
While SCMA has used considerable efforts to ensure an accurate
representation of information of this RFP, the information contained in
this RFP is supplied solely as a guideline for Proponents. The
information is not guaranteed or warranted to be accurate by the
Corporation, nor is it necessarily comprehensive or exhaustive.
Nothing in this RFP is intended to relieve Proponents from forming

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

their own opinions and conclusions with respect to the matters
addressed in this RFP.
1.3.6 USE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
This document, or any portion thereof, may not be used for any
purpose other than the submission of proposals.
1.3.7 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Any and all Information pertaining to either a provincial or territorial
Institute, or SCMA, obtained by the Proponent as a result of
participation in this project is confidential and must not be disclosed
without written authorization from the Corporation.

2.1 PROJECT PARAMETERS

Questions and Issues to be Addressed

2.1 a)What to Benchmark ?

Process Benchmarks
Performance Benchmarks
The proposal must recommend and explain which benchmark
indicators for each type of Supply Chain Benchmarks
2.1 b)
Who to Bench-mark ?
The proposal must describe the process(es) to be used to identify and
qualify organizations to be used as benchmark comparators. Ideally,
comparators will include Best-in-Class and Best Practice
organizations, and will describe the methods to be used to identify
and equate indicators

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

2.1 c) Scope of processes to be benchmarked
The proposal will identify appropriate benchmark indicators for
activities including, but not limited to:
Product design and manufacturing
Purchasing/Procurement and Strategic Sourcing
Materials/Inventory Management
Logistics and Transportation
Customer and supplier relationship management
Demand planning
Reverse logistics
Proposals should justify and recommend the scope of business
processes that should be benchmarked.
2.1 d)
Point-in-time versus Continuous Process
Proposals should indicate what benchmarks should be measured on a
single or periodic basis, and which could and should be measured on
an on-going basis.
2.1 e)Data Collection
Proposals should indicate the data source of information required to
calculate and analyze each proposed benchmark indicator.
Data sources should be easily accessible from standardized MIS
reports, and should consist of components which are easily compared
and verified from organization to organization.
2.1 f)

Output Usage
SCMA envisions that Benchmarking Project outputs will provide
information for the use by all its Stakeholders to:
Identify gaps in supply chain performance,
Develop process improvement opportunities,
Identify trends that signal private and public action,
Target research and project opportunities,
Identify areas for professional education and development
Stakeholders include individual and corporate members, government,
the academic/consulting community and the SCMA organization itself.

2.1 g)
Support for decision-making at strategic and tactical
levels
Supply chain managers make decisions and plan at the strategic,
tactical and operational levels.Strategic decisions impact how the
supply chain supports the organizations competitivestrategy, obtains
and allocates resources and organizes the multiple activities across
the firm.Tactical decisions drive the utilization of resources and
operational decisions focus onimplementing specific processes. The
benchmarking data needs to address both strategic-based
andprocess/tactical-based functions. The proponent should justify and

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

recommend what benchmark metricsshould be measured for each
function and at each level.
2.1 h)
Industry scope
There is complexity and diversity across and within different industry
sectors. Benchmarks atbroad economy wide or industry level do not
allow the benchmark to fully deliver results thatindividuals or firms
can utilize to make valid comparisons. Benchmarks need to reflect
thestructural differences across firms and how this impacts on their
performance. The proponentshould justify and recommend industry
classifications and sub classification (i.e. degree ofdisaggregation) for
organizing benchmark data. The benchmarking data should be
relevant toboth major industry sectors and emerging sectors (such as
services, public sector and smallbusiness) that are part of the
Canadian economy and represented in the SCMA membership.
2.1 j)

Geographic Scope
The core users of the benchmarking data are Canadian firms and
stakeholders with operationsin Canada. While the focus of the
benchmarking program should be of performance and bestpractice in
Canada, many Canadian firms compete globally. The proponent is
asked to identifybenchmarking programs in the U.S. or North
American and-or global-wide which may be leveraged toenhance the
value of the Canadian benchmarking data.

2.1 k)Existing Benchmarking Data

There are many available commercial benchmarking firms. There are
also existing
benchmarking studies, some conducted periodically and others are
one-offs. What supply chainbenchmarking is already in the market?
What needs of SCMA members would be met byaccess to
commercially available benchmarking? Is it better to purchase or
provide access toexisting benchmarking studies that are available?
The proposal should include the recommended approach for SCMA
and its Partners to achieve the optimum level of analysis and
resource utilization. Solution(s) may include a blend of purchased and
custom metrics to achieve the desired result.
2.1 m)
Benchmarking Implementation
The proposal should provide an evaluation and recommendation of
the alternative paths forimplementation of the benchmarking
program. Alternatives may include in-house at the national office, inhousevia a Lead Institute, in-house at each Institute, external
consultant, or an educational institution. Alternatives may
alsoconsider collaboration between Canadian organizations and
organizations in the U.S. to collectcross country benchmarking which
addresses the issues of geographic scope discussed above.

