Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 1, May 20
Shirov - Kasparov 0:1
Morozevich - Sadvakasov 1:0
Kramnik - Gelfand 1:0
Morozevich,A (2749) - Sadvakasov,D
(2585) [B90]
At the transition from the opening to the
middle game the host of the tournament
failed to find the right path in a
complicated position and went down
without much fight.
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6
5.Nc3 a6 6.f3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.Be3 h5
This is a fashionable plan right now.
Black is preventing g2-g4.
9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.0-0-0 Rc8 11.Kb1 Be7
12.h3
White is insisting on pushing g2-g4.
Darmen already played this line on the
black side - 12.Nd5 Nxd5 13.exd5 Bf5
14.Bd3 Bxd3 15.Qxd3 Bg5 16.Bf2 0-0
17.h4 Bh6 18.g4 Bf4 19.Nd2 hxg4
20.fxg4 Re8 21.g5 += Perunovic,MSadvakasov,D/Subotica 2000/1/2 (62).
12...Qc7N
More common is 12...b5. From the
outside, 12...h4!? looks more logical.
13.Bd3
White is bringing his h1-rook into play.
13...b5 [13...h4!?] 14.g4 Nb6
Strange as it may look, Blacks bold
breakthrough at the center deserved a
26.Qg3
Kasparov: This looks like a decisive
mistake. 26.h3 d5 27.Ng3 looks better.
26Rfd8
14.Qxd8N
Previously White played 14.Nc3 with
total equality.
14...Rxd8 15.Nbd2 Bc6
At this point of the game I had the
impression that a draw was not far away.
16.Nb3 Nbd7
White has nothing after 16...Be7!, for
example, 17.Na5 Bd5 18.Ne1 Bxg2
19.Nxg2 Nc6!
17.Rfc1 Bb6 18.Nfd2 Bxg2 19.Kxg2
Rdc8 20.Bxf6 Nxf6 21.Nc4 Bc7 22.Nc5
Rab8
The simplest way to achieve an equal
game was 22...b5 23.Nd2 Bd6 24.Ndb3
Kf8=.
23.b4 Kf8 24.Rab1
Now Black is facing some problems.
24...Ke7
On 24...b5 White has an interesting
continuation in store: 25.Nxa6 bxc4
26.Nxb8 Bxb8 27.b5 and his passed
pawns are very dangerous.
25.b5 Bd8 26.Nd3 axb5 27.Rxb5 b6?!
Safer is 27...Nd7!
28.Nde5 Kf8
This is a blunder. 28...Ne4! looks scary,
but I think Black can hold the position.
For example, 29.Rd1 f6 30.Rd7+ Ke8
31.Rd4 Nc3 32.Nd6+ Ke7 33.Nxc8+
Rxc8 34.Rd7+ (34.Rc4 Rxc4 35.Nxc4
Nxb5 36.axb5=) 34...Ke8 35.Rb4 g5!!
+/=.
29.Nxb6!
Not a very difficult combinational blow.
The following conversion of the
advantage is not that difficult (for
Kramnik).
29...Rxc1 30.Nbd7+ Nxd7 31.Nxd7+
Ke8 32.Nxb8 Rc8 33.Na6 Rc2 34.e3 Ra2
35.Nc5 Bc7 36.Rb7 Kd8 37.Rb4 Ke7
38.Ne4 f5 39.Rb7 Rc2 40.Ng5 h6 41.Nf3
Kf6 42.Nd4 Rc4 43.Nb5 Be5 44.f4 Bc3
45.Rf7+ Kxf7 46.Nd6+ Ke7 47.Nxc4
Kd7 48.Kf3 Kc6 49.e4 Kc5 50.Ne5 fxe4+
51.Kxe4 Kb4 52.Nc6+ Kxa4 53.Nd4
Kb4 54.Nxe6 Kc4 55.g4 Bf6 56.h3 Bb2
57.h4 Bc3 58.f5 Bb2 59.Nxg7!
White could have won with 59.g5 but why
not please the fans?
59...Bxg7 60.g5 1-0
Round 2: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 2, May 21
Shirov - Morozevich 1:0
Sadvakasov - Kramnik 0:1
Kasparov - Gelfand 1/2
Kasparov,G (2835) - Gelfand,B (2712)
[C07]
1.e4 e6
Here comes a little surprise! Usually Boris
plays the Najdorf Variation in the Sicilian
Defense. However it is really difficult to
play this variation with either White or
Black against Garry. So the Israeli chess
leaders decision to take up another
variation is quite logical.
Kasparov: For all I know, this is the first
time that Gelfand has played the French
Defence. His choice has proved to be
lucky.
2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 c5 4.Ngf3 cxd4 5.exd5
Qxd5 6.Bc4 Qd6 7.0-0 Nf6 8.Re1
In response Garry dodges the usual
continuation (8.Nb3) too.
8...Be7 9.Ne4 Nxe4 10.Rxe4 Nc6
11.Nxd4
A brave move.
11...0-0
Avoiding the complications. I mean the
following line: 11...e5!? 12.Qf3 (in the
variation 12.Bf4 exf4 13.Nxc6 Qxd1+
14.Rxd1 bxc6 15.Rde1 Kf8 16.Rxe7 Black
has the counterblow 16...Be6!) 12...Nxd4
13.Qxf7+ Kd8 14.Qxg7 Re8 15.Bf4 Bf6
16.Bg5 Bxg5 17.Qxg5+ Kc7 and Black
gradually wins, Braig - Bibby/Bern
op/1991. Evidently Garry could have
strengthened these two prominent
players game.
12.Bf4 Qc5 13.Nxc6
Kasparov: (?!) An unhappy decision.
