Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
Considerations
Introduction
Pipeline operators today face the dilemma of increasing costs, aging pipelines, high demand for products, and
stringent safety regulations. The pressures from all of these factors seem to demand decisions which are polarized:
each solution seems to be in direct opposition to the other.
The pressures of return-on-investment demand that pipeline operators get full value for their investment of
company resources. Every expenditure must be made only after assessing the cost as compared to the need.
Management can no longer afford to "send an elephant to crush an ant". The solution to problems must meet
specifications which have been developed by people who are fully aware of all aspects of the problem to be
solved, and of the impact the solution will have on the company.
The demand for products to be transported to remote markets by pipeline has increased significantly in the past 20
years as the population of the world has virtually exploded. This population growth has changed the boundaries of
the cities to the extent that areas which were once farm land are now the center of dense housing developments.
This growth in population and expansion has created two basic problems for pipeline companies:
1. Increased demand for products has caused a demand for higher throughput which, in turn, demands
higher operating pressures.
2. Higher housing density demands that the pipeline operator prove that his pipeline meets the code
requirements for the changing environment.
In each case, the demand for more precise non-destructive testing methods becomes evident.
Considerations
1. Why do I want to inspect my pipeline?
2. What are my objectives?
3. What unique features do I have in my pipeline?
4. What historical data do I have on my pipeline?
5. What is the best inspection tool for my pipeline?
6. What are the contracting and establishing requirements?
metal loss
corrosion
gouging
spalling
laminations
mill defects
product deposits
fatigue cracking
geometry defects
ovality
wrinkles
buckles
dents
Government requirements
The pressures of government regulation on the pipeline industry have increased around the world. All
governments, to varying degrees, are requiring that pipeline operators prove that their pipelines are in safe
operating condition and are free from defects, which effectively lower their operating specifications.
For example, there is pending legislation today in the USA to require pipeline operators to inspect their entire
system every five years. This would require a program of inspection at the rate of 20% of the system every year.
The problem is not just the inspection tools and their cost, but it is also the ability to access the pipeline. Many
lines are not designed for pigging; they may have reduced-diameter valves or dual line sizes in the same run of
pipeline. They also may not have launchers and receivers to insert the tools on-stream. Obviously, modification of
lines to allow in-line inspection tools to be used can be an extremely expensive operation.
make repair and replacement decisions from the data furnished by the pipeline inspection service
complete all work with minimum interference to pipeline service and at the least possible total
cost to operator
These are just a few points that need to be reviewed and considered during the discussion process, and need to be
altered to meet unique conditions for your particular pipeline.
dual-diameter pipeline
type of construction
flow rate
check valves
(Note: Bend radius of most elbows or tube turns can be the single most common cause for problems with
inspection tools...3R or 3D? Interpretation of this term can be 18in or 36in radius in a 12-in diameter pipeline,
depending on an individual's age or background. In order to avoid this problem, list radius in inches or millimeters
to avoid any misunderstanding.)
location
maps
inspection specifications
All these items need to be factored into the selection of the best tool for a given pipeline. In some cases, the
lowest cost per mile (kilometer) is not the best selection or in the best interest of the company making the
selection.
6
Pipeline cleaning
Pipeline preparation and cleaning is a critical element in any inspection program, be it flux-leakage or ultrasonic,
increasing the potential for better inspection results. Overlooking or de-emphasizing the cleaning process can, and
in most cases will, result in extra inspection charges and possible standing-rate charges.
Many inspection companies can provide cleaning services that can compliment the corrosion survey, or
recommend several independent contractors that would be able to assist in the cleaning process.
Benchmarker placement
Depending on the inspection service selected for a corrosion survey, this will dictate the method of benchmarking
the pipeline. For increasing the accuracy of locating possible problem areas, several types are being used:
above-ground receivers
Regardless of the type of marking system is being used, be sure that all locations are accessible and accurately
located in advance of the actual survey.
Final report
Final reports provide specialized information in various forms, and should contain some of the items present in
the sample report provided in Addendum 2. Familiarity with the information and data provided by any inspection
company will normally ease many concerns or problems in interpretation of these results. Several inspection
services are offering additional software support to compliment the data provided in these reports, and should be
considered for additional information not being provided in most reports. Keep in mind that most of these
software programs are meant to compliment final reports rather than act as a replacement for wall-loss analysis
being provided by the inspection company.