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

2.1 n)
Sources of Benchmarking Information
The proposal should identify, evaluate and recommend from whom
and how the needed benchmarkinginformation is collected. Issues
include the feasibility and ease of gathering the data, whether it is
availablefrom industry, whether it is gathered consistently, whether
they are willing to share it, how datais displayed and confidentiality
requirements.
2.1 p)
Long-term Sustainability and Governance
The proposal should identify and evaluate how benchmarking
programs, particularly thosedealing with the supply chain sector are
funded on a multi-year basis. Alternatives includeinternally funded,
subscription, user fees, corporate sponsorship, government funding
and utilization of freeservices.

3.1

PROJECT DELIVERABLES

3.1 a)Benchmarking Plan Including Implementation Plan

The Plan will need to include the following items:
1. A response to each of the issues outlined in the Section 2.1.
2. An analysis of existing North American and global supply chainspecific and
comparableindustry benchmarking programs including examples
and templates that could beused for the SCMA benchmarking
program.
3. An analysis of existing North American and global generic
benchmarking programs with arecommendation on how they can be
leveraged to complement the SCMAbenchmarking program.
4. An analysis of the issues, opportunities, costs and financial and nonfinancialbenefits that may be expected to accrue for the key
stakeholders if a decision weremade to proceed with establishing
the SCMA benchmarking program.
5. A proposed set of the key performance indicators that could be
included in abenchmarking program, based on the review of sources
of benchmarkinginformation.
6. An analysis of the benefits, costs or limitations, and risks of the
benchmarkingprogram.
7. A plan for implementing the benchmarking program including:
Benchmarking Scope;Implementation Plan and Timeline; Resource
Needs; and Estimated Costs toimplement and maintain the
benchmarking program.
8. The plan should include an analysis of alternatives covering a range
of budgets.
3.1 b)
Draft Report
A draft report incorporating key information and findings (a digital
copy in PDF format) willbesubmitted for review and comments by the

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Study Steering Committee. The draft report shouldclearly identify how
the benchmarking program will be run including organization models
andresource requirements.
3.1 c) Final Report
The Proponent is required to fully incorporate feedback on the draft
report and complete andsubmit a final report of the study to the
identified project manager (2 hard copies and a digitalcopy in MSWord and PDF format). The report should be a professional quality
document with awell-written executive summary.
3.1 d)
Other Documentation In addition to the above tasks and
deliverables, the proponent will alsobe required to provide:
Electronic files of meeting agenda, minutes, memorandums,
reports,
Electronic files of data, technical notes and background materials
collected for this
assignment; and
Presentation and presentation materials

4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND OWNERSHIP

Creation of the benchmarking plan is the responsibility of the Proponent,
with the assistance asappropriate of SCMA and a benchmarking program
steering committee. If the benchmarkingplan is implemented, the
implementation will be managed by a senior staff member of SCMA,
notwithstanding any other terms and conditions agreed to in writingby the
parties involved.

4.2 Study Steering Committee

The Study Steering Committee, which will provide overall direction and final
approval, consists
of:
Senior staff SCMA national;
Research Task Force members;

Steering Committee Members

Name
Cheryl
Paradowski
Gerry Fredette
Garland Chow

Title
President & CEO

Organization
SCMA

Director, Procurement
&Contracts
Associate Professor
Director, Bureau of Intelligent
Transportation Systems &
Freight Security

Calgary Airport Authority

Sauder School of
Business
The University of British
Columbia

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Tim McLaren

Principal

Korva Consulting Ltd.

All questions and comments for clarification must be directed

through the RFP Leader, Cheryl Paradowski. Information obtained
from any other source may contain inaccuracies.
Proponents MUST NOT direct comments or enquiries, or directly
contact, any other member of the Steering Committee, nor any
other employee of SCMA or it Participating Partners with respect to
the subject matter of this process during the RFP process.

4.3 Meetings
4.3.1 Start-Up Meeting
The successful proponent is required to fully consult the Study Steering
Committee at the
project start-up meeting to gain a better understanding of the study
objectives, clarification on
any outstanding issues and/or any additional information relevant to the
study. The objective isfor the proponent to fully understand the needs and
the issues of establishing the proposed
benchmarking study.
4.3.2 Steering Committee Meetings
The successful proponent will present the draft deliverables and findings for
each of the tasks
described in Section 3.1 to the Study Steering Committee and seek direction
from committee
members before proceeding to the next task. If the meeting is deemed to
require a presentation,then the meeting will be held at the SCMA national
office at 777 Bay St, Suite 2701, Toronto,Canada. If the meeting is deemed
to require only comments from the committee members, thena conference
call may be considered instead of a face-to-face meeting. The Final
SteeringCommittee Meeting would be a presentation of the proposed
business plan.
5.