Perhaps stronger is the immediate 13.Bd3,
and after 13...Nxd4 14.Rxd4, Black has no
time for 14...b5 due to 15.Be4.
13Qxc6
White has a slight advantage thanks to his
17...Qxe4
A fear of miscalculation manifests itself.
He could do without giving away his
queen: 17...Qb6 18.Bxh7+ (the addition of
a4-a5 and Qb6-c7 does not change the
positions evaluation) 18...Kxh7 19.Qh5+
Kg8 20.Rh3 f5! (but not 20...f6? 21.Qh7+
Kf7 22.Rg3 Rg8 23.Qg6+ Kf8 24.Bh6)
21.Qh7+ Kf7 and there is nothing but
perpetual check to be seen for White.
Kasparov: (?!) An unjustified sacrifice. As
a matter of fact, White doesnt have a real
advantage, but if Black tries a variation
like 17...Qb6 18.a5 Qa7 19.Bxh7+ Kxh7
20.Rh3+ Kg8 21.Qh5, here 21...f6 is
probably losing, because of 22.Qh7+ Kf7
27.Ra3
The white rooks transposition to the gfile changes nothing. 27.Ra7!? deserves
attention.
Kasparov: (?) A terrible mistake. Surely I
should have played 27.Ra7 moving the
rook to the seventh rank. However, it is
rather difficult to win even this position,
yet the chances are much better than in the
game. More to the point, at that moment I
had twice as much time as my opponent.
27...Rb7 28.Rg3 f6 29.Rg4 Rc8 30.Rd4
Kasparov: Unfortunately there is nothing
better for White. I thought I had winning
chances after 30.h5 h6 31.b3, threatening
Round 3: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 3, May 22
Kramnik - Shirov 1/2
Gelfand - Sadvakasov 1:0
Morozevich - Kasparov 0:1
Morozevich,A (2749) - Kasparov,G
(2835) [B87]
Alexander Morozevich got into a scrape.
His blunder of yesterday in the game with
Shirov robbed him of a good nights
sleep. Nevertheless, the young Muscovite
decided not to avoid a hard fight with an
extremely strong opponent. It came to no
good...
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6
5.Nc3 a6 6.Bc4
The Sozin Attack.
Kasparov: When preparing for this game,
I realized, that I had not checked this
move for a while, so I decided to brush up
on a few lines.
6...e6 7.Bb3 b5
Another fashionable continuation in this
position is 7...Nbd7 with the idea of Nc5.
8.0-0 Be7 9.Qf3 Qc7 10.Qg3 0-0 11.Bh6
Ne8 12.Rad1 Bd7 13.f4
Kasparov: I played 13.Nf3 vs. Gelfand
twice, and scored a point and half, but the
move in the text is the most consistent.
13Nc6 14.f5
This is a very aggressive move. White has
attacked the e6-square, but put the e5square at his opponents disposal. Sasha
played differently in his previous game:
14.Bg5 Bxg5 15.fxg5 Nxd4 16.Rxd4 Qc5
17.Qe3 b4 18.Nd1 Bb5 19.Re1 a5. Black
27...Bb5
Black is regaining the exchange.
28.Nf4
Kasparov: I was calculating 28.h3 Nxe4
29.Qh4+ Nf6 30.Rdf3 Rh8 31.Qxh8 Bxe2
- just another folly in this crazy game. The
e5-bishop guards Black against all the
troubles.
28Bxf4
Kasparov: It is just impossible to refrain
from capturing such a knight in time
trouble, with all sorts of combinational
blows in the air. At this point I had just 10
minutes left, whereas my opponent had 7.
29.Qxf4 Qe5 30.h3
30.Rxd6 Qxf4 31.Rxf4 Kxd6 32.Rxf6
Ra7! -/+
Kasparov: I calculated the line 30.Rxd6
Qxf4 31.Rxf4 Kxd6 32.Rxf6 and
32...Ra7! -/+. Blacks last move is very
important. It came in handy down the
road.
30...g5 31.Qf2
Kasparov: Probably 31.Qd2 was better.
31g4
Black is in no hurry to capture on d3,
because in this case White straightens out
his pawn structure.
32.Qb6
Kasparov: It is hard to reject such a
tempting move. Most likely my opponent
could have reached a draw after 32.Qxf6+
Qxf6 33.Rxf6 Kxf6 34.Rxd6 gxh3 35.Rd4
hxg2+ 36.Kxg2 Rb8 and White is not
worse.
32Nd7 33.Qf2
Kasparov: We repeated the position at this
point.
33Nf6
33...Qh5 34.h4!
34.Qb6 Rh8
Kasparov: Black is playing for a win.
35.Rxd6?
This is a decisive mistake. After the
correct move, 35.Qc7+ Nd7 36.Rxd6!, I
can see no winning continuations for
Black. For example, 36...Rxh3+
(36...Qxd6? 37.Rxf7+) 37.gxh3 Qxe4+
38.Kg1 Qe3+ 39.Rf2 Qe1+ 40.Kg2 Qe4+
41.Kg1.
Kasparov: This is a mistake. White could
have forced a draw after 35.Qc7+! Nd7
36.Rxd6 Rxh3+ 37.gxh3 Qxe4+ and
Black has nothing better than a perpetual
check.
35...Qxd6 36.Qxd6+
36.Qxb5 gxh3
36...Kxd6 37.Rxf6 Rh7!
Kasparov: The above-mentioned line with
the rook on the seventh rank stood me in
good stead. Now White is in trouble.
38.Kh2 Ke5 39.Rf2 gxh3 40.gxh3 Bc6!
