Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Benchmarking
The prime objective of benchmarking is to
understand those practices which will
provide a competitive advantage in the
market place; target setting is secondary.
Paul Allaire
Chairman,
Xerox Corporation
Rushmore Reviews
Drilling Performance Review, since 1989
Completions Performance Review, since 1994
Well Abandonment Performance Review, since 2008
Well Interventions Performance Review, since 2011
Shale Performance Review, since 2012
Data from hundreds of Operating Companies in 100 countries
Over 52,000 DPR wells & 12,000 CPR completions
WellViewTM / OpenWellsTM / DataNetTM etc. compatible for data input
Completions Review
-
Operational Timing
Activity time / Non-productive time / WOW time
Well Cost
Total Cost / Overheads / Tangibles
Completion Diagram
Some Time/Event Plots
Well count
Platform
Subsea
UK/NO/DK
Other, 0.32%
GL, 80.19%
UK/NO/DK
Other, 0.32%
(Platform)
GL, 80.19%
Offshore
Land
(Pakistan land)
4 Operators
Chevron: 11 / Ithaca: 10 / EnQuest: 7 / Talisman-Sinopec: 2
Subsea: Ithaca:5 / Enquest:2 / Talisman-Sinopec: 2
Dual ESPs
15 (50%) / 6 Platform & 9 Subsea (100% of Subsea ESP completions)
Pod ESPs
23 (77%) / 16 Platform & 7 Subsea (78% of Subsea ESP completions)
Workovers
15 W/O: 14 Platform & 1 Subsea
Average time since last installation: 3.3 years
Average time since last installation (excluding unique cases*): 1.5 years
Subsea well time since last installation: ~2 years
* two platform well re-entries 12 & 15 years after last installation
Number of Mandrels
Maximum: 7
Well count
Completion Depth
ESP vs Gas Lift
Operator Benchmarking
Completion Running Time
Operator Benchmarking
Non-Productive Time (NPT)
Questions?
www.RushmoreReviews.com
www.letstrain.co.uk