CRITERIA

5.1

Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be assessed against the following criteria. The relative
weighting for each criterion is also given.
a)
b)
c)
d)

Project Plan
Related Expertise
Cost
20%
References

40%
20%
10%

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Presentation evaluation (if requested)
e) Presentation format and delivery
50%
f) Responsiveness to questions, clarification 50%

APPENDIX 1 -SIGNATURES
Defining a way forward for benchmarkingsupply
chain management performance inCanada
The Proponent must unconditionally sign this Appendix in order to submit a
Proposal. This executed Appendix must be submitted in hard copy, to be
received by SCMA by the RFP Closing Date. When submitted, this Proposal
shall include the RFP, the Schedules and Appendices to the RFP, documents
incorporated by reference into the RFP and the Proposal provided by the
Proponent.
By submitting this Appendix, executed on behalf of the Proponent, the
Proponent is representing and warranting that the persons executing this
Appendix are representatives of the Proponent, duly authorized to execute
and deliver the Proposal and the Proposal, if accepted as the successful
Proposal, will constitute a binding obligation of the Proponent, enforceable in
accordance with the terms hereof.

Company Name of Proponent

Signature

Address of Proponent

Name and Title

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Date

APPENDIX 2 RFP RESPONSE GRID

Response to each of the requirements is required in the grid below. Grid
shall be completed with all key information included herein. Additional
materials may be referenced within the answer block. Referenced material
should be highlighted within the document(s), with the clause reference
noted.
Vendors may expand the answer blocks as required, and may attach
additional pages as necessary. Ensure that all response materials are clearly
identified.

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Ref.
2.1
a)
2.1
b)
2.1
c)
2.1
d)
2.1
e)
2.1 f)
2.1
g)
2.1
h)
2.1 j)
2.1
k)
2.1
m)

2.1
n)
2.1
p)
31 a)
3.1
b)
3.1
c)
3.1
d)
4.3.1
4.3.2

Clause Title
What to Benchmark
Who to Benchmark
Scope of processes to be
benchmarked
Point-in-time vs
Continuous
Data collection
Output usage
Support for decisionmaking at strategic and
tactical levels
Industry scope
Geographic scope
Existing benchmarking
data
Benchmarking
implementation
Sources of benchmarking
information
Long-term sustainability
and governance
Benchmarking Plan with
implementation plan (7
factors)
Draft report
Final report
Other documentation (3
types or formats)
Start-up meeting
Steering Committee
meetings

Proponent Response

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

APPENDIX 3- CONFLICT AND/OR RELATIONSHIP DECLARATION

Any Proponent(s) that has a current, or may have had a previous
relationship with SCMA or Participating SCMA Partners(s), must disclose all
such relationship(s). Please attach the specific details to this schedule.
All conflicts must be fully disclosed and include the following detail:
1. Name of the person within your organization with the conflict
2. Name of the Participating SCMA Partner(s) and/or individual working for
or consulting to the Client(s) for which the conflict exists (if applicable)
3. Nature of the conflict in each case
All individuals having conflicts with SCMA, its Partner(s) and/or employees
and/or consultants working for SCMA and or its Partner(s) must sign and
date this Conflict Declaration.
_____________________________
Name (please print)

If there are no conflicts of interest, please check the appropriate box below.
There are no conflicts of interest between the Proponent and SCMAand
or its Partner(s).
I as a designated signing authority for my company, declare that any
conflicts have been fully disclosed and declared and are a part of this
submission.

Company Name of Proponent

Signature

Address of Proponent

Name and Title

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

Date

APPENDIX 4- CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

All information gathered for the purpose of preparing the Proposal is

confidential and will not be shared with anyone, except those individuals
preparing this Submission. Permission must be obtained in writing from
SCMA to divulge any information to any other persons.
All those individuals involved in preparing or reviewing this submission are
listed, below, and the Proponent has taken the necessary steps to ensure
the individuals listed are bound by the confidentiality obligations imposed
hereby. Upon request, the Proponent shall provide confirmation of such
steps.

Name (please print)

Appendix 4 forms part of the Proponents Proposal

Company Name of Proponent

Signature

Address of Proponent

Name and Title

Date

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

APPENDIX 5 - PROPONENT CONTACT INFORMATION

Proponent Name
Address
City/Province/Postal
Code
Main Contact
Name
Title
Address
City/Province/Postal
Code
Telephone
Fax
E-mail Address

Company Name of Proponent

Signature

Address of Proponent

Name and Title

Date

Request for Proposals: Benchmarking

APPENDIX 6- PRICING
Proponents are to carefully follow the instructions set out in Section 1.2.8 and 1.2.9
when submitting prices. Failure to submit Appendix 6 in the prescribed manner may
result in your bid being disqualified.

Company Name of Proponent

Signature

Address of Proponent

Name and Title

Date