47.Re8
Kasparov: There is no escape for White in
the line 47.Rb8 Rc7 48.Kg3 Rg7+ 49.Kh2
Kd2 50.Rxb4 e3 51.Rb5 Rg5 52.h4 e2-+
47Rc7 48.Rxe5
Kasparov: The rest is an easy ride for
Black. White could have posed some
problems with 48.Kg3.
48Kf4 49.Rb5 Rxc2+ 50.Kg1 e3
51.Rxb4+ Kf3 52.Rb1
Kasparov: After 52.Rb8 Rc1+ 53.Kh2 e2
54.Rf8+ Ke3 55.Re8+ Kd3 56.Rd8+ Kc3
57.Rc8+ Kb2 58.Re8 e1Q 59.Rxe1 Rxe1
60.Kg3 Re4-+ White is losing.
52Rg2+ 53.Kh1 e2 54.a4 Kf2 55.a5
Rg5 56.Kh2 Rxa5 57.h4 Ra3
The ex-champion has caught up to the
champion!
0-1
Kramnik,V (2797) - Shirov,A (2722)
[D12]
This is another encounter of old friendsrivals. Despite their youth, they both have
a lot to reminisce about. This game turned
out to be extremely interesting, especially
the ending. I am not sure that I managed
to comprehend all the intricacies of this
encounter, though.
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3
Here we go! Kramnik has opted for an
unpretentious continuation, which does
not promise a real advantage. It looks like
the champion decided to play in this dry,
technical style with all the participants.
Why not, if it works?
4...Bf5!
22...Nc4!
This is a very logical reaction. It is time
for Black to transfer his knight to a better
position from the edge of the board.
23.Nxc4 bxc4 24.Rxc4 Rab8
It has turned out that Black is regaining a
pawn. White would be glad to return his
f4 pawn to f2!
25.Rc2
25.Qd2? Rxb2
25...Qe3+ 26.Kh1 Rfe8
Why not 26...Qxf4 ? I cant imagine.
27.g3 Qe4+ 28.Kg1 Rb3 29.Rd4 Qe6
30.Rf2 Re3 31.Kg2 f5?!
31...Qc6+ 32.Kh3!
32.Rd6 Qe4+ 33.Kh3
White is slightly better. Time trouble now
crept in. There is not much sense in
commenting on the following sequence.
33...Re6 34.Qd5 Kh7 35.Qxe4 R3xe4
1-0
Round 4: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 4, May 24
Gelfand - Morozevich 1:0
Sadvakasov - Shirov 1/2
Kramnik - Kasparov 1/2
23...bxc4 24.Be5
What can I say about this position? I
doubt that White has any winning
chances. The transposition into a drawing
endgame with opposite-colored bishops is
always at Blacks service. Meanwhile, he
can try to pester the opponent with his
bishops.
Kasparov: Only this move poses some
problems to Black.
24...Bf8
24...Bh6 suggested itself.
Kasparov: This is a key move of the
game, which consumed a lot of time. Not
so good was 24...Bh6 in view of 25.Nd4;
then the pawn advances to f4, the knight
jumps to c6, and the white king heads to
Blacks c-pawn. If Black reacts with
24...f6 then White retreats, winning a
tempo: 25.Bd4 a6 26.Kd2 Kf7 27.Kc3 Bf8
28.Nd2, but not 28.Kxc4 Bb5+ 29.Kc3
with some hopes for a fortress. I was also
calculating the move 24...Bf5, but it can
be met by the unpleasant 25.Kd2 and
Black is at a loss. For example 25...f6
26.Bd4 Be4 27.d6 Kf7 28.Bxa7 Ke6
29.Bc5
25.Nd2!
Kasparov: The most consistent
continuation was 25.Nd4 but Black holds
in this line as well. 25...Bc5 26.Nc6 Kf8
27.f3 Bxc6 28.dxc6 Ke7 29.Kd2 Bb4+
30.Ke3 Bc5+ 31.Ke4 Ke6 32.c7 and
Black is just in time with the check
32...f5+
24Bb5 26.Ne4 f5!
Kasparov: I thought that this move was
obligatory in the course of the game. I was
under the impression that after 26...c3+
Black was losing -- 27.Ke3 c2 28.Nf6+
Kg7 29.Kd2 Bd3 30.d6 and White is
winning -- but it turned out that Black
probably escapes in this line, in a very
spectacular way. Black should play
29...Be7 30.Ne4+ f6 31.d6 Bd8 32.Bd4
Bd3 33.Nxf6 Bxf6 34.d7 Bxd4 35.d8Q Bb2
which leads to an amazing drawing
position. White has nothing better than a
perpetual check.
27.Nc3!
This is a good knight transfer to the
25.Rd1!
This move is even better than 25.Nd6
25...Be2
Again, so near and yet so far. The knight
is taboo 25...Rxb7 26.Rxd3 Bxc5 27.Rd8+
Bf8 28.Rxa6
26.Rd7 Bg4
26...Re7 27.Rxe7 Bxe7 28.Re1! and one
of the Blacks unluckily lined up bishops
perishes. 28...Rxb7 29.Rxe2 Bxc5
30.Re8+ Bf8 31.Bb4+27.Rc7 Rc4 28.Rxa6 h5
28...Bxc5 29.Nxc5 Rxc5 30.b7 Rb5
31.Ra7+-; 28...Rxb7 29.Rxb7 Bc8
30.Raa7 Bxb7 31.Rxb7 Rxc5 32.Rd7 Rb5
33.b7+29.Ra7 Be6 30.Rxc6
This is Whites third extra pawn!
30...Bd5 31.Rc7 Re8
Finally Black has managed to create his
first threat - 32...Rxc3, but it is way too
transparent.
32.h3 Rf4 33.Nd6 Re2 34.f3 Rxg2+
35.Kxg2 Rxf3 36.Kg1 1-0
Round 5: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 5, May 25
Shirov - Gelfand 1/2
Morozevich - Kramnik 0:1
Kasparov - Sadvakasov 1/2
25.Bf4!
Garry is in the habit of cutting the knots!
In response to 25.Ne3 there is 25...Bc6!
25...Bc2 26.Rb2 Bxd3 27.exd3 Rd8
Why has White lost the exchange? He has
lost it for the sake of obtaining a good
structure.
28.h4!
There appears a dangerous positional
threat, i.e. the white pawns route to h6.
28...Nc6 29.h5 Ne7
29...Ne5 suggests itself, but in this case
White can response with 30.Bf1! and
implement h5-h6 all the same.
Kasparov: Probably better is 29...Ne5
30.Bf1, and White has compensation for
the exchange but no more.
30.Ne3
Sure enough, the knights should not be
traded off.
30...Rbd7
Of course, in response to 30...f6 one
should play 31.h6!, thus breaking up the
opponents pawn structure.
31.Ng4
From my point of view, it is at this
moment that White has lost his advantage.
Strong is 31.h6 followed by 31...g6
32.Ng4 Kh8 33.Nf6 Rb7 and then the line
34.e5 d5 35.c4 gxf5 36.cxd5 Neg6 leads
to an unclear game. Instead of this,
stronger is 34.c4!, and there is always a
threat of Bf4-d2-c3! for Black.
Kasparov: (?) A bad move from all
possible points of view. I couldnt see an
immediate win for White, so I didnt want
to make the position clear. Meanwhile, the
immediate 31.h6 would have posed more
serious problems to Black:
31...g6 (variations like 31...gxh6 32.Ng4
are not even worth examining - the white
pieces become too active ) 32.Ng4 Kh8
33.Nf6 Rc7 34.e5
A) now bad is 34...d5 because of 35.e6,
and Black has difficulties. For example,
losing is 35...Rb7 36.Be5 Nc6 37.Bxd5
Rxd5 38.Nxd5+ Nxe5 39.e7 Rb8 40.Re2
Nfd7 41.Nf6 followed by a win.
B) it is necessary to move 34...Nxf5
35.exd6 and here Black should play
35...Rxd6 (because bad is 35...Nxd6
36.Nd5 Rcd7 37.Be5+ with a big
advantage ) , but in that case White plays
36.Ne8 Rcd7 37.Be5+ f6 38.Nxf6 Re7
39.Bxd6 Nxd6 40.d4 and here comes the
ending where White has a considerable
advantage. For instance, 40...cxd4
41.cxd4 Ne6 42.Re2 Nf5 43.Rc2 Rc7
44.Rxc7 Nxc7 45.d5.
31...Nc6
Kasparov: A good defense. Now Blacks
knight can move to e5.
32.h6 Ne5!
A wonderful protective idea! The rooks
have to blow up one file at least.
33.Bxe5
Kasparov: Another possibility is 33.Nf2,
sticking to the same line of action - not to
make the position clearer, waiting for the
opponent to blunder. White does not risk
21.Bg5
And this move is made in pure Shirov
style! Alexey challenges his opponent to
compete in calculations.
21...Ne4
Gelfand refuses the challenge, though if
the sacrifice were accepted, any result
would be possible. The basic variation is
as follows: 21...Qxb2 22.Bxf6 Rxe1+
23.Rxe1 Qxc3 24.Re3 Qc1+ 25.Kh2, and
now Black should be very cautious in
choosing which move to make.
A) For example, in response to the
following attempt of simplifying the
position - 25...Qb1 White plays 26.Qd7!
gxf6 27.Rg3+ Bg7 28.Qg4 Qg6 29.Qf4!
winning the queen.
B) the counterattack 25...Rb1 fails due to
26.Bxg7! Qh1+ 27.Kg3 Rg1 28.Bxf8
Qxg2+ (28...Rxg2+ 29.Kh4 Kxf8 30.Rf3
Rg7 31.Qc8+) 29.Kh4 Kxf8 30.Qc8+ Kg7
31.Rg3+.
But the line 22...gxf6 23.Qd3 Bh6!?
24.Rxe8+ Rxe8 25.Rc2 Qxa3 deserves
attention, where the white queen attacks
Round 6: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 6, May 26
Kasparov - Shirov 1:0
Sadvakasov - Morozevich 0:1
Gelfand - Kramnik 1/2
16 Rc5
In the line 16...Qc5 17.Rd2 Nc6 18.Ncb5!
White retains control over the d4-square.
On 18...Na5 White has a good response
19.Nd6.
Kasparov: Another consistent
continuation was 16...Qc5 17.Bd3 and at
this point 17...Ba4. This last move baffled
me at the board. I could not calculate all
the lines. The idea of this move is to
prepare the queens transfer on a5.
Besides, after Nxd3 White cant capture
with the c-pawn. An interesting position
with mutual chances would have arisen.
17.a3 Nc6?!
To tell you the truth I dont understand the
reasons behind the following sequence.
Black could have proceeded with 17...Na6
The knight does not occupy an ideal
position, to put it mildly, but it is just for a
short period of time.
18.Ncb5
Why not 18.Nb3 - ? For example 18...d4
(18...Rc4 19.Bxc4 Nxc4 20.Qd3 +/-)
19.Nxd4 Nxd4 20.Rxd4 Rac8 21.Rd6!
and it looks like does not have adequate
compensation for a pawn.
Kasparov: It looks like better was 18.Nb3
d4 19.Nxd4 Nxd4 20.Rxd4 Rac8 and here
I missed a strong move 21.Rd6
neutralizing Blacks threat Rxc3. White
emerges up a pawn.
18...Nxd4 19.Nxd4 Rac8 20.Bd3
Finally White has completed development
34Kf5??
Obviously Black should have opted for
the more reserved 34...Kf7 35.Rh1 and
18...a5!
Blacks counterplay on the queenside is
aimed at trading the a-pawns. In this case
the position with hanging pawns is not as
favorable for White because of the
weakness on b3.
19.Qc1 Rec8
An impatient player would play 19...a4
which may result in following sequence
20.b4!? (20.bxa4 c4 21.Bxe4 Qxe4 22.Rb2
Re6 regaining a pawn with an excellent
position.) 20...cxd4!? (20...c4 21.Bxe4
dxe4 22.Nd2 b5 23.a3 Qg5 24.Nb1 in such
a stark pawn structure, the knight can be
potentially better that the bishop. )
21.Nxd4! (On 21.Rc7 Black wriggles out
with 21...Qxb4 22.Rxb7 Nc5!) 21...Qxb4
22.Qb1 and White has a dangerous
initiative on the queenside.
Take into account that White can opt for
not reacting to this provocation, for
example by 20.Rd1. If so, why should
Black waste time on calculating all these
variations? Vladimir prefers a more solid
positional move, preventing all the tricks.
20.Rd1 a4 21.h3
Gelfand has calculated the pawn
exchanges 21.dxc5 axb3 22.axb3
22...bxc5 (dangerous is 22...Nxc5?!
23.Bf5 Nxb3?! 24.Rxc8+ Bxc8 25.Qc6
Bb7 26.Qxb6) to make sure one more
24.Ne5
White is accurate. 24.Rdc1 would have
been met by 24...c4! 25.bxc4 dxc4
26.Bxc4 Nxc4 27.Rxc4 Rxc4 28.Rxc4
Bxf3 29.gxf3 Qxf3.
24...Rc7 25.Be2
The insertion of the moves 25.Rdc1 Rac8
yields White no dividends: 26.Be2 Ne4
27.Bg4 Re8 28.Nd3 Ba6 29.Nf4 Bb7 and
the c5-square is protected by Black.
25...Ne4 26.Bf3 Ng5 27.Bg4 Qe7
28.Rdc1 Bc8
Finally, Kramnik has solved the problem
of his bad bishop. The position is
completely equal.
29.Bxc8 1/2-1/2
18.g4!?
As long as the black knight is having
some rest far away from the king...
18...g5
Black preventing the g4-g5 breakthrough
in the most radical way.
19.Bg3 Bg7 20.h4 f6 21.Ng1
This move looks somewhat ugly. I would
rather play 21.Rae1 Qd7 22.Qg2.
21...Qd7 22.Rf5 b5!
Opening the position favors Black.
Whites king is stripped.
23.cxb5 Qxb5 24.Bxd6 c4! 25.dxc4 Qxc4
26.Qg2 Rad8 27.Bh2 Nc5 28.d6 Ne4
29.Rxa5 Nxd6 [29...Bf8!?] 30.Bxd6?!
Safer was 30.Qd5+ and the opponents
chances are equal. However, it looks like
Darmen was playing for a win.
30...Rxd6 31.Ra8 Rxa8 32.Qxa8+ Bf8
33.Qf3 h5!
An excellent move! Black is complicating
the game in his opponents time trouble.
Morozevich has a dangerous initiative.
34.Re1 hxg4 35.Qe4
No fun for White is 35.Qg2 f5 36.hxg5
Qf4 or 35.Qf5 Qc6+.
35...Qxe4+ 36.Rxe4 f5! 37.Re5 gxh4
38.Rxf5
45...Rf3!
No wonder White missed this subtlety in
his calculations.
46.a4 Bxf4+ 47.Kg1 h2+ 48.Kg2 Rf1
What can I say? Morozevichs class is
higher, so the result is natural.
0-1
Round 7: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 7, May 28
Morozevich - Shirov 1:0
Kramnik - Sadvakasov 1:0
Gelfand - Kasparov 1/2
Gelfand,B Kasparov,G [D91]
13...e4
Perhaps Black should have simply
continued developing: 13...Bg4.
14.Ng5 Bd6
In the line 14...Bg4 15.Nd5 Bxe2 16.Nxc7
Bxd1 17.Nxa8 Bh5 18.Bxf6 there is the
calm move 18...Bg6!?, which does not
equalize the position either.
15.Nd5!
No notice is paid to the h2-pawn!
15...Nxd5 16.Rxd5!
Worse is 16.Qh5 Bf5!
16...Bxh2+ 17.Kh1 Be5 18.Qh5 Bf5?
Much more stubborn is 18...h6 19.Nxf7
Rxf7 20.Rxe5 Nxe5 21.Bxe5 Qe7
22.Bxf7+ Qxf7 23.Qxf7+ Kxf7 24.Rc1
and the champion would have had to play
to his best technique in the opposed
bishops ending.
19.Nxf7! Rxf7
19...Bxb2 20.Rxf5 Bxa1 21.Ne5+ Kh8
22.Ng6#
20.Qxf5! g6
In order to go down in history, he should
have played 20...Rxf5! 21.Rd8# - mate
with double check.
21.Bxe5 1-0
5.Bd3
This looks like another opening fad of
Alexander Morozevich. Leko was the first
to employ this move in his game with
Kramnik (Linares 1999). This idea was to
Morozevichs taste, and I believe this
variation is going to draw more admirers
after todays game. Alexanders ability to
make extravagant openings popular is
exceptional.
5...d5 6.Qe2 Qe7 7.0-0 Nd6
At the Sarajevo 2000 tournament, Shirov
played Morozevich in the following way:
7...Nc5. This time he follows Kramnik.
8.Qd1 g6
A novelty. Shirov does not want to waste
time retreating with the queen, so he
decides to fianchetto the bishop. At Wijk
aan Zee 2000 Kramnik played 8...Qd8
9.Re1+ Be7 10.Nc3 c6 11.Qe2 (the
queens transpositions to and fro are quite
funny!) 11...Bg4 12.b3 Nd7 13.Bb2 Nc5
14.Na4 Bxf3 15.Qxf3 Nxd3 16.Qxd3, a
draw.
9.Re1 Be6 10.Bf1 Bg7 11.d4
So the bishop will be developed in the
usual way.
11...0-0 12.Bf4 Nc6 13.c3 Qd7 14.Nbd2
Rfe8 15.h3 f6
90% of chess players would draw this
game soon after exchanges along the efile. But, much to the publics relief,
Morozevich and Shirov are not among
them.
16.Qa4
Now this move is quite possible. If g7bishop wasnt screened by the f6 pawn
this move would allow Black to play
Nxd4.
16...Bf7 17.Rxe8+ Rxe8 18.b4 a6 19.Nb3
There threatens 20.Nc5 Qc8 21.Bxa6, and
the pawn is won. Morozevich created
problems for his opponent with the help of
a few precise moves.
19...Ne4 20.Nc5 Qf5
A witty decision in Shirovs style. Bad is
20...Nxc3 21.Qb3 Qf5 22.Qxc3 Qxf4
23.Nxb7; after 20...Nxc5 21.bxc5 the bfile is open for White.
21.Be3
In response to 21.Nxb7 there follows
44.h4! Be6?!
Surely the bishop is a good fighter against
passed pawns, but only a very phlegmatic
person could risk 44...Bd5 45.Qg5+ Qxg5
46.hxg5+ Kxg5 47.Nc5. After 47...Kf6
(bad is 47...Kf4? 48.Nxa6 c5 49.Nxc5 Ke3
50.a6 Kd2 51.Na4 Bc6 52.Nb6 Kxc3
53.d5+-) 48.Nxa6 c5 it is hard to believe
that Black can escape, but there is no
definite win to be seen on the spot.
A) wishy-washy is 49.dxc5 Ke7 50.Nb4
Be4, and Black organizes a good defense
at the queenside, and as far as his kingside
is concerned, everything is OK.
B) more serious is 49.Nc7!? Bb7 50.a6 (in
the pawn ending after 50.dxc5 Ke7 51.a6
Kd7! 52.axb7 Kxc7 53.c6 g5 the best thing
that White can achieve is the queen
ending 54.g3 h5 55.Kg2 Kb8 56.Kf3 Kc7
57.Ke3 Kb8 58.Kd4 Kc7 59.Ke5 h4
60.gxh4 gxh4 61.Kf4 Kb8 62.Kxf5 h3
63.Ke6 h2 64.Kd7 h1Q 65.c7+ Kxb7
66.c8Q+ Ka7 where the pawn is much too
far away from the promotion square)
50...Bxa6 51.Nxa6 cxd4 52.cxd4 f4 but
even here Blacks defense seems to be all
right.
C) 49.Nxc5 49...Ke7 50.Na4
C1) losing is 50...Kd6? 51.Nb6 Kc6
(51...Be6 52.a6+-) 52.Nxd5 Kxd5 53.a6
Kc6 54.d5+;
C2) 50...Bb7! (this move is necessary for
protecting the e4-pawn) 51.Nb6 Ba6
52.Kg3 g5 53.Nd5+ Kd6 54.Nb4 Bb7
55.a6 Ba8 and the white king hasnt
managed to take part in the fight.
45.Nb8 Bc8 46.Nxc6 Bb7 47.Ne5
The queens are still on the chessboard,
and this means that Black should watch
60.Nb7!
Black loses the c4-pawn, and the fight is
over.
60...Bd5 61.Na5 Kd6 62.a7 Kc7 63.Nxc4
g5 64.Ne5 Kb6 65.c4
There is a popular puzzle that consists in
moving the knight all over the chessboard
without visiting any square twice.
Morozevichs heroic knight went along
the following route: f3-h2-g4-f6-d7-b8c6-e5-d7-c5-e6-c5-a6-c5-b7-a5-c4-e5.
This is 18 moves.
1-0
Round 8: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 8, May 29
Shirov - Kramnik 1/2
Sadvakasov - Gelfand 1/2
Kasparov - Morozevich 1/2
Shirov,A Kramnik,V [C67]
The second encounter of these opponents
repeated the scenario of their first game in
the tournament. The champion had an
advantage but did not manage to convert
it.
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6
Quite naturally we see the Berlin wall.
Most likely the same position will appear
in the last round game between Kasparov
and Kramnik.
4.0-0 Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5
Nf5 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8 9.Nc3 Bd7 10.h3 h6
11.b3 Kc8 12.Bb2 b6 13.Rad1 Ne7
Vladimir played this way in the match
with Kasparov.
14.Ne2 Ng6 15.Ng3N
This is a novelty. I analyzed this move in
my book about the London match.
Whites knight is heading for h5. The first
game of that match saw 15.Ne1 h5
16.Nd3 c5 17.c4 a5 18.a4 h4 19.Nc3 Be6
20.Nd5 Kb7 21.Ne3 Rh5 22.Bc3 Re8 with
an equal game, Kasparov,GKramnik,V/London 2000/1/2-1/2 (25).
15...Nf4!
This looks like the best move, thwarting
Whites plan. Note, that this was the
seventh move of this knight! And it was
not his last jump...
16.Nd4
This is a nontrivial response. The first
moves to consider are 16.Rfe1 and 16.Rd4
Ne6 17.Rd2. Apparently both opponents
came to the conclusion that Black was just
fine in these lines.
16...a5
This is a typical maneuver aimed at
loosening Whites queenside. Black had
another option which deserves a closer
34.Nxc3?
34.g4!?
34...Rc6!
This is a refutation of Whites idea.
35.Nxa4
They shoot horses, dont they? It was an
amazing trip for this knight: g8-f6-e4-d6f5-e7-g6-f4-d5-b6-a4!
35...Bxe1 36.Rxe1 Rxc2
Black is threatening with Rf8xf2. White
has to give up a piece.
37.Bd4 Bxa4 38.Re5 Bd7?
It looks like the champion let the victory
slip at this point. Much better was
38...Rd8 39.Be3 c5! -/+, preserving the
a5-passer, which would have cost White
dearly.
39.Rxa5 Rf5 40.Rxf5
Also unclear is 40.Ra8+ Kb7 41.Ra7+
Kb8 42.Ng3!
40...Bxf5 41.Be3
15...0-0!?
Another pawn sacrifice looks dubious
15...d4 16.Bxb7 Rb8 17.Bc6+ Ke7
18.Ng2 (18.Nc2? Bb3 19.Rd2 Rhc8 and
Black has strong initiative) 18...Bb3
19.Rf1 Rhc8 (19...Rb6 20.Bb5 a6 21.Bd3)
20.Bb5 and Whites "underdeveloped"
pieces are hard to get to whereas an extra
pawn is still there.
Alexander is sacrificing his d-pawn in a
different way, because passive observing
Whites regrouping after 15...Rd8 16.Nc2
is no fun.
Kasparov: This is a courageous and
correct decision. Black is giving up a
pawn. It was not worth clinging to it. For
example, the following sequence looks
21.d6!?
Garry decided that White still had nothing
in the rook endgame after 21.Be3 Bxe3
22.fxe3 Rfd8 23.Rbc1 f5 24.Rc5 b6
25.Rb5 Rd6.
White could not develop his bishop to d2 21.Bd2 Rxd5 22.Bxa5 Bxf2+! 23.Kxf2
Rxa5. This is the reason behind the
parodoxical move that was played in the
game.
21...Rfd8
Again, Morozevich is in no hurry to
regain a sacrificed pawn. After 21...Rxd6
22.Rxd6 Bxd6 23.Be3 Rc8 24.Rd1 Be5
25.Rd5 Bxb2 26.Rxa5 Kf8 27.Rb5 Bc1
28.Rxb7 Bxe3 29.fxe3 Rc2 Black had
nothing to worry about, but there is no
need of forcing the issue. In the above
mentioned line White has a couple of
interesting options - 25.b3 or 23.Bd2,
keeping the edge thank to more active
pieces.
22.Rd5 b6
The following pawn sacrifice is incorrect
22...Bxd6 23.Rxa5 Bc7 24.Rb5 Rd1+
25.Kg2 b6 26.b3 +/23.Bf4 f6 24.Rbd1 Kf7 25.Kg2 Ke6
All Blacks pieces have attacked a poor
white pawn.
26.Kf3 g6
Black has refrained from capturing one
more time. After 26...Bxd6 27.Be3 Bc7
28.Rxd7 Rxd7 29.Rc1 White has a
minimal advantage, but Alexander wants
to regain the pawn with maximum
comfort.
27.g4
Kasparov: White pins his hopes on the
pawn endgame. I could have played
27.Ke2 with the idea of meeting 27...Bxd6
with 28.Be3.
Now bad is 28...Bc5 29.Rxd7 Rxd7
30.Rxd7 Kxd7 31.Bxc5 bxc5 32.Kd3 Kc6
33.Kc4 and the endgame is winning for
White.
However, Black can play 28...Bc7 and
after 29.Rxd7 Rxd7 30.Rxd7 Kxd7
31.Kd3 Kc6 32.Kc4 White has the same
slight advantage, which is virtually
impossible to convert.
27Bxd6 28.h4
Now if 28.Be3 then 28...Bxh2 29.Rxd7
Rxd7 30.Rxd7 Kxd7 31.Bxb6 Bc7 with a
draw. Kasparov is trying his last chance a pawn ending.
34.f5
White had a problem-like move at his
disposal: 34.Kd5!
A) Black is losing after 34...Kxa4?
35.Kc4 b5+ 36.Kc3 b4+ (36...h5 37.f5!)
37.Kc4 b3 38.Kc5 h6 and White wins
after the typical breakthrough 39.g5! fxg5
40.h5! gxh5 41.f5 g4 42.Kd4! h4
43.Ke3+-.
B) 34...Kb3 35.f5 gxf5 36.gxf5 Kxa4
37.Ke6 Kb3 38.Kxf6 Kxb2 39.Kg5 a4
40.f6 a3 41.f7 a2 42.f8Q a1Q 43.Qg7+
Ka2 44.Qa7+ Kb2 45.Qxb6+ Kc2 and
White captures the h7 pawn, although in
this case his king finds himself under
numerous checks.
Nevertheless, Garry would have had some
winning chances only in this line.
Kasparov: At this point I had the option of
34.Kd5, containing an elegant trap. Now
Black loses after 34...Kxa4 in view of
35.Kc4 b5+ 36.Kc3 h6 37.g5 and White
either delivers checkmate - 37...fxg5
38.h5 gxf4 39.hxg6 f3 40.g7 f2 41.g8Q
b4+ 42.Kc2 f1Q 43.Qe8+ Qb5 44.b3+, or
Black fails to promote his pawn 37...hxg5 38.f5 gxf5 39.h5 g4 40.Kd2 and
Whites king is in the square.
Alas, Black is just in time to save the
position after 34...Kb3 35.f5 gxf5 36.gxf5
Kxa4 37.Ke6 Kb3 38.Kxf6 Kxb2 39.Kg7
Round 9: GM Analysis
(Sergei Shipov)
Round 9, May 31
Gelfand - Shirov 1/2
Kramnik - Morozevich 1/2
Sadvakasov - Kasparov 1/2
17...Rxc3!?
This move is aimed at complicating the
issue at any cost! An exchange for a pawn
is not such high price. After long
deliberation I must say that Black could
have brought about very complicated play
even without this sacrifice: 17...Neg4
18.e5 Ne4! (but not 18...Nxe3 19.Qxe3
Ng4 20.Qf3! +/-) 19.Nxe4 dxe4 and upon
a closer look Black has promising
counterplay.
18.Rxc3 Nxe4 19.Rc2 Ng4
It is just about impossible to refrain from
this move, though from the standpoint of
fighting for the center 19...Nc6 looks
pretty good.
20.Rfc1!
The upcoming infiltration of the white
rooks is highly unpleasant for Black. A
possible rook exchange on c8 will reduce
Blacks attacking potential. I also
analyzed 20.f5, but it does not look as
strong as the move played in the game.
20...h5
With this move Black is making a useful
luft and fortifies the g4-knight at the same
time.
21.Rc7 Qd6
In my opinion Black had more chances to
complicate the issue with 21...Qe8!?
(preventing an exchange on c8) 22.Nf3
(22.Rxb7? Nd6) 22...b5!.
22.Nf3
Simplier and better was 22.Rc8+! Rxc8
23.Rxc8+ Kh7 24.Nf3 and it is only White
who is playing for a win.
22...Bf6!
Black is preparing a comfortable g7-
23.g3?!
White is loosening the position of his own
king. Time trouble has set in. Neither
player can boast of impeccable play at this
stage of the game. It looks like 23.Qd3
was better.
23...Qe6
The spectacular blow 23...Nxg3 24.hxg3
Qe6 suggested itself. However, analysis
revealed that it lead to a forced draw after
25.Rxb7 Re8 (25...Nxe3 26.Rcc7) 26.Rcc7
Qxe3+ 27.Qxe3 Rxe3 28.Kg2 Re2+
29.Kg1 Re3 in view of the move
repetition.
24.Bd4 Bxd4+ 25.Nxd4 Qb6
25...Qf6!?
26.Qd3
26.Qb2 is met by 26...h4! and Black has a
strong initiative.
26...Ngf2 27.Qe3 Ng4 28.Qd3
Black already has a draw, but who really
needs it?
28...h4! 29.a5
In case of 29.Kg2 h3+ Black would have
woven a mating net around the white
king.
Objectively speaking the best move for
White in this position was 29.gxh4, but
human beings do not even consider such
moves.
29...Qf6
There is no time to check the opponents
calculation in time trouble. Black could
have captured the a5-pawn with good
winning chances.
30.Nf3?
It is hard to give a reasonable explanation
for this move. Much stronger was
30.Ne2!+=
30...hxg3 31.hxg3 Nxg3
The cover of Whites king is completely
destroyed. One might have thought that
Black was winning here, but both
opponents were in terrible time trouble by
now...
32.Rc8+ Rxc8 33.Rxc8+ Kg7 34.Kg2
Nf5!
On 34...Nh5 Garry apparently feared the
exchange of queens. He was quite right.
White can capture on b7 and play for a
win with 35.Qd4!
35.Qc3
35Nge3+?
This is a serious mistake. The right
continuation was 35...d4 36.Qc5 Nd6!
37.Rc7 d3! and White has problems
holding this position. The key is that he
can trade queens only in a very bad
situation: 38.Qc3 Ne3+ 39.Kg1 Nd5
14...Nc5!
A novelty, looking like a good one.
Alexander opted for an inferior move
when facing the thirteenth World
Champion: 14...Ng4 15.a5! fxg3 16.hxg3
a6 17.Ra4! Ndf6 18.Ne4 Nxe4 19.Bxe4
h5 20.Kf1 Kb8 21.Kg2 Be7 22.Nxe7
Qxe7 23.Bf3 Ne5 24.Bxh5 and White
converted his advantage in the endgame.
Kasparov,G-Morozevich,A/Wijk aan Zee
2000/1-0 (45).
15.0-0
15.b4 was not good in view of the
counterblow 15...f3!
15...Ne6
With this move Black is not only
preventing b2-b4, but also keeping his
pawn on f4. On 15...a5 White could have
plucked up his courage - 16.gxf4 Nc4
17.Rad1! and Black is in trouble.
16.Rad1 Bc5 17.Ne4 Bb4
An interesting maneuver of the black
bishop. This way Morozevich has
connected his rooks.
18.Qc1
Kramnik is insisting on trading pawns. If
18.Qb3 then the correct reply, 18...Qb6!,
gives Black good counterplay.
White had an interesting continuation in
18.Nf6! with the idea of Qe4. Besides,
this move contains a trap: 18...Be7?
19.Nd5!+-I cant see a clear way to
equalize for Black.
18...fxg3 19.hxg3 Rxd1 20.Rxd1 Rd8
Black is playing strictly for a draw